A randomized controlled intervention tested the effectiveness of a community health worker (CHW) program in increasing compliance with annual preventive exams among uninsured Hispanic women living in a rural U.S.-Mexico border area. During 1999-2000, household surveys were administered to women aged 40 and older. Uninsured women not receiving routine comprehensive preventive care were invited to participate in a free comprehensive clinical exam. Participants in the initial exam were eligible to participate in the CHW (promotora) intervention. Women were randomized to one of two intervention arms. One arm received a post-card reminder for an annual preventive exam, the other a postcard reminder and follow-up visit by a promotora. Receiving the promotora intervention was associated with a 35% increase in rescreening over the postcard-only reminder (risk ratio [RR] = 1.35, 95% confidence interval 0.95-1.92). Using promotoras to increase compliance with routine screening exams is an effective strategy for reaching this female population.
1. Council on Scientific Affairs: Hispanic health in the United States. JAMA265: 248-252, 1991.
2.
2. Therrien M, Ramirez RR: The Hispanic population in the United States: March 2000, in Current Population Reports. Washington, DC, U.S. Census Bureau, 2001, pp. 1-7.
3.
3. Treviño RP, Treviño FM, Medina R, Ramirez G, Ramirez RR: Health care access among Mexican Americans with different health insurance coverage. J Health Care Poor Underserved7(2): 112-121, 1996.
4.
4. Hubbell FA, Waitzkin H, Mishra SI, Dombrink J, Chavez LR: Access to medical care for documented and undocumented Latinos in a southern California county. West J Med154: 414-417, 1991.
5.
5. Solis JM, Marks G, Garcia M, Shelton D: Acculturation, access to care, and use of preventive services by Hispanics: Findings from HHANES 1982-84. Am J Public Health80(suppl): 11-19, 1990.
6.
6. Andersen R, Zelman Lewis S, Giachello AL, Aday LA, Chiu G: Access to medical care among the Hispanic population of the southwestern United States. J Health Soc Behav22: 78-89, 1981.
7.
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Self-reported prevalence of diabetes among Hispanics—United States, 1994-1997. MMWR48(1): 8-12, 1999.
8.
8. American Cancer Society: Cancer Prevention and Early Detection: Facts and Figures 2002. Atlanta, GA, American Cancer Society, 2002.
9.
9. Eng E, Young R: Lay health advisors as community change agents. Fam Community Health15(1): 24-40, 1992.
10.
10. Witmer A, Seifer SD, Finocchio L, Leslie J, O’Neil EH: Community health workers: Integral members of the health care work force. Am J Public Health85(8): 1055-1058, 1995.
11.
11. Meister JS, Warrick LH, Guernsey de Zapien J, Wood AH: Using lay health workers: Case study of a community-based prenatal intervention. J Community Health17(1): 37-51, 1992.
12.
12. Poland ML, Giblin PT, Waller JB, Bayer IS: Development of a paraprofessional home visiting program for low-income mothers and infants. Am J Prev Med7(4): 204-207, 1991.
13.
13. Jackson EJ, Parks CP. Recruitment and training issues from selected lay health advisor programs among African Americans: A 20-year perspective. Health Educ Behav24(4): 418-431, 1997.
14.
14. Suarez L, Roche RA, Pulley LV, Weiss NS, Goldman D, Simpson DM: Why a peer intervention program for Mexican-American women failed to modify the secular trend in cancer screening. Am J Prev Med13(6): 411-417, 1997.
15.
15. Hiatt RA, Pasick RJ, Stewart S, Bloom J, Davis P, Gardiner P, et al: Community-based cancer screening for underserved women: Design and baseline findings from the breast and cervical cancer intervention study. Prev Med33: 190-203, 2001.
16.
16. Perino S: Nike-footed health workers deal with the problems of adolescent pregnancy. Public Health Rep107(2): 208-212, 1992.
17.
17. Clarke M, Clarke SJ, Jagger C: Social intervention and the elderly: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Epidemiol136(12): 1517-1523, 1992.
18.
18. Watkins EL, Harlan C, Eng E, Gansky SA, Gehan D, Larson K: Assessing the effectiveness of lay health advisors with migrant farmworkers. Fam Community Health16(4): 72-87, 1994.
