Among rising rates of overweight and obesity, schools have become essential settings to promote health behaviors, such as physical activity (PA). As schools exist within a broader environment, the social ecological model (SEM) provided a framework to consider how different levels interact and influence PA. The purpose of this study was to provide insight on school-based PA promotion by investigating the integration between different levels of Emmons’s SEM within one public school board in a large Canadian city. Interviews were conducted with participants from the government (n = 4), the public school board (n = 3), principals (n = 3), and teachers (n = 4) and analyzed to explore perspectives on the various levels of the model. The results suggested that higher level policies “trickled down” into the organizational level of the SEM but there was pivotal responsibility for schools to determine how to implement PA strategies. Furthermore, schools have difficulty implementing PA because of the continued priority of academic achievement.
Berkman, L.F., & Glass, T. ( 2000). Social integration, social networks, social support and health. In L. Berkman & I. Kawachi (Eds.), Social epidemiology (pp. 137-173). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2.
Biddle, S.J.H., Gorely, T., & Stensel, D.J. ( 2004). Health-enhancing physical activity and sedentary behaviour in children and adolescents. Journal of Sports Sciences, 22, 679-701.
3.
Brofenbrenner, U. ( 1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32, 513-531.
4.
Deschensnes, M., Martin, C., & Jomphe Hill, A. (2003). Comprehensive approaches to school health promotion: How to achieve broader implementation?Health Promotion International, 18, 387-396.
5.
Dowda, M., Sallis, J.F., McKenzie, T.L., Rosengard, P., & Kohl, H.W., III. (2005). Evaluating the sustainability of SPARK physical education: A case study of translating research into practice . Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76, 11-9.
6.
Emmons, K. ( 2000). Health behaviours in a social context. In L. Berkman & I. Kawachi (Eds.), Social epidemiology (pp. 242-266). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Lincoln, T.S., & Guba, E.G. ( 1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. In D. D. Williams (Ed.), Naturalistic evaluation (pp. 73-84). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
9.
Luepker, R.V., Perry, C.L., McKinlay, S.M., Nader, P.R., Parcel, G.S., Stone, E.L., . . . Wu, M. ( 1996). Outcomes of a field trial to improve children’s dietary patterns and physical activity. The Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health. CATCH collaborative group. Journal of the American Medical Association, 275, 768-776.
10.
Lytle, L.A., Ward, J.W., Nader, P.R., Pedersen, S., & Williston, B.J. (2003). Maintenance of a health promotion program in elementary schools: Results from the CATCH-ON study key informant interviews. Health Education & Behavior, 30, 503-518.
11.
McLeroy, K.R., Bibeau, D., Steckler, A., & Glanz, K. ( 1988). An ecological perspective on health promotion programs . Health Education Quarterly, 15, 351-377.
12.
Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
13.
Morse, J.M., & Richards, L. ( 2002). Read me first for a user’s guide to qualitative methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
14.
Naylor, P.J., Macdonald, H.M., Zebedee, J.A., Reed, K.E., & McKay, H.A. (2006). Lessons learned from Action Schools! BC-An "active school" model to promote physical activity in elementary schools. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 9, 413-423.
15.
Pate, R.R., Trost, S.G., Mullis, R., Sallis, J.F., Wechsler, H., & Brown, D.R. ( 2000). Community interventions to promote proper nutrition and PA among youth. Preventive Medicine, 31, S138-S149.
16.
Patton, M. ( 1990). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
Resnicow, K., & Allensworth, D. (1996). Conducting a comprehensive school health program. Journal of School Health, 66(2), 59-63.
18.
Robertson-Wilson, J., Lévesque, L., & Richard, L. ( 2009). Using an analytic framework to identify potential targets and strategies for ecologically based physical activity interventions in middle schools. Health Promotion Practice, 10, 232-243.
19.
Sallis, J.F., Bauman, A., & Pratt, M. ( 1998). Environmental and policy interventions to promote physical activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 15, 379-397.
20.
Sallis, J.F., Cervero, R.B., Ascher, W., Henderson, K.A., Kraft, M.K., & Kerr, J. ( 2006). An ecological approach to creating active living communities . Annual Review of Public health, 27, 297-322.
21.
Spence, J.C., & Lee, R.E. ( 2003). Toward a comprehensive model of physical activity. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 4, 7-23.
22.
Statistics Canada. (2005). 2004 Canadian Community Health Survey: Obesity among children and adults. Retrieved from http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/050706/d050706a.htm
23.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. ( 1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
Trochim, W.M.K. ( 2001). The research methods knowledge base (2nd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Atomic Dog Publishing.
25.
Wallhead, T.L., & Buckworth, J. ( 2004). The role of physical education in the promotion of youth physical activity. Quest, 56, 285-301.
26.
Welk, G.J. ( 1999). The youth physical activity promotion model: A conceptual bridge between theory and practice. Quest, 51, 5-23.
