The goal of this study was to determine how well four organizational characteristics (structure, resources, motivation, or political capacity) explained local organizations' use of a variety of advocacy tactics aimed at promoting state gun control laws. In 1998, 679 local organizations were identified as potentially active on state gun control issues; a questionnaire was mailed to each group's leader. Seventy-nine percent (n=538) responded to the survey, with 81% (n=207) of eligible organizations completing questionnaires. The four organizational characteristics explained approximately half the variation in local groups' use of a wide range of advocacy tactics. Organizations with stronger motivation to address the gun control issue and greater political capacity engaged in more diverse gun control advocacy tactics; the authors found organizational structure and resources unlikely to be related. Leaders of advocacy organizations should consider ways to encourage members' motivations on the issue while fostering greater capacity for political action.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Nonfatal and fatal firearm-related injuries—US, 1993-1997. MMWR48:1029-1034, 1999.
2.
2. U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation: Crime in the United States: Uniform Crime Reports. Washington, DC, Government Printing Office, 1999.
3.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wonder: State Injury Mortality Data. Retrieved January 4, 1999, from http://wonder.cdc.gov/injury/shtml
4.
4. Cook PJ, Leitzel JA: Perversity, futility, jeopardy: An economic analysis of the attack on gun control. Law Contemp Problems59:91-118, 1996.
5.
5. Teret SP, Wintemute GJ: Policies to prevent firearm injuries. Health Aff12:96-109, 1993.
6.
6. Zimring F: Is gun control likely to reduce violent killings? Univ Chic Law Rev35:721-737, 1968.
7.
7. Cummings J, Grossman DC, Rivara FP, Koepsell TD: State gun safe storage laws and child mortality due to firearms. J Am Med Assoc278:1084-1086, 1997.
8.
8. Weil DS, Knox RC: Effects of limiting handgun purchases on interstate transfer of firearms. J Am Med Assoc275:1759-1761, 1996.
9.
9. Wright MA, Wintemute GJ, Rivara FP: Effectiveness of denial of handgun purchase to persons believed to be at high risk for firearm violence. Am J Pub Health89:88-90, 1999.
10.
10. Vernick JS, Webster DW, Hepburn LM: Effects of Maryland's law banning Saturday night special handguns on crime guns. Inj Prev5:259-263, 1999.
11.
11. Vernick JS, Teret SP, Howard KA, Teret MD, Wintemute GJ: Public opinion polling on gun policy. Health Affairs12:199-208, 1993.
12.
12. Blendon RJ, Young JT, Hemenway D: The American public and the gun control debate. JAMA275:1719-1722, 1996.
13.
13. Davidson OG: Under Fire: The NRA and the Battle for Gun Control. New York, Henry Holt, 1993.
14.
14. Spitzer RJ: The Politics of Gun Control (2nd ed). New York, Chatham House, 1998.
15.
15. Leddy EF: Magnum Force Lobby: The National Rifle Association Fights Gun Control. New York, University Press of America, 1987.
16.
16. Schattschneider EE: The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View on Democracy in America. Hinsdale, IL, Dryden, 1975.
17.
17. Heinz JP, Laumann EO, Nelson RL, Salisbury RH: The Hollow Core: Private Interests in National Policy-Making. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1993.
18.
18. Elder R, Cobb C: Participation in American politics: The Dynamics of Agenda Setting. Boston, Allyn and Bacon, 1972.
19.
19. Truman DB: The Governmental Process. New York, Knopf, 1962.
20.
20. Steckler A, Dawson L, Goodman RM, Epstein N: Policy Advocacy: Three Emerging Roles for Health Education. Advances in Health Education and Promotion. Greenwich, CT,JAI, 1987.
21.
21. Schwartz R, Goodman RM, Steckler A: Policy advocacy interventions for health promotion and education: Advancing the state of practice. Health Educ Q22:421-426, 1996.
22.
22. Wallack L, Dorfman L, Jernigan D, Themba M: Media Advocacy and Public Health. Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 1993.
23.
23. Schlozman KL, Tierney JT: Organized Interests and American Democracy. New York, Harper & Row, 1986.
24.
24. Gais TL, Walker JL: Pathways to influence in American Politics, in Walker JL (ed.): Mobilizing Interest Groups in America: Patrons, Professions, and Social Movements. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 1991, pp. 103-122.
25.
25. Kollman K: Outside Lobbying: Public Opinion and Interest Groups Strategies. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1998.
26.
26. Smith RA: Interest group influence in the US Congress. Legisl Stud Q20:89-139, 1995.
27.
27. Baumgartner FR, Leech BL: Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and Political Science. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1998.
28.
