A Systematic Review of Youth Participatory Action Research (YPAR) in the United States: Methodologies,Youth Outcomes,and Future Directions

Abstract

Objectives. To use a systematic review methodology to describe the state of the youth participatory action research (YPAR) literature and synthesize findings about the youth outcomes reported in these studies. Methods. We screened and coded studies using a process consistent with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Of the 3,724 articles found in the database search, 67 reports of 63 distinct studies were included in the final sample. These reports were coded for reports of YPAR principles and project characteristics, study methods, and reported youth outcomes. Results. The YPAR literature comprises predominantly qualitative studies, with only two randomized trials. The most common outcomes associated with participation in YPAR were those related to agency and leadership (75.0%), followed by academic or career (55.8%), social (36.5%), interpersonal (34.6%), and cognitive (23.1%) outcomes. Conclusions. This systematic review provides emerging evidence of the skills and competencies youth may develop through YPAR and offers methodological recommendations for future research that can provide greater evidence of causality.

Keywords

adolescence community-based participatory research social determinants systematic review youth participatory action research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anyon

Brink

Crawford

Fernandez

Hofstedt

Osberg

Strobel

(Eds.). (2007). Youth engaged in leadership and learning: A handbook for program staff, teachers, and community leaders. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University, John W. Gardner Center for Youth and Their Communities. Retrieved from https://gardnercenter.stanford.edu/publications/youth-engaged-leadership-and-learning-yell-handbook-program-staff-teachers-and

Anyon

Kennedy

Durbahn

Jenson

J. M.

(2018). Youth-led participatory action research: Promoting youth voice and adult support in afterschool programs. Afterschool Matters, 27(Spring 2018), 10-18. Retrieved from http://www.niost.org/pdf/afterschoolmatters/asm_2018_spring/ASM_Spring2018_YouthLedResearch.pdf

*Arches

(2012). The role of groupwork in social action projects with youth. Groupwork, 22(1), 59-77. doi:10.1921/gpwk.v22i1.741

*Bautista

M. A.

Bertrand

Morrell

Scorza

Matthews

(2013). Participatory action research and city youth: Methodological insights from the Council of Youth Research. Teachers College Record, 115(10), 100303.

Bender

Barman-Adhikari

DeChants

Haffejee

Anyon

Begun

. . . Dunn

(2017). Asking for Change: Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary outcomes of a manualized photovoice intervention with homeless youth. Children and Youth Services Review, 81(C), 379-389. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.08.028

*Berg

Coman

Schensul

J. J.

(2009). Youth action research for prevention: A multi-level intervention designed to increase efficacy and empowerment among urban youth. American Journal of Community Psychology, 43, 345-359. doi:10.1007/s10464-009-9231-2

*Bertrand

(2014). Reciprocal dialogue between educational decision makers and students of color: Opportunities and obstacles. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50, 812-843.

*Borgida

Worth

K. A.

Lippmann

Ergun

Farr

(2008). Beliefs about deliberation: Personal and normative dimensions. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 551-569. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00577.x

*Brazg

Bekemeier

Spigner

Huebner

. (2011). Our community in focus: The use of photovoice for youth-driven substance abuse assessment and health promotion. Health Promotion Practice, 12, 502-511. doi:10.1177/1524839909358659

10.

*Brown

T. M.

(2010). ARISE to the challenge: Partnering with urban youth to improve educational research and learning. Penn GSE Perspectives on Urban Education, 7, 4-14.

11.

Cammarota

Fine

(2010). Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion. New York, NY: Routledge.

12.

*Cammarota

Romero

(2011). Participatory action research for high school students: Transforming policy, practice, and the personal with social justice education. Educational Policy, 25, 488-506.

13.

*Cammarota

Romero

A. F.

(2009). A social justice epistemology and pedagogy for Latina/o students: Transforming public education with participatory action research. New Directions for Youth Development, 2009(123), 53-65. doi:10.1002/yd.314

14.

Caraballo

Lozenski

B. D.

Lyiscott

J. J.

Morrell

(2017). YPAR and critical epistemologies: Rethinking education research. Review of Research in Education, 41, 311-336.

15.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010). Best practices user guide; youth engagement: State and community interventions. Retrieved from https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/5628/

16.

*Checkoway

Richards-Schuster

(2003). Youth participation in community evaluation research. American Journal of Evaluation, 24, 21-33.

17.

*Christens

B. D.

Dolan

(2011). Interweaving youth development, community development, and social change through youth organizing. Youth & Society, 43, 528-548.

18.

