American adolescents consume more sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) than any other age group. Sports and energy drinks consumption among adolescents is higher than other SSBs. For sports drinks, there is uncertainty about their “healthiness” and also beliefs that these drinks may provide health benefits such as hydration, enhanced athletic performance, heightened mental alertness, and rapid recovery after exercise. Confusion about relative healthiness and expectations of health benefits suggest that factors that may encourage youth to avoid drinking sports and energy drinks, such as athletic status, psychological reactance, and SSB media literacy, may necessitate different approaches to promoting avoidance of sports drinks compared with avoidance of energy drinks. Using a nationally representative U.S. probability-based web panel augmented by a volunteer nonprobability-based web panel of 500 adolescent participants aged 14 to 18 years, we used the reasoned action approach to model intention to avoid sports and to avoid energy drinks. The result show there are similarities and differences in the determinants associated with adolescents’ avoidance of sports and energy drinks: attitudes and descriptive normative pressure are both related to increased avoidance for both types of drinks and perceived control over the avoidance behavior is positively associated for with intention to avoid for energy drinks. Sport identification, psychological reactance, and SSB media literacy also play a different role in the sports and energy drink models. Based on our results, the content of prevention messages in interventions to limit sports drinks will need to be quite different from those targeted at reducing energy drink consumption.
ArnoldH. J. (1982). Moderator variables: A clarification of conceptual, analytic, and psychometric issues. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 29(2), 143–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(82)90254-9
2.
BleakleyA.HennessyM. (2012). The quantitative analysis of reasoned action theory. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 640(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716211424265
3.
BolterN. D.GaoY.CongerS. A.SpearC. E.RadinA. K.FlintH. (2019). Parents’ knowledge, attitudes and behaviours related to children’s beverage consumption in youth soccer: A qualitative analysis. Health Education Journal, 79(3), 290–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0017896919880225
4.
BrehmS. S.BrehmJ. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. Academic Press New York.
5.
BrewerB. W.Van RaalteJ. L.LinderD. E. (1993). Athletic identity: Hercules’ muscles or Achilles heel?International Journal of Sport Psychology, 24(2), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1037/t15488-000
6.
BrownbillA. L.MillerC. L.SmithersL. G.Braunack-MayerA. J. (2020). Selling function: The advertising of sugar-containing beverages on Australian television. Health Promotion International, 36(1), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaa052
7.
BuchananL.KellyB.YeatmanH. (2017). Exposure to digital marketing enhances young adults’ interest in energy drinks: An exploratory investigation. PLOS ONE, 12(2), e0171226. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171226
8.
BuchananL.YeatmanH.KellyB.KariippanonK. (2018). Digital promotion of energy drinks to young adults is more strongly linked to consumption than other media. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 50(9), 888–895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2018.05.022
9.
BuntingH.BaggettA.GrigorJ. (2013). Adolescent and young adult perceptions of caffeinated energy drinks: A qualitative approach. Appetite, 65(June), 132–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2013.02.011
ChenY.PorterK.EstabrooksP.ZoellnerJ. (2017). Development and evaluation of the Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Media Literacy (SSB-ML) scale and its relationship with SSB consumption. Health Communication, 32(10), 1310–1317. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1220041
12.
CoatesA. E.HardmanC. A.HalfordJ. C. G.ChristiansenP.BoylandE. J. (2019). Food and beverage cues featured in YouTube videos of social media influencers popular with children: An exploratory study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2142. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02142
13.
ConnerM.McEachanR.LawtonR.GardnerP. (2017). Applying the reasoned action approach to understanding health protection and health risk behaviors. Social Science & Medicine, 195(December), 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.10.022
14.
CostaB. M.HayleyA.MillerP. (2014). Young adolescents’ perceptions, patterns, and contexts of energy drink use: A focus group study. Appetite, 80(September), 183–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.05.013
15.
DillardJ. P.KimJ.LiS. S. (2018). Anti-sugar-sweetened beverage messages elicit reactance: Effects on attitudes and policy preferences. Journal of Health Communication, 23(8), 703–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2018.1511012
16.
DillardJ. P.ShenL. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72(2), 144–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750500111815
17.
EmondJ. A.SargentJ. D.Gilbert-DiamondD. (2015). Patterns of energy drink advertising over U.S. television networks. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 47(2), 120–126.E1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2014.11.005
18.
FarhangiM. A.NikniazL.KhodarahmiM. (2020). Sugar-sweetened beverages increases the risk of hypertension among children and adolescence: A systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis. Journal of Translational Medicine, 18(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02511-9
GadermannA.GuhnM.ZumboB. (2012). Estimating ordinal reliability for Likert-type and ordinal item response data: A conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 17(3), 1–13. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/pare/vol17/iss1/3/
21.
