Adequate functional literacy skills positively influence individuals' ability to take control of their health. Print and Web-basedcancer informationis oftenwritten at difficult readinglevels. This systematic review evaluates readability instruments (FRE, F-K, Fog, SMOG, Fry) used to assess print and Web-based cancer information and word recognition and comprehension tests (Cloze, REALM, TOFHLA, WRAT) that measure people's health literacy. Articles on readability and comprehension instruments explicitly used for cancer information were assembled by searching MEDLINE and Psyc INFO from 1993 to 2003. In all, 23 studies were included; 16 on readability, 6 on comprehension, and 1 on readability and comprehension. Of the readability investigations, 14 focused on print materials, and 2 assessed Internet information. Comprehension and word recognition measures were not applied to Web-based information. None of the formulas were designed to determine the effects ofvisuals ordesignfactorsthat couldinfluencereadabilityandcomprehensionofcancereducationinformation.
Bailin, A., & Grafstein, A. (2001). The linguistic assumptions underlying readability formulae: A critique. Language & Communication, 21, 285-301.
2.
Baker, D. W., Parker, R. M., Williams, M. V., & Scott Clark, W. (1998). Health literacy and the risk of hospital admission. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 13, 791-798.
3.
Baker, D. W., Williams, M. V., Parker, R. M., Gazmararian, J. A., & Nurss, J. (1999). Development of a brief test to measure functional health literacy. Patient Education and Counseling, 38,33-42.
4.
Bass, P. F., Wilson, J. F., & Griffith, C. H. (2001). A shortened instrument for literacy screening. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16, 117-117.
5.
Bass, P. F., Wilson, J. F., Griffith, C. H., & Barnett, D. R. (2002). Residents' ability to identify patients with poor literacy skills. Academic Medicine, 77, 1039-1041.
6.
Beaver, K., & Luker, K. (1997). Readability of patient information booklets for women with breast cancer. Patient Education and Counseling, 31, 95-102.
7.
Bennett, C. L., Ferreira, M. R., Davis, T. C., Kaplan, J., Weinberger, M., Kuzel, T., et al. (1998). Relation between literacy, race, and stage of presentation among low-income patients with prostate cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 16, 3101-3104.
8.
Berland, G. K., Elliott, M. N., Morales, L. S., Algazy, J. I., Kravitz, R. L., Broder, M. S., et al. (2001). Health information on the Internet: Accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2612-2621.
9.
Bradley, M., Singleton, M., & Li Wan Po, A. (1994). Readability of patient information leaflets on over-the-counter (OTC) medicines. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 19(1),7-15.
10.
Butow, P., Brindle, E., McConnell, D., Boakes, R., & Tattersall, M. (1998). Information booklets about cancer: Factors influencing patient satisfaction and utilisation. Patient Education and Counseling, 33, 129-141.
11.
Chi-Lum, B. (1999). Friend or foe? Consumers using the Internet for medical information. Journal of Medical Practice Management, 14, 196-198.
12.
Chung, V., Horowitz, A. M., Cantos, M. T., & Siriphant, P. (2000). Oral cancer educational materials for the general public: 1998. Journal of Public Health Dentistry, 60(1), 49-52.
13.
Cooley, M. E., Moriarty, H., Berger, M. S., Selm-Orr, D., Coyle, B., & Short, T. (1995). Patient literacy and the readability of written cancer educational materials. Oncology Nursing Forum, 22, 1345-1351.
14.
Dale, E., & Chall, J. S. (1949). The concept of readability. Elementary English, 26, 23-23.
15.
D'Alessandro, D. M., Kingsley, P., & Johnson-West, J. (2001). The readability of pediatric patient education materials on the World Wide Web. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 155, 807-812.
16.
Davis, T. C., Arnold, C., Berkel, H. J., Nandy, I., Jackson, R. H., & Glass, J. (1996). Knowledge and attitude on screening mammography among low-literacy, low income women. Cancer, 78, 1912-1920.
17.
Davis, T. C., Crouch, M. A., Long, S. W., Jackson, R. H., Bates, P., & George, R. B. (1991). Rapid assessment of literacy levels of adult primary care patients. Family Medicine, 23, 433-435.
18.
Davis, T. C., Long, S. W., Jackson, R. H., Mayeaux, E. J., George, R. B., Murphy, P.W., et al. (1993). Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: A shortened screening instrument. Family Medicine, 25, 391-395.
