This study hypothesized a multilevel model to examine the contextual effects of gender norms, exposure to health-related radio programs, interpersonal communication, and social capital on family planning behavior in Uganda. The results of hierarchical linear modeling showed that all of the four variables were significant predictors of family planning behavior. The authors found that gender norms as a contextual factor significantly interacted with the individual-level perceived benefit. The significant cross-level interaction effect was also observed between individuals' interpersonal communication and contextual variation in listening to a health-related radio program. Practical implications for family planning communication campaigns are discussed.
Allard, R. (1989). Beliefs about AIDS as determinants of preventive practices and of support for coercive measures. American Journal of Public Health, 79, 448-452.
2.
Asch, S.E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs , 70(9, Whole No. 416), 1-70.
3.
Bandura, A. (1994). Social cognitive theory and exercise of control over HIV infection. In J. L. Peterson (Ed.), Preventing AIDS theories and methods of behavioral interventions (pp. 25-59). New York: Plenum.
4.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
5.
Blau, P.M. (1960). Structural effects. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 178-193.
6.
Cammack, M., & Heaton, T.B. (2001). Regional variation in acceptance of Indonesia's family planning program. Population Research and Policy Review , 20(6), 565-585.
7.
Campbell, C., Williams, B., & Gilgen, D. (2002). Is social capital a useful conceptual tool for exploring community level influences on HIV infection? An exploratory case study from South Africa. AIDS Care, 14(1), 41-54.
8.
Chaffee, S.H. (1982). Mass media and interpersonal channels: Competitive, convergent, or complementary? In R. Cathart (Ed.), Inter/media: Interpersonal communication in a media world (pp. 57-77). New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
Feyisetan, B.J. (2000). Spousal communication and contraceptive use among the Yoruba of Nigeria. Population Research and Policy Review , 19(1), 29-45.
11.
Frohlich, K.L., Potvin, L., Chabot, P., & Corin, E. (2002). A theoretical and empirical analysis of context: Neighborhoods, smoking and youth. Social Science and Medicine , 54, 1401-1417.
12.
Goodson, P. (1997). Protestants and family planning. Journal of Religion & Health, 36(4), 353-366.
13.
Goodson, P. (2002). Predictors of intention to promote family planning: Survey of Protestant seminarians in the United States. Health Education & Behavior, 29(5), 521-541.
14.
Greenwell, K.F. (1996). Contraceptive method mix menu: Providing healthy choices for women. World Health Statistics Quarterly, 49(2), 88-93.
15.
Gupta, N., Katende, C., & Bessinger, R. (2003). Associations of mass media exposure with family planning attitudes and practices in Uganda. Studies in Family Planning, 34(1), 19-31.
16.
Hox, J.J. (1995). Applied multi-level analysis. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: TT-Publikaties.
17.
Kawachi, I., Kennedy, B.P., Lochner, K., & Prothrow-Stith, D. (1997). Social capital, income inequality, and mortality. American Journal of Public Health , 87, 1491-1498.
18.
Kreft, I., & de Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
Kvalem, I.L., & Traeen, B. (2000). Self-efficacy, scripts of love and intention to use condoms among Norwegian adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29(3), 337-353.
20.
Magadi, M.A., & Curtis, S.L. (2003). Trends and determinants of contraceptive method choice in Kenya. Studies in Family Planning, 34(3), 149-159.
21.
Malhotra, A., Schuler, S.R., & Boender, C. (2002). Measuring women's empowerment as a variable in international development. Retrieved March 12, 2004, from http://www.worldbank.org/poverty/empowerment/events/feb03/pdf/malhotra.pdf
22.
Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Harper & Row.
23.
Mutz, D.C. (1998). Impersonal influence: How perceptions of mass collectives affect political attitudes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Nabukera, S., Witte, K., Bajunirwe, F., Muchunguzi, C., Mulogo, E., Batwala, V., et al. (2002). Evaluation of DISH II special interventions (Uganda): Final report. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
25.
Paisley, W. (1984). Communication in the communication sciences. In B. Dervin & M. J. Voigt (Eds.), Progress in the communication sciences (Vol. 5, pp. 1-43). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
26.