GorseS.ChadwickS.BurtonN. (2010). Entrepreneurship through sports marketing: A case analysis of Red Bull in sport. Journal of Sponsorship, 3(4), 348–357.
22.
GreenlandS.MaclureM.SchlesselmanJ. J.PooleC.MorgensternH. (1991). Standardized regression coefficients: A further critique and review of some alternatives. Epidemiology, 2(5), 387–392. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001648-199109000-00015
HarrisJ. L.PomeranzJ. L. (2021). Misperceptions about added sugar, non-nutritive sweeteners and juice in popular children’s drinks: Experimental and cross-sectional study with U.S. parents of young children (1–5 years). Pediatric Obesity. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpo.12791
25.
HeckmanM.SherryK.De MejiaE. G. (2010). Energy drinks: An assessment of their market size, consumer demographics, ingredient profile, functionality, and regulations in the United States. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 9(3), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00111.x
26.
HennessyM.BleakleyA.EllithorpeM. (2017). Prototypes reflect normative perceptions: Implications for the development of reasoned action theory. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 23(3), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2017.1339896
27.
HennessyM.BleakleyA.FishbeinM.BrownL.DiClementeR.RomerD.ValoisR.VanableP. A.CareyM. P.SalazarL. (2010). Differentiating between precursor and control variables when analyzing reasoned action theories. AIDS and Behavior, 14(1), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-009-9560-z
28.
HennessyM.BleakleyA.PiotrowskiJ. T.MallyaG.JordanA. (2015). Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption by adult caregivers and their children: The role of drink features and advertising exposure. Health Education & Behavior, 42(5), 677–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198115577379
29.
HongS.-M. (1992). Hong’s Psychological Reactance Scale: A further factor analytic validation. Psychological Reports, 70(2), 512–514. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1992.70.2.512
30.
HongS.-M.PageS. (1989). A Psychological Reactance Scale: Development, factor structure and reliability. Psychological Reports, 64(3_Suppl.), 1323–1326. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1989.64.3c.1323
31.
HoyteC. O.AlbertD.HeardK. (2013). The use of energy drinks, dietary supplements, and prescription medications by United States college students to enhance athletic performance. Journal of Community Health, 38(3), 575–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-013-9653-5
32.
ImamuraF.O’ConnorL.YeZ.MursuJ.HayashinoY.BhupathirajuS.ForouhiN. (2015). Consumption of sugar sweetened beverages, artificially sweetened beverages, and fruit juice and incidence of type 2 diabetes: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and estimation of population attributable fraction. BMJ, 351, h3576. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h3576
33.
KingG. (1986). How not to lie with statistics: Avoiding common mistakes in quantitative political science. American Journal of Political Science, 30(3), 666–687. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111095
34.
LaniadoN.SandersA. E.GodfreyE. M.SalazarC. R.BadnerV. M. (2020). Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and caries experience: An examination of children and adults in the United States, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011–2014. Journal of the American Dental Association, 151(10), 782–789. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12092841
35.
MalikV. S.HuF. B. (2019). Sugar-sweetened beverages and cardiometabolic health: An update of the evidence. Nutrients, 11(8), 1840. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11081840
36.
MalikV. S.PanA.WillettW. C.HuF. B. (2013). Sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain in children and adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 98(4), 1084–1102. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.113.058362
37.
ManningM. (2009). The effects of subjective norms on behaviour in the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(4), 649–705. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608X393136
38.
MarriottB. P.HuntK. J.MalekA. M.NewmanJ. C. (2019). Trends in intake of energy and total sugar from sugar-sweetened beverages in the United States among children and adults, NHANES 2003–2016. Nutrients, 11(9), 2004. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11092004
39.
MartinJ. J.EklundR. C.MushettC. A. (1997). Factor structure of the Athletic Identity Measurement Scale with athletes with disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 14(1), 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.14.1.74
40.
MillerK. E. (2008). Wired: Energy drinks, jock identity, masculine norms, and risk taking. Journal of American College Health, 56(5), 481–490. https://doi.org/10.3200/JACH.56.5.481-490
41.
MoranA. J.RobertoC. A. (2018). Health warning labels correct parents’ misperceptions about sugary drink options. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 55(2), e19–e27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.018
42.
MunsellC.HarrisJ.SardaV.SchwartzM. (2016). Parents’ beliefs about the healthfulness of sugary drink options: Opportunities to address misperceptions. Public Health Nutrition, 19(1), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980015000397
43.
O’KeefeD. J. (2008). Elaboration likelihood model. In DonsbachW. (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication (Vol. 4, pp. 1475–1480). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiece011
44.