19.
Davis, T. C., Mayeaux, E. J., Fredrickson, D., Bocchini, J. A., Jr., Jackson, R. H., & Murphy, P. W. (1994). Reading ability of parents compared with reading level of pediatric patient education materials. Pediatrics, 93, 460-468.
20.
Davis, T. C., Michielutte, R., Askov, E. N., Williams, M. V., & Weiss, B. D. (1998). Practical assessment of adult literacy in healthcare. Health Education & Behavior, 25, 613-624.
21.
Davis, T. C., Williams, M. V., Marin, E., Parker, R. M., & Glass, J. (2002). Health literacy and cancer communication. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 52, 134-149.
22.
Doak, C. C., Doak, L. G., Friedell, G. H., & Meade, C. D. (1998). Improving comprehension for cancer patients with low literacy skills: Strategies for clinicians. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 48, 151-162.
23.
Doak, L. G., Doak, C. C., & Meade, C. D. (1996). Strategies to improve cancer education materials. Oncology Nursing Forum, 23, 1305-1312.
24.
Dollahite, J., Thompson, C., & McNew, R. (1996). Readability of printed sources of diet and health information. Patient Education and Counseling, 27, 123-134.
25.
Estey, A., Kemp, M., Allison, S., & Lamb, C. (1993). Evaluation of a patient information booklet. Journal of Nursing Staff Development, 9, 276-282.
26.
Estey, A., Musseau, A., & Keehn, L. (1994). Patient's understanding of health information: A multihospital comparison. Patient Education and Counseling, 24, 73-78.
27.
Flesch, R. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32, 221-233.
28.
Foltz, A., & Sullivan, J. (1996). Reading level, learning presentation preference, and desire for information among cancer patients. Journal of Cancer Education, 11, 32-38.
29.
Foltz, A., & Sullivan, J. (1998). Get real: Clinical testing of patient reading abilities. Cancer Nursing, 21, 162-166.
30.
Friedman, D. B., & Hoffman-Goetz, L. (2003). Cancer coverage in North American publications targeting seniors. Journal of Cancer Education, 18, 43-47.
31.
Friedman, D. B., Hoffman-Goetz, L., & Arocha, J. F. (2004). Readability of cancer information on the Internet. Journal of Cancer Education, 19, 117-122.
32.
Fry, E. (1968). A readability formula that saves time. Journal of Reading, 11, 513-516.
33.
Gausman Benson, J., & Forman, W. B. (2002). Comprehension of written health care information in an affluent geriatric retirement community: Use of the test of functional health literacy. Gerontology, 48, 93-97.
34.
Gilliam, B., Pena, S., & Moutain, L. (1980). The Fry graph applied to Spanish readability. Reading Teacher, 426-430.
35.
Glazer, H. R., Kirk, L. M., & Bosler, F. E. (1996). Patient education pamphlets about prevention, detection, and treatment of breast cancer for low literacy women. Patient Education and Counseling, 27, 185-189.
36.
Gribble, J. N. (1999). Informed consent documents for BRCA1 and BRCA2 screening: How large is the readability gap?Patient Education and Counseling, 38, 175-183.
37.
Grossman, S. A., Piantadosi, S., & Covahey, C. (1994). Are informed consent forms that describe clinical oncology research protocols readable by most patients and their families?Journal of Clinical Oncology, 12, 2211-2215.
38.
Guidry, J. J., Fagan, P., & Walker, V. (1998). Cultural sensitivity and readability of breast and prostate printed cancer education materials targeting African Americans. Journal of the National Medical Association, 90, 165-169.
39.
Gunning, R. (1968). The technique of clear writing. New York: McGraw-Hill.
40.
Hafner, L. (1966). Cloze procedure. Journal of Reading, 9, 415-421.
41.
Humphris, G. M., Duncalf, M., Holt, D., & Field, E. A. (1999). The experimental evaluation of an oral cancer information leaflet. Oral Oncology, 35, 575-582.
42.
Jastak, S., & Wilkinson, G. S. (1987). Wide range achievement test-revised. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.
43.
Kincaid, J. P., Fishburne, R. P., Rogers, R. L., & Chissom, B. S. (1975). Derivation of new readability formula for navy enlisted personnel. Millington, TN: Navy Research Branch.
44.
