Removing low nutrition snacks from schools is controversial. Although the objective is to decrease the consumption of these foods at school, some critics argue that children will compensate by eating more of these foods at home. Others worry that school-based obesity prevention programs will increase student preoccupation with weight. The present study examines these concerns. Three middle schools replaced snacks and beverages that did not meet nutrition guidelines, whereas three comparison schools made no systematic changes. Students were surveyed about dietary intake and weight concerns before and after implementation of the intervention. Findings indicate that removing low nutrition items from schools decreased students’ consumption with no compensatory increase at home. Furthermore, there were no differences in students’ reported weight concerns. These results support the value of strengthening school nutrition standards to improve student nutrition and provide evidence dispelling concerns that such efforts will have unintended negative consequences.
Austin, S., Field, A., Wiecha, J., Peterson, K., & Gortmaker, S. ( 2005). The impact of a school-based obesity prevention trial on disordered weight control behaviors in early adolescent girls. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 159, 225-230.
2.
The Child Nutrition and WIC Reauthorization Act. (2004). Public Law 108-265-June 30.
3.
Connecticut Department of Public Health. ( 2005). Healthy eating and active living: Connecticut’s plan for health promotion. Hartford, CT: Author.
4.
Connecticut State Department of Education. ( 2006). Healthy snacks guidance. Retrieved October 10, 2006, from http://www.state.ct.us/SDE/deps/Student/NutritionEd/index.htm#Healthy
5.
Connecticut State Department of Education, & Bureau of Health and Nutrition Services and Child/Family/School Partnerships. ( 2006). Action guide for school nutrition and physical activity policies. Middletown, CT: Author .
6.
Cullen, K., Eagan, J., Baranowski, T., Owens, E., & de Moor, C. ( 2000). Effect of a la carte and snack bar foods at school on children’s lunchtime intake of fruits and vegetables. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 100, 1482-1486.
7.
Cullen, K., & Thompson, D. ( 2005). Texas school food policy changes related to middle school a la carte/snack bar foods: Potential savings in kilocalories. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 105, 1952-1954.
8.
Fairburn, C., Marcus, M., & Wilson, G. ( 1993). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for binge eating and bulimia nervosa: A comprehensive treatment manual. In C. Fairburn & G. Wilson (Eds.), Binge eating: Nature, assessment, and treatment (pp. 361-404). New York: Guilford Press.
9.
Fisher, J.O., & Birch, L.L. ( 1999). Restricting access to foods and children’s eating . Appetite, 32, 405-419.
10.
Francis, L.A., & Birch, L.L. ( 2005). Maternal weight status modulates the effects of restriction on daughters’ eating and weight. International Journal of Obesity, 29, 942-949.
French, S.A., Jeffery, R.W., Story, M., Breitlow, K.K., Baxter, J.S., Hannan, P., et al. (2001). Pricing and promotion effects on low-fat vending snack purchases: The CHIPS study. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 112-117.
13.
Geier, A., Rozin, P., & Doros, G. ( 2006). Unit bias: A new heuristic that helps explain the effect of portion size on food intake. Psychological Science, 17, 521-525.
14.
Harnack, L., Snyder, P., Story, M., Holliday, R., Lytle, L., & Neumark-Sztainer, D. (2000). Availability of a la carte food items in junior and senior high schools: A needs assessment. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 100, 701-703.
15.
Health Policy Tracking Service. (2006). A report on state action to promote nutrition, increase physical activity and prevent obesity (No. Issue 3).
16.
Heatherton, T.F., Polivy, J., & Herman, C. ( 1990). Dietary restraint: Some current findings and speculations . Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 4, 100-106.
17.
Hoelscher, D., Day, R., Kelder, S., & Ward, J. ( 2003). Reproducibility and validity of the secondary level School-Based Nutrition Monitoring student questionnaire. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 103, 186-194.
18.
Kann, L., Grunbaum, J., McKenna, M., Wechsler, H., & Galuska, D. ( 2004). Competitive foods and beverages available for purchase in secondary schools-selected sites in the United States. Journal of School Health, 75, 370-374.
19.
Kubik, M.Y., Lytle, L.A., & Story, M. ( 2005). School-wide food practices are associated with body mass index in middle school students. Archives of Pediatric & Adolescent Medicine, 159, 1111-1114.
20.
Neumark-Sztainer, D., French, S.A., Hannan, P.J., Story, M., & Fulkerson, J.A. (2005). School lunch and snacking patterns among high school students: Associations with school food environment and policies. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2, 1-7.
21.
O’Dea, J.A. ( 2005). Prevention of child obesity: ‘First, do no harm.’Health Education Research, 20, 259-265.
22.
Probart, C., McDonnell, E., Hartman, T., Weirich, J.E., & Bailey-Davis, L. (2006). Factors associated with the offering and sale of competitive foods and school lunch participation . Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 106, 242-247.
23.
Raczynski, J.M., & Phillips, M. ( 2006). Year two evaluation: Arkansas Act 1220 of 2003 to combat childhood obesity. Little Rock: Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences.
24.
Rolls, B., Roe, L., & Meengs, J. ( 2006). Larger portion sizes lead to a sustained increase in energy intake over 2 days. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 106, 543-549. United States Department of Agriculture. (2004). National school lunch program. Washington, DC: Author.
25.
Wansink, B. ( 2004). Environmental factors that increase the food intake and consumption volume of unknowing customers. Annual Review of Nutrition, 24, 455-479.
26.
Wechsler, H., Brener, N., Kuester, S., & Miller, C. ( 2001). Food service and foods and beverages available at school: Results from the School Health Policies and Programs Study 2000. Journal of School Health, 71, 313-324.
