Interest in the topic of human flourishing has burgeoned. This article discusses what is required for a general account of flourishing. It builds on three previous critiques of flourishing conceptualization that clarified the lack of systematic theorizing, the overemphasis on psychometric investigations, and the acultural manner of conceptualization. Addressing these difficulties is necessary to move toward a more cohesive, cumulative science of flourishing. The first theme of the article is a vital first step toward providing a systematic theory of flourishing. The article appropriates Aristotle’s conception of eudaimonia (flourishing or good living) to contemporary concerns. The proposed Eudaimonic Theory defines flourishing, specifies its content in terms of human goods, discusses flourishing as a way of life (i.e., not a one-time achievement or subjective experience), and discusses virtue traits in a flourishing life. A second theme reaffirms the Aristotelian commitment to empirical (broadly conceived) verification. Psychometric evaluations of flourishing measures are useful, but insufficient evidence for a flourishing science. Therefore, hypotheses are provided for heuristic research guidance. The third theme is that flourishing must be made sufficiently capacious to accommodate the substantial cultural variation in flourishing conceptions. The article concludes with a promising proposal for formulating a general account of flourishing.
AndersonA. R.FowersB. J. (2020). An exploratory study of friendship characteristics and their relations with hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(1), 260–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407519861152
2.
AnnasJ. (1993). The morality of happiness, Oxford University Press.
3.
AristotleS. (1996). The politics and the constitution of Athens, EversonS., Trans.). Cambridge University Press.
ArnhartL. (1998). Darwinian natural right: The biological ethics of human nature, SUNY Press.
6.
BarlettiJ. P. S. (2016). The angry earth: Wellbeing, place and extractivism in the Amazon. Anthropology in Action, 23(3), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.3167/aia.2016.230305
7.
BrewerM. B. (2007). The importance of being we: Human nature and intergroup relations. American Psychologist, 62(8), 726–738. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.8.728
8.
BrewerM. B.CaporaelL. R. (2006). An evolutionary perspective on social identity: Revisiting groups. In SchallerM.SimpsonJ. A.KendrickD. T. (Eds.), Evolution and social psychology (pp. 143–161), Psychology Press.
9.
BrewerM. B.YukiM. (2007). Culture and social identity. In KitayamaS.CohenD. (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 307–322), Guilford.
10.
BrinkmannS. (2011). Psychology as a moral science: Perspectives on normativity, Springer.
11.
BroadieS. (1991). Ethics with Aristotle, Oxford University Press.
12.
BussD. M. (Ed.), (2016). The handbook of evolutionary psychology (Vol. 1), Wiley.
13.
CacioppoJ. T.PatrickW. (2008). Loneliness: Human nature and the need for social connection, W. W. Norton.
14.
ClayZ.TennieC. (2018). Is overimitation a uniquely human phenomenon? Insights from human children compared with bonobos. Child Development, 89(5), 1535–1544. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12857
15.
CookeP. J.MelchertT. P.ConnorK. (2016). Measuring well-being: A review of instruments. The Counseling Psychologist, 44(5), 730–757. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000016633507
16.
CoronaC. D.Van OrdenK. A.WiscoB. E.PietrzakR. H. (2019). Meaning in life moderates the association between morally injurious experiences and suicide ideation among US combat veterans: Results from the National Health and Resilience in Veterans Study. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 11(6), 614–620. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000475
17.
CushmanP. (2019). Travels with the self: Interpreting psychology as cultural history, Routledge.
18.
DarnellC.FowersB. J.KristjánssonK. (2022). A multi-function approach to assessing Aristotelian phronesis (practical wisdom). Personality and Individual Differences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111684
19.
de CarvalhoT. F.de AquinoS. D.NatividadeJ. C. (2021). Flourishing in the Brazilian context: Evidence of the validity of the PERMA-profiler scale. Current Psychology. Advanced Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01587-w
20.
de ChavezA. C.Backett-MilburnK.ParryO.PlattS. (2005). Understanding and researching wellbeing: Its usage in different disciplines and potential for health research and health promotion. Health Education Journal, 64(1), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/001789690506400108
21.
de la FuenteR.Sánchez-QueijaI.ParraÁ. (2023). A longitudinal study on the stability and predictors of flourishing among emerging adults. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 55(3), 210–219. https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000327
22.
DemirM.OrthelH.AndelinA. K. (2013) Friendships and happiness. In DavidS.BoniwellD. S.AyersA. C. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of happiness (pp. 860–871), Oxford University Press.
23.
