This article compares prevalence estimates of substance use and delinquent behavior in Washington State, United States and Victoria, Australia, two states chosen for their different policy environments around problem behavior. Few comparisons of international differences on rates of multiple problem behavior exist, and most are based on methods that are not matched, raising the question of whether findings are based on methodological differences rather than actual rate differences. The International Youth Development Study used standardized methods to recruit and administer an adaptation of the Communities That Care Youth Survey to representative state samples of fifth-, seventh-, and ninth-grade students in each state. Rates of delinquent behavior were generally comparable. However, striking differences in substance use were noted, with Victoria students reporting higher rates of alcohol use, alcohol misuse, smoking, and inhalant use, whereas Washington State students reported higher rates of marijuana use. Implications for conducting international comparisons are discussed.
Alsaker, F.D., & Flammer, A. (1999). The adolescent experience: European and American adolescents in the 1990s. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
Arthur, M.W., Hawkins, J.D., Pollard, J.A., Catalano, R.F., & Baglioni, A.J. , Jr. (2002). Measuring risk and protective factors for substance use, delinquency, and other adolescent problem behaviors: The Communities That Care Youth Survey. Evaluation Review, 26, 575-601.
3.
Australia Bureau of Statistics. (2001). 2001 census of population and housing. Canberra: Australia Bureau of Statistics.
4.
Bauer, U.E., & Johnson, T.M. (2000). Editing data: What difference do consistency checks make?American Journal of Epidemiology, 151, 921-926.
5.
Beyers, J.M., Evans-Whipp, T., Mathers, M., Toumbourou, J.W., & Catalano, R.F. (2005). An international comparison of the school drug policy environments in Washington State, U.S. and Victoria, Australia. Journal of School Health, 75, 134-140.
6.
Beyers, J.M., Toumbourou, J.W., Catalano, R.F., Arthur, M.W., & Hawkins, J.D. (2004). A cross-national comparison of risk and protective factors for adolescent substance use: The United States and Australia. Journal of AdolescentHealth, 35, 3-16.
7.
Carson, E., & Martin, S. (2001). Social disadvantage in South Australia. Adelaide: Social Policy Research Group, University of South Australia, and the South Australia Council of Social Services.
8.
Caulkins, J.P., & Reuter, P. (1997). Setting goals for drug policy: Harm reduction or use reduction?Addiction, 92, 1143-1150.
9.
Chikritzhs, T., & Pascal, R. (2004). Trends in youth alcohol consumption and related harms in Australian jurisdictions, 1990-2002 (National Alcohol Indicators Bulletin No. 6). Sydney: Curtin University, National Drug Research Institute.
10.
Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing. ( 2002). Return on investment in needle and syringe programs in Australia: Summary report. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing.
11.
Denny, S.J., Clark, T.C., & Watson, P.D. (2003). Comparison of health-risk behaviors among students in alternative high schools from New Zealand and the USA. Journal of Pediatrics andChild Health, 39, 33-39.
12.
Directorate of School Education. (1994). Guidelines for developing the student code of conduct. Melbourne: Directorate of School Education.
13.
Evans-Whipp, T., Beyers, J.M., Lloyd, S., LaFazia, A.N., Toumbourou, J.W., Arthur, M.W., et al. (2004). A review of school drug policies and their impact on youth substance use. Health Promotion International , 19, 227-234.
14.
Fendrich, M., & Johnson, T.P. (2001). Examining prevalence differences in three national surveys of youth: Impact of consent procedures, mode, and editing rules. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 615-642.
15.
Gfroerer, J., Wright, D., & Kopstein, A. (1997). Prevalence of youth substance use: The impact of methodological differences between two national surveys. Drug & Alcohol Dependence, 47, 19-30.
16.
Glaser, R.R., Van Horn, M.L., Arthur, M.W., Hawkins, J.D., & Catalano, R.F. (2005). Measurement properties of the Communities That Care Youth Survey across demographic groups. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21, 73-102.
17.
Hambleton, R.K. (1994). Guidelines for adapting educational and psychological tests: A progress report. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 10, 229-244.
18.
Hibbert, M., Caust, J., Patton, G.C., Rosier, M., & Bowes, G. (1996). The health of young people in Victoria: Adolescent Health Survey. Melbourne: Centre for Adolescent Health Monograph (ISBN 0 646 28831 8).
Hingson, R., Heeren, T., Winter, M., & Wechsler, H. (2005). Magnitude of alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students ages 18-24: Changes from 1998-2001. Annual Review of Public Health, 26, 259-79.
21.
Hosman, C.M.H., & Clayton, R. (2000). Prevention and health promotion on the international scene: The need for a more effective and comprehensive approach. Addictive Behaviors, 25, 943-954.
22.
Huizinga, D., & Elliott, D.S. (1986). Reassessing the reliability and validity of self-report delinquency measures. Journal of QuantitativeCriminology , 2, 293-327.
23.
