Individuals may find it challenging and discomforting to communicate about sex because they may lack the skills and efficacy necessary to communicate their sexual desires. When individuals do have opportunities to have such discussions about sex in open and comfortable settings, they may seek informational support (i.e., advice) from a close friend because of knowledge sharing and past experiences navigating sex-related concerns.
Aims
This research study used a communication theory-based quantitative analysis to examine how advice givers’ prosocial behaviors influence their advice outcome messages during conversations about sex.
Methods
A total of 264 participants completed a survey developed based on the Integrated Model of Advice-Giving (IMA). Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling.
Results
Advice givers reported that their emotional supportive messages elicited better quality advice. Additionally, advice givers indicated that being attentive and understanding to others’ feelings elicited better disclosures about their own sexual experiences. Structural equation modeling results suggested a good model fit for the theoretical model (comparative fit index [CFI] = .939, tucker-lewis fit index [TLI] = .931, root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = .056, 90% confidence interval: [.049, .063], and standardized root mean square residual [SRMR] = .082).
Conclusions
This study highlights the theoretical and pragmatic implications of communication theory in sexual health education interventions.
BabinE. A. (2013). An examination of predictors of nonverbal and verbal communication of pleasure during sex and sexual satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(3), 270–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512454523
Blunt-VintiH.JozkowskiK. N.HuntM. (2019). Show or tell? Does verbal and/or nonverbal sexual communication matter for sexual satisfaction?Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 45(3), 206–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2018.1501446
4.
BodieG. D.BurlesonB. R.JonesS. M. (2012). Explaining the relationships among supportive message quality, evaluations, and outcomes: A dual-process approach. Communication Monographs, 79(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2011.646491
5.
BodieG. D.JonesS. M. (2012). The nature of supportive listening II: The role of verbal person centeredness and nonverbal immediacy. Western Journal of Communication, 76(3), 250–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2011.651255
6.
BodieG. D.KeatonS. A.JonesS. M. (2018). Individual listening values moderate the impact of verbal person centeredness on helper evaluations: A test of the dual-process theory of supportive message outcomes. International Journal of Listening, 32(3), 127–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2016.1194207
7.
BrownP.LevinsonS. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
8.
BrownR. D.WeigelD. J. (2018). Exploring a contextual model of sexual self-disclosure and sexual satisfaction. The Journal of Sex Research, 55(2), 202–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1295299
9.
ByersE. S. (2011). Beyond the birds and the bees and was it good for you? Thirty years of research on sexual communication. Canadian Psychology, 52, 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022048
ChaudoirS. R.FisherJ. D. (2010). The disclosure processes model: Understanding disclosure decision making and postdisclosure outcomes among people living with a concealable stigmatized identity. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 236. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018193
12.
CoffeltT. A. (2018). Sexual goals, plans, and actions: Toward a sexual script emerging adults use to delay or abstain from sexual intercourse. Western Journal of Communication, 82(4), 416–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2017.1400095
13.
Colon-RamosU.AtienzaA. A.WeberD.TaylorM.UyC.YarochA. (2009). Practicing what they preach: Health behaviors of those who provide health advice to extensive social networks. Journal of Health Communication, 14(2), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730802659111
14.
DeHartD. D.BirkimerJ. C. (1997). Trying to practice safer sex: Development of the sexual risks scale. Journal of Sex Research, 34(1), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499709551860
15.
DonovanE. E.ThompsonC. M.LeFebvreL.TollisonA. C. (2017). Emerging adult confidants’ judgments of parental openness: Disclosure quality and post-disclosure relational closeness. Communication Monographs, 84(2), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2015.1119867
16.
FeddA.SampJ. A. (2023). “Let’s talk about sex”: Expanding advice response theory to sexual advice-seeking. Southern Communication Journal, 88(3), 266–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2023.2168740
FengB. (2014). When should advice be given? Assessing the role of sequential placement of advice in supportive interactions in two cultures. Communication Research, 41(7), 913–934. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212456203
19.
FengB.BurlesonB. R. (2008). The effects of argument explicitness on responses to advice in supportive interactions. Communication Research, 35(6), 849–874. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208324274
20.
FengB.JangJ. Y.KimI.WangB. (2017). Explaining the effectiveness of the integrated model of advice-giving in supportive interactions: The mediating roles of politeness and normativeness. Communication Quarterly, 65(4), 402–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2017.1279676
21.
FengB.MagenE. (2016). Relationship closeness predicts unsolicited advice giving in supportive interactions. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(6), 751–767. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407515592262
22.
GoldsmithD. J. (2000). Soliciting advice: The role of sequential placement in mitigating face threat. Communications Monographs, 67(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750009376492
23.
GoldsmithD. J. (2004). Communicating social support. Cambridge University Press.
24.
GoldsmithD. J.MacGeorgeE. L. (2000). The impact of politeness and relationship on perceived quality of advice about a problem. Human Communication Research, 26(2), 234–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00757.x
25.
GrossmanJ. M.NagarA.CharmaramanL.RicherA. M. (2020). A larger ecology of family sexuality communication: Extended family perspectives on relationships, sexual orientation, and positive aspects of sex. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3), 1057. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17031057
26.
GuntzvillerL. M.LiaoD.PulidoM. D.ButkowskiC. P.CampbellA. D. (2020). Extending advice response theory to the advisor: Similarities, differences, and partner-effects in advisor and recipient advice evaluations. Communication Monographs, 87(1), 114–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2019.1643060
27.
GuntzvillerL. M.PulidoM. D.LiaoD.ButkowskiC. P. (2020). Advisor interaction goals and verbal messages: Merging a multiple goals approach and the integrated model of advice giving. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 39(3), 292–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20912260
28.
