Turnout measurement procedures, results, and reporting formats vary in dance medicine and science research, making comparisons difficult. It is agreed that turnout results from summative contributions of the hip, knee, lower-leg, and the foot-ankle complex. However, the most frequently reported measurement is hip external rotation, and even this is measured in incompatible ways. No normative data exist for component and summative measures or for different categories of dancers, making screening, clinical assessment, and research problematic. Thus, there is a need to standardize component measurements, develop an inclusive measurement procedure for total turnout, and establish normative data for each measurement and for different categories of dancers. This review evaluates the 24 published articles that have reported original data for turnout assessment in dancers. Results are summarized and displayed for each article. In conclusion, recommendations are made for: use of selected hip external range of motion and tibial version measurements as the most important components of turnout; a procedure for assessing total turnout; adoption of conventions for reporting data in compatible forms; and the development of normative data sets for different categories of dancers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CopianJA. Ballet dancers turnout and its relationship to self-reported injury. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther.2002;32(11):579–84.
2.
HardakerW, EricksonL, MyersM. The pathogenesis of dance injury. In: ShellC (ed): The Dancer as Athlete.Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishing, 1986, pp. 11–29.
3.
GilbertCB, GrossMT, KlugKB. Relationship between hip external rotation and turnout angle for the five classical ballet positions. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther.1998;27(5):339–47.
4.
LukeA, MicheliLJ. Management of injuries in the young dancer. J Dance Med Sci.2000;4(1):6–15.
5.
BennellK, KhanKM, MatthewsB, . Hip and ankle range of motion and hip muscle strength in young female ballet dancers and controls. Br J Sports Med.1999;33(5):340–6.
6.
KhanK, RobertsP, NattrassC, . Hip and ankle range of motion in elite classical ballet dancers and controls. Clin J Sport Med.1997;7(3):174–9.
NegusV, HopperD, BriffaNK. Associations between turnout and lower extremity injuries in classical ballet dancers. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther.2005;35(5):307–18.
9.
WatkinsA, Woodhull-McNealAP, ClarksonPM, . Lower extremity alignment and injury in young, preprofessional, college, and professional ballet dancers: Part I. turnout and knee-foot alignment. Med Probi Perform Artists.1989;148–53.
10.
Clippinger-RobertsonKS. Biomechanical considerations in turnout. In: SolomonR, MintonSC, SolomonJ (eds): Preventing Dance Injuries.Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1990, pp. 75–102.
11.
SammarcoGJ. The dancers hip. In: RyanAJ, StephensRE (eds): Dance Medicine: A Comprehensive Guide.Chicago, IL: Pluribus Press, Inc., 1987, pp. 220–42.
12.
StephensRE. The etiology of injuries in ballet. In: RyanAJ, StephensRE (eds): Dance Medicine: A Comprehensive Guide.Chicago, IL: Pluribus Press, Inc., 1987, pp. 16–50.
13.
RyanAJ, StephensRE. Glossary. In: RyanAJ, StephensRE (eds): Dance Medicine: A Comprehensive Guide.Chicago, IL: Pluribus Press, Inc., 1987, pp. 350–6.
ClippingerKS. Biomechanical considerations in turnout. In: SolomonRL, SolomonJ, MintonSC (eds): Preventing Dance Injuries (2nd ed). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2005, pp. 135–50.
16.
ThomasenE. Diseases and Injuries of Ballet Dancers.Arhus, Denmark: Universitetsfor-lageti, 1982.
17.
Siev-NerI, BarakA, HeimM, . The value of screening. J Dance Med Sci.1997;l(3):87–92.
18.
TeitzCC. Sports medicine concerns in dance and gymnastics. Pediatr Clin North Am.1982;29(6):1399–421.
19.
HamiltonWG, HamiltonLH, MarshallP, . A profile of the musculoskeletal characteristics of elite professional ballet dancers. Am J Sports Med.1992;20(3):267–73.
20.
GrossmanG. Measuring dancer's active and passive turnout. J Dance Med Sci.2003;7(2):49–55.
