While transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has traditionally been used in perioperative care, there is growing evidence supporting point of care ultrasound (POCUS) for the anesthesiologist in guiding patient care. It is a quick way to non-invasively evaluate hemodynamically unstable patients and ascertain their state of shock, determine volume status, and guide resuscitation in cardiac arrest. In addition, through use of POCUS, the anesthesiologist is able to identify signs of chronic heart disease to provide a more tailored and safer approach to perioperative care.
HolmJHFrederiksenCAJuhl-OlsenPSlothE. Perioperative use of focus assessed transthoracic echocardiography (FATE). Anesth Analg. 2012;115(5):1029-1032. doi:10.1213/ANE.0b013e31826dd867.
2.
JohnsonDWOren-GrinbergA. Perioperative point-of-care ultrasonography: the past and the future are in anesthesiologists’ hands. Anesthesiology. 2011;115(3):460-462. doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e31822a62a1.
3.
ShillcuttSKWalshDPThomasWR, et al.The implementation of a preoperative transthoracic echocardiography consult service by anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg. 2017;125(5):1479-1481. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000002156.
4.
DunhamCMChirichellaTJGruberBS, et al.In emergently ventilated trauma patients, low end-tidal CO2 and low cardiac output are associated and correlate with hemodynamic instability, hemorrhage, abnormal pupils, and death. BMC Anesthesiol. 2013;13(1):20. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-13-20.
5.
JonesAETayalVSSullivanDMKlineJA. Randomized, controlled trial of immediate versus delayed goal-directed ultrasound to identify the cause of nontraumatic hypotension in emergency department patients. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:1703-1708. doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000133017.34137.82.
6.
JosephMXDisneyPJSDa CostaRHutchisonSJHutchinsonSJ. Transthoracic echocardiography to identify or exclude cardiac cause of shock. Chest. 2004;126(5):1592-1597. doi:10.1378/chest.126.5.1592.
7.
RamsinghDFoxJCWilsonWC. Perioperative point-of-care ultrasonography. an emerging technology to be embraced by anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg. 2015;120(5):990-992. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000000702.
8.
ZimmermanJMCokerBJ. The nuts and bolts of performing focused cardiovascular ultrasound (FOCUS). Anesth Analg. 2017;124(3):753-760. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000001861.
9.
ShokoohiHBonifaceKSPourmandA, et al.Bedside ultrasound reduces diagnostic uncertainty and guides resuscitation in patients with undifferentiated hypotension. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(12):2562-2569. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000001285.
10.
HeibergJEl-AnsaryDCantyDJRoyseAGRoyseCF. Focused echocardiography: a systematic review of diagnostic and clinical decision-making in anaesthesia and critical care. Anaesthesia. 2016;71(9):1091-1100. doi:10.1111/anae.13525.
11.
Navas-BlancoJRLouroJReynoldsJEpsteinRHDudarykR. Intraoperative focused cardiac ultrasound for assessment of hypotension: a systematic review. Anesth Analg. 2021; 133(4):852-859. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005336.
12.
JasudavisiusAArellanoRMartinJMcConnellBBainbridgeD. A systematic review of transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography in non-cardiac surgery: implications for point-of-care ultrasound education in the operating room. Can J Anaesth. 2016;63(4):480-487. doi:10.1007/s12630-015-0524-7.
13.
HammillBGCurtisLHBennett-GuerreroE, et al.Impact of heart failure on patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 2008;108(4):559-567. doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e31816725ef.
14.
SmilowitzNRBancoDKatzSDBeckmanJABergerJS. Association between heart failure and perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2021;7(1):68-75. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcz066.
15.
HuangYYCChenLWrightJD. Comparison of perioperative outcomes in heart failure patients with reduced versus preserved ejection fraction after noncardiac surgery. Ann Surg. 2022;275(4):807-815. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000004044.
16.
MaileMDEngorenMCTremperKKJewellEKheterpalS. Worsening preoperative heart failure is associated with mortality and noncardiac complications, but not myocardial infarction after noncardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Anesth Analg. 2014;119(3):522-532. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000000116.
17.
GreviousSNFernandesMFAnnorAK, et al.Prognostic assessment of right ventricular systolic dysfunction on post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement short-term outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(12):e014463. doi:10.1161/JAHA.119.014463.
18.
FleisherLAFleischmannKEAuerbachAD, et al.2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: executive summary: a report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2014;130(24):2215-2245. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000105.
19.
CavallariIMegaSGoffredoCPattiGChelloMDi SciascioG. Hand-held echocardiography in the setting of pre-operative cardiac evaluation of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: results from a randomized pilot study. Int J Cardiovasc Imag. 2015;31(5):995-1000. doi: 10.1007/s10554-015-0656-4.
20.
RugolottoMHuBSLiangDHSchnittgerI. Rapid assessment of cardiac anatomy and function with a new hand-carried ultrasound device (OptiGo): a comparison with standard echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2001;2(4):262-269. doi:10.1053/euje.2001.0121.