DienerE.WirtzD.TovW.Kim-PrietoC.ChoiD.OishiS.Biswas-DienerR. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y
24.
DreyfusH. (1987). Beyond hermeneutics. In GibbonsM. (Ed.), Interpreting politics (pp. 203–220), New York University Press.
25.
DriverJ. (2001). Uneasy virtue, Cambridge University Press.
26.
FiskeS. T. (2005). Social cognition and the normality of prejudgment. In DovidioJ. F.GlickP.RudmanL. A. (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 36–53). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470773963.ch3
27.
FlanaganO. (1991). Varieties of moral personality: Ethics and psychological realism, Harvard University Press.
28.
FordB. Q.DmitrievaJ. O.HellerD.Chentsova-DuttonY.GrossmannI.TamirM.UchidaY.Koopmann-HolmB.FloerkeV. A.UhrigM.BokhanT.MaussI. B. (2015). Culture shapes whether the pursuit of happiness predicts higher or lower well-being. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(6), 1053–1062. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000108
29.
FowersB. J. (2000). Beyond the myth of marital happiness, Jossey-Bass.
30.
FowersB. J. (2005). Virtue and psychology: Pursuing excellence in ordinary practices, APA Books.
31.
FowersB. J. (2012). An Aristotelian framework for the human good. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 32(1), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025820
32.
FowersB. J. (2015). The evolution of ethics: Human sociality and the emergence of ethical mindedness, Palgrave/McMillan.
33.
FowersB. J. (2016). Aristotle on eudaimonia: On the virtue of returning to the source. In VittersøJ. (Ed.), The handbook of eudaimonic well-being (pp. 67–83), Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42445-3_4
FowersB. J.CarrollJ. S.LeonhardtN. D.CokeletB. (2021). The emerging science of virtue. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(1), 118–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620924473
36.
FowersB. J.CokeletB.LeonhardtN. D.The science of virtue: A framework for research, Cambridge University Press. (in press).
37.
FowersB. J.MollicaC. O.ProcacciE. N. (2010). Constitutive and instrumental goal orientations and their relations with eudaimonic and hedonic well-being. Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(2), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439761003630045
38.
FowersB. J.NovakL. F.KiknadzeN. C.CalderA. J. (2023). Questioning contemporary universalist approaches to human flourishing. Review of General Psychology, 27(2), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680221138230
39.
FowersB. J.RichardsonF. C.SlifeB. D. (2017). Frailty, suffering, and vice: Flourishing in the face of human limitations, APA Books.
40.
FowlerJ. H.ChristakisN. A. (2008). Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: Longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study. British Medical Journal, 337, a2338–a2347. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a2338
41.
FredricksonB. L.GrewenK. M.CoffeyK. A.AlgoeS. B.FirestineA. M.ArevaloJ. G.MaS. W.ColeS. W. (2013). A functional genomic perspective on human well-being. PNAS, 110(33), 13684–13689. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1305419110
42.
GergenK. J. (2011). Relational being: Beyond self and community, Oxford University Press.
43.
GlassenP. (1957). A fallacy in Aristotle’s argument about the good. The Philosophical Quarterly, 7(29), 319–322. https://doi.org/10.2307/2217295
44.
GrossmannI.WeststrateN. M.ArdeltM.BrienzaJ. P.DongM.FerrariM.FournierM. A.HuC. S.NusbaumH. C.VervaekeJ. (2020). The science of wisdom in a polarized world: Knowns and unknowns. Psychological Inquiry, 31(2), 103–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840x.2020.1750917
HardinE. E.RobitschekC.FloresL. Y.NavarroR. L.AshtonM. W. (2014). The cultural lens approach to evaluating cultural validity of psychological theory. American Psychologist, 69(7), 656–668. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036532
47.
HawkinsA. J.FowersB. J.CarrollJ. S.YangC. (2007). Conceptualizing and measuring marital virtues. In HofferthS. L.CasperL. M. (Eds.), Handbook of measurement issues in family research (pp. 67–83), Erlbaum.
48.
HaybronD. M. (2013). Happiness: A very short introduction, Oxford University Press.
Holt-LunstadJ.SmithT. B.BakerM.HarrisT.StephensonD. (2015). Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: A meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614568352
51.
Holt-LunstadJ.SmithT. B.LaytonJ. B. (2010). Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLOS Medicine, 7(7), e1000316–e1000320. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316
52.
HutaV. (2016). Eudaimonic and hedonic orientations: Theoretical considerations and research findings. In VittersøJ. (Ed.), Handbook of eudaimonic well-being (pp. 215–231), Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42445-3_15
53.
