Avoidance of colonoscopy is often associated with fear, embarrassment, and disgust aroused in screening procedures. However, each emotion can be linked to different challenges faced by patients. More research is needed to evaluate and address the causes of these respective emotions.
Aim
The purpose of this study was to develop and assess the scales of three negative emotions (i.e., fear, embarrassment, and disgust) caused by specific issues in colonoscopy screening.
Method
The measurement items were developed based on multiple common barriers in colonoscopy screening procedures. An online sample of 232 adults aged 45-75 was recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk to test the scales. Explorative and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to validate the measurement models.
Results
Psychometric evidence demonstrated the factor structures of three negative emotions. Each emotional factor was caused by unique combinations of barriers in the preparation, screening, and recovery stages of colonoscopy. Most of the emotional factors were associated with attitudes and screening intention.
Conclusion
This study showed different dimensions of negative emotions and their underlying causes in colonoscopy. These findings will help assess specific causes of negative emotions in colonoscopy and develop effective interventions to improve screening uptake.
AjzenI. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In KuhlJ.BeckmannJ. (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). Springer.
2.
AlménN.LundbergH.SundinÖ.JanssonB. (2018). The reliability and factorial validity of the Swedish version of the recovery experience questionnaire. Nordic Psychology, 70(4), 324–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/19012276.2018.1443280
3.
BaschC. H.BaschC. E.ZybertP.WolfR. L. (2016). Fear as a barrier to asymptomatic colonoscopy screening in an urban minority population with health insurance. Journal of Community Health, 41(4), 818–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-016-0159-9
4.
BerleD.PhillipsE. S. (2006). Disgust and obsessive–compulsive disorder: An update. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 69(3), 228–238. https://doi.org/10.1521/psyc.2006.69.3.228
5.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980
6.
BynumS. A.DavisJ. L.GreenB. L.KatzR. V. (2012). Unwillingness to participate in colorectal cancer screening: Examining fears, attitudes, and medical mistrust in an ethnically diverse sample of adults 50 years and older. American Journal of Health Promotion, 26(5), 295–300. https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.110113-QUAN-20
7.
ChappleA.ZieblandS.HewitsonP.McPhersonA. (2008). What affects the uptake of screening for bowel cancer using a faecal occult blood test (FOBT): A qualitative study. Social Science & Medicine, 66(12), 2425–2435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.02.009
8.
ChenF.CurranP. J.BollenK. A.KirbyJ.PaxtonP. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in Structural Equation Models. Sociological Methods & Research, 36(4), 462–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124108314720
9.
CodoriA. M.PetersenG. M.MigliorettiD. L.BoydP. (2001). Health beliefs and endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer: Potential for cancer prevention. Preventive Medicine, 33(2Pt 1), 128–136. https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.2001.0862
10.
ConsedineN. S.KrivoshekovaY. S.HarrisC. R. (2007). Bodily embarrassment and judgment concern as separable factors in the measurement of medical embarrassment: Psychometric development and links to treatment-seeking outcomes. British Journal of Health Psychology, 12(Pt 3), 439–462. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910706X118747
11.
ConsedineN. S.LadwigI.ReddigM. K.BroadbentE. A. (2011). The many faeces of colorectal cancer screening embarrassment: Preliminary psychometric development and links to screening outcome. British Journal of Health Psychology, 16(3), 559–579. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910710X530942
12.
ConsedineN. S.MoskowitzJ. T. (2007). The role of discrete emotions in health outcomes: A critical review. Applied & Preventive Psychology: Journal of the American Association of Applied and Preventive Psychology, 12(2), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appsy.2007.09.001
13.
ConsedineN. S.ReddigM. K.LadwigI.BroadbentE. A. (2011). Gender and ethnic differences in colorectal cancer screening embarrassment and physician gender preferences. Oncology Nursing Forum, 38(6), E409–E417. https://doi.org/10.1188/11.ONF.E409-E417
14.
CurtisV.BiranA. (2001). Dirt, disgust, and disease. Is hygiene in our genes?Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 44(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2001.0001
15.
CurtisV.de BarraM.AungerR. (2011a). Disgust as an adaptive system for disease avoidance behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 366(1563), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0117
16.
CyhaniukA.CoombesM. E. (2016). Longitudinal adherence to colorectal cancer screening guidelines. The American Journal of Managed Care, 22(2), 105–111. https://www.ajmc.com/pubMed.php?pii=86532
17.