GuntzvillerL. M.RatcliffC. L.DorschT. E.OsaiK. V. (2017). How do emerging adults respond to exercise advice from parents? A test of advice response theory. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34(6), 936–960. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407516662920
29.
GuntzvillerL. M.RatcliffC. L.PusateriK. B. (2021). Expanding advice response theory by incorporating goal inference: College students’ perceptions of parental exercise advice. Communication Theory, 31(3), 336–359. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz021
30.
HillL. M.MoodyJ.GottfredsonN. C.KajulaL. J.PenceB. W.GoV. F.MamanS. (2018). Peer norms moderate the association between mental health and sexual risk behaviors among young men living in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Social Science & Medicine, 196, 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.10.030
31.
HorowitzL. M.KrasnoperovaE. N.TatarD. G.HansenM. B.PersonE. A.GalvinK. L.NelsonK. L. (2001). The way to console may depend on the goal: Experimental studies of social support. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2000.1435
32.
JonesS. M.WirtzJ. G. (2006). How does the comforting process work? An empirical test of an appraisal-based model of comforting. Human Communication Research, 32(3), 217–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00274.x
33.
KalichmanS. C.DiMarcoM.AustinJ.LukeW.DiFonzoK. (2003). Stress, social support, and HIV-status disclosure to family and friends among HIV-positive men and women. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 26(4), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024252926930
34.
KleinV.BeckerI.ŠtulhoferA. (2018). Parenting, communication about sexuality, and the development of adolescent womens’ sexual agency: A longitudinal assessment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(7), 1486–1498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0873-y
35.
KlineR. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Publications.
36.
LeaperC. (2019). Young adults’ conversational strategies during negotiation and self-disclosure in same-gender and mixed-gender friendships. Sex Roles, 81(9–10), 561–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-1014-0
37.
LefkowitzE. S.BooneT. L.ShearerC. L. (2004). Communication with best friends about sex-related topics during emerging adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33, 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOYO.0000032642.27242.c1
38.
LefkowitzE. S.Espinosa-HernandezG. (2007). Sex-related communication with mothers and close friends during the transition to university. Journal of Sex Research, 44(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490709336789
39.
MacGeorgeE. L.FengB.ButlerG. L.BudarzS. K. (2004). Understanding advice in supportive interactions: Beyond the facework and message evaluation paradigm. Human Communication Research, 30(1), 42–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00724.x
40.
MacGeorgeE. L.FengB.GuntzvillerL. M. (2016). Advice: Expanding the communication paradigm. Annals of the International Communication Association, 40(1), 213–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2015.11735261
41.
MacGeorgeE. L.GuntzvillerL. M.BrisiniK. S.BaileyL. C.SalmonS. K.SeverenK.BranchS. E.LillieH. M.LindleyC. K.PastorR. G.CummingsR. D. (2017). The influence of emotional support quality on advice evaluation and outcomes. Communication Quarterly, 65(1), 80–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2016.1176945
42.
MajumdarD. (2006). Social support and risky sexual behavior among adolescents: The protective role of parents and best friends. Journal of Applied Sociology, 28–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/19367244062300103
43.
MallochY. Z.FengB.WangB.KimC. (2020). Advice padded with encouragement: A preliminary assessment of an extended integrated model of advice giving in supportive interactions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 39(3), 334–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20911991
44.
McManusT. G. (2020). Providing support to friends experiencing a sexual health uncertainty. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 48(4), 515–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2020.1797143
45.
McManusT. G.LucasA. A. (2018). Received support from friends about sex-related concerns: A multiple goals perspective. Communication Reports, 31(3), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2018.1464199
46.
MettsS.SpitzbergB. H. (1996). Sexual communication in interpersonal contexts: A script-based approach. Annals of the International Communication Association, 19(1), 49–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1996.11678928
47.
MontemurroB.BartasavichJ.WintermuteL. (2015). Let’s (not) talk about sex: The gender of sexual discourse. Sexuality & Culture, 19(1), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-014-9250-5
48.
MontesiJ. L.FauberR. L.GordonE. A.HeimbergR. G. (2011). The specific importance of communicating about sex to couples’ sexual and overall relationship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(5), 591–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510386833
49.
PaikJ. E. (2020). The contextual effects of advice solicitation on advice outcomes: The role of perceived face threats and psychological reactance. Communication Monographs, 87(1), 70–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2019.1641729
50.
PowellH. L.SegrinC. (2004). The effect of family and peer communication on college students’ communication with dating partners about HIV and AIDS. Health Communication, 16(4), 427–449. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327027hc1604_3
SnellW. E.BelkS. S.PapiniD. R.ClarkS. (1989). Development and validation of the sexual self-disclosure scale. Annals of Sex Research, 2(4), 307–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00849749
53.
SprecherS.HarrisG.MeyersA. (2008). Perceptions of sources of sex education and targets of sex communication: Sociodemographic and cohort effects. Journal of Sex Research, 45(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490701629522
54.
TardyC. H.DindiaK. (2006). Self-disclosure: Strategic revelation of information in personal and professional relationships. In HargieO. (Ed.), The handbook of communication skills (4th ed., pp. 229–266). Routledge.
55.
TheissJ. A.EstleinR. (2014). Antecedents and consequences of the perceived threat of sexual communication: A test of the relational turbulence model. Western Journal of Communication, 78(4), 404–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2013.845794
56.
TreesA. R. (2000). Nonverbal communication and the support process: Interactional sensitivity in interactions between mothers and young adult children. Communications Monographs, 67(3), 239–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750009376509
57.
WidmanL.Choukas-BradleyS.HelmsS. W.GolinC. E.PrinsteinM. J. (2014). Sexual communication between early adolescents and their dating partners, parents, and best friends. The Journal of Sex Research, 51(7), 731–741. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.843148
