The researchers used grounded theory methodology to study the implementation of a school-based alcohol and drug prevention project in secondary schools in British Columbia, Canada. Preventionworkers (PWs) were responsible for working with school and community personnel in a collaborative process to develop, implement, and evaluate prevention strategies in the school using an adaptation of the Precede-Proceed Model for health promotion planning. Before they could begin to do this, PWs had to establish their credibility in the school. Once accepted, the focus of the PWs’workwas to reconcile the goals, values, and philosophy of the project with those of the school. In doing so, PWs encountered many practical dilemmas. The challenges in resolving these dilemmas are presented, and the implications for policy and practice are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. Alcohol and Drug Programs: 1990 British Columbia Student Drug Use Survey: Summary Report. Victoria, Canada, British Columbia Ministry of Health and Ministry Responsible for Seniors, 1992.
2.
2. Eliany M, Wortley S, Adlaf EM: Alcohol and Other Drug Use by Canadian Youth: A National Alcohol and Other Drugs Survey (1989): Technical Report. Ottawa, Minister of Supply and Services Canada, 1991.
3.
3. Health and Welfare Canada: National Alcohol and Other Drugs Survey (1989): Highlights Report. Ottawa, Minister of Supply and Services Canada, 1990.
4.
4. Adlaf EM, Smart RG, Walsh GW: The Ontario Student Drug Use Survey: 1977-1993.Toronto, Addiction Research Foundation of Ontario, 1993.
5.
5. Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG: National Survey Results on Drug Use From Monitoring the Future Study, 1975-1992.Rockville, MD, National Institute on Drug Abuse, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1993.
6.
6. Cameron H, Mutter GW, Hamilton N: Comprehensive school health: Back to the basics in the 90s. Health Promot(Canada) 29(4):2-5, 10-10, 1990.
7.
7. Kolbe LJ, Iverson DC: Implementing comprehensive school health education: Educational innovations and social change. Health Educ Q8:57-80, 1981.
8.
8. Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development: Turning Points: Preparing American Youth for the 21st Century. New York, Carnegie Corporation, 1989.
9.
9. Green LW, Kreuter MW: Health Promotion Planning: An Educational and Environmental Approach. Mountain View, CA, Mayfield, 1991.
10.
10. Gerstein DR, Green LW: Preventing Drug Abuse: What Do We Know?Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 1993.
11.
11. Alcohol and Drug Programs: School-Based Prevention Model Handbook. Victoria, Canada, Ministry of Health, Prevention and Health Promotion Branch, 1994.
12.
12. MacDonald M: Reconciling Concept and Context: A Grounded Theory Study of Implementing School-Based Health Promotion. Ph.D. dissertation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 1998.
13.
13. Rogers E: Diffusion of Innovations(3rd ed.). New York, Free Press, 1983.
14.
14. Anderson DM, Portnoy B: Diffusion of cancer education in schools. J Sch Health59(2): 214-217, 1989.
15.
15. Basch CE: Research on disseminating and implementing health education programs in schools. J Sch Health54(6):57-66, 1984.
16.
16. Best JA: Intervention perspectives on school health promotion research. Health Educ Q16:299-306, 1989.
17.
17. Connell DB, Turner RR: The impact of instructional experience and the effects of cumulative instruction. J Sch Health55(8):324-331, 1985.
18.
18. McCormick LK, Steckler AB, McLeroy KR: Diffusion of innovations in schools: A study of adoption and implementation of school-based tobacco prevention curricula. Am J Health Promotion9(3):210-219, 1995.
19.
19. Ross JG, Gold RS, Lavin AT, Errecart MT, Nelson GD: Design of the teenage health teaching modules evaluation. J Sch Health61(1):21-25, 1991.
20.
20. Steckler A, Goodman RM, McLeroy KR, Davis S, Koch G: Measuring the diffusion of innovative health promotion programs. Am J Health Promotion6(3):214-224, 1992.
21.
21. Parcel GS, Eriksen MP, Lovato CY, Gottlieb NH, Brink SG, Green LW: The diffusion of school-based tobacco-use prevention programs: Project description and baseline data. Health Educ Res4(1):111-124, 1989.
22.
22. Hausman AJ, Ruzek SB: Implementation of comprehensive school health education in elementary schools: Focus on teacher concerns. J Sch Health65(3):81-86, 1995.
23.