21.
SpencerKTKimuraBJKorcarzCEPellikkaPARahkoPSSiegelRJ. Focused cardiac ultrasound: recommendations from the American society of echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013;26(6):567-581. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2013.04.001.
22.
MarbachJAAlmuflehADi SantoP, et al.Comparative accuracy of focused cardiac ultrasonography and clinical examination for left ventricular dysfunction and valvular heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2019;171(4):264-272. doi: 10.7326/M19-1337.
23.
LangRMBadanoLPMor-AviV, et al.Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American society of echocardiography and the european association of cardiovascular imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28(1):1-39.e14. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.003.
24.
ViaGHussainAWellsM, et al.International evidence-based recommendations for focused cardiac ultrasound. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014;27:683.e1-683.e33. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.05.001.
25.
PuchalskiMDWilliamsRVAskovichBMinichLLMartCTaniLY. Assessment of right ventricular size and function: echo versus magnetic resonance imaging. Congenit Heart Dis. 2007;2(1):27-31. doi:10.1111/j.1747-0803.2007.00068.x.
26.
MillingtonSJArntfieldRT. Advanced point-of-care cardiac ultrasound examination: doppler applications, valvular assessment, and advanced right heart examination. Glob Heart. 2013;8(4):305-312. doi:10.1016/j.gheart.2013.11.003.
27.
TeiCDujardinKSHodgeDO, et al.Doppler echocardiographic index for assessment of global right ventricular function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1996;9(6):838-847. doi:10.1016/s0894-7317(96)90476-9.
28.
AnavekarNSGersonDSkaliHKwongRYYucelEKSolomonSD. Two-dimensional assessment of right ventricular function: an echocardiographic-MRI correlative study. Echocardiography. 2007;24(5):452-456. doi:10.1111/j.1540-8175.2007.00424.x.
29.
GopalASChukwuEOIwuchukwuCJ, et al.Normal values of right ventricular size and function by real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20(5):445-455. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2006.10.027.
30.
RudskiLGLaiWWAfilaloJ, et al.Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the american society of echocardiography. endorsed by the european association of echocardiography, a registered branch of the european society of cardiology, and the canadian society of echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23(7):685-713. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2010.05.010.
RahulkumarHHBhavinPRShreyasKPKrunalkumarHPAtulkumarSBansariC. Utility of point-of-care ultrasound in differentiating causes of shock in resource-limited setup. J Emergencies, Trauma, Shock. 2019;12(1):10-17. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_61_18. PMID: 31057278; PMCID: PMC6496999.
33.
De BackerDBistonPDevriendtJMadlCChochradDAldecoaCSOAP II Investigators, et al. Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(9):779-789. Doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907118.
34.
BughraraNDiaz-GomezJLPustavoitauA. Perioperative management of patients with sepsis and septic shock, part II: ultrasound support for resuscitation. Anesthesiol Clin. 2020;38(1):123-134. doi:10.1016/j.anclin.2019.11.001.
35.
ShillcuttSKMarkinNWMontzingoCRBrakkeTR. Use of rapid “rescue” perioperative echocardiography to improve outcomes after hemodynamic instability in noncardiac surgical patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012;26(3):362-370. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2011.09.029.
36.
Chamsi-PashaMASenguptaPPZoghbiWA. Handheld echocardiography current state and future perspectives. Circulation. 2017;136:2178-2188.
37.
MiglioranzaMHGarganiLSant’AnnaRTRoverMMMartinsVMMantovaniA, et al.Lung ultrasound for the evaluation of pulmonary congestion in outpatients: a comparison with clinical assessment, natriuretic peptides, and echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:1141-1151. doi:10.1016/j.cmg.2013.08.004.
38.
FrassiFGarganiLGligorovaSCiampiQMottolaGPicanoE. Clinical and echocardiographic determinants of ultrasound lung comets. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2007;8(6):474-479. doi:10.1016/j.euje.2006.09.004.
39.
LichtensteinDGoldsteinIMourgeonECluzelPGrenierPRoubyJJ. Comparative diagnostic performances of auscultation, chest radiography, and lung ultrasonography in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Anesthesiology. 2004;100(1):9-15. doi:10.1097/00000542-200401000-00006.
40.
GoldhaberSZ. Pulmonary embolism thrombolysis: broadening the paradigm for its administration. Circulation. 1997;96:716-718.
41.
Ten WoldeMSohneMQuakEMacGillavryMRBullerHR. Prognostic value of echocardiographically assessed right ventricular dysfunction in patients with pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1685-1689.
42.
RibeiroALindmarkerPJuhlin-DAnnfeltAJohnssonHJorfeldtLRibeiroA, et al.Echocardiography Doppler in pulmonary embolism: right ventricular dysfunction as a predictor of mortality rate. Am Heart J. 1997;134:479-487.
43.
BovaCGrecoFMisuracaGSerafiniOCroccoFGrecoA, et al.Diagnostic utility of echocardiography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Am J Emerg Med. 2003;21:180-183.