DillardJ. P.ShenL.VailR. G. (2007). Does perceived message effectiveness cause persuasion or vice versa? 17 consistent answers. Human Communication Research, 33(4), 467–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00308.x
18.
dos SantosP. M.CirilloM. Â. (2021). Construction of the average variance extracted index for construct validation in Structural Equation Models with adaptive regressions. Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation, 52, 1639–1650. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2021.1888122
19.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with unobservable variables and measurement error. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
20.
FriedmanS.CheifetzA. S.FarrayeF. A.BanksP. A.MakrauerF. L.BurakoffR.FarmerB.TorgersenL. N.WahlK. E. (2014). High self-efficacy predicts adherence to surveillance colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, 20(9), 1602–1610. https://doi.org/10.1097/MIB.0000000000000125
21.
HaidtJ.RozinP.MccauleyC.ImadaS. (1997). Body, psyche, and culture: The relationship between disgust and morality. Psychology and Developing Societies, 9(1), 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/097133369700900105
22.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E.TathamR. L. (2005). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson Prentice Hall.
23.
HarewoodG. C.WiersemaM. J.MeltonL. J.III. (2002). A prospective, controlled assessment of factors influencing acceptance of screening colonoscopy. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 97(12), 3186–3194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.07129.x
24.
HayJ. L.BuckleyT. R.OstroffJ. S. (2005). The role of cancer worry in cancer screening: A theoretical and empirical review of the literature. Psycho-Oncology, 14(7), 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.864
25.
HlatshwakoT. G.ShahS. J.KosanaP.AdebayoE.HendriksJ.LarssonE. C.HenselD. J.ErausquinJ. T.MarksM.MichielsenK.SaltisH.FrancisJ. M.WoutersE.TuckerJ. D. (2021). Online health survey research during covid-19. The Lancet. Digital Health, 3(2), e76–e77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00002-9
26.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
27.
KeesJ.BerryC.BurtonS.SheehanK. (2017). An analysis of data quality: Professional panels, student subject pools, and Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2016.1269304
28.
KeltnerD.AndersonC. (2000). Saving face for Darwin: The functions and uses of embarrassment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(6), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00091
29.
KeltnerD.BuswellB. N. (1997). Embarrassment: Its distinct form and appeasement functions. Psychological Bulletin, 122(3), 250–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.122.3.250
30.
KennyD. A.KaniskanB.McCoachD. B. (2015). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods & Research, 44(3), 486–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114543236
31.
Klasko-FosterL. B.KellerM. M.KiviniemiM. T. (2020). Is it disgusting or am I just easily disgusted? The relation between situational disgust, dispositional disgust, and colonoscopy intentions. European Journal of Cancer Care, 29(5), e13244. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.13244
32.
KlineR. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
33.
LazarusR. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford University Press.
34.
McLachlanS.-A.ClementsA.AustokerJ. (2012). Patients’ experiences and reported barriers to colonoscopy in the screening context–A systematic review of the literature. Patient Education and Counseling, 86(2), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2011.04.010
MitchellK. A.RawlS. M.ChampionV. L.JeffriesP. R.WelchJ. L. (2012). Development and psychometric testing of the colonoscopy embarrassment scale. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 34(4), 548–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945911410328
37.
MossA. J.RosenzweigC.RobinsonJ.LitmanL. (2020). Demographic stability on Mechanical Turk despite covid-19 [Review of Demographic Stability on Mechanical Turk Despite COVID-19]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 678–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.05.014
OhK. M.ParkB.JacobsenK. H. (2021). A qualitative analysis of barriers to colorectal cancer screening among Korean Americans. Journal of Cancer Education: The Official Journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 36(2), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-019-01621-3
42.
ÖhmanA. (2008). Fear and anxiety: Overlaps and dissociations. In LewisM.Haviland-JonesJ. M.BarrettL. F. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (Vol. 3, pp. 709–728). Guilford Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/2008-07784-044.pdf
43.
PengW.HuangQ.LunD.CarcioppoloN. (2022). The development and validation of the colonoscopy joking scale. Health Communication, 37(4), 409–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1846274
44.
ReesC. J.BevanR.Zimmermann-FraedrichK.RutterM. D.RexD.DekkerE.PonchonT.BretthauerM.RegulaJ.SaundersB.HassanC.BourkeM. J.RöschT. (2016). Expert opinions and scientific evidence for colonoscopy key performance indicators. Gut, 65(12), 2045–2060. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312043
45.
ReumkensA.RondaghE. J. A.BakkerC. M.WinkensB.MascleeA. A. M.SanduleanuS. (2016). Post-colonoscopy complications: A systematic review, time trends, and meta-analysis of population-based studies. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 111(8), 1092–1101. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2016.234
46.
