Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper examines how William James (1842–1910) and Carl Gustav Jung (1875–1961) developed fundamentally different philosophical frameworks for understanding consciousness, nature, and religious experience. Through close textual analysis of primary sources and engagement with recent historiographical debates, this study demonstrates that James’s evolution from “supernaturalist” phenomenology to religious naturalism grounded in radical empiricism differs fundamentally from Jung’s psycho-epistemological framework emphasizing archetypal structures. The analysis reveals how their divergent ontological commitments—James’s neutral monism versus Jung’s careful distinction between psychological and metaphysical reality—led to distinct methodological approaches to religious phenomena. James evaluated religious experiences pragmatically for their transformative “fruits,” while Jung interpreted them as symbolic expressions of individuation processes. These findings contribute to understanding how early psychology navigated between scientific materialism and religious phenomena, offering insights relevant to contemporary consciousness studies. Rather than imposing anachronistic categories, this historically grounded analysis clarifies both thinkers’ actual positions while exploring their enduring significance for psychology and philosophy of mind.

Keywords

William James Carl Gustav Jung religious naturalism radical empiricism neutral monism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aru

Bachmann

Singer

Melloni

(2012). Distilling the neural correlates of consciousness. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(2), 737–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.12.003

Barrett

J. L.

(2004). Why would anyone believe in god? AltaMira Press.

Boyer

(2001). Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought. Basic Books.

Büchner

(1855/1918). Kraft und Stoff [Force and matter or Principles of the natural order of the universe with a system of morality based thereon a popular exposition]. University of Connecticut Librarie.

Chalmers

D. J.

(1995). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2(3), 200–219.

Cooper

W. E.

(2002). The Unity of william James's thought. Vanderbilt University Press.

Goff

(2017). Consciousness and fundamental reality. Oxford University Press.

Jacob

G. A.

Arntz

(2013). Schema therapy for personality disorders: A review. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 6(2), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1521/ijct.2013.6.2.171

James

(1890). The principles of psychology. Henry Holt.

10.

James

(1897a). What psychical research has accomplished. In The will to believe and other essays in popular philosophy (pp. 299–327). Longmans Green.

11.

James

(1902). The varieties of religious experience: A study in human nature. Longmans.

12.

James

(1904). Does 'consciousness' exist? Journal of philosophy. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 1(18), 477–491. https://doi.org/10.2307/2011942

13.

James

(1909). A pluralistic universe. Project Gutenberg.

14.

James

(1912). Essays in radical empiricism. Longmans Green.

15.

Jones

(2013). Jung’s ‘Psychology with the psyche’ and the behavioral sciences. Behavioral Sciences, 7(3), 408–417. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs3030408

16.

Jung

C. G.

(1938). Psychology and religion. Yale University Press.

17.

Jung

C. G.

(1952/1973). Synchronicity: An acausal connecting principle. Princeton University Press.

18.

Jung

C. G.

(1969). The archetypes and the collective unconscious. In Hull

R. F. C.

(Ed.), Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1936).

19.

Jung

C. G.

(1961). Memories, dreams, reflections. Jaffé

Winston

(Ed.), Random House.

20.

Lamberth

D. C.

(1999). William James and the metaphysics of experience. Cambridge University Press.

21.

McDermott

J. J.

(Ed.), (1977). The writings of William James: A comprehensive edition. University of Chicago Press.

22.

McDougall

(1911). Body and mind: A history and defense of animism. Methuen.

23.

Meier

C. A.

(Ed.), (2001). Atom and archetype: The Pauli/Jung letters, 1932-1958. Princeton University Press.

24.

Myers

F. W. H.

(1903). Human personality and its survival of bodily death. CreateSpace Independent Publishing.

25.

Proulx

Inzlicht

(2012). The five “A”s of meaning maintenance: Finding meaning in the theories of sense-making. Psychological Inquiry, 23(4), 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840x.2012.702372

26.

Santana

L. H.

(2019). Evolutionary Ideas and the Naturalization of Mind in William James. Human Ethology, 26(11–12), 104–116. https://doi.org/10.22330/he/34/144-15

27.

Shamdasani

(2003). Jung and the making of modern psychology: The dream of a science. Cambridge University Press.

28.

Shani

(2015). Cosmopsychism: A holistic approach to the metaphysics of experience. Philosophical Papers, 44(3), 389–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/05568641.2015.1106709

29.

Sotirova-Kohli

Opwis

Roesler

Smith

S. M.

Rosen

D. H.

Vaid

Djonov

(2013). Symbol/meaning paired-associate recall: An “archetypal memory” advantage? Behavioral Sciences, 3(4), 541–561. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs3040541

30.

Strawson

(2009). Realistic monism: Why physicalism entails panpsychism. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 13(10–11), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199267422.003.0003

31.

Taylor

(1996). William James on consciousness beyond the margin. Princeton University Press.

32.

Taylor

(2010). William James and the humanistic implications of the neuroscience revolution: An outrageous hypothesis. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 50(4), 410–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167810376305

33.

Thompson

(2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Harvard University Press.

34.

Wolffram

(2009). The stepchildren of science: Psychical research and parapsychology in Germany, C. 1870-1939. Rodopi.

Mind,Nature,and Religious Experience in William James and Carl Gustav Jung

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References