IzquierdoC. (2009). When “health” is not enough: Societal, individual and biomedical assessments of well-being among the Matsigenka of the Peruvian Amazon. Social Science & Medicine, 61(4), 767–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.045
54.
KashdanT. B.Biswas-DienerR.KingL. A. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: The costs of distinguishing between hedonics and eudaimonia. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(4), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760802303044
55.
KenwardB. (2012). Over-imitating preschoolers believe that unnecessary actions are normative and enforce their performance by a third party. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 112(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.02.006
56.
KiknadzeN. C.FowersB. J. (2023). Cultural variation in flourishing. Journal of Happiness Studies. Advanced Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-023-00677-9
KingL. A.HicksJ. A.KrullJ. L.Del GaisoA. K. (2006). Positive affect and the experience of meaning in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(1), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.179
59.
KorsgaardC. (1996). The sources of normativity, Cambridge University Press.
60.
KrettenauerT. (2022). Development of moral identity: From the age of responsibility to adult maturity. Developmental Review, 65, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2022.101036
61.
KrettenauerT.HertzS. (2015). What develops in moral identities? A critical review. Human Development, 58(3), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1159/000433502
62.
KristjánssonK. (2020). Flourishing as the aim of education: A neo-aristotelian view, Routledge.
63.
KristjánssonK.FowersB. J. (2024). Phronesis: Retrieving practical wisdom in psychology, philosophy, and education. Oxford University Press.
64.
LambertL.LomasT.van de WeijerM. P.PassmoreH. A.JoshanlooM.HarterJ.IshikawaY.LaiA.KitagawaT.ChenD.KawakamiT.MiyataH.DienerE. (2020). Towards a greater global understanding of wellbeing: A proposal for a more inclusive measure. International Journal of Wellbeing, 10(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v10i2.1037
65.
LeeK. S.OnoH. (2012). Marriage, cohabitation, and happiness: A cross-national analysis of 27 countries. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(5), 953–972. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.01001.x
66.
LiY.TongK. K.TaoV. Y. K.ZhangM. X.WuA. M. S. (2020). Testing the associations among social axioms, school belonging, and flourishing in university students: A two‐year longitudinal study. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 12(3), 749–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12205
67.
LomasT.HefferonK.IvtzanI. (2015). The LIFE model: A meta-theoretical conceptual map for applied positive psychology. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(5), 1347–1364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9563-y
68.
MargolisS.SchwitzgebelE.OzerD. J.LyubomirskyS. (2021). Empirical relationships among five types of well-being. In LeeM. T.KubzanskyL. D.VanderWeeleT. J. (Eds.), Measuring well-being: Interdisciplinary perspectives from the social sciences and the humanities (pp. 377–407), Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197512531.003.0014
69.
MartelaF.SheldonK. M. (2019). Clarifying the concept of well-being: Psychological need satisfaction as the common core connecting eudaimonic and subjective well-being. Review of General Psychology, 23(4), 458–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089268019880886
70.
MathewsG.IzquierdoC. (2009). Pursuits of happiness: Well-being in anthropological perspective, Berghahn books.
71.
McAdamsD. P. (2012). Exploring psychological themes through life-narrative accounts. In HolsteinJ. A.GubriumJ. F. (Eds.), Varieties of narrative analysis (pp. 15–32), Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335117.n2
72.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.BrashearsM. E. (2006). Social isolation in America: Changes in core discussion networks over two decades. American Sociological Review, 71(3), 353–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100301
73.
MillerR. B.HollistC. S.OlsenJ.LawD. (2013). Marital quality and health over 20 years: A growth curve analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75(3), 667–680. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12025
74.
NelsonS. K.LayousK.ColeS. W.LyubomirskyS. (2016). Do unto others or treat yourself? The effects of prosocial and self-focused behavior on psychological flourishing. Emotion, 16(6), 850–861. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000178
75.
NicolasM.NovakL. F.KiknadzeN. C.LouderC.SelimM.FowersB. J. (2023). Does flourishing vary by culture? A qualitative study of 10 cultures. Manuscript under preparation.
76.
NovakL. F.FowersB. J.KiknadzeN. C.CalderA.A close analysis of eight flourishing measures, Journal of Positive Psychology. (in press).
77.
OishiS.DienerE. (2014). Residents of poor nations have a greater sense of meaning in life than residents of wealthy nations. Psychological Science, 25(2), 422–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613507286
78.
