In response to calls to reinvent the 5 A Day fruit and vegetable campaign, this study assesses the utility of VALS™, a consumer-based audience segmentation tool that divides the U.S. population into groups leading similar lifestyles. The study examines whether the impact of theory of planned behavior (TPB) constructs varies across VALS groups in a cross-sectional sample of 1,588 U.S. adults. In a multigroup structural equation model, the VALS audience group variable moderated latent TPB relationships. Attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control explained 57% to 70% of the variation in intention to eat fruit and vegetables across 5 different VALS groups. Perceived behavioral control and intention also predicted self-reported consumption behavior (R 2 = 20% to 71% across VALS groups). Bivariate z tests were calculated to determine statistical differences in parameter estimates across groups. Nine of the bivariate z tests were statistically significant (p ≤ .04), with standardized coefficients ranging from .05 to .70. These findings confirm the efficacy of using the TPB to explain variation in fruit and vegetable consumption as well as the validity of using a consumer-based algorithm to segment audiences for fruit and vegetable consumption messaging.
Ajzen, I. ( 1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
2.
Anderson, E.S., Winett, R.A., Wojcik, J.R., Winett, S.G., & Bowden, T. ( 2001). A computerized social cognitive intervention for nutrition behavior: Direct and mediated effects on fat, fiber, fruits, and vegetables, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations among food shoppers. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 23, 88-100.
3.
Armitage, C.J., & Arden, M.A. ( 2002). Exploring discontinuity patterns in the transtheoretical model: An application of the theory of planned behaviour. British Journal of Health Psychology, 7, 89-103.
4.
Armitage, C.J., & Conner, M. ( 2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471-499.
5.
Arnould, E., Price, L., & Zinkhan, G. ( 2004). Consumers (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin .
6.
Bandura, A. ( 1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7.
Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. ( 1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
8.
Biddle, S., Goudas, M., & Page, A. ( 1994). Social-psychological predictors of self-reported actual and intended physical activity in a university workforce sample. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 28, 160-163.
9.
Block, G., Patterson, B.H., & Subar, A. ( 1992). Fruit, vegetables and cancer prevention: A review of the epidemiologic evidence. Nutrition and Cancer, 18, 1-29.
10.
Bogers, R.P., Brug, J., van Assema, P., & Dagnelie, P.C. (2004). Explaining fruit and vegetable consumption: The theory of planned behavior and misconception of personal intake levels. Appetite, 42, 157-166.
11.
Bogers, R.P., van Assema, P., Brug, J., Kester, A.D.M., & Dagnelie, P.C. (2007). Psychosocial predictors of increases in fruit and vegetable consumption. American Journal of Health Behavior, 31, 135-145.
12.
Boomsma, A. ( 1982). Robustness of LISREL against small sample sizes in factor analysis models. In K. Jöreskog & H. Wold (Eds.), Systems under indirect observation: Causality, structure, prediction, (pp. 149-173). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
13.
Brug, J., Lechner, L., & De Vries, H. ( 1995). Psychosocial determinants of fruit and vegetable consumption . Appetite, 25, 285-296.
14.
Burg, J., de Vet, E., de Nooijer, J., & Verplanken, B. (2006). Predicting fruit consumption: Cognitions, intention, and habits. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 38, 73-81.
15.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. ( 2005). Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey questionnaire . Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
16.
Cheung, G.W. ( 2002, August). The identification of a partial metric invariance model for multigroup studies. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Denver, CO.
Conner, M., Norman, P., & Bell, R. ( 2002). The theory of planned behavior and healthy eating. Health Psychology, 21, 194-201.
19.
Conner, M., Povey, R., Sparks, P., James, R., & Shepherd, R. ( 2003). Moderating role of attitudinal ambivalence within the theory of planned behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology , 42, 75-94.
20.
Croyle, R.T., Nebeling, L., & Stables, G. ( 2001). 5 A Day for Better Health program. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health.
21.
Della, L.J., DeJoy, D.M. & Lance, C.E. ( 2008). Promoting fruit and vegetable consumption in different lifestyle groups: Recommendations for program development based on behavioral research and consumer media data. Health Marketing Quarterly , 25, 66-96.
22.
de Nooijer, J., van Assema, P., De Vet, E., & Brug, J. ( 2005). How stable are stages of change for nutrition behaviors in the Netherlands?Health Promotion International, 20, 27-32.
23.
Enders, C.K. ( 2001). A primer on maximum likelihood algorithms available for use with missing data. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 128-141.
24.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. ( 1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
25.
Gardner, C., McLaughlin, C., Sugarman, J., & Weston, F. (Eds.). (1997). Food, nutrition and the prevention of cancer: A global perspective. Washington, DC: American Institute for Cancer Research .
26.
Godin, G., & Kok, G. ( 1996). The theory of planned behavior: A review of its applications to health-related behaviors. American Journal of Health Promotion , 11, 87-98.
27.
Havas, S., Heimendinger, J., Damron, D., Nicklas, T.A., Cowan, A., Beresford, S., et al. (1995). 5 A Day for Better Health-Nine community research projects to increase fruit and vegetable consumption. Public Health Reports, 110, 68-79.
28.
Havas, S., Treiman, K., Langenberg, P., Ballesteros, M., Anliker, J., Damron, D., et al. (1998). Factors associated with fruit and vegetable consumption among women participating in WIC. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 98, 1141-1148.
29.
Hochbaum, G. ( 1958). Public participation in medical screening programs: A socio-psychological study (Public Health Service Publication No. 572). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
30.
Hu, L.T., & Bentler, P.M. ( 1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453.
31.