23. Lovato C, Rybar J: Development and dissemination of a manual to promote teacher preservice in health education. J Sch Health65(5):172-175, 1995.
24.
24. Ross JG, Luepker RV, Nelson GD, Saavedra P, Hubbard BM: Teenage health teaching modules: Impact of teacher training and student outcomes. J Sch Health61(1):31-34, 1991.
25.
25. Santi S, Best JA, Payne ME, Brown KS, Cameron R: A comparison between instructional experience and performance of teachers and nurses delivering a smoking prevention program. Can J Public Health83:433-436, 1992.
26.
26. Taggart VS, Bush P, Zuckerman AE, Theiss PK: A process evaluation of the District of Columbia “Know Your Body” project. J Sch Health60(2):60-66, 1990.
27.
27. Johnson CC, Powers CR, Bao W, Harsha DW, Berenson GS: Cardiovascular risk factors of elementary school teachers in a low socio-economic area of a metropolitan city. Health Educ Res9(12):183-191, 1994.
28.
28. House ER: Three perspectives on educational innovation: Technological, political and cultural, in Lehming R, Kane M (eds.): Improving Schools: Using What We Know. Beverly Hills, CA, Sage, 1981, pp. 17-41.
30. McLaughlin MW: The Rand change agent study revisited: Macro perspectives and micro realities. Educ Researcher19(9):11-16, 1990.
31.
31. Musella DF: Problems in policy implementation, in Holmes M, Leithwood KA, Musella DF (eds.): Educational Policy for Effective Schools. Toronto, Canada, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, pp. 93-111.
32.
32. Firestone WA, Corbett HD: Planned organizational change, in Boyan NJ (ed.): Handbook of Research in Educational Administration. New York, Longman, 1988, pp. 321-340.
33.
33. Yanow D: Toward a policy culture approach to implementation. Policy Studies Rev7(1): 103-115, 1987.
34.
34. Rossman GB, Corbett HD, Firestone WA: Change and Effectiveness in Schools: A Cultural Perspective. Albany, State University of New York, 1988.
35.
35. Larson R (ed.): Changing Schools From the Inside Out. Lancaster, UK, Technomic, 1992.
36.
36. Sarason SB: The Culture of the School and the Problem of Change. Boston, Allyn & Bacon, 1982.
37.
37. Fullan MG: The New Meaning of Educational Change. Toronto, Canada, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, 1991.
38.
38. Yanow D: Tackling the implementation problem: Epistemological issues in implementation research, in Palumbo DJ, Callista DJ (eds.): Implementation and the Policy Process: Opening up the Black Box. New York, Greenwood, 1990, pp. 213-227.
39.
39. Parcel GS, Simmons-Morton BG, Kolbe LJ: Health promotion: Integrating organizational change and student learning strategies. Health Educ Q15(4):435-450, 1988.
40.
40. McBride N, Midford R, Cameron I: An empirical model for school health promotion: The Western Australian school health project model. Health Promot Int14:17-25, 1999.
41.
41. Downey AM, Virgilio SJ, Serpas DC, Nicklas TA, Arbeit ML, Berenson G: “Heart Smart”—A staff development model for a school based cardiovascular health intervention. Health Educ4(4):64-71.
42.
42. Fisher EB: Editorial: The results of the COMMIT trial. Am J Public Health85:159-160, 1995.
43.
43. Wagenaar AC, Murray DM, Wolfson M, Forster JL, Finnegan JR: Communities mobilizing for change on alcohol: Design of a randomized community trial (CSAP Special Issue). J Comm Psychol79-101, 1993.
44.
44. Hansen WB, Kaftarian SJ: Strategies for comparing multiple-site evaluations under nonequivalent design conditions CSAP Special Issue. J Comm Psychol170-187, 1994.
45.
45. Patton MQ: Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods(2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 1990.
46.
46. School Based Prevention Project Evaluation Team: Summary Report, 1992-93 Evaluation. Vancouver, Canada, Institute of Health Promotion Research, University of British Columbia, 1994.
47.
47. School Based Prevention Project Evaluation Team: Summary Report, 94-95 Evaluation. Vancouver, Canada, Institute of Health Promotion Research, University of British Columbia, 1995.
48.
48. Glaser B, Strauss A: The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago, Aldine, 1967.
49.
49. Glaser B: Theoretical Sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA, Sociology Press, 1978.
50.
50. Strauss A: Qualitative Methods for Social Scientists. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, 1987.
51.
