Advocates have endorsed transgender visibility via gender identity (GI) data capture with the advent of the Affordable Care Act and electronic health record (EHR) requirements. Visibility in data in order to enumerate a population contrasts with ways in which other LGBT and public health scholars have deployed these concepts.
Aims
The article aims to assess the effectiveness of GI data capture in EHRs and implications for trans health care quality improvements and research.
Method
Semistructured interviews were conducted with 27 stakeholders from prominent gender-affirming care providers across the United States. A range of informants shared their experiences with GI data capture. Interviews were coded, themes were identified, and the extended case method was used to contextualize data in relation to key concepts.
Results
Data capture is effective for increasing patient counts and making quality improvements but limited in terms of enhancing gender-affirming care depending on provider size, type, and competencies. Many challenges were highlighted regarding use of GI data for research, sharing GI data across systems, as well the ways data capture erases the dynamism of GI. These issues create conditions for limited kinds of disclosure, capture of particular categories, and care and treatment barriers.
Discussion
Stakeholders exposed a visibility paradox emerging from GI data capture. While data fields are created to increase the visibility of trans persons in medical settings and in health research, they work to increase the visibility of some while reducing the visibility of other gender diverse persons, including trans, nonbinary, and cisgender.
Conclusion
New approaches are needed to explore implications of GI data standardization and the logics of health care in the face of gender expansiveness.
BaralS.PoteatT.StromdahlS.WirtzA.GuadamuzT.BeyrerC. (2013). Worldwide burden of HIV in transgender women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis, 13(3), 214–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70315-8
2.
BauerG. R.BraimohJ.ScheimA. I.DharmaC. (2017). Transgender-inclusive measures of sex / gender for population surveys: Mixed- methods evaluation and recommendations. PLOS ONE, 12(5), Article e0178043. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178043
3.
BauerG. R.HammondR.TraversR.KaayM.HohenadelK. M.BoyceM. (2009). “I don’t think this is theoretical; this is our lives”: How erasure impacts health care for transgender people. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care, 20(5), 348–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jana.2009.07.004
4.
BosseJ. D.LeblancR. G.JackmanK.BjarnadottirR. I. (2018). Benefits of implementing and improving collection of sexual orientation and gender identity data in electronic health records. CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing, 36(6), 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000417
BrownG. R.JonesK. T. (2016). Mental health and medical health disparities in 5135 transgender veterans receiving healthcare in the Veterans Health Administration: A case–control study. LGBT Health,3(2), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2015.0058
7.
BurawoyM.BurtonA.FergusonA. A.FoxK.GamsonJ.GartrellN.HurstL.JuliusN. G.KurzmanC.SalzingerL.SchiffmanJ.UiS. (1991). Ethnography unbound: Power and resistance in the modern metropolis. University of California Press.
8.
CahillS.MakadonH. (2014). Sexual orientation and gender identity data collection in clinical settings and in electronic health records, LGBT Health, 1(1), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2013.0001
9.
CahillS.SingalR.GrassoC.KingD.MayerK.BakerK.MakadonH. (2014). Do ask, do tell: High levels of acceptability by patients of routine collection of sexual orientation and gender identity data in four diverse American community health centers. PLOS ONE, 9(9), Article e107104. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107104
City and County of San Francisco Department of Public Health. (2013). Principles for collecting, coding, and reporting identity data: Sex and gender guidelines (interim draft 8.15.13).
12.
ConronK. J.LandersS. J.ReisnerS. L.SellR. L. (2014). Sex and gender in the US health surveillance system: A call to action. American Journal of Public Health, 104(6), 970–976. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301831
13.
ConronK.LombardiE.ReisnerS. L. (2014). Identifying transgender and other gender minority respondents on population-based surveys: Approaches. In HermanJ. L. (Ed.), Best practices for asking questions to identify transgender and other gender minority respondents in population-based surveys (pp. 9–18). Williams Institute.
14.
CruzT. M. (2014, June). Assessing access to care for transgender and gender nonconforming people: A consideration of diversity in combating discrimination. Social Science & Medicine, 110, 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.032
15.
CruzT. M. (2017, February). The making of a population: Challenges, implications, and consequences of the Quantification of social difference. Social Science & Medicine, 174, 79–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.12.025
16.
CruzT. M. (2020). Perils of data-driven equity: Safety-net care and big data’s elusive grasp on health inequality. Big Data & Society, 7(1), 205395172092809. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720928097
EpsteinS. (2003). Sexualizing governance and medicalizing identities: The emergence of “state-centered” LGBT health politics in the United States. Sexualities, 6(2), 131–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460703006002001
Gill-PetersonJ. (2018). Histories of the transgender child. University of Minnesota Press.
21.
GrassoC.GoldhammerH.FunkD.KingD.ReisnerS. L.MayerK. H.KeuroghlianA. S. (2019). Required sexual orientation and gender identity reporting by US health centers: First-year data. American Journal of Public Health, 109(8), 1111-1118. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2019.305130
KriegerN. (2012). Who and what is a “population”? Historical debates, current controversies, and implications for understanding “population health” and rectifying health inequities. Milbank Quarterly, 90(4), 634–681. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2008.00538.x
25.
LabuskiC.Keo-MeierC. (2015). The (mis)measure of trans. Transgender Studies Quarterly, 2(1), 13–31.
NamasteV. (2000). Invisible lives: The erasure of transsexual and transgendered people. University of Chicago Press.
28.
O’BrienB. C.HarrisI. B.BeckmanT. J.ReedD. A.CookD. A. (2014). Standards for reporting qualitative research: A synthesis of recommendations. Academic Medicine, 89(9), 1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388
29.
PlemonsE. (2019). A capable surgeon and a willing electrologist: Challenges to the expansion of transgender surgical care in the United States. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 33(2), 282–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/maq.12484
30.
ShimJ. (2000). Bio-power and racial, class, and gender formation in biomedical knowledge production. In KronenfeldJ. J. (Ed.), Health care providers, institutions, and patients: Changing patterns of care provision and care delivery (pp. 173–195). JAI Press.
31.
SilvermanD. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction (2nd ed.). Sage.
32.
SpadeD. (2011). Normal life: Administrative violence, critical trans politics, and the limits of the law. South End Press.
TateC. C.LedbetterJ. N.YoussefC. P. (2012). A two-question method for assessing gender categories in the social and medical sciences. Journal of Sex Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.690110
35.
ThompsonH.KingL. (2015). Who counts as “transgender”? Epidemiological methods and a critical intervention. TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, 2(1), 148–159. https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-2848913
36.
ThompsonH. M. (2016). Patient perspectives on gender identity data collection in electronic health records: An analysis of disclosure, privacy, and access to care. Transgender Health, 1(1), 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1089/trgh.2016.0007
VyasD. A.EisensteinL. G.JonesD. S. (2020). Hidden in plain sight—Reconsidering the use of race correction in clinical algorithms. New England Journal of Medicine, 383, 874–882. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMms2004740
39.
WillgingC.GundersonL.ShattuckD.SturmR.LawyerA.CrandallC. (2019, February). Structural competency in emergency medicine services for transgender and gender non-conforming patients. Social Science & Medicine, 222, 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.12.031