19.
19. Earp JAL, Viadro CI, Vincus AA, Altpeter M, Flax V, Mayne L, et al: Lay health advisors: A strategy for getting the word out about breast cancer. Health Educ Behav24(4): 432-451, 1997.
20.
20. Corkery E, Palmer C, Foley ME, Schechter CB, Frisher L, Roman SH: Effect of a bicultural community health worker on completion of diabetes education in a Hispanic population. Diabetes Care20(3): 254-257, 1997.
21.
21. Stout JW, White LC, Rogers LT, McRorie T, Morray B, Miller-Ratcliffe M, et al: The asthma outreach project: A promising approach to comprehensive asthma management. J Asthma35(1): 119-127, 1998.
22.
22. Dick J, Clarke M, Tibbs J, Schoeman H: Combating tuberculosis-Lessons learnt from a rural community project in the Klein Drakenstein area of the Western Cape. S Afr Med J87: 1042-1047, 1997.
23.
23. Sung JFC, Blumenthal DS, Coates RJ, Williams JE, Alema-Mensah E, Liff JM: Effect of a cancer screening intervention conducted by lay health workers among inner-city women. Am J Prev Med13(1): 51-57, 1997.
24.
24. Krieger J, Collier C, Song L, Martin D: Linking community-based blood pressure measurement to clinical care: A randomized controlled trial of outreach and tracking by community health workers. Am J Public Health89(6): 47-52, 1999.
25.
25. Meister JS, Giuliano AR, Saltzman S, Abrahamsen M, Stephan J, de la Ossa E, et al: Community health workers at the U.S.-Mexico border: Effectiveness of a cancer prevention/education intervention. Women & Cancer1(5): 25-34, 1999.
26.
26. Navarro AM, Senn KL, McNicholas LJ, Kaplan RM, Roppe B, Campo MC: Por la vida model intervention enhances use of cancer screening tests among Latinas. Am J Prev Med15(1): 32-41, 1998.
27.
27. Hunter J, Guernsey de Zapien J, Denman CA, Moncada E, Papenfuss M, Wallace D, et al: Health care access and utilization among women 40 and older at the U.S.-Mexico border: Predictors of a routine check-up. J Community Health28(5): 317-333, 2003.
28.
28. Macharia W, Gladys L, Rowe B, Stephenson B, Haynes B: An overview of interventions to improve compliance with appointment keeping for medical services. JAMA267(13): 1813-1817, 1992.
29.
29. Roter D, Hall J, Merisca R, Nordstrom B, Cretin D, Svarstad B: Effectiveness of interventions to improve patient compliance: A meta-analysis. Med Care36(8): 1138-1161, 1998.
30.
30. Shefer A, Briss P, Rodewald L, Bernier R, Strikas R, Yusuf H, et al: Improving immunization coverage rates: An evidence-based review of the literature. Epidemiol Rev21(1): 96-142, 1999.
31.
31. Stone E, Morton S, Hulscher M, Maglione M, Roth E, Grimshaw J, et al: Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: A meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med136(9): 641-651, 2002.
32.
32. Szilagyi P, Gordley C, Vann J, Chelminski A, Kraus R, Margolis P, et al: Effect of patient reminder/recall interventions on immunization rates: A review. JAMA284(14): 1820-1827, 2000.
33.
33. Tseng D, Cox E, Plane MB, Hla KM: Efficacy of patient letter reminders on cervical cancer screening: A meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med16: 563-568, 2001.
34.
34. Strogatz D, Earp JA: The determinants of dropping out of care among hypertensive patients receiving a behavioral intervention. Med Care21(10): 970-980, 1983.
35.
35. Bone LR, Mamon J, Levine DM, Walrath JM, Nanda J, Gurley HT, et al: Emergency department detection and follow-up of high blood pressure: Use and effectiveness of community health workers. Am J of Emerg Med7(1): 16-20, 1989.
36.
36. Love MB, Gardner K, Legion V: Community health workers: Who they are and what they do. Health Educ Behav24(4): 510-522, 1997.