Hunt, G., & Barker, J.C. (2001). Socio-cultural anthropology and alcohol and drug research: Towards a unified theory. Social Science & Medicine , 53, 165-188.
24.
Jessor, R., Turbin, M.S., Costa, F.M., Dong, Q., Zhang, H., & Wang, C. (2003). Adolescent problem behavior in China and the United States: A cross-national study of psychosocial protective factors. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13, 329-360.
25.
Johnston, L.D., O'Malley, P.M., Bachman, J.G., & Schulenberg, J.E. (2004). Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2003. Volume 1: Secondary school students (NIH Publication No. 04-5507). Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
26.
Kish, L. (1965). Survey sampling. New York: John Wiley.
27.
Makkai, T. (1994). Patterns of drug use: Australia and the United States. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
28.
Maxwell, J.C. (2003). Update: Comparison of drug use in Australia and the United States as seen in the 2001 National Household Surveys. Drug and Alcohol Review, 22, 347-357.
29.
McMorris, B.J., Clements, J., Evans-Whipp, T., Ganges, D., Bond, L., Toumbourou, J.W., et al. (2004). A comparison of methods to obtain active parental consent for an international student survey. Evaluation Review, 28, 64-83.
30.
Ministerial Council on Drug Strategy. (1998 ). National Drug Strategic Framework 1998-1999 to 2002-2003: Building partnerships. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia Ministerial Council on Drug Strategy.
31.
Needle, R., McCubbin, H.I., Lorence, J., & Hochhauser, M. (1983). Reliability and validity of adolescent self-reported drug use in a family-based study: A methodological report. International Journal of the Addictions, 18, 901-912.
32.
Office of Superintendent for Public Instruction. (2002). School enrollment summary: Washington State school districts school year 2001-2002. Olympia: Washington State Office of Superintendent for Public Instruction.
33.
Perneger, T.V. (1998). What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. British Medical Journal, 316, 1236-1238.
34.
Pirkis, J.E., Irwin, C.E., Brindis, C., Patton, G.C., & Sawyer, M.G. (2003). Adolescent substance use: Beware of international comparisons. Journal of Adolescent Health, 33, 279-286.
35.
Pollard, J.A., Hawkins, J.D., & Arthur, M.W. (1999). Risk and protection: Are both necessary to understand diverse behavioral outcomes in adolescence?Social Work Research , 23, 145-158.
36.
Pritchard, C., & Evans, B.T. (2001). An international comparison of “youth” (15-24) and “adult” (25-34) homicide 1974-94: Highlighting the U.S. anomaly. Critical Public Health, 11, 83-93.
37.
Reuter, P., & Mouzos, J. (2003). Australia; A massive buyback of low-risk guns . In J. Ludwig & P. Cook (Eds.), Evaluating gun policy: Effects on crime and violence (pp. 121-156). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
38.
Rothman, K.J. (1990). No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons . Epidemiology, 1, 43-46.
39.
Savitz, D.A., & Olshan, A.F. (1985). Multiple comparisons and related issues in the interpretation of epidemiologic data. American Journal of Epidemiology, 122, 1080-1095.
40.
Segall, M.H., Lonner, W.J., & Berry, J.W. (1998). Cross-cultural psychology as a scholarly discipline: On the flowering of culture in behavioral research. American Psychologist, 53, 1101-1110.
41.
Skiba, R.J., & Peterson, R.L. (1999). The dark side of zero tolerance: Can punishment lead to safe schools?Phi Delta Kappan,80, 372-376, 381-382.
42.
Smith-Khuri, E., Iachan, R., Scheidt, P.C., Overpeck, M.D., Grabhainn, S.N., Pickett, W., et al. (2004). A cross-national study of violence-related behaviors in adolescents. Archives of Pediatrics &Adolescent Medicine, 158, 539-544.
43.
STATA Corporation. (2003). Intercooled STATA 8 for Windows (Version Intercooled STATA 8 for Windows). College Station, TX: Author.
44.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Population estimates, census of population and housing 2000. Washington, DC: Author.
45.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. ( 2000). Healthy People 2010: Understanding and improving health and objectives for improving health (2 vols., 2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
46.
Unger, J.B., Yan, L., Shakib, S., Rohrbach, L.A., Chen, X., Qian, G., et al. (2002). Peer influences and access to cigarettes as correlates of adolescent smoking: A cross-cultural comparison of Wuhan, China and California. Preventive Medicine, 34, 476-484.
47.
Vassallo, S., Smart, D., Sanson, A., Dussuyer, I., McKendry, B., Toumbourou, J.W., et al. (2002). Patterns and precursors of adolescent antisocial behaviour. Melbourne: Crime Prevention Victoria.
48.
Verhulst, F.C., Achenbach, T.M., Van der Ende, J., Erol, N., Lambert, M.C., Leung, P.W.L., et al. (2003). Comparisons of problems reported by youths from seven countries. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 1479-1485.
