One of the most challenging diabetes-related behavior changes is adhering to a healthful diet. Drawing on the social cognitive theory and social support literature, this qualitative study explores how spousal support influences dietary changes following a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes in middle-aged and older adults. The purpose of this study was to determine how aspects of the spousal relationship translate into behavior changes, specifically adherence to a healthful diet. Analyses revealed five core themes related to dietary adherence: control over food, dietary competence, commitment to support, spousal communication, and coping with diabetes. The themes can be categorized within two key social cognitive theory constructs: reinforcement and self-efficacy. Implications from the focus group data can inform the development of more effective, targeted nutrition messages and programs to provide specific knowledge and skills.
Anderson, E.S., Winett, R.A., Wojcik, J.R., Winett, S.G., & Bowden, R. (2001). A computerized social cognitive intervention for nutrition behavior: Direct and mediated effects on fat, fiber, fruits, and vegetables, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations among food shoppers. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 23, 88-100.
2.
Ary, D.V., Toobert, D., Wilson, W., & Glasgow, R.E. (1986). Patient perspectives on factors contributing to nonadherence to diabetes regimen. Diabetes Care, 9, 168-172.
3.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5.
Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175-1184.
6.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
7.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective . Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26.
8.
Bandura, A. (2004). Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Education & Behavior, 31, 143-164.
9.
Barrera, M. (2000). Social support research in community psychology . In J. Rapaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology . New York: Kluwer Academic.
10.
Berkman, L.F., Glass, T., Brissette, I., & Seeman, T.E. (2000). From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Social Science & Medicine, 51, 843-857.
11.
Burg, M.M., & Seeman, T.E. (1994). Families and health: The negative side of social ties. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 16, 109-115.
12.
Burke, V., Gianguilio, N., Gillam, H.F., Beilin, L.J., & Houghton, S. (2003). Physical activity and nutrition programs for couples: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , 56, 421-432.
13.
Conn, V.S., Bruks, K.J., Pomeroy, S.H., Ulbrich, S.L., & Cochran, J.E. (2003). Older women and exercise: Explanatory concepts . Women's Health Issues, 13, 158-166.
14.
Connell, C.M., Davis, W.K., Gallant, M.P., & Sharpe, P.A. (1994). Impact of social support, social cognitive variables, and perceived threat on depression among adults with diabetes. Health Psychology, 13, 263-273.
15.
Day, J.L., Bodmer, C.W., & Dunn, O.M. (1996). Development of a questionnaire identifying factors responsible for successful self-management of insulin-treated diabetes. Diabetic Medicine, 13, 564-573.
16.
Garay-Sevilla, M.E., Nava, L.E., Malacara, J.M., Huerta, R., Diaz de Leon, J., Mena, A., et al. (1995). Adherence to treatment and social support in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus . Journal of Diabetes Complications, 9, 81-86.
17.
Grembowski, D., Patrick, D., Diehr, P., Durham, M., Beresford, S., Kay, E., et al. (1993). Self-efficacy and health behavior among older adults. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 34, 89-104.
18.
Hippisley-Cox, J., Coupland, C., Pringle, M., Crown, N., & Hammersley, V. (2002). Married couples' risk of same disease: Cross-sectional study. British Medical Journal , 325, 636-641.
19.
House, J.S., Landis, K.R., & Umberson, D. (1988). Social relationships and health. Science, 241, 540-545.
20.
Kaplan, S.H., Greenfield, S., and Ware, J.E., Jr. (1989). Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease . Medical Care, 27, S110-S127.
21.
Khan, A., Lasker, S.S., & Chowdbury, T.A. (2003). Are spouses of patients with type 2 diabetes at increased risk of developing diabetes? Diabetes Care, 26, 710-712.
22.
Krueger, R.A. (1994, 2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (2nd &3rd eds.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
23.
Mokdad, A.H., Bowman, B.A., Ford, E.S., Vinicor, F., Marks, J.S., & Koplan, J.P. (2001). The continuing epidemics of obesity and diabetes in the United States. JAMA, 286, 1195-1200.
24.
Morgan, D.L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications.
25.
Morse, J. (1994). Designing funded qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 220-235). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
O'Leary, A. (1985). Self-efficacy and health. Behavior Research and Therapy, 23, 437-451.
27.
Pearlin, L.I., Lieberman, M.A., Menaghan, E.G., & Mullan, J.T. (1981). The stress process. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 22, 337-356.
28.
Pieper, B.A., Kushion, W., & Gaida, S. (1990). The relationship between a couple's marital adjustment and beliefs about diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Educator, 16, 108-112.
29.
Ruggiero, L., Spirito, A., Bond, A., Coustan, D., & McGarvey, S. (1990). Impact of social support and stress on compliance in women with gestational diabetes. Diabetes Care, 13, 441-443.
30.
Savoca, M., & Miller, C. (2001). Food selection and eating patterns: Themes found among people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Journal of Nutrition Education, 33, 224-233.
31.
Trief, P.M., Himes, C.R., Orendorff, R., & Weinstock, R.S. (2001). The marital relationship and psychosocial adaptation and glycemic control of individuals with diabetes . Diabetes Care, 28, 1348-1389.
32.
Trief, P.M., Wade, M.J., Britton, K.D., & Weinstock, R.S. (2002). A prospective analysis of marital relationship factors and quality of life in diabetes. Diabetes Care, 25, 1154-1158.
33.
Williams, G.C., Freedman, Z.R., and Deci, E.L. (1998). Supporting autonomy to motivate patients with diabetes for glucose control. Diabetes Care, 21, 1644-1651.
