Previous research has found that religiosity may protect against risky alcohol and drug use behaviors among adolescents, but the social mechanics underpinning the relationship are not well understood. This study examined the relationship between religiosity, heavy drinking, and social norms among U.S. adolescents aged 12 to 17 years, using the 2007 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (n = 14,556). Based on a vicarious learning networks theoretical perspective, the effect of religiosity on heavy drinking behavior was hypothesized to be exerted indirectly through the norms of key reference groups in the social network (close friends and parents). Support was found for reference group norms as one underlying mechanism of the religiosity–alcohol relationship. Religiosity and nonpermissive drinking norms of parents, close friends, and peers maintained a strong protective association with adolescent heavy drinking. Supplementary analyses elaborated on the role of competing and complementary normative orientations among reference groups in the social network.
AdlafE. M.MannR. E.PagliaA. (2003). Drinking, cannabis use and driving among Ontario students. Canadian Medical Journal, 168, 565-566.
2.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
AroianL. A. (1947). The probability function of the product of two normally distributed variables. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18, 265-271.
4.
BahrS. J.HoffmanJ. P. (2008). Religiosity, peers, and adolescent drug use. Journal of Drug Issues, 38, 743-769.
5.
BahrS. J.HoffmanJ. P. (2010). Parenting style, religiosity, peers, and adolescent heavy drinking. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 79, 539-543.
6.
BanduraA. (1969). Principles of behavior modification. New York, NY: Rinehart & Winston.
7.
BanduraA. (1977). Social learning theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
9.
BerryD. (2005). Methodological pitfalls in the study of religiosity and spirituality. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 27, 628-647.
10.
BonomoY.CoffeyC.WolfeR.LynskeyM.BowesG.PattonG. (2001). Adverse outcomes of alcohol use in adolescents. Addiction, 96, 1485-1496.
11.
BorsariB.CareyK. B. (2001). Peer influences on college drinking: A review of the research. Journal of Substance Abuse, 13, 391-424.
12.
BorsariB.CareyK. B. (2003). Descriptive and injunctive norms in college drinking: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 64, 331-341.
13.
BorsariB.CareyK. B. (2006). How the quality of peer relationships influences college alcohol use. Drug and Alcohol Review, 25, 361-370.
14.
BrownT. L.ParksG. S.ZimmermanR. S.PhillipsC. M. (2001). The role of religion in predicting adolescent alcohol use and problem drinking. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 62, 696-705.
15.
BrownT. L.SalsmanJ. M.BrechtingE. H.CarlsonC. R. (2007). Religiosity, spirituality, and social support: How are they related to underage drinking among college students?Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse, 17, 15-39.
16.
CareyK. B.Scott-SheldonL. A. J.CareyM. P.DeMartiniK. S. (2007). Individual-level interventions to reduce college student drinking: A meta-analytic review. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 2469-2494.
17.
ChawlaN.NeighborsC.LewisM. A.LeeC. M.LarimerM. E. (2007). Attitudes and perceived approval of drinking as mediators of the relationship between the importance of religion and alcohol use. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 68, 410-418.
18.
ChoH. (2006). Influences of norm proximity and norm types on binge and non-binge drinkers: Examining the under-examined aspects of social norms interventions on college campuses. Journal of Substance Use, 11, 417-429.
19.
CohenJ. (1983). The cost of dichotomization. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 249-253.
20.
CottonS.ZebrackiK.RosenthalS. L.TsevatJ.DrotarD. (2006). Religion/spirituality and adolescent health outcomes. Journal of Adolescent Health, 38, 472-480.
21.
DewR. E.DanielS. S.ArmstrongT. D.GoldstonD. B.TriplettM. F.KoenigH. G. (2008). Religion/spirituality and adolescent psychiatric symptoms: A review. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 39, 381-398.
22.
DiClementeC. C.MarinilliA. S.SinghM.BellinoL. E. (2001). The role of feedback in the process of health behavior change. American Journal of Health Behavior, 25, 217-227.
23.
EscobedoL. G.ChorbaT. L.WaxweilerR. (1995). Patterns of alcohol use and the risk of drinking and driving among US high school students. American Journal of Public Health, 85, 976-978.
24.
FenzelL. M. (2005). Multivariate analyses of predictors of heavy episodic drinking and drinking-related problems among college students. Journal of College Student Development, 46, 126-140.
25.
GrovenorD.ToomeyT. L.WagenaarA. C. (1999). Deterrence and the adolescent drinking driver. Journal of Safety Research, 30, 187-191.
26.
GryczynskiJ.WardB. W. (2011). Social norms and the relationship between religiosity and cigarette use among adolescents in the United States. Health Education & Behavior, 38, 39-48.
27.
JohnsonP. B.RichterL. (2002). The relationship between smoking, drinking, and adolescents’ self-perceived health and frequency of hospitalization: Analyses from the 1997 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. Journal of Adolescent Health, 30, 175-183.
28.
JohnsonT. J.SheetsV. L.KristellerJ. L. (2008). Identifying mediators of the relationship between religiousness/spirituality and alcohol use. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 69, 160-170.
29.
JohnstonL. G.O’MalleyP. M.BachmanJ. G.SchulenbergJ. E. (2009). Monitoring the Future Study National Survey results on drug use, 1975-2008: Volume I. Secondary school students (NIH Publication No. 09-7402). Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Drug Abuse.
30.
