Background. Physically active lessons have not often been assessed with randomized controlled trials. Aims. Evaluate the effects of the “Virtual Traveller” (VT) intervention delivered using classroom interactive whiteboards on physical activity, on-task behavior, and student engagement. Methods. Participants were 219 children aged 8 to 9 years from 10 schools in Greater London, assessed in a cluster-randomized controlled trial between March 2015 and May 2016. For 6 weeks, intervention children received 10-minute VT sessions three times a week during math and English lessons (VT group: n = 113). Children in control schools received regular teaching (COM group: n = 106). Outcomes were school-day, weekend-day, and lesson-time sedentary behavior (SB), light physical activity (LPA) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), and on-task behavior and student engagement, assessed at baseline (T0), 2 weeks (T1), and 4 weeks (T2) during the VT intervention and 1 week (T3) and 3 months (T4) postintervention using multilevel modeling. Results. VT pupils engaged in significantly more school-day MVPA at T1 only, with no other significant differences between groups in overall school-day or weekend-day activity. VT pupils engaged in significantly less SB and more MVPA during lesson time than COM pupils. More on-task behavior was shown in VT pupils than COM pupils but there was no difference in student engagement. Discussion. VT reduced sedentary behavior and increased physical activity during lesson time but not across overall school or weekend days. VT improved on-task behavior but had no effect on student engagement. Conclusion. Physical activity can be integrated into teaching using interactive whiteboards with no detriment to educational outcomes.
AppletonJ. J.ChristensonS. L.KimD.ReschlyA. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 427-445.
2.
BiddleS. J.AsareM. (2011). Physical activity and mental health in children and adolescents: A review of reviews. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 45, 886-895.
3.
BiddleS. J.PearsonN.RossG. M.BraithwaiteR. (2010). Tracking of sedentary behaviours of young people: A systematic review. Preventive Medicine, 51, 345-351.
4.
CainK. L.SallisJ. F.ConwayT. L.Van DyckD.CalhoonL. (2013). Using accelerometers in youth physical activity studies: A review of methods. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, 10, 437-450.
5.
CampbellM. K.MollisonJ.SteenN.GrimshawJ. M.EcclesM. (2000). Analysis of cluster randomized trials in primary care: A practical approach. Family Practice, 17, 192-196.
6.
CarsonV.HunterS.KuzikN.WiebeS. A.SpenceJ. C.FriedmanA.. . . HinkleyT. (2015). Systematic review of physical activity and cognitive development in early childhood. Journal of Science in Medicine & Sport, 19, 573-578.
7.
CarterC. P.ReschlyA. L.LovelaceM. D.AppletonJ. J.ThompsonD. (2012). Measuring student engagement among elementary students: Pilot of the Student Engagement Instrument—Elementary version. School Psychology Quarterly, 27, 61-73.
8.
CesaC. C.SbruzziG.RibeiroR. A.BarbieroS. M.de Oliveira PetkowiczR.EibelB.. . . PellandaL. C. (2014). Physical activity and cardiovascular risk factors in children: Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Preventive Medicine, 69, 54-62.
9.
CicchettiD. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284-294.
10.
ColeT. J.FreemanJ. V.PreeceM. A. (1995). Body mass index reference curves for the UK, 1990. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 73, 25-29.
11.
de GreeffJ.HartmanE.Mullender-WijnsmaM.BoskerR.DoolaardS.VisscherC. (2016). Long-term effects of physically active academic lessons on physical fitness and executive functions in primary school children. Health Education Research, 31, 185-194.
12.
Department for Education. (2013). The national curriculum in England: Framework document. London, England: Author.
13.
DobbinsM.HussonH.DeCorbyK.LaRoccaR. L. (2013). School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2, CD007651.
14.
DonnellyJ. E.GreeneJ. L.GibsonC. A.SmithB. K.WashburnR. A.SullivanD. K.. . . WilliamsS. L. (2009). Physical Activity Across the Curriculum (PAAC): A randomized controlled trial to promote physical activity and diminish overweight and obesity in elementary school children. Preventive Medicine, 49, 336-341.
15.