King, M. M., Winton, A. S. W., & Adkins, A. D. (2003). Assessing the readability of mental health Internet brochuresfor children and adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 12,91-99.
45.
Klare, G. R. (1984). Readability. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 681-744). White Plains, NY: Longman.
46.
Ley, P., & Florio, T. (1996). The use of readability formulas in health care. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 1, 7-28.
47.
Lindau, S. T., Tomori, C., Lyons, T., Langseth, L., Bennett, C. L., & Garcia, P. (2002). The association of health literacy with cervical cancer prevention knowledge and health behaviors in a multiethnic cohort of women. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 186, 938-943.
48.
McCall, W. A., & Crabbs, L. M. (1961). Standard test lessons in reading. New York: Teachers College Press.
49.
McLaughlin, G. H. (1969). SMOG grading—A new readability formula. Journal of Reading, 12, 639-646.
50.
Meade, C. D., McKinney, P., & Barnas, G. P. (1994). Educating patients with limited literacy skills: The effectiveness of printed and videotaped materials about colon cancer. American Journal of Public Health, 84, 119-121.
51.
Meade, C. D., & Smith, C. F. (1991). Readability formulas: Cautions and criterias. Patient Education and Counseling, 17, 153-158.
52.
Mohrmann, C. C., Coleman, E. A., Coon, S. K., Lord, J. E., Heard, J. K., Cantrell, M. J., et al. (2000). An analysis of printed breast cancer information for African American women. Journal of Cancer Education, 15, 23-27.
53.
Nurss, J. R., Baker, D. W., Davis, T. C., Parker, R. M., & Williams, M. V. (1995). Difficulties in functional health literacy screening in Spanish-speaking adults. Journal of Reading, 38, 632-637.
54.
Nutbeam, D. (1998). Health promotion glossary. Health Promotion International, 13, 349-364.
55.
Parikh, N. S., Parker, R. M., Nurss, J. R., Baker, D. W., & Williams, M. V. (1996). Shame and health literacy: The unspoken connection. Patient Education and Counseling, 27, 33-39.
56.
Parker, R. M., Baker, D. W., Williams, M. V., & Nurss, J. R. (1995). The test of functional health literacy in adults: A new instrument for measuring patients' literacy skills. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 10, 537-541.
57.
Parker, R. M., Williams, M. V., Baker, D., & Nurss, J. R. (1996). Literacy and contraception: Exploring the link. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 88(3), 72S-77S.
58.
Paskett, E. D., Tatum, C., Wilson, A., Dignan, M., & Velez, R. (1996). Use of a photoessay to teach low-income African American women about mammography. Journal of Cancer Education, 11, 216-220.
59.
Price, J. H., & Everett, S. A. (1996). Developing cancer pamphlets for economically disadvantaged African Americans. Patient Education and Counseling, 28, 159-167.
60.
Rehe, R. F. (1984). Typography: How to make it more legible (5th ed.). Carmel, CA: Design Research International.
61.
Sharp, L. K., Zurawski, J. M., Roland, P. Y., O'Toole, C., & Hines, J. (2002). Health literacy, cervical cancer risk factors, and distress in low-income African-American women seeking colposcopy. Ethnicity & Disease, 12, 541-546.
62.
Singh, J. (2003). Reading grade level and readability of printed cancer education materials. Oncology Nursing Forum, 30, 867-870.
63.
Slaten, D., Parrott, R., & Steiner, C. (1999). Readability of skin cancer prevention brochures targeting parents of young children. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 40,997-999.
64.
Taylor, W. L. (1953). “Cloze procedure”: A new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Quarterly, 30, 415-433.
65.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (2000). Healthy People 2010. Available January 15, 2002, from http://www.health.gov/healthypeople
66.
U.S. National Cancer Institute. (1979). Readability testing in cancer communications (DHEW Publication No. 79-1689). Washington, DC: Department of Health Education and Welfare.
67.
Wilson, F. L., Baker, L. M.,Brown-Syed,C.,& Gollop, C. (2000). An analysis of the readability and cultural sensitivity of information on the National Cancer Institute's Web site: Cancer Net. Oncology Nursing Forum, 27, 1403-1409.
68.
World Health Organization. (2000). Health promotion—Provisional agenda item 3.2, EB107/4-December 1, 2000. Retrieved January 15, 2002, from http://www.who.int/gb/EB_WHA/PDF/EB107/ee4.pdf.