LarimerM. E.KaysenD.LeeC. M.LewisM. A.DillworthT.MontoyaH. D.NeighborsC. (2009). Evaluating level of specificity of normative referents in relation to personal drinking behavior. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 16(Suppl.), 115-121.
31.
LewisM. A.NeighborsC. (2006). Social norms approaches using descriptive drinking norms education: A review of the research on personalized normative feedback. Journal of American College Health, 54, 213-218.
32.
LewisM. A.NeighborsC. (2007). Optimizing personalized normative feedback: The use of gender-specific referents. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 68, 228-237.
33.
MacKinnonD. P.DwyerJ. H. (1993). Estimating mediated effects in prevention studies. Evaluation Review, 17, 144-158.
34.
MacKinnonD. P.WarsiG.DwyerJ. H. (1995). A simulation study of mediated effect measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 41-62.
35.
MaistoS. A.CareyK. B.BradizzaC. M. (1999). Social learning theory. In LeonardK. E.BlaneH. T. (Eds.), Psychological theories of drinking and alcoholism (pp. 106-163). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
36.
MartensM. P.PageJ. C.MowryE.DamannK. M.TaylorK. K.CiminiM. D. (2006). Differences between actual and perceived student norms: An examination of alcohol use, drug use, and sexual behavior. Journal of American College Health, 54, 295-300.
37.
NeighborsC.LaBrieJ. W.HummerJ. F.LewisM. A.LeeC. M.DesaiS.LarimerM. E. (2010). Group identification as a moderator of the relationship between perceived social norms and alcohol consumption. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 24, 522-528.
38.
NeighborsC.LarimerM. E.LewisM. A. (2004). Targeting misperceptions of descriptive drinking norms: Efficacy of a computer-delivered personalized normative feedback intervention. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 434-447.
39.
NeighborsC.LeeC. M.LewisM. A.FossosN.LarimerM. E. (2007). Are social norms the best predictor of outcomes among heavy-drinking college students?Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 68, 556-565.
40.
NeighborsC.LewisM. A.AtkinsD. C.JensenM. M.WalterT.FossosN.LarimerM. E. (2010). Efficacy of web-based personalized normative feedback: A two-year randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 898-911.
41.
NeighborsC.O’ConnorR. M.LewisM. A.ChawlaN.LeeC. M.FossosN. (2008). The relative impact of injunctive norms on college student drinking: The role of reference group. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 22(4), 576-581.
42.
O’MalleyP. M.JohnstonL. G.BachmanJ. G. (1998). Alcohol use among adolescents. Alcohol Health & Research World, 22, 85-93.
43.
PatrickM. E.SchulenbergJ. E. (2010). Alcohol use and heavy episodic drinking prevalence and predictors among national samples of American eighth- and tenth-grade students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 71, 41-45.
44.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS Procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, 36, 717-731.
45.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
46.
RegnerusM. D. (2003). Religion and positive adolescent outcomes: A review of research and theory. Review of Religious Research, 44, 394-413.
47.
RewL.WongY. J. (2006). A systematic review of associations among religiosity/spirituality and adolescent health attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Adolescent Health, 38, 433-442.
48.
RialaK.HakkoH.IsohanniM.JärvelinM.-R.RäsänenP. (2004). Teenage smoking and substance use as predictors of severe alcohol problems in late adolescents and in young adulthood. Journal of Adolescent Health, 35, 245-254.
49.
SchultzP. W.NolanJ. M.CialdiniR. B.GoldsteinN. J.GriskeviciusV. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18, 429-434.
50.
Simons-MortonB.HaynieD. L.CrumpA. D.SaylorK. E.EitelP.YuK. (1999). Expectancies and other psychosocial factors associated with alcohol use among early adolescent boys and girls. Addictive Behaviors, 24, 229-238.
51.
SinhaJ. W.CnaanR. A.GellesR. W. (2007). Adolescent risk behaviors and religion: Findings from a national study. Journal of Adolescence, 30, 231-249.
52.
SmithC. (2002). Religious participation and parental moral expectations and supervision of American youth. Reviews of Religious Research, 44, 414-424.
53.
SmithC. (2003a). Religious participation and network closure among American adolescents. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42, 259-267.
54.
SmithC. (2003b). Theorizing religious effects among American adolescents. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42, 17-30.
55.
SmithC.DentonM. L.FarisR.RegnerusM. (2002). Mapping American adolescent religious participation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41, 597-612.
56.
SobelM. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290-312.
57.
StewartC.BollandJ. M. (2002). Parental styles as a possible mediator of the relationship between religiosity and substance use in African-American adolescents. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Use, 1, 63-81.
58.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2002). Binge drinking among underage persons (The NHSDA Report). Rockville, MD: Author.
59.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2008). National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2007 public use file codebook (ICPSR 23782). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
60.
SussmanS.SkaraS.De CaliceP.HoffmanB.DentC. (2005). Spirituality as a 1-year prospective predictor of violence perpetration and drug use among youth at continuation high schools. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 80-99.
61.
WardB. W.GryczynskiJ. (2009). Social learning theory and the effects of living arrangement on heavy alcohol use: Results from a national study of college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 70, 364-372.
62.
WillsT. A.YaegerA. M.SandyJ. M. (2003). Buffering effect of religiosity for adolescent substance use. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 17, 24-31.
63.
WindleM.DaviesP. T. (1999). Depression and heavy alcohol use among adolescents: Concurrent and prospective relations. Development and Psychopathology, 11, 823-844.