ReynoldsL. M.BissettI. P.ConsedineN. S. (2018). Emotional predictors of bowel screening: The avoidance-promoting role of fear, embarrassment, and disgust. BMC Cancer, 18(1), 518. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4423-5
47.
ReynoldsL. M.ConsedineN. S.PizarroD. A.BissettI. P. (2013). Disgust and behavioral avoidance in colorectal cancer screening and treatment: A systematic review and research agenda. Cancer Nursing, 36(2), 122–130. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0b013e31826a4b1b
48.
RozinP. (2008). Hedonic “adaptation”: Specific habituation to disgust/death elicitors as a result of dissecting a cadaver. Judgment and Decision Making, 3(2), 191. http://www.sjdm.org/journal/jdm7802.pdf
RozinP.LoweryL.ImadaS.HaidtJ. (1999). The cad triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 574–586. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10234846
51.
SaundersB.SimJ.KingstoneT.BakerS.WaterfieldJ.BartlamB.BurroughsH.JinksC. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
52.
ScaglioniG.GuidettiM.CavazzaN. (2021). The role of disgust as an emotional barrier to colorectal cancer screening participation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychology & Health, 38, 389–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2021.1967351
53.
ShapiroJ. A.KlabundeC. N.ThompsonT. D.NadelM. R.SeeffL. C.WhiteA. (2012). Patterns of colorectal cancer test use, including CT colonography, in the 2010 national health interview survey. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 21(6), 895–904. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0192
54.
SiegelR. L.MillerK. D.FuchsH. E.JemalA. (2021). Cancer statistics, 2021. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71(1), 7–33. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21654
55.
TaasoobshiraziG.WangS. (2016). The performance of the SRMR, RMSEA, CFI, and TLI: An examination of sample size, path size, and degrees of freedom. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods, 11(3), 31–40. http://www.jaqm.ro/issues/volume-11,issue-3/pdfs/2_GI_SH_.pdf
56.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Pearson.
57.
TangneyJ. P.MillerR. S.FlickerL.BarlowD. H. (1996). Are shame, guilt, and embarrassment distinct emotions?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1256–1269. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1256
58.
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force., Bibbins-DomingoK.GrossmanD. C.CurryS. J.DavidsonK. W.EplingJ. W.JrGarcíaF. A. R.GillmanM. W.HarperD. M.KemperA. R.KristA. H.KurthA. E.LandefeldC. S.MangioneC. M.OwensD. K.PhillipsW. R.PhippsM. G.PignoneM. P.SiuA. L. (2016). Screening for colorectal cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 315(23), 2564–2575. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.5989
59.
Von WagnerC.KnightK.HalliganS.AtkinW.LilfordR.MortonD.WardleJ. (2009). Patient experiences of colonoscopy, barium enema and CT colonography: A qualitative study. The British Journal of Radiology, 82(973), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/61732956
60.
VrintenC.McGregorL. M.HeinrichM.von WagnerC.WallerJ.WardleJ.BlackG. B. (2017). What do people fear about cancer? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of cancer fears in the general population. Psycho-Oncology, 26(8), 1070–1079. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4287
61.
VrintenC.WallerJ.von WagnerC.WardleJ. (2015). Cancer fear: Facilitator and deterrent to participation in colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention: A Publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, Cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 24(2), 400–405. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0967
62.
WaggonerP.KennedyR.CliffordS. (2019). Detecting fraud in online surveys by tracing, scoring, and visualizing IP addresses. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(37), 1285. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01285
63.
WangH.RoyS.KimJ.FaraziP. A.SiahpushM.SuD. (2019). Barriers of colorectal cancer screening in rural USA: A systematic review. Rural and Remote Health, 19(3), 5181. https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH5181
64.
WangmarJ.WengströmY.JervaeusA.FritzellK. (2021). Two sides of every coin: Individuals’ experiences of undergoing colorectal cancer screening by faecal immunochemical test and colonoscopy. European Journal of Public Health, 31(6), 1290–1295. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckab171
65.
WinterichJ. A.QuandtS. A.GrzywaczJ. G.ClarkP. E.MillerD. P.AcuñaJ.ArcuryT. A. (2009). Masculinity and the body: How African American and white men experience cancer screening exams involving the rectum. American Journal of Men’s Health, 3(4), 300–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988308321675
66.
ZhongX.YuanK.-H. (2011). Bias and efficiency in structural equation modeling: Maximum likelihood versus robust methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(2), 229–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.558736
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