*Conner

J. O.

Strobel

(2007). Leadership development. An examination of individual and programmatic growth. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22, 275-297. doi:10.1177/0743558407299698

19.

*De Jesús

Oviedo

Feliz

. (2015). Global kids organizing in the global city: Generation of social capital in a youth organizing program. Afterschool Matters, 21, 20-28.

20.

*Dzewaltowski

D. A.

Estabrooks

P. A.

Welk

Hill

Milliken

Karteroliotis

Johnston

J. A.

(2009). Healthy youth places: A randomized controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of facilitating adult and youth leaders to promote physical activity and fruit and vegetable consumption in middle schools. Health Education & Behavior, 36, 583-600. doi:10.1177/1090198108314619

21.

*Fox

Fine

(2013). Accountable to whom? A critical science counter-story about a city that stopped caring for its young. Children & Society, 27(4), 321-335.

22.

*Frerichs

Sjolie

Curtis

Peterson

Huang

T. T.-K.

(2015). Process and outcomes from a youth-led campaign to address healthy eating in an urban high school. Journal of Primary Prevention, 36, 433-438. doi:10.1007/s10935-015-0409-0

23.

*Galletta

Jones

(2010). “Why are you doing this?” Questions on purpose, structure, and outcomes in participatory action research engaging youth and teacher candidates. Educational Studies: Journal of the American Educational Studies Association, 46, 337-357.

24.

*Gant

L. M.

Shimshock

Allen-Meares

Smith

Miller

Hollingsworth

L. A.

Shanks

(2009). Effects of photovoice: Civic engagement among older youth in urban communities. Journal of Community Practice, 17, 358-376. doi:10.1080/10705420903300074

25.

*Garcia

Mirra

Morrell

Martinez

Scorza

(2015). The council of youth research: Critical literacy and civic agency in the digital age. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 31, 151-167.

26.

*Gomez

R. J.

Ryan

T. N.

(2016). Speaking out: Youth led research as a methodology used with homeless youth. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 33, 185-193. doi:10.1007/s10560-015-0414-4

27.

*Hamilton

Flanagan

(2007). Reframing social responsibility within a technology-based youth activist program. American Behavioral Scientist, 51, 444-464. doi:10.1177/0002764207306070

28.

*Harden

Kenemore

Mann

Edwards

List

Martinson

(2015). The truth N’ trauma project: Addressing community violence through a youth-led, trauma-informed and restorative framework. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal, 32, 65-79. doi:10.1007/s10560-014-0366-0

29.

*Hilfinger Messias

D. K.

Jennings

L. B.

Fore

M. E.

McLoughlin

Parra-Medina

. (2008). Societal images of youth: Representations and interpretations by youth actively engaged in their communities. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 21, 159-178.

30.

*Hope

E. C.

Skoog

A. B.

Jagers

R. J.

(2015). “It’ll never be the white kids, it’ll always be us”: Black high school students’ evolving critical analysis of racial discrimination and inequity in schools. Journal of Adolescent Research, 30, 83-112. doi:10.1177/0743558414550688

31.

*Horn

B. R.

(2014). “This is just like those projects from last semester!”: Student empowerment and praxis at an urban Title I middle school. Multicultural Perspectives, 16, 154-159.

32.

*Irizarry

(2011). “Buscando la Libertad”: Latino youths in search of freedom in school. Democracy & Education, 19, 10.

33.

*Jacquez

Vaughn

L. M.

Wagner

(2013). Youth as partners, participants or passive recipients: A review of children and adolescents in community-based participatory research (CBPR). American Journal of Community Psychology, 51, 176-189.

34.

Jenson

J. M.

Bender

(2014). Preventing child and adolescent problem behavior: Evidence-based strategies in schools, families, and communities. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

35.

Jones

J. N.

Warnaar

B. L.

Bench

J. H.

Stroup

(2014). Promoting the development of moral identity, behavior, and commitment in a social action program. Journal of Peace Education, 11, 225-245.

36.

*Kirshner

(2009). “Power in numbers”: Youth organizing as a context for exploring civic identity. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 19, 414-440.

37.

*Kirshner

Pozzoboni

K. M.

(2011). Student interpretations of a school closure: Implications for student voice in equity-based school reform. Teachers College Record, 113, 1633-1667.

38.

*Kohfeldt

Langhout

R. D.

(2012). The five whys method: A tool for developing problem definitions in collaboration with children. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 22, 316-329. doi:10.1002/casp.1114

39.