Paek, H.-J., Yoon, S.-H., & Shah, D. (2005) Local news, social integration, and community participation: Hierarchical linear modeling of contextual and cross-level effects. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82, 587-606.
27.
Pan, Z., & McLeod, J.M. (1991). Multilevel analysis in mass communication research. Communication Research, 18(2), 140-173.
28.
Paterson, L., & Goldstein, H. (1992). New statistical methods for analyzing social structures: An introduction to multilevel models. British Educational Research Journal, 17, 387-393.
29.
Piotrow, P.T., Kincaid, D.L., Rimon, J.G., II ,& Rinehart, W. (1997). Health communication: Lessons from family planning and reproductive health. Westport, CT: Praeger.
30.
Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
31.
Raudenbush, S.W., & Bryk, A.S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
Rimal, R.N., Flora, J.A., & Schooler, C. (1999). Achieving improvements in overall health orientation: Effects of campaign exposure, information seeking, and health media use. Communication Research, 26(3), 322-348.
33.
Price, V., Ritchie, D.L., & Eulau, H. (1991). Cross-level challenges for communication research: Epilogue. Communication Research, 18(2), 262-271.
34.
Rosenstock, I.M. (1974). Historical origin of the health belief model. In M. H. Becker (Ed.), The health belief model and personal health behavior (pp. 1-8). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
35.
Rosenstock, I.M., Strecher, V.J., & Becker, M.H. (1988). Social learning theory and the health belief model . Health Education Quarterly, 15(2), 175-183.
36.
Rutter, D., & Quine, L. (2002). Social cognition models and changing behaviours . In L. Quine (Ed.), Changing health behaviour: Intervention and research with cognition models (pp. 1-27). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
37.
Schwarzer, R., & Fuchs, R. (1995). Changing risk behaviors and adopting health behaviors: The role of self-efficacy beliefs. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 1-45). New York: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Serageldin, I., & Grootaert, C. (1999). Defining social capital: An integrating view. In P. Dasgupta & I. Serageldin (Eds.), Social capital: A multifaceted perspective (pp. 40-58). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
39.
Smith, N., Littlejohns, L.B., & Thompson, D. (2001). Shaking out the cobwebs: Insights into community capacity and its relation to health outcomes. Community Development Journal, 36(1), 30-41.
40.
Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
41.
Stephenson, R., & Tsui, A.O. (2002). Contextual influences on reproductive health service use in Uttar Pradesh, India. Studies in Family Planning, 33(4), 309-320.
42.
Storey, D., Boulay, M., Karki, Y., Heckert, K., & Karmacharya, D.M. (1999). Impact of the integrated Radio Communications Project in Nepal, 1994-1997. Journal of Health Communication, 4(4), 271-294.
43.
United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). (2002 ). Women and gender inequality. State of world population 2002: People, poverty and possibilities. Retrieved March 5, 2004, from http://www.unfpa.org/swp/2002/english/ch4/page3.htm
44.
Valante, T.W., & Saba, W.P. (1998). Mass media and interpersonal influence in a reproductive health communication campaign in Bolivia. Communication Research , 25(1), 96-124.
45.
Varga, C.A. (2003). How gender roles influence sexual and reproductive health among South African adolescents. Studies in Family Planning, 34(3), 160-172.
46.
Volk, J.E., & Koopman, C. (2001). Factors associated with condom use in Kenya: A test of the health belief model. AIDS Education and Prevention , 13(6), 495-508.
47.
Waszak, C., Severy, L.J., Kafafi, L., & Badawi, I. (2003). Fertility behavior and psychological stress: The mediating influence of gender norm beliefs among Egyptian women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25(3), 197-208.
48.
Winfield, E.B., & Whaley, A.L. (2002). A comprehensive test of the health belief model in the prediction of condom use among African American college students. Journal of Black Psychology, 28(4), 330-346.
49.
World Health Organization [WHO]. (2006). Family planning. Retrieved September 2, 2006, from http://www.who.int/topics/family_planning/en/
50.
Zaltman, G., & Duncan, R. (1977). Strategies for planned change. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