QuickB. L.StephensonM. T. (2007). Further evidence that psychological reactance can be modeled as a combination of anger and negative cognitions. Communication Research, 34(3), 255–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650207300427
45.
RivisA.SheeranP. (2003). Descriptive norms as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. Current Psychology, 22(3), 218–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-003-1018-2
46.
RoeslerA.RojasN.FalbeJ. (2021). Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption, perceptions, and disparities in children and adolescents. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 53(7), 553–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2021.04.004
47.
RosenbergB. D.SiegelJ. T. (2018). A 50-year review of psychological reactance theory: Do not read this article. Motivation Science, 4(4), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000091
48.
RummoP. E.PhoN.BraggM. A.RobertoC. A.ElbelB. (2020). Trends in store-level sales of sugary beverages and water in the U.S., 2006–2015. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 59(4), 522–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2020.04.022
49.
RussoR. G.NorthridgeM. E.WuB.StellaS. Y. (2020). Characterizing sugar-sweetened beverage consumption for U.S. children and adolescents by race/ethnicity. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 7(6), 1100–1116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-020-00733-7
50.
ShiL.van MeijgaardJ. (2010). Substantial decline in sugar-sweetened beverage consumption among California’s children and adolescents. International Journal of General Medicine, 3, 221–224. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S12464
51.
SimonP. A.LightstoneA. S.BaldwinS.KuoT.ShihM.FieldingJ. E. (2013). Declines in sugar-sweetened beverage consumption among children in Los Angeles County, 2007 and 2011. Preventing Chronic Disease, 10, 130049. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd10.130049
UnderwoodJ. M.BrenerN.ThorntonJ.HarrisW. A.BryanL. N.ShanklinS. L.DeputyN.RobertsA. M.QueenB.ChyenD.WhittleL.LimC.YamakawaY.Leon-NguyenM.KilmerG.Smith-GrantJ.DemissieZ.Everett JonesS.ClaytonH.DittusP. (2020). Overview and methods for the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System—United States, 2019. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), 69(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.su6901a1
55.
ValenzuelaM. J.WaterhouseB.AggarwalV. R.BloorK.DoranT. (2021). Effect of sugar-sweetened beverages on oral health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Public Health, 31(1), 122–129. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaa147
56.
ValizadehP.PopkinB. M.NgS. W. (2020). Distributional changes in U.S. sugar-sweetened beverage purchases, 2002–2014. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 59(2), 260–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2020.02.002
57.
VercammenK. A.KomaJ. W.BleichS. N. (2019). Trends in energy drink consumption among U.S. adolescents and adults, 2003–2016. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 56(6), 827–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.12.007
58.
VercammenK. A.MoranA. J.SotoM. J.Kennedy-ShafferL.BleichS. N. (2020). Decreasing trends in heavy sugar-sweetened beverage consumption in the United States, 2003 to 2016. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 120(12), 1974–1985.E5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2020.07.012
59.
Weintraub AustinE.PinkletonB.ChenY.-C.AustinB. (2015). Processing of sexual media messages improves due to media literacy effects on perceived message desirability. Mass Communication and Society, 18(4), 399–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2014.1001909
60.
YinJ.ZhuY.MalikV.LiX.PengX.ZhangF. F.ShanZ.LiuL. (2020). Intake of sugar-sweetened and low-calorie sweetened beverages and risk of cardiovascular disease: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Advances in Nutrition, 12(1), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1093/advances/nmaa084
61.
YzerM. (2012a). The integrated model of behavioral prediction as a tool for designing health messages. In ChoH. (Ed.), Designing messages for health communication campaigns: Theory and practice (pp. 21–40). Sage.
62.
YzerM. (2012b). Perceived behavioral control in reasoned action theory: A dual aspect interpretation. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 640(March), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716211423500
63.
YzerM. (2013). Reasoned action theory: Persuasion as belief-based behavior change. In DillardJ. P.ShenL. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 120–136). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452218410.n8
64.
ZoellnerJ.YouW.ConnellC.Smith-RayR. L.AllenK.TuckerK. L.DavyB. M.EstabrooksP. (2011). Health literacy is associated with Healthy Eating Index scores and sugar-sweetened beverage intake: Findings from the rural lower Mississippi delta. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 111(7), 1012–1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2011.04.010
65.
ZumboB. D.GadermannA. M.ZeisserC. (2007). Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta for Likert rating scales. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 6(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1177992180
66.
ZytnickD.ParkS.OnufrakS. J. (2016). Child and caregiver attitudes about sports drinks and weekly sports drink intake among U.S. youth. American Journal of Health Promotion, 30(3), e110–e119. https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.140103-QUAN-8