*Kroeger

Burton

Comarata

Combs

Hamm

Hopkins

Kouche

(2004). Student voice and critical reflection: Helping students at risk. Teaching Exceptional Children, 36(3), 50-57.

40.

*Kulbok

P. A.

Meszaros

P. S.

Bond

D. C.

Thatcher

Park

Kimbrell

Smith-Gregory

(2015). Youths as partners in a community participatory project for substance use prevention. Family & Community Health, 38, 3. doi:10.1097/FCH.0000000000000061

41.

*Langhout

R. D.

Collins

Ellison

E. R.

(2014). Examining relational empowerment for elementary school students in a yPAR program. American Journal of Community Psychology, 53, 369-381. doi:10.1007/s10464-013-9617-z

42.

*McIntyre

Chatzopoulos

Politi

Roz

(2007). Participatory action research: Collective reflections on gender, culture, and language. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 748-756. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.12.025

43.

*Mitra

(2004). The significance of students: Can increasing” student voice” in schools lead to gains in youth development? Teachers College Record, 106, 651-688.

44.

*Mitra

D. L.

(2005). Adults advising youth: Leading while getting out of the way. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41, 520-553.

45.

*Mitra

D. L.

Serriere

S. C.

(2012). Student voice in elementary school reform: Examining youth development in fifth graders. American Educational Research Journal, 49, 743-774.

46.

Moher

Liberati

Tetzlaff

Altman

D. G.

& The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med, 6(7), e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

47.

Morales

D. M.

Bettencourt

G. M.

Green

George Mwangi

C. A.

(2017, October). “I want to know about everything that’s happening in the world”: Enhancing critical awareness through a youth participatory action research project with Latinx youths. The Educational Forum, 81, 404-417.

48.

*Noonan

(2015). When soda is a social justice issue: Design and documentation of a participatory action research project with youth. Educational Action Research, 23(2), 194-206.

49.

*Otis

M. D.

Loeffler

D. N.

(2006). Changing youths’ attitudes toward difference: A community-based model that works. Social Work with Groups, 28, 41-64. doi:10.1300/J009v28n01_04

50.

*Ozer

E. J.

Douglas

(2013). The impact of participatory research on urban teens: An experimental evaluation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 51, 66-75. doi:10.1007/s10464-012-9546-2

51.

Ozer

E. J.

Douglas

(2015). Assessing the key processes of youth-led participatory research: Psychometric analysis and application of an observational rating scale. Youth & Society, 47, 29-50.

52.

*Ozer

E. J.

Newlan

Douglas

Hubbard

(2013). “Bounded” empowerment: Analyzing tensions in the practice of youth-led participatory research in urban public schools. American Journal of Community Psychology, 52, 13-26. doi:10.1007/s10464-013-9573-7

53.

*Ozer

E. J.

Ritterman

Wanis

(2010). Participatory action research (PAR) in middle school: Opportunities, constraints, and key processes. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46, 152-166. doi:10.1007/s10464-010-9335-8

54.

*Ozer

E. J.

Wright

(2012). Beyond school spirit: The effects of youth-led participatory action research in two urban high schools. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22, 267-283.

55.

*Phillips

E. N.

Berg

M. J.

Rodriguez

Morgan

(2010). A case study of participatory action research in a public New England middle school: Empowerment, constraints and challenges. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46, 179-194.

56.

*Pritzker

LaChapelle

Tatum

(2012). “We need their help”: Encouraging and discouraging adolescent civic engagement through Photovoice. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 2247-2254. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.07.015

57.

*Reich

S. M.

Kay

J. S.

Lin

G. C.

(2015). Nourishing a partnership to improve middle school lunch options: A community-based participatory research project. Family & Community Health, 38, 77. doi:10.1097/FCH.0000000000000055

58.

Rodriguez

L. F.

Brown

T. M.

(2009). From voice to agency: Guiding principles for participatory action research with youth. New Directions for Youth Development, 2009(123), 19-34.

59.

*Rogers

Morrell

Enyedy

(2007). Studying the struggle: Contexts for learning and identity development for urban youth. American Behavioral Scientist, 51, 419-443. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764207306069

60.

*Ross

(2011). Sustaining youth participation in a long-term tobacco control initiative: Consideration of a social justice perspective. Youth & Society, 43, 681-704.

61.

*Sanchez

(2009). “In between Oprah and Cristina”: Urban Latina youth producing a countertext with participatory action research. Social Justice, 36(4), 54-68.

62.

*Schaafsma

Tendero

(1999). Making it real: Girls’ stories, social change, and moral struggle. English Journal, 88(5), 28-36.

63.