21.
SchneiderB, LaubenbergerJ, JemlichS, . Measurement of femoral anteversion and tibial torsion by magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol.1997;70:575–9.
22.
SeberS, HazerB, KoseN, . Rotational profile of the lower extremity and foot progression angle: computerized tomographic examination of 50 male adults. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg.2000; 120(5-6):255–8.
23.
EckhoffDG, WinterWG. Femoral and tibial torsion. Clin Orthop Relat Res.1994;302:2–3.
24.
Le DamanyP. La torsion du tibia. Normale pathologique, experimentale. J l'Anat Physiol.1909;45:598–615.
25.
ClementzB. Assessment of tibial torsion and rotational deformity with a new fluoroscopic technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res.1989;245:199–209.
26.
MalekafzaliS, WoodMB. Tibial torsion—a simple clinical apparatus for its measurement and its application to a normal adult population. Clin Orthop Relat Res.1979;145:154–7.
27.
MilnerCE, SoamesRW. A comparison of four in vivo methods of measuring tibial torsion. J Anat.1998;193(Pt 1):139–44.
28.
SchwartzM, LakinG. The effect of tibial torsion on the dynamic function of the soleus during gait. Gait Posture.2003; 17(2): 113–18.
29.
StaheliLT, EngelGM. Tibial torsion: a method of assessment and a survey of normal children. Clin Orthop Relat Res.1972;86:183–6.
30.
TurnerMS, SmillieIS. The effect of tibial torsion of the pathology of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br.1981;63-B(3):396–8.
31.
StubergW, TemmeJ, KaplanP, . Measurement of tibial torsion and thigh-foot angle using goniometry and computed tomography. Clin Orthop Relat Res.1991;272:208–12.
32.
BaillonJM, RoozeM, de FerrareE. Tibial torsion in dancers. Acta Orthop Belg.1983;49(1-2):117–23.
33.
NemecekS, ChatfieldS. Affective dimensions of, and prototypic data from, a flexibility lab in a dance kinesiology course. In: SolomonR, SolomonJ (eds): Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the International Association for Dance Medicine and Science.San Francisco, CA: IADMS, 2004, pp. 255–8.
34.
ChampionLM, HermanAC, Chat-fieldSJ, . An interactive work- shop to build consensus on methods of measurement for total turn-out in dancers. In: SolomonR, SolomonJ (eds): Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the International Association for Dance Medicine and Science.Stockholm, Sweden: IADMS, 2005, pp. 77–9.
35.
MilanKR. Injury in ballet: a review of relevant topics for the physical therapist. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther.1994;19(2):121–9.
36.
DiTullioM, WilczekL, PaulusD, . Comparison of hip rotation in female classical ballet dancers versus female nondancers. Med Probi Perform Art.1989;4:154–8.
37.
GarrickJG, RequaRK. Turnout and training in ballet. Med Probi Perform Art.1994;9(2):43–9.
38.
LiGreci-ManginiLA. A comparison of hip range of motion between professional ballerinas and age-/sexmatched nondancers. Kinesiol Med Dance.1993-94;16(1):19–30.
39.
MeinelKK, AtwaterAE. Analysis of components of the “turnout” in beginning and advanced female ballet dancers [Abstract]. Med Sci Sports Exerc.1988;20(Suppl 2):S-6.
40.
KadelNJ, Donaldson-FletcherEA, GerbergLE. Anthropometric measurements of young ballet dancers: examining body composition, puberty, flexibility, and joint range of motion in comparison with non-dancer controls. J Dance Med Sci.2005;9(3&4):84–90.
41.
StaheliLT, CorbettM, WyssC, . Lower-extremity rotational problems in children. Normal values to guide management. J Bone Joint Surg Am.1985;67(1):39–47.
42.
HamiltonD, AronsenP, LokenJH, . Dance training intensity at 11-14 years is associated with femoral torsion in classical ballet dancers. Br J Sports Med.2006;40(4):299–303, discussion 303.
43.
