Theory-driven, mass media interventions prevent smoking among youth. This study examined effects of a media campaign on adolescent smoking cessation. Four matched pairs of media markets in four states were randomized to receive or not receive a 3-year television/radio campaign aimed at adolescent smoking cessation based on social cognitive theory. The authors enrolled 2,030 adolescent smokers into the cohort (n = 987 experimental; n = 1,043 comparison) and assessed them via annual telephone surveys for 3 years. Although the condition by time interaction was not significant, the proportion of adolescents smoking in the past month was significantly lower in the experimental than comparison condition at 3-year follow-up when adjusted for baseline smoking status. The media campaign did not impact targeted mediating variables. A media campaign based on social cognitive constructs produced a modest overall effect on smoking prevalence among adolescents, but the role of theory-based constructs is unclear.
Aaker, D., & Brussone, D. (1981). Viewer perceptions of prime time television advertising . Journal of Advertising Research, 21, 15-23.
2.
Aveyard, P., Cheng, K.K., Almond, J., Sherratt, E., Lancashire, R., Lawrence, T., et al. (1999). A cluster-randomized controlled trial of an expert system based on the transtheoretical ("stages of change") model for smoking prevention and cessation in schools. British Medical Journal, 319, 948-953.
3.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
Biener, L. (2002). Anti-tobacco advertisements by Massachusetts and Philip Morris: What teenagers think. Tobacco Control, 11(Suppl. II), ii43-ii46.
5.
Biener, L., Ji, M., Gilpin, E.A., & Albers, A.B. (2004). The impact of emotional tone, message, and broadcast parameters in youth anti-smoking advertisements. Journal of Health Communication, 9, 259-274.
6.
Brown, B.B., Mory, M.S., & Kinney, D. (1994). Casting adolescent crowds in a relational perspective: Caricature, channel, and context. In R. Montemayor , G. R. Adams, & T. P. Gullota (Eds.), Personal relationships during adolescence (pp. 123-167). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Brown, H., & Prescott, R. (1999). Applied mixed models in medicine. New York: John Wiley.
8.
Burt, R., & Peterson, A. (1998). Smoking cessation among high school seniors. Preventive Medicine, 27, 319-327.
9.
Farrelly, M.C., Healton, C.G., Davis, K.C., Messeri, P., Hersey, J.C., & Haviland, L. (2002). Getting to the truth: Evaluating national tobacco countermarketing campaigns. American Journal of Public Health , 92, 901-907.
10.
Farrelly, M.C., Niederdeppe, J., & Yarsevich, J. (2003). Youth tobacco prevention mass media campaigns: Past, present and future directions. Tobacco Control, 12(Suppl. 1), i35-i47.
11.
Flynn, B.S., Worden, J.K., Secker-Walker, R.H., Badger, G.J., Geller, B.M., & Costanza, M.C. (1992). Prevention of cigarette smoking through mass media intervention and school programs. American Journal of Public Health, 82, 827-834.
12.
Flynn, B.S., Worden, J.K., Secker-Walker, R.H., Pirie, P.L., Badger, G.J., Carpenter, J.H., et al. (1994). Mass media and school interventions for cigarette smoking prevention: Effects 2 years after completion. American Journal of Public Health, 84, 1148-1150.
13.
Garrison, M.M., Christakis, D.A., Ebel, B.E., Wiehe, S.E., & Rivara, F.P. (2003). Smoking cessation interventions for adolescents: A systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine , 25, 363-367.
14.
Hafstad, A., Aaro, L.E., Engeland, A., Anderson, A., Langmark, F., & Stray-Pedersen, B. (1997). Provocative appeals in anti-smoking mass media campaigns targeting adolescents: The accumulated effect of multiple exposures. Health Education Research, 12, 227-236.
15.
Hafstad, A., Aaro, L.E., & Langmark, F. (1996). Evaluation of an anti-smoking mass media campaign targeting adolescents: The role of affective responses and interpersonal communication . Health Education Research, 11, 29-38.
16.
Hannan, P.J., & Murray, D.M. (1996). Gauss or Bernoulli? A Monte Carlo comparison of the performance of the linear mixed-model analyses in simulated community trials with a dichotomous outcome variable at the individual level. Evaluation Review, 20, 338-352.