EfratM. (2011). The relationship between low-income and minority children’s physical activity and academic-related outcomes: A review of the literature. Health Education & Behavior, 38, 441-451.
16.
EkelundU.LuanJ.SherarL. B.EsligerD. W.GriewP.CooperA. (2012). Moderate to vigorous physical activity and sedentary time and cardiometabolic risk factors in children and adolescents. JAMA Journal of the American Medical Association, 307, 704-712.
17.
EngelenL.BundyA. C.NaughtonG.SimpsonJ. M.BaumanA.RagenJ.. . . van der PloegH. P. (2013). Increasing physical activity in young primary school children—it’s child’s play: A cluster randomised controlled trial. Preventive Medicine, 56, 319-325.
18.
FedewaA. L.AhnS. (2011). The effects of physical activity and physical fitness on children’s achievement and cognitive outcomes: A meta-analysis. Research Quarterly in Exercise & Sport, 82, 521-535.
19.
FinnJ. D.ZimmerK. S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In ChristensonS. L.ReschlyA. L.WylieC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97-131). New York, NY: Springer.
20.
FinnK. J.SpeckerB. (2000). Comparison of Actiwatch activity monitor and Children’s Activity Rating Scale in children. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 32, 1794-1797.
21.
FredricksJ.McColskeyW.MeliJ.MontrosseB.MordicaJ.MooneyK. (2011). Measuring student engagement in upper elementary through high school: A description of 21 instruments. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.
22.
Futuresource Consulting. (2010). Interactive displays quarterly insight: State of the market report, quarter 1. Hertfordshire, England: Author.
23.
GriecoL. A.JowersE. M.BartholomewJ. B. (2009). Physically active academic lessons and time on task: The moderating effect of body mass index. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 41, 1921-1926.
24.
HowieE. K.PateR. R. (2012). Physical activity and academic achievement in children: A historical perspective. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 1, 160-169.
25.
KimY.BeetsM. W.WelkG. J. (2012). Everything you wanted to know about selecting the “right” Actigraph accelerometer cut-points for youth, but . . . : A systematic review. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 15, 311-321.
26.
LeBlancA. G.BroylesS. T.ChaputJ.-P.LeducG.BoyerC.BorgheseM. M.TremblayM. S. (2015). Correlates of objectively measured sedentary time and self-reported screen time in Canadian children. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12, 1-12.
27.
MaasC. J.HoxJ. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1, 86-92.
28.
MartinR.MurtaghE. M. (2015). Preliminary findings of Active Classrooms: An intervention to increase physical activity levels of primary school children during class time. Teaching and Teacher Education, 52, 113-127.
29.
Medical Research Council. (2013). Developing and evaluating complex interventions: New guidance. London, England: Author.
30.
MerrettF.WheldallK. (1986). Observing Pupils and Teachers in Classrooms (OPTIC): A behavioural observation schedule for use in schools. Educational Psychology, 6, 57-70.
31.
MichieS.FixsenD.GrimshawJ. M.EcclesM. P. (2009). Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: The need for a scientific method. Implementation Science, 4(40), 1-6.
32.
MichieS.RichardsonM.JohnstonM.AbrahamC.FrancisJ.HardemanW.. . . WoodC. (2013). The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: Building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 46, 81-95.
33.
Mullender-WijnsmaM. J.HartmanE.de GreeffJ. W.BoskerR. J.DoolaardS.VisscherC. (2015a). Improving academic performance of school-age children by physical activity in the classroom: 1-year program evaluation. Journal of School Health, 85, 365-371.
34.
Mullender-WijnsmaM. J.HartmanE.de GreeffJ. W.BoskerR. J.DoorlaardS.VisscherC. (2015b). Moderate-to-vigorous physically active academic lessons and academic engagement in children with and without a social disadvantage: a within subject experimental design. BMC Public Health, 15, 404.
35.
Mullender-WijnsmaM. J.HartmanE.de GreeffJ. W.DoolaardS.BoskerR. J.VisscherC. (2016). Physically active math and language lessons improve academic achievement: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics, 137, e20152743.
36.
NaylorP. J.NettlefoldL.RaceD.HoyC.AsheM. C.Wharf HigginsJ.McKayH. A. (2015). Implementation of school based physical activity interventions: A systematic review. Preventive Medicine, 72, 95-115.