Hu, L.T., & Bentler, P.M. ( 1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
Kratt, P., Reynolds, K., & Shewchuk, R. ( 2000). The role of availability as a moderator of family fruit and vegetable consumption. Health Education & Behavior , 27, 471-482.
34.
Kristal, A.R., Bowen, D.J., Curry, S., Shattuck, A.L., & Henry, H.J. ( 1990). Nutrition knowledge, attitudes and perceived norms as correlates of selecting low-fat diets. Health Education Research , 5, 467-477.
35.
Kristal, A.R., Patterson, R.E., Glanz, K., Heimendinger, J., Hebert, J.R., Feng, Z.D., et al. (1995). Psychosocial correlates of healthful diets: Baseline results from the Working Well study. Preventive Medicine , 24, 221-228.
36.
Lefebvre, C.R., Doner, L., Johnston, C., Loughrey, K., Balch, G.I., & Sutton, S. ( 1995). Use of database marketing and consumer-based health communications in message design: An example from the Office of Cancer Communications’ 5 A Day for Better Health program. In E. Maibach & R. L. Parrott (Eds.), Designing health messages: Approaches from communication theory and public health practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
Leganger, A., & Kraft, P. ( 2003). Control constructs: Do they mediate the relation between educational attainment and health behaviour? Journal of Health Psychology, 8, 361-372.
38.
Lien, N., Lytle, L.A., & Komro, K.A. ( 2002). Applying theory of planned behavior to fruit and vegetable consumption of young adolescents. American Journal of Health Promotion, 16, 189-197.
39.
Maibach, E.W., Maxfield, A., Ladin, K., & Slater, M. ( 1996). Translating health psychology into effective health communication: The American Healthstyles Audience Segmentation Project. Journal of Health Psychology, 1, 261-277.
40.
MacCallum, R.C., Widaman, K.F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. ( 1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84-99.
41.
Marsh, H.W., Hau, K.T., & Wen, Z. ( 2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320-341.
42.
Montaño, D., & Kasprzyk, D. ( 2002). The theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, & F. M. Lewis (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed., pp. 67-98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
43.
National Cancer Institute. (2005, December). Cancer Trends Progress Report-2007 Update. Retrieved March 10, 2007, http://progressreport.cancer.gov
44.
National Cancer Institute. (2006). 5 A Day for Better Health program evaluation report. Retrieved March 10, 2007, from http://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/5aday_12-4-00.pdf
45.
Olinsky, A., Chen, S., & Harlow, L. ( 2003). The comparative efficacy of imputation methods for missing data in structural equation modeling. European Journal of Operational Research, 151, 53-79.
46.
Povey, R., Conner, M., Sparks, P., James, R., & Shepherd, R. ( 2000a). Application of the theory of planned behaviour to two dietary behaviours: Roles of perceived control and self-efficacy. British Journal of Health Psychology, 5, 121-139.
47.
Povey, R., Conner, M., Sparks, P., James, R., & Shepherd, R. ( 2000b). The theory of planned behavior and healthy eating: Examining additive and moderating effects of social influence variables. Psychology & Health, 14, 991.
48.
Prochaska, J.J., & DiClemente, C. (1983). Stages and processes of self-change in smoking: Toward an integrative model of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 390-395.
49.
Reinecke, J. ( 2002). Nonlinear structural equation models with the theory of planned behavior: Comparison of multiple group latent product term analyses . Quality and Quantity, 36, 93-112.
50.
Rhodes, R.E., Courneya, K.S., & Hayduk, L.A. ( 2002). Does personality moderate the theory of planned behavior in the exercise domain? Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology , 24, 120-132.
Serdula, M.K., Gillespie, C., Kettel, L., & Farris, R. ( 2004). Trends in fruit and vegetable consumption among adults in the United States: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1994-2000 . American Journal of Public Health, 94, 1014.
53.
Smith, R.A., & Biddle, S.J.H. (1999). Attitudes and exercise adherence: Test of the theories of reasoned action and planned behaviour. Journal of Sports Sciences, 17, 269-281.
54.
SRI Consulting Business Intelligence. (2005 ). Examples of successful VALS applications in health. Menlo Park, CA: Author.
55.
SRI Consulting Business Intelligence. (2007 ). Welcome to VALS. Retrieved March 12, 2007, from http://www.sric-bi.com/VALS/
56.
Steinmetz, K.A., & Potter, J.D. ( 1996). Vegetables, fruit, and cancer prevention: A review. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 96, 1027-1036.
57.
Thompson, R.L., Margetts, B.M., Speller, V.M., & McVey, D. ( 1999). The Health Education Authority’s health and lifestyle survey, 1993: Who are the low fruit and vegetable consumers?Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 53, 294-299.
58.
Trudeau, E., Kristal, A.R., Li, S., & Patterson, R.E. (1998). Demographic and psychosocial predictors of fruit and vegetable intakes differ: Implications for dietary interventions. Journal of the American Dietetic Association , 98, 1412-1417.
59.
Vandenberg, R.J., & Lance, C.E. ( 2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4-69.
60.
Van Duyn, M.A.S., Kristal, A.R., Dodd, K., Campbell, M.K., Subar, A.F., Stables, G., et al. (2001). Association of awareness, intrapersonal and interpersonal factors, and stage of dietary change with fruit and vegetable consumption: A national survey. American Journal of Health Promotion, 16, 69-78.
61.
Weaver, M., Poehlitz, M., & Hutchison, S. ( 1999). 5 A Day for low-income families: Evaluation of an advertising campaign and cooking events. Journal of Nutrition Education , 31, 161-169.
62.
Zenk, S.N., Schulz, A.J., Hollis-Neely, T., Campbell, R.T., Holmes, N., Watkins, G., et al. (2005). Fruit and vegetable intake in African Americans: Income and store characteristics. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 29, 1-9.