28. Klandersmans B: Organizational effectiveness. Int Soc Movement Res2:383-394, 1989.
29.
29. Huberts LW: The influence of social movements on government policy. Int Soc Movement Res2:395-426, 1989.
30.
30. Gundelach P: Effectiveness and the structure of new social movements. Int Soc Movement Res2:427-442, 1989.
31.
31. Rochon TR, Mazmanian DA: Social movements and the policy process. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sc528:75-87, 1993.
32.
32. Burstein P, Einwohner RL, Hollander JA: The success of political movements: A bargaining perspective, in Jenkins JC, Klandersmans B (eds.): The Politics of Social Protest: Comparative Perspectives on States and Social Movements. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1995, pp. 275-295.
33.
33. Berry JM: Lobbying for the People. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1977.
34.
34. Anderson JE: Public Policy Making (2nd ed.). Boston, Houghton Mifflin, 1994.
35.
35. Langbein LI, Lotwis MA: The political efficacy of lobbying and money: Gun control in the US House, 1986. Legisl Stud Q15:413-440, 1990.
36.
36. McCarthy JD, Zald MN: Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. Am J Social82:1212-1241, 1977.
37.
37. Tilly C: From Mobilization to Revolution. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1978.
38.
38. Knoke D: Organizing for Collective Action: The Political Economics of Associations. Hawthorne, NY, Aldine, 1990.
39.
39. Scheppele KL, Walker JL: The litigation strategies of interest groups, in Walker JL (ed.): Mobilizing Interest Groups in America: Patrons, Professions, and Social Movements. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 1991, pp. 157-184.
40.
40. Gamson WA: The Strategy of Social Protest. Homewood, IL, Dorsey, 1975.
41.
41. Freeman J: The origins of the women's liberation movement. Am J Sociol78:792-811, 1973.
42.
42. Weed FJ: Organizational mortality in the anti-drunk driving movements: Failure among local MADD chapters. Soc Forces69:851-868, 1991.
43.
43. Freeman J: Resource mobilization and strategy: A model of analyzing social movement organization action, in Zald MN, McCarthy JD (eds.): The Dynamics of Social Movements: Resource Mobilization, Social Control, and Tactics. Cambridge, MA, Winthrop, 1979, pp. 167-189.
44.
44. Knoke D, Wood JR: Organized for Action: Commitment in Voluntary Associations. New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers University Press, 1981.
45.
45. Wilson JQ: Political Organizations. New York, Basic Books, 1973.
47. Steedly HR, Foley JW: The success of protest groups: Multivariate analyses. Soc Sci Res8:1-15, 1979.
48.
48. Wolfson M: The legislative impact of social movement organizations: The anti-drunk driving movement and the 21 year-old drinking age. Soc Sci Q76:311-327, 1995.
49.
49. Knoke D: Resource acquisition and allocation in US national associations. Int Soc Movement Res2:129-154, 1989.
50.
50. Lauman EO, Knoke D: The Organizational State: Social Choice in National Policy Domains. Madison, University of Wisconsin Press, 1987.
51.
51. Zakocs RC, Earp J, Runyan CR: Gun control advocacy tactics and resources. Am J Prev Med20:251-257, 2001.
52.
52. McCarthy J, Wolfson M, Harvey D: Chapter Survey Report on the Project of the Citizen's Movement Against Drunk Driving. Washington, DC, Center for the Study of Youth Development, 1987.
53.
53. Wolfson M: Interpenetration of Social Movements and the State: The Case of Tobacco Control in the United States. Unpublished manuscript. Winston-Salem, NC, Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, 1997.
54.
54. Kline P: An Easy Guide to Factor Analysis. New York, Routledge, 1994.
55.
55. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS: Using Multivariate Statistics (3rd ed.). New York, HarperCollins, 1996.
56.
56. Foreman CH: Grassroots victims organizations: Mobilizing for personal and public health, in Cigler AJ, Loomis BA (eds.): Interest Group Politics (4th ed.). Washington, DC, Congressional Quarterly Press, 1995, pp. 33-54.
57.
57. Olson M: The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1965.
58.
58. Reinarman C: The social construction of an alcohol problem: The case of Mothers Against Drunk Drivers and social control in the 1980s. Theory Society17:91-120, 1988.
59.
59. Zaccaro SJ, Blair V, Peterson C, Zazanis M: Collective efficacy, in Maddux JE (ed.): Self-Efficacy, Adaptation, and Adjustment: Theory, Research, and Application. New York, Plenum, 1995, pp. 305-328.
60.
60. Bandura A: Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall, 1986.
61.
61. Milio N: Priorities and strategies for promoting community-based prevention policies. J Public Health Management4:14-28, 1998.