37.
NeelonS. E. B.HeskethK. R.van SluijsE. M. (2016). Will physically active lessons improve academic achievement for all or widen the achievement gap?Pediatrics, 137, e20154137.
38.
NorrisE.DunsmuirS.Duke-WilliamsO.StamatakisE.SheltonN. (2016). Protocol for the “Virtual Traveller” cluster-randomised controlled trial: A behaviour change intervention to increase physical activity in primary-school maths and English lessons. BMJ Open, 6, e011982.
39.
NorrisE.DunsmuirS.Duke-WilliamsO.StamatakisE.SheltonN. (2018). Mixed method evaluation of the Virtual Traveller physically active lesson intervention: An analysis using the RE-AIM framework. Evaluation and Program Planning, 70, 107-114. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.01.007.
40.
NorrisE.HamerM.StamatakisE. (2016). Active video games in schools and effects on physical activity and health: A systematic review. Journal of Pediatrics, 172, 40-46.
41.
NorrisE.SheltonN.DunsmuirS.Duke-WilliamsO.StamatakisE. (2015a). Physically active lessons as physical activity and educational interventions: A systematic review of methods and results. Preventive Medicine, 72, 116-125.
42.
NorrisE.SheltonN.DunsmuirS.Duke-WilliamsO.StamatakisE. (2015b). Teacher and pupil perspectives on the use of virtual field trips as physically active lessons. BMC Research Notes, 8, 719.
43.
NorrisE.SheltonN.DunsmuirS.Duke-WilliamsO.StamatakisE. (2015c). Virtual field trips as physically active lessons for primary-school children: A pilot study. BMC Public Health, 15, 366.
44.
PengW.CrouseJ. C.LinJ.-H. (2013). Using Active Video Games for physical activity promotion: A systematic review of the current state of research. Health Education & Behavior, 40, 171-192.
45.
PuhlJ.GreavesK.HoytM.BaranowskiT. (1990). Children’s Activity Rating Scale (CARS): Description and calibration. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 61, 26-36.
46.
PulsfordR. M.Cortina-BorjaM.RichC.KinnafickF.-E.DezateuxC.GriffithsL. J. (2011). Actigraph accelerometer-defined boundaries for sedentary behaviour and physical activity intensities in 7 year old children. PloS One, 6, e21822.
47.
RileyN.LubansD. R.HolmesK.MorganP. J. (2016). Findings from the EASY Minds cluster randomized controlled trial: Evaluation of a physical activity integration program for mathematics in primary schools. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 13, 198-206.
48.
RobertsonC.DunsmuirS. (2013). Teacher stress and pupil behaviour explored through a rational-emotive behaviour therapy framework. Educational Psychology, 33, 215-232.
49.
RowlandT. W. (1998). The biological basis of physical activity. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 30, 392-399.
50.
SchulzK. F.AltmanD. G.MoherD. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Medicine, 8, 18.
51.
StamatakisE.CoombsN.TilingK.MattocksC.CooperA.HardyL. L.LawlorD. A. (2015). Sedentary time in late childhood and cardiometabolic risk in adolescence. Pediatrics, 135, e1432-e1441.
52.
TelamaR. (2009). Tracking of physical activity from childhood to adulthood: A review. Obesity Facts, 2, 187-195.
53.
TroianoR. P.BerriganD.DoddK. W.MâsseL. C.TilertT.McDowellM. (2008). Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 40, 181-188.
54.
TurnerL.ChaloupkaF. J. (2017). Reach and implementation of physical activity breaks and active lessons in elementary school classrooms. Health Education & Behavior, 44, 370-375.
55.
VazouS.SkradeM. (2016). Integrating physical activity and math: An intervention examining effects on math performance, perceived competence, and need satisfaction in children. International Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology,15, 508-522. doi:10.1080/1612197X.2016.1164226
56.
WeilerR.AllardyceS.WhyteG. P.StamatakisE. (2013). Is the lack of physical activity strategy for children complicit mass child neglect?British Journal of Sports Medicine, 48, 1010-1013.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
