Development of Three Psychology Sub-Disciplines Over the Past 30 Years: A Citation Analysis

Abstract

At the end of the last century, there was a debate about whether cognitive psychology had superseded behavioral psychology and psychoanalysis, and the question was raised of whether the latter two might even be dead. The aim of this study was to investigate how these sub-disciplines have developed since then. The citation count, Journal Impact Factor (JIF), and Immediacy Index of four leading journals from each sub-discipline were abstracted for the years 1998, 2008, and 2018. Trends were analyzed using joinpoint regression analysis. The average number of times each sub-discipline’s journals were cited increased between 1988 and 2018. The cognitive journals’ JIF increased slightly, the behavioral journals’ doubled, and the psychoanalytic journals’ remained at the same level. The average annual percentage change for citations to the International Journal of Psychoanalysis showed that the number of citations statistically significantly increased over the years. This was also the case for the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. Its JIF trend changed at one point: it decreased up through 2006, after which it increased. Citations to Cognitive Psychology also increased over time, while there was no evidence that its JIF changed. This shows that all three sub-disciplines are still alive and relevant.

Keywords

behaviorism cognitive psychology psychoanalysis citations references

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Altmann

Thielemann

Strauss

(2016). Ambulante Psychotherapie unter Routinebedingungen: Forschungsbefunde aus dem deutschsprachigen Raum. Psychiatrische Praxis, 43(7), 360–366. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-115616

Alvarez

L. D. C.

Leach

J. L.

Rodriguez

J. L.

Jones

K. N.

(2020). Unsung psychology pioneers: A content analysis of who makes history (and who doesn’t). American Journal of Psychology, 133(2), 241–262. https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.133.2.0241

Alvarez

M. P.

(2020). The scientific imbroglio of psychotherapy: A way out. Papeles Del Psicologo, 41(3), 174–183. https://doi.org/10.23923/pap.psicol2020.2944

Arnett

J. J.

(2008). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist, 63(7), 602–614. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.7.602

Benecke

Eschstruth

(2015). Verfahrensvielfalt und Praxisbezug im derzeitigen Psychologiestudium - eine Online-Umfrage unter Studierenden. Psychotherapeutenjournal, 14(1), 23–29.

Birksted-Breen

Blass

(2019, August). IJP writing workshop. 51st IPA /25th IPSO Congress, London, 2019.

Bornstein

R. F.

(2001). The impending death of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 18(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/0736-9735.18.1.2

Bornstein

R. F.

(2005). Reconnecting psychoanalysis, to mainstream psychology - challenges and opportunities. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 22(3), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/0736-9735.22.3.323

Broadbent

(2010). The UK research assessment exercise: Performance measurement and resource allocation. Australian Accounting Review, 20(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1835-2561.2010.00076.x

10.

Bundesausschuss

(2018). Richtlinie des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses über die Durchführung der Psychotherapie (Fassung 19. Februar 2009, in Kraft getreten am 21. Dezember 2018 ed.). G-BA.

11.

Friman

P. C.

Allen

K. D.

Kerwin

M. L. E.

Larzelere

(1993). Changes in modern psychology - a citation analysis of the Kuhnian displacement thesis. American Psychologist, 48(6), 658–664. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.6.658

12.

Friman

P. C.

Allen

K. D.

Kerwin

M. L. E.

Larzelere

(2000). Questionable validity, not vitality. American Psychologist, 55(2), 274–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.2.274

13.

Huprich

S. K.

Bornstein

R. F.

(2015). Behind closed doors: Sadomasochistic enactments and psychoanalytic research. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 35, 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2015.987604

14.

Ioannidis

J. P. A.

Boyack

K. W.

Klavans

(2014). Estimates of the continuously publishing core in the scientific workforce. Plos One, 9(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101698

15.

Ioannidis

J. P. A.

Klavans

Boyack

K. W.

(2018). The scientists who publish a paper every five days. Nature, 561(7722), 167–169. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06185-8

16.

Kim

H. J.

Fay

M. P.

Feuer

E. J.

Midthune

D. N.

(2000). Permutation tests for joinpoint regression with applications to cancer rates. Statistics in Medicine, 19, 335–351 (correction: 2001;2020:2655). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000215)19:3<335::AID-SIM336>3.0.CO;2-Z

17.

Kirsch

Singer

(2021). Der drohende Tod der Psychoanalyse. Überlegungen zu Selbstdestruktivem und Wiederholungszwang in unserem Fach. In Keßeler-Scheler

Bouville

(Eds.), Jenseits des Lustprinzips. Zur theoretischen und klinischen Aktualität 100 Jahre danach (pp. 254–270). Psychosozial-Verlag.