51. Strauss A, Corbin J: Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 1990.
52.
52. Jorgenson DL: Participant Observation: A Methodology for Human Studies. Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 1989.
53.
53. Sandelowski M: Sample size in qualitative research. Res Nurs Health18:179-183, 1995.
54.
54. Richards L, Richards T: The NUDIST qualitative data analysis system. Qual Sociol14(4):307-324, 1991.
55.
55. Lapadat JC, Lindsay AC: Transcription in research and practice: From standardization of technique to interpretive positionings. Qual Inquiry5:64-86, 1999.
56.
56. Poland B: Transcription quality as an aspect of rigor in qualitative research. Qual Inquiry1:290-310, 1995.
57.
57. Lincoln YS, Guba E: Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA, Sage, 1985.
58.
58. Lincoln YS, Guba E: But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation, in Shadish W, Reichardt C (eds.): Evaluation Studies Review Annual(Vol. 12). Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 1987, pp. 425-436.
59.
59. Sandelowski M: The problem of rigor in qualitative research. Adv Nurs Science8:27-37, 1986.
60.
60. Sandelowski M: Rigor or rigor mortis: The problem of rigor in qualitative research revisited. Adv Nurs Science16:1-8, 1993.
61.
61. Hargreaves A: Curriculum policy and the culture of teaching, in Milburn G, Goodson I, Clark K (eds.): Re-Interpreting Curriculum Research: Images and Arguments. London, Canada, Altrouse, 1989.
62.
62. Microsoft Encarta 97 Encylopedia[computer software]. Seattle, WA, Microsoft, 1986.
63.
63. Sarason S: The Predictable Failure of Educational Reform. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1990.
64.
64. Huberman AM: Teacher careers and school improvement. J Curric Studies20(2):119-132, 1988.
65.
65. Crandall DP: Peering at paradigms through the prism of practice improvement, in Guba E (ed.): The Paradigm Dialogue. Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 1990, pp. 216-224.
66.
66. Martin W, Willower D: The managerial behavior of high school principals. Educ Admin Q17(1):69-90, 1981.
67.
67. House E, Lapan S: Survival in the classroom. Boston, Allyn & Bacon, 1978.
68.
68. Louis KS, Miles MB: Improving the Urban High School: What Works and Why. New York, Teachers College Press, 1990.
69.
69. Corbett HD, Dawson JA, Firestone WA (eds.): School Context and School Change. New York, Teachers College Press, 1984.
70.
70. Clark DL: Rational Planning in Curriculum and Instruction. Washington, DC, National Education Association, 1981.
71.
71. Louis KS, Miles MB: Toward effective urban high schools: The importance of planning and coping, in Bliss JR, Firestone WA, Richards C (eds.): Rethinking effective schools: Research and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1991, pp. 91-111.
72.
72. Hargreaves A: Changing Teachers: Changing Times, Toronto, Canada, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, 1994.
73.
73. Gold R, Green LW, Kreuter MW: EMPOWER: Enabling Methods of Planning and Organizing Within Everyone’s Reach. Sudbury, MA, Jones and Bartlett, 1997.
74.
74. Institute of Health Promotion Research: A List of Published Applications of the Precede Proceed Model. Vancouver, Canada, University of British Columbia. [http://www.ihpr.ubc.ca/preapps/html]
75.
75. Ottoson JM: After the applause: Exploring multiple influences on application following an adult continuing education program. Adult Educ Q47(2):92-107, 1997.
76.
76. Lavin AT, Shapiro GR, Weill KS: Creating an agenda for school-based health promotion: A review of 25 selected papers. J Sch Health62(6):212-228, 1992.
77.
77. Ottoson JM, Green LW: Reconciling concept and context: Theory of implementation. Adv Health Educ Promotion2:353-382, 1987.
78.
78. Berman P: The study of macro-and micro-implementation. Public Policy26(2):157-184, 1978.
79.
79. Hasenfeld Y, Brock T: Implementation of social policy revisited. Admin Society22(4):451-479, 1991.
80.
80. Majone G, Wildavsky A: Implementation as evolution, in Pressman J, Wildavsky A (eds.): Implementation. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1979, pp. 177-194.
81.
81. Palumbo DJ, Oliverio A: Implementation theory and the theory driven approach to validity. Evaluation and Program Planning12:337-344, 1989.
82.
82. Phillips, DC: The Social Scientists Bestiary. New York, Pergamon, 1992.