OttenS. (2016). The Minimal Group Paradigm and its maximal impact in research on social categorization. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 85–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.06.010
79.
PlominR. (2018). Blueprint: How DNA makes us who we are, MIT Press.
80.
QuickA. D.TungI.KeenanK.HipwellA. E. (2023). Psychological well-being across the perinatal period: Life satisfaction and flourishing in a longitudinal study of Young Black and White American women. Journal of Happiness Studies, 24(3), 1283–1301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-023-00634-6
81.
RichardsonF. C.FowersB. J.GuignonC. (1999). Re-envisioning psychology: Moral dimensions of theory and practice, Jossey-Bass.
82.
RichersonP. J.BoydR. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution, University of Chicago Press.
83.
RoblesT. F.SlatcherR. B.TrombelloJ. M.McGinnM. M. (2014). Marital quality and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(1), 140–187. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031859
84.
RussellD. (2009). Practical intelligence and the virtues. Oxford University Press.
85.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness, Guilford.
86.
RyffC. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
87.
RyffC. D.BoylanJ. M.KirschJ. A. (2021). Eudaimonic and hedonic well-being: An integrative perspective with linkages to sociodemographic factors and health. In LeeM. T.KubzanskyL. D.VanderWeeleT. J. (Eds.), Measuring well-being: Interdisciplinary perspectives from the social sciences and the humanities (pp. 92–135). Oxford University Press.
88.
SartreJ. P. (1956). Being and nothingness: An essay on phenomenological ontology. BarnesH. E. (trans.). Philosophical Library.
89.
ScheierM. F.WroschC.BaumA.CohenS.MartireL. M.MatthewsK. A.SchulzR.ZdaniukB. (2006). The life engagement test: Assessing purpose in life. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 29(3), 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-005-9044-1
90.
Senol-DurakE.DurakM. (2019). Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Flourishing Scale and the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience. Religion & Culture, 22(10), 1021–1032, https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2019.1689548
91.
ShorE.RoelfsD. J.YogevT. (2013). The strength of family ties: A meta-analysis and meta-regression of self-reported social support and mortality. Social Networks, 35(4), 626–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2013.08.004
92.
SmithC. (2015). To flourish or destruct: A personalist theory of human goods, motivations, failure, and evil, University of Chicago Press.
93.
StegerM. F. (2012). Experiencing meaning in life: Optimal functioning at the nexus of well-being, psychopathology, and spirituality. In WongP. T. P. (Ed.), The human quest for meaning: Theories, research, and applications (2nd ed., pp. 165–184), Routledge.
94.
StegerM. F.FrazierP.OishiS.KalerM. (2006). The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(1), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.80
95.
StegerM. F.KashdanT. B. (2007). Stability and specificity of meaning in life and life satisfaction over one year. Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being, 8(2), 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9011-8
96.
SteptoeA.ShankarA.DemakakosP.WardleJ. (2013). Social isolation, loneliness, and all-cause mortality in older men and women. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(15), 5797–5801. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1219686110
97.
SuR.TayL.DienerE. (2014). The development and validation of the Comprehensive Inventory of thriving (CIT) and the brief Inventory of thriving (BIT). Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 6(3), 251–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12027
98.
TanisM.PostmesT. (2005). Short communication, A social identity approach to trust: Interpersonal perception, group membership and trusting behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(3), 413–424. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.256
99.
TaylorC. (1989). Sources of the self, Harvard University Press.
100.
TessmanL. (2005). Burdened virtues: Virtue ethics for liberatory struggles, Oxford University Press.
ThorsteinsenK.VittersøJ. (2020). Now you see it, now you don’t: Solid and subtle differences between Hedonic and Eudaimonic Wellbeing. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 15(4), 519–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2019.1639794
103.
TiberiusV. (2013). Recipes for a good life: Eudaimonism and the contribution of philosophy. In WatermanA. (Ed.), The best within us: Positive psychology perspectives on Eudaimonia, American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14092-002
104.
ToS.SungW. (2017). Presence of meaning, sources of meaning, and subjective well-being in emerging adulthood: A sample of Hong Kong community college students. Emerging Adulthood, 5(1), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696816649804
105.
VanderWeeleT. J. (2017). On the promotion of human flourishing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(31), 8148–8156. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1702996114
106.
VittersøJ. (2016). The handbook of eudaimonic well-being, Springer.
107.
WrightJ.WarrenM.SnowN. (2021). Understanding virtue: Theory and measurement, Oxford University Press.