18.

Kiselica

A. M.

Ruscio

(2014). Scientific communication in clinical psychology: Examining patterns of citations and references. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 21(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.1815

19.

Koch

(1993). “Psychology” or “the psychological studies”? American Psychologist, 48(8), 902–904. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.48.8.902

20.

Krampen

(2016). Scientometric trend analyses of publications on the history of psychology: Is psychology becoming an unhistorical science? Scientometrics, 106(3), 1217–1238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1834-4

21.

Leichsenring

Abbass

Beutel

Gundel

Heuft

Hoffmann

S. O.

Kachele

Kruse

Ruger

Rudolf

Spitzer

Salzer

Luyten

Wampold

Steinert

(2019). Why the concept of distinct psychotherapeutic approaches is indispensable - and why the tool box concept of psychotherapy cannot work. Zeitschrift Fur Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, 65(4), 321–340. https://doi.org/10.13109/zptm.2019.65.4.oa1

22.

Leong

F. T. L.

Pickren

W. E.

Vasquez

M. J. T.

(2017). APA efforts in promoting human rights and social justice. American Psychologist, 72(8), 778–790. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000220

23.

Malich

(2021). Behavior Therapy as genuinely psychological? On the relationship between psychology and medicine at the Max Planck Institute for Psychiatry in the 1960s and 1970s. Psychologische Rundschau, 72(3), 192–200. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000545

24.

Malich

Rehmann-Sutter

(2022). Metascience is not enough-A plea for psychological humanities in the wake of the replication crisis. Review of General Psychology, 26(2), 261–273, Article 10892680221083876. https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680221083876

25.

Martens

M. P.

(2000). Difficulties in analyzing trends in psychology. American Psychologist, 55(2), 272–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.2.272

26.

Millner

U. C.

Maru

Ismail

Chakrabarti

(2021). Decolonizing mental health practice: Reconstructing an Asian-centric framework through a social justice lens. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 12(4), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1037/aap0000268

27.

Pickren

W. E.

(2009). Liberating history: The context of the challenge of psychologists of color to American psychology. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 15(4), 425–433. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017561

28.

Quesque

Coutrot

Cox

de Souza

L. C.

Baez

Cardona

J. F.

Mulet-Perreault

Flanagan

Neely-Prado

Clarens

M. F.

Cassimiro

Musa

Kemp

Botzung

Philippi

Cosseddu

Trujillo-Llano

Grisales-Cardenas

J. S.

Fittipaldi

Matallana

(2022). Does culture shape our understanding of others’ thoughts and emotions? An investigation across 12 countries. Neuropsychology, 36(7), 664–682. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000817. 35834208

29.

Robins

R. W.

Gosling

S. D.

Craik

K. H.

(1999). An empirical analysis of trends in psychology. American Psychologist, 54(2), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.2.117

30.

Robins

R. W.

Gosling

S. D.

Craik

K. H.

(2000). Trends in psychology: An empirical issue. American Psychologist, 55(2), 276–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.2.276

31.

Rozin

(2007). Exploring the landscape of modern academic psychology: Finding and filling the holes. American Psychologist, 62(8), 754–766. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.8.754

32.

Singer

Kojima

Beckerle

Kleining

Schneider

Reuter

(2017). Practice requirements for psychotherapeutic treatment of cancer patients in the outpatient setting - a survey among certified psychotherapists in Germany. Psycho-Oncology, 26(8), 1093–1098. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4427

33.

Singer

Sievers

Linn

L.-M.

Janke

Dietsch

Negwer

(2021). What is considered to be emotional suffering by psychotherapy patients and their therapists in eastern versus western Germany? A mixed-methods study. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(2), 448–458. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12345

34.

Small

Boyack

K. W.

Klavans

(2019). Citations and certainty: A new interpretation of citation counts. Scientometrics, 118(3), 1079–1092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03016-z

35.

Spear

J. H.

(2007). Prominent schools or other active specialties? A fresh look at some trends in psychology. Review of General Psychology, 11(4), 363–380. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.11.4.363

36.

Thoma

N. C.

Cecero

J. J.

(2009). Is integrative use of techniques in psychotherapy the exception or the rule? Results of A National survey of doctoral-level practitioners. Psychotherapy, 46(4), 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017900

37.

Wieczorek

Unger

Riebling

Erhard

Koss

Heiberger

(2021). Mapping the field of psychology: Trends in research topics 1995-2015. Scientometrics, 126(12), 9699-9731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04069-9

38.

Yeung

A. W. K.

(2021). Is the influence of Freud declining in psychology and psychiatry? A bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 631516. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631516