Although muscular strength training is important to dancers there are many factors that must be considered when working with children during their growing years. Increasing muscle power by maximal loading is inappropriate during those years and submaximal muscle strength or “control” is a safer and more suitable option. Combining “controlled strength” training with a focus on the trunk may also provide a welcome answer to the question of how to work with flexibility, balance, and coordination, issues that are most common during the growth spurt and which may underlie the development of injuries.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FrobergK, LammertO: Development of muscle strength during childhood. In: Bar-OrO (ed): Child and Adolescent Athlete.London: Blackwell Science, 1996, pp. 25–41.
2.
BlimkieCJR, RiceS, WebberCE, MartinJ, LevyD, GordonCL: Effects of resistance training on bone mass and density in adolescent females. Med Sci Sports Exerc25(5):S48, 1993.
3.
O'BrienJ: Growth plate injuries and other orthopaedic problems. In: RussoP, GassG (eds): Children and Exercise — Conference Proceedings.Sydney: NSW Sport Sciences and Research Centre, Cumberland College of Health Sciences, 1982, pp. 102–103.
4.
BlimkieCJR, Bar-OrO: Trainability of muscle strength, power and endurance during childhood. In: Bar-OrO (ed): Child and Adolescent Athlete.London: Blackwell Science, 1996, pp. 113–129.
5.
VanderAJ, ShermanJH, LucianoDS: The mechanisms of body function. In: VastynJE, WagleyS (eds): Human Physiology.New York: McGraw Hill, 1980, pp. 589–606.
6.
ComerfordM: Dynamic Stability and Muscle Balance (Course Notes). 1997.
7.
RichardsonCA, JullGA: Concepts of assessment and rehabilitation for active lumbar stability. In: BoylingJD, PalastangaN (eds): Grieves Modern Manual Therapy (2nd ed). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1994, pp. 705–720.
8.
DahlstromM, EsbjornssonM, KaijserL, GierupJ, JanssonE: High proportion of type I muscle fibres in young dancers. In: The Dancer, Physical effort, Muscle Fibre Types and Energy Intake and Expenditure.Sweden: Karolinska Institute, 1996, pp. 24–25.
9.
PateRR, WardDS: Endurance exercise trainability in children and youths. In: GranaWA, LombardoJA, SharkeyBJ, StoneJA (eds): Advances in Sports Medicine and Fitness (Vol 3). Littleton MA: YearBook Medical Publishers, 1990, pp. 37–55.
10.
MalinaRM, BouchardC: Growth, Maturation and Physical Activity.Champaign IL: Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc., 1991.
11.
AcklandT, BlanskyBA, BloomfieldJ: Physical growth and motor performance of adolescent males. In: BlanksbyBA, (eds): Athletics, Growth, and Development in Children.Camberwell, Australia: Harwood Academic Press, 1994, pp. 200–255.
12.
GeevesA: Safedance II Report.Australia: Australian Dance Council -Ausdance.1997.
13.
BurmeisterW: Body Cell mass as the basis of allometric growth functions, Ann Paediatr20:65–721965.
14.
TannerJM: Sequence tempo in the somatic changes in puberty. In: GrumbachMM, GraveGD, MayerFE (eds): Control of the Onset of Puberty.New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1974.
15.
StolzHR, StolzLM: Somatic Development of Adolescent Boys.New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1951.
16.
CarronAV, BaileyDA: Strength Development of Boys from 10 Through 16 Years.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1974.
17.
TannerJM: Growth at Adolescence (2nd ed). Oxford: Blackwell Science, 1962.
18.
JensenRK: Estimation of the biomechanical properties of three body types using a photogrammetric method. J Biomechanics11:349–358, 1978.
19.
BeunenG, MalinaRM: Growth and biological maturation. In: Bar-OrO (ed): Child and Adolescent Athlete.London: Blackwell Science, 1996, pp. 3–24.
20.
SaleDG: Testing strength and power. In: McDougallJD, WengerHA, GreenHJ (eds): Physiological Testing of the High — Performance Athlete.Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc., 1991, pp. 21–106.
21.
MolnarGE, AlexanderJ, GutfieldN: Reliability of quantitative strength measurements in children. Arch Phys Med Rehab60(5):218–221, 1979.
22.
AssmussenE: Muscular Performance. In: RodahlK, HorvarthSM (eds): Muscle as a Tissue.New York: McGraw Hill, 1962, pp. 161–175.
23.
AssmussenE, Heeboll-NeilsenK: A dimensional analysis of physical performance and growth in Boys. J App Physiol7:593–603, 1955.
24.
BlimkieCJR: Age and Sex associ- ated variation in strength during childhood: Anthropometric, morphologic, neurologic, biomechanical, endocrinologic, genetic, and physical activity correlates. In: GisolfiCV, LambDR (eds): Perspectives in Exercise Science and Sports Medicine (vol 2). Indiana, PA: Benchmark Press, 1989, pp. 99–163.
25.
OzmunJC, MikeskyAE, SurburgPR: Neuromuscular adaptations following prepubescent strength training. Med Sci Sports Exerc26:510–514, 1994.
26.
BlimkieCJR, MartinJ, RamsayJ, SaleD, MacDougallD: The effects of detraining and maintenance weight training on strength development in prepubertal boys. Can J Sport Sci14:102, 1989.
27.
FukunagaTFunatoK, IkegawaS: The effects of resistance training on muscle area and strength in prepubescent age. Ann Physiol Anthropol11:357–364, 1992.
28.
RamsayJA, BlimkieCJR, SmithK, GarnerS, MacDougallJD, SaleDG: Strength training effects in prepubescent boys. Med Sci Sports Exerc22(5):605–614, 1990.
29.
BlimkieCJR: Resistance training during pre- and early puberty: Efficacy, trainability, mechanisms and persistance. Can J Sport Sci17: 264–279, 1992.
30.
International Federation of Sports Medicine: Excessive physical training in children and adolescents. Sport Health9(1):23–24, 1991.
31.
GeevesA: Safedance Report.Australia: Australian Dance Council -Ausdance, 1990.
32.
RichardsonCA, JullGA: An historical perspective on the development of clinical techniques to evaluate and treat the active stabilising system of the lumbar spine. In: SharpeM (ed): The lumbar Spine.Melbourne: Australian Physiotherapy Association, 1995, pp 5-14.
