Abstract
Purpose has long been identified in philosophy and theology as an essential component of a well-directed life. In recent years, support for this longstanding philosophical intuition has come from a rapidly increasing set of studies in psychological science that has examined the nature, origins, development, and positive life outcomes of purpose. Yet this line of research has been limited by unexamined variations in how researchers across multiple labs define and conceptualize purpose. The present review examines prevailing definitions of purpose in present psychological research, discussing the strengths and limitations of each. Three approaches to conceptualizing and defining purpose emerged from this review: The first approach focuses on “
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