*Scott

M. A.

Pyne

K. B.

Means

D. R.

(2015). Approaching praxis: YPAR as critical pedagogical process in a college access program. The High School Journal, 98, 138-157. doi:10.1353/hsj.2015.0003

64.

Shamrova

D. P.

Cummings

C. E.

(2017). Participatory action research (PAR) with children and youth: An integrative review of methodology and PAR outcomes for participants, organizations, and communities. Children and Youth Services Review, 81, 400-412. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.08.022

65.

*Smith

Bratini

Appio

L. M.

(2012). “Everybody’s teaching and everybody’s learning”: Photovoice and youth counseling. Journal of Counseling & Development, 90, 3-12. doi:10.1111/j.1556-6676.2012.00001.x

66.

*Smith

Davis

Bhowmik

(2010). Youth participatory action research groups as school counseling interventions. Professional School Counseling, 14, 174-182.

67.

*Suleiman

A. B.

Soleimanpour

London

(2006). Youth action for health through youth-led research. Journal of Community Practice, 14, 125-145.

68.

*Taines

(2012). Educational or social reform? Students inform the debate over improving urban schools. Education and Urban Society, 44, 247-273.

69.

*Teixeira

(2014). “It seems like no one cares”: Participatory photo mapping to understand youth perspectives on property vacancy. Journal of Adolescent Research, 30, 390-414. doi:10.1177/0743558414547098

70.

*Torre

M. E.

(2009). Participatory action research and critical race theory: Fueling spaces for “Nos-Otras” to research. Urban Review: Issues and Ideas in Public Education, 41, 106-120.

71.

*Turner

C. K.

Hayes

Way

(2013). Critical multimodal hip hop production: A social justice approach to African American language and literacy practices. Equity & Excellence in Education, 46(3), 13.

72.

*Voight

(2015). Student voice for school-climate improvement: A case study of an urban middle school. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 25, 310-326. doi:10.1002/casp.2216

73.

Voight

Velez

(2018). Youth participatory action research in the high school curriculum: Education outcomes for student participants in a district-wide initiative. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 11, 433-451. doi:10.1080/19345747.2018.1431345

74.

*Wagaman

M. A.

(2015). Changing ourselves, changing the world: Assessing the value of participatory action research as an empowerment-based research and service approach with LGBTQ young people. Child & Youth Services, 36(2), 124-149. doi:10.1080/0145935X.2014.1001064

75.

*Walker

K. C.

Saito

R. N.

(2011). You<th are here: Promoting youth spaces through community mapping. Afterschool Matters, 14, 30-39.

76.

*White

D. J.

Shoffner

Johnson

Knowles

Mills

(2012). Advancing positive youth development: Perspectives of youth as researchers and evaluators. Journal of Extension, 50(4), 10.

77.

*Wilson

Dasho

Martin

A. C.

Wallerstein

Wang

C. C.

Minkler

(2007). Engaging young adolescents in social action through Photovoice: The youth empowerment strategies (YES!) project. Journal of Early Adolescence, 27, 241-261.

78.

*Wilson

Minkler

Dasho

Wallerstein

Martin

A. C.

(2008). Getting to social action: The youth empowerment strategies (YES!) project. Health Promotion Practice, 9, 395-403. doi:10.1177/1524839906289072

79.

*Wright

D. E.

Mahiri

(2012). Literacy learning within community action projects for social change. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56, 123-131.

80.

*Yoshida

S. C.

Craypo

Samuels

S. E.

(2011). Engaging youth in improving their food and physical activity environments. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48, 641-643. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.09.007

81.

YPAR Hub. (2018). Get started. Retrieved from http://yparhub.berkeley.edu/get-started-curriculum/

82.

*Zenkov

Pellegrino

Sell

Ewaida

Bell

Fell

McCamis

(2014). Picturing kids and “kids” as researchers: Preservice teachers and effective writing instruction for diverse youth and English language learners. New Educator, 10, 306-330.

83.

Zimmerman

Stewart

Hurd

Morrel-Samuels

Hutchinson

Reischl

Roberts

(2017). Youth empowerment solutions curriculum (Prevention Research Center, School of Public Health, University of Michigan). Retrieved from http://yes.sph.umich.edu/curriculum/download

84.

*Zimmerman

M. A.

Stewart

S. E.

Morrel-Samuels

Franzen

Reischl

T. M.

(2011). Youth empowerment solutions for peaceful communities: Combining theory and practice in a community-level violence prevention curriculum. Health Promotion Practice, 12, 425-439. doi:10.1177/1524839909357316