Anatomic and physiologic screening of dancers, conducted on a regular basis, is by now a widely accepted aid to injury prevention and the enhancement of performance. The primary focus of screening procedures to date has been on assessing orthopedic and fitness parameters: on detecting those unique physical characteristics of the individual dancer that, in combination with the demands of the dance form being practiced, over time, may cause injuries or impede optimal performance. This is all well and good; however, it leaves unaccounted for the influence of the dancer's psyche, which, through the mind-body connection, can produce equally detrimental effects. It is the authors’ contention that the efficacy of virtually all screening procedures currently in use could be greatly increased by adding to them a comprehensive, standardized, psychological component. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate what such a component might look like, and to discuss some of the problems involved in, and important benefits to be derived from, its implementation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
PiastinoJG: Physical screening procedures. In: SolomonR, SolomonJ, MintonSC (eds): Preventing Dance Injuries: Second Edition.Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics, 2005, pp. 19–27.
2.
HamiltonLH: The NYC Ballet's Guide to Mind, Body & Nutrition.New York: St. Martin's Press, In press.
3.
SolomonR: A pro-active screening program for addressing injury prevention in a professional ballet company. J Dance Med Sci.1997;1(3):113–7.
4.
SolomonR, SolomonJ: Dance Medicine & Science Bibliography (3rd ed). Andover, New Jersey: J. Michael Ryan Publishing, Inc., 2005.
5.
HamiltonLH, HamiltonWG, War-renMP, KellerK, MolnarM: Factors contributing to the attrition rate in elite ballet students. J Dance Med Sci.1997;1(4):131–8.
6.
LiederbachM: Movement and function in dance. In: BrownsteinB, BronnerS (eds): Functional Movement: Evaluation, Treatment, and Outcomes in Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy.New York: Churchill Livingstone, Inc., 1997, pp. 253–310.
7.
LiederbachM: Screening for functional capacity in dancers: designing standardized, dance-specific injury prevention screening tools. J Dance Med Sci.1997;1(3):93–106.
8.
LiederbachM, SpivakJ, RoseDJ: Scoliosis in dancers: a method of assessment in quick-screen settings. J Dance Med Sci.1997;1(3):107–12.
9.
MolnarM: Dynamic evaluation of the student dancer: enhancement of healthy functioning and movement quality. Impulse.1995 Oct;3(4):287–95.
10.
MolnarM, EstersonJ: Screening students in a pre-professional ballet school. J Dance Med Sci.1997;1(3):118–21.
11.
MolnarM: The orthopedic screen. In: SolomonR, SolomonJ (eds): Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of the International Association for Dance Medicine & Science 2005.Eugene, Oregon: International Association for Dance Medicine & Science, 2005, pp. 244–246.
12.
PiastinoJG: Issues encountered in the screening process. J Dance Med Sci.1997;1(3):85–6.
13.
PiastinoJG: The university dancer: physical screening. J Phys Ed Recreat Dance.1987 May/June;58(5):30.
14.
WyonM, ReddingE, AbtG, HeadA, SharpNCC: Development, reliability, and validity of a multistage dance specific aerobic fitness test (DAFT). J Dance Med Sci.2003;7(3):80–4.
15.
WyonM: Cardiorespiratory training for dancers. J Dance Med Sci.2005;9(1):7–12.
16.
WyonM, ReddingE: Fitness screening. In: SolomonR, SolomonJ (eds): Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of the International Association for Dance Medicine & Science 2005.Eugene, Oregon: International Association for Dance Medicine & Science, 2005, pp. 239–244.
17.
KoutedakisYPacyP, CarsonRJ, DickF: Health and fitness in professional dancers. Med Probl Perform Arts.1997 March;12(1):23–7.
18.
KoutedakisY, SharpNCC: The Fit and Healthy Dancer.Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons, 1999.
19.
KoutedakisY, JamurtasA: The dancer as a performing athlete. Sports Med.2004;4(10):651–61.
20.
HamiltonLH: Advice for Dancers: Emotional Counsel and Practical Strategies.San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1998.
21.
HamiltonLH, KellaJJ, HamiltonWG: Personality and occupational stress in elite performers. Med Probl Perform Arts.1995;10(3):86–9.
22.
HamiltonLH, HamiltonWG, MarshallP: Risk factors associated with physical disability among injured dancers. Paper presented at the 113th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, August 2005.
23.
SmithRE, PtacekJT, PattersonE: Moderator effects of cognitive and somatic trait anxiety on the relation between life stress and physical injuries. J Anxiety Stress Coping.2000;13:269–88.
24.
MicheliLJ, CassellaM, FaigenbaumAD, SouthwickH, HoV: Preseason to postseason changes in body composition of professional ballet dancers. J Dance Med Sci.2005; 9(2):56–9.
25.
PiranN: On the move from tertiary to secondary and primary prevention: working with an elite dance school. In: PiranN, LevineMP, Steiner-AdairC (eds): Preventing Eating Disorders: A Handbook of Interventions and Special Challenges.Philadelphia: Brunner/Mazel, 1999, pp. 256–269.
26.
PiranN: The role of dance teachers in the prevention of eating disorders. In: SolomonR, SolomonJ, MintonSC (eds): Preventing Dance Injuries (2nd ed). Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics, 2005, pp. 201–210.
27.
BuckroydJ: The Student Dancer: Emotional Aspects of Teaching and Learning Dance.London: Dance Books Ltd., 2000.
28.
RobsonBE, BookA, WilmerdingMV: Psychological stresses experienced by dance teachers: ‘How can I be a role model when I never had one?’Med Probl Perform Arts.2002;17(4):173–7.