American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Joint Motion: Method of Measuring and Recording.Chicago: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1965.
44.
KhanKM, BennellK, NgS, . Can 16-18-year-old elite ballet dancers improve their hip and ankle range of motion over a 12-month period?Clin J Sport Med.2000;10(2):98–103.
45.
BennellKL, KhanKM, MatthewsBL, . Changes in hip and ankle range of motion and hip muscle strength in 8-11 year old novice female ballet dancers and controls: a 12 month follow up study. Br J Sports Med.2001;35(1):54–9.
46.
ReidDC, BurnhamRS, SaboeLA, . Lower extremity flexibility patterns in classical ballet dancers and their correlation to lateral hip and knee injuries. Am J Sports Med.1987;15(4):347–52.
47.
LivaneliogluA, OtmanS, YakutY, . The effects of classical ballet training on the lumbar region. J Dance Med Sci.1998;2(2):52–5.
KingHA, StaheliLT. Torsional problems in cerebral palsy. Foot Ankle.1984;4(4):180–4.
50.
LoselS, Burgess-MillironMJ, MicheliLJ, . A simplified technique for determining foot progression angle in children 4 to 16 years of age. J Pediatr Orthop.1996;16(5):570–4.
51.
WinslowJ, YoderE. Patellofemoral pain in female ballet dancers: correlation with iliotibial band tightness and tibial external rotation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther.1995;22(1):18–21.
52.
MartinSC, MarquezFA, OrdonioMA, . Measuring functional range of motion in ballet dancer's hips. J Dance Med Sci.1998;2(2):56–62.
53.
MicheliLJ, GillespieWJ, WalaszekA. Physiologic profiles of female professional ballerinas. Clin Sports Med.1984;3(1):199–209.
54.
NicholasJA. Risk factors, sports medicine and the orthopedic system: an overview. J Sports Med.1975;3(5):243–59.
55.
LeightonJR. An instrument and technic for the measurement of range of joint motion. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.1955;36(9):571–8.
56.
LiederbachM, WelshT, HaginsM. Analysis of dancer screening forms used in the dance medicine community. In: SolomonR, SolomonJ (eds): Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the International Association for Dance Medicine and Science, West Palm Beach, FL: IADMS, 2006, pp. 146–50.
57.
SolomonRSolomonJ. Publications in dance medicine and science: a bibliographers perspective. In: Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference International Association for Dance Medicine and Science.London, England: IADMS, 2003, pp. 45–8.
58.
LiederbachM. Screening for functional capacity in dancers: designing standardized, dance-specific injury prevention screening tools. J Dance Med Sci.1997;1(3):93–106.
59.
LiederbachM, WelshTM, HaginsM. Standardizing measurement of dancers, injury surveillance, and extrinsic risk factors: a panel-audience discussion and call to action. In: SolomonR, SolomonJ (eds): Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the International Association for Dance Medicine and Science.San Francisco, CA: IADMS, 2004, pp. 141–4.
60.
SchafleMD. The child dancer: medical considerations. Pediatr Clin North Am.1990;37(5):1211–21.
61.
KristiansenLP, GundersonRB, SteenH, . The normal development of tibial torsion. Skeletal Radiol.2001;30(9):519–22.
62.
LangLM, VolpeRG. Measurement of tibial torsion. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc.1998;88(4):160–5.
63.
TamariK, TinleyP, BriffaK, . Validity and reliability of existing and modified clinical methods of measuring femoral and tibiofibular torsion in healthy subjects: use of different Reference axes may improve reliability. Clin Anat.2005;18(1):46–55.
64.
JakobRPHaertelM, StussiE. Tibial torsion calculated by computerised tomography and compared to other methods of measurement. J Bone Joint Surg Br.1980;62(2):238–42.
HoppenfeldS. Physical examination of the hip and pelvis. In: HoppenfeldS (ed): Physical Examination of the Spine and Extremities.Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange, 1976, pp. 158–159.
67.
LowJL. The reliability of joint measurement. Physiother.1976;62(7):227–9.
