Researchers from the North Carolina BEAUTY and Health Project conducted an observational study in 10 North Carolina beauty salons to gain insight into naturally occurring conversations between cosmetologists and customers, and to assess features of the salon environment that might be used to inform the development of salon-based health promotion interventions. Results revealed that the social environment of a salon is a place where cosmetologists and customers talk openly about many subjects, including health. Information, advice, appraisal, humor, and empathy are typically shared in these health conversations. Several features of the physical environment of the salon may be mobilized to support health—access to healthy foods, snacks, and beverages; smoking restrictions; and availability of print or video materials, signs, or displays that include healthy messages. Implications for planning salon-based health promotion interventions—including the training of licensed cosmetologists to deliver health messages—are discussed in light of these findings.
1. American Cancer Society: Cancer Facts & Figures 2002. Atlanta, GA, American Cancer Society, 2002.
2.
2. American Cancer Society: Cancer Prevention & Early Detection Facts & Figures 2002. Atlanta, GA, American Cancer Society, 2002.
3.
3. Campbell MK, Demark-Wahnefried W, Symons M, Kalsbeek WD, Dodds J, Cowan A, et al: Fruit and vegetable consumption and prevention of cancer: The Black Churches United for Better Health Project. Am J Public Health89(9):1390-1395, 1999.
4.
4. Ferdinand KC: Lessons learned from the Health Heart community prevention project in reaching the African American Population. J Health Care Poor Underserved8(3):366-372, 1997.
5.
5. Kong BW: Community-based hypertension control programs that work. J Health Care Poor Underserved8(4):409-415, 1997.
6.
6. Havas S, Heimendinger J, Damron D, Nicklas TA, Cowan A, Beresford SA, et al: 5 a day for better health—Nine community research projects to increase fruit and vegetable consumption. Public Health Rep110(1):69-79, 1995.
7.
7. Eng E: The Save Our Sisters Project: A social network strategy for reaching rural black women. Cancer Suppl72(3):1071-1077, 1993.
8.
8. National Cancer Institute: Cancer Clinical Trials: The In-Depth Program. Bethesda, MD, 2001. (NIH Pub. No. 02-5051.)
9.
9. Stokols D: Establish and maintaining healthy environments: Toward a social ecology of health promotion. Am Psychol47(1):6-22, 1992.
10.
10. Sallis JF, Owen N: Ecological models, in Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK (eds.): Health Behavior and Health Education (2nd ed.). San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1997, pp. 403-424.
11.
11. Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK (eds.): Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, & Practice. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1996.
12.
12. Wallston BS, Alagna SW, DeVellis BM, DeVellis RF: Social support and physical health. Health Psychol2(4):367-391, 1983.
13.
13. House JS: Work Stress and Social Support. Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley, 1981.
14.
14. Kelsey KS, Kirkley BG, DeVellis RF, Earp JA, Ammerman AS, Keyserling TC, et al: Social support as a predictor of dietary change in a low-income population. Health Educ Res11(3):383-395, 1996.
15.
15. Wing R, Marcus MD, Epstein LH, Jawad A: A “family-based” approach to the treatment of obese Type II diabetic patients. J Consult Clin Psychol59:156-162, 1991.
16.
16. Kaplan RM, Hartwell SL: Differential effects of social support and social network on physiological and social outcome in mean and women with Type II diabetes mellitus. Healthy Psychology8:387-397, 1987.
17.
17. Granovetter M: The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol78:1360-1380, 1973.
18.
18. Willett JA: Permanent Waves: The Making of the American Beauty Shop. New York: New York University Press, 2000.
19.
19. Israel BA: Social networks and social support: Implications for natural helper and community level interventions. Health Educ Q12(1):65-80, 1985.
20.
20. Furman FK: Facing the Mirror: Older Women and Shop Culture. New York, Routledge, 1997.
21.
21. Sadler GR, Thomas AG, Gebrekristos B, Dhanjal SK, Mugo J: Black cosmetologists promoting health program: Pilot study outcomes. J Cancer Educ15:33-37, 2000.
22.
22. Howze EH, Broyden RR, Impara JC: Using informal caregivers to communicate with women about mammography. Health Commun4:227-244, 1992.
23.
23. Linnan LA, Kim AE, Wasilewski Y, Lee AM, Yang J, Solomon F: Working with licensed cosmetologists to promote health: Results from the North Carolina BEAUTY and Health pilot study. Prev Med33:606-612, 2001.
24.
24. Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, June 19-22, 1946; signed on July 22, 1946 by the representatives of 61 states (Official Records of the World Health Organization, no. 2, p. 100) and entered into force on April 7, 1948.
25.
25. Srinivasan S, O’Fallon LR, Dearry A: Creating health communities, health homes, health people: Initiating a research agenda on the built environment and public health. Am J Public Health93(9):1446-1449, 2003.
26.
26. Linnan LA, Emmons KM, Abrams DB: Beauty and the beast: Results of the Rhode Island Smokefree Shop Initiative. Am J Public Health92(1):27-28, 2002.
27.
27. Stillman FA, Becker DM, Swank RT: Ending smoking at the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions. JAMA246:1565-1592, 1990.
29. Pierce JP, Shanks TG, Pertschuk M: Do smoking ordinances protect non-smokers from environmental tobacco smoke at work?Tob Control3:15-20, 1994.
30.
30. Ericksen MP, Gottlieb N: A review of the health impact of smoking control at the workplace. Am J Health Prom13:83-104, 1998.
31.
31. Jackson EJ, Parks CP: Recruitment and training issues from selected lay health advisor programs among African Americans: A 20-year perspective. Health Educ Behav24(4):418-431, 1997.
32.
32. Sadler GR, Thomas AG, Dhanjal SK, Gebrekristos B, Wright FA: Breast cancer screening adherence in African-American women. Cancer83:1836-1839, 1998.