17.
Hornik, R., Maklan, D., Cadell, D., Prado, A., Barmada, C., Jacobsohn, L., et al. (2002). Evaluation of the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign: Fourth semi-annual report of findings. Report prepared for the National Institute on Drug Abuse (Contract No. N01DA-8-5063) . Washington, DC: Westat.
18.
Hurt, R.D., Croghan, G.A., Beede, S.D., Wolter, T.D., Croghan, I.T., & Patten, C.A. (2000). Nicotine patch therapy in 101 adolescent smokers: Efficacy, withdrawal symptom relief, and carbon monoxide and plasma cotinine levels. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 154, 31-37.
19.
Johnston, L.D., O'Malley, P.M., Bachman, J.G., & Schulenberg, J.E. (2004). Monitoring the future national results on adolescent drug use: Overview of key findings, 2003. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
20.
Lowry, R., Kann, L., Collins, J.L., & Kolbe, L.J. (1996). The effect of socioeconomic status on chronic disease risk behaviors among US adolescents. Journal of the American Medical Association, 276, 792-797.
21.
McDonald, P., Colwell, B., Backinger, C.L., Husten, C., & Maule, C.O. (2003). Better practice for youth tobacco cessation: Evidence of review panel. American Journal of Health Behavior, 27(Suppl. 2), S144-S158.
22.
Murray, D.M. (1998). Design and analysis of group-randomized trials . New York: Oxford University Press .
23.
Murray, D.M., Hannan, P.J., & Baker, W.L. (1996). A Monte Carlo study of alternative responses to intraclass correlation in community trials. Is it ever possible to avoid Cornfield's penalties?Evaluation Review, 20, 313-337.
24.
Murray, D.M., Hannan, P.J., Wolfinger, R.D., Baker, W.L., & Dwyer, J.H. (1998). Analysis of data from group-randomized trials with repeat observations on the same groups. Statistics in Medicine, 17, 1581-1600.
25.
Palmgreen, P., Donohew, L., Lorch, E.P., Hoyle, R.H., & Stephenson, M.T. (2001). Television campaigns and adolescent marijuana use: Tests of sensation seeking targeting. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 292-296.
26.
Pechmann, C., & Reibling, E.T. (2000). Anti-smoking advertising campaigns targeting youth: Case studies from USA and Canada. Tobacco Control, 9(Suppl. II), ii18-ii31.
27.
Rideout, V., Roberts, D.R., & Foehr, U.G. (2005). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8-18 year-olds (Publication No. 7250). Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
28.
Robinson, L.A., Vander Weg, M.W., Riedel, B.W., Klesges, R.C., & McLain-Allen, B. (2003). "Start to stop": Results of a randomised controlled trial of a smoking cessation programme for teens . Tobacco Control, 12(Suppl. 4), IV26-IV33.
29.
SAS Institute Inc. (2000). SAS system for Windows (Version 8.1) [Computer software]. Cary, NC: Author.
Solomon, L.J., Bunn, J.Y., Pirie, P.L., Worden, J.K., & Flynn, B.S. (2006). Self-efficacy and outcome expectations for quitting among adolescent smokers. Addictive Behaviors, 31, 1122-1132.
32.
Stanton, W.R., Lowe, J.B., & Gillespie, A.M. (1996). Adolescents' experiences of smoking cessation. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 43, 63-70.
33.
Stanton, W.R., McClelland, M., Elwood, C., Ferry, D., & Silva, P.A. (1996). Prevalence, reliability and bias of adolescents' reports of smoking and quitting. Addiction, 91, 1705-1714.
34.
Sussman, S., Lichtman, K., Ritt, A., & Pallonen, U.E. (1999). Effects of thirty-four adolescent tobacco use cessation and prevention trials on regular users of tobacco products. Substance Use and Misuse, 34, 1469-1503.
35.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). General characteristics: Race and Hispanic or Latino: 2000 data set census (SF1) (SF3). Retrieved October 5, 2005, from http://www.census.gov
36.
Worden, J.K., Flynn, B.S., Geller, B.M., Chen, M., Shelton, L.G., Secker-Walker, R.H., et al. (1988). Development of a smoking prevention mass media program using diagnostic and formative research. Preventive Medicine, 17, 531-558.