44.
KasperWKonstantinidesSGeibelAOlschewskiMHeinrichFGrosserKD, et al. Management strategies and determinants of outcome in acute major pulmonary embolism: results of a multicenter registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:1165-1171.
45.
MiniatiMMontiSPrataliLDi RiccoGMariniCFormichiB, et al.Value of transthoracic echocardiography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: results of a prospective study in unselected patients. Am J Med. 2001;110:528-535.
46.
MansencalNVieillard-BaronABeauchetAFarcotJ-CEl HajjamMDufaitreG, et al.Triage patients with suspected pulmonary embolism in the emergency department using a portable ultrasound device. Echocardiography. 2008;25:451-456.
47.
LabovitzAJNobleVEBierigM, et al.Focused cardiac ultrasound in the emergent setting: a consensus statement of the American society of echocardiography and American college of emergency physicians. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23(12):1225-1230. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2010.10.005.
48.
AlerhandSCarterJM. What echocardiographic findings suggest a pericardial effusion is causing tamponade?Am J Emerg Med. 2019;37(2):321-326. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2018.11.004.
49.
AlerhandSAdrianRJLongBAvilaJ. Pericardial tamponade: a comprehensive emergency medicine and echocardiography review. Am J Emerg Med. 2022;58:159-174. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2022.05.001.
50.
LenkTWhittleJMillerTEWilliamsDGABronshteynYS. Focused cardiac ultrasound in preoperative assessment: the perioperative provider’s new stethoscope?Perioperat Med. 2019;8:16. doi:10.1186/s13741-019-0129-8.
51.
BaumgartnerHHungJBermejoJChambersJBEdvardsenTGoldsteinS, et al.Recommendations on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis: a focused update from the european association of cardiovascular imaging and the American society of echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017; 30:372-392.
52.
BaumgartnerHHungJBermejoJChambersJBEvangelistaAGriffinBPAmerican Society of EchocardiographyEuropean Association of Echocardiography, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. J Am Soc Echocardiogr.2009; 22(1): 1-23. quiz 101-102.
Huis In't VeldMAAllisonMGBostickDS, et al.Ultrasound use during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is associated with delays in chest compressions. Resuscitation. 2017;119:95-98. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.07.021.
55.
BreitkreutzRWalcherFSeegerFH. Focused echocardiographic evaluation in resuscitation management: concept of an advanced life support-conformed algorithmCrit Care Med. 2007;35:S150-S161. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000260626.23848
56.
TsouPYKurbedinJChenYS, et al.Accuracy of point-of-care focused echocardiography in predicting outcome of resuscitation in cardiac arrest patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2017;114: 92-99. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.02.021.
57.
GaspariRWeekesAAdhikariS, et al.Emergency department point-of-care ultrasound in out-of-hospital and in-ED cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2016;109:33-39. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.09.018.
58.
BreitkreutzRPriceSSteigerHV, et al.Focused echocardiographic evaluation in life support and peri-resuscitation of emergency patients: a prospective trial. Resuscitation. 2010;81(11):1527-1533. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.07.013.
59.
FerradaPVanguriPAnandRJWhelanJDuaneTAboutanosM, et alA, B, C, D, echo: limited transthoracic echocardiogram is a useful tool to guide therapy for hypotension in the trauma bay--a pilot study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74:220-223.,
60.
HollonMMBradleyCMcCulloughIBorgmeierE. Perioperative applications of focused cardiac ultrasound. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2022;60(3):24-33. doi:10.1097/AIA.0000000000000371.
61.
LeungJMLevineEH. Left ventricular end-systolic cavity obliteration as an estimate of intraoperative hypovolemia. Anesthesiology. 1994;81:1102-1109.
62.
BrennanJMRonanAGoonewardenaSBlairJEAHammesMShahD, et al.Hand Carried ultrasound measurement of the inferior vena cava for assessment of intravascular volume status in the outpatient hemodialysis clinic. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;1:749-753.
63.
DiptiASoucyZSuranaAChandraS. Role of inferior vena cava diameter in assessment of volume status: a meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30:1414-1419.
64.
BurnsJMSingRFMostafaGHuynhTTJacobsDGMilesWS, et al.The role of transesophageal echocardiography in optimizing resuscitation in acutely injured patients. J Trauma. 2005;59(1):36-40. doi:10.1097/01.ta.0000171460.56972.42.
65.
BrennanJMBlairJEGoonewardenaSRonanAShahDVasaiwalaS, et al.Reappraisal of the use of inferior vena cava for estimating right atrial pressure. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20:857-861.
66.
LevitovAMarikPE. Echocardiographic assessment of preload responsiveness in critically ill patients. Cardiol Res Pract. 2012;2012:819696.
67.
MarikPEBaramMVahidB. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest. 2008;134:172-178.
68.
PreauSSaulnierFDewavrinFDurocherAChagnonJL. Passive leg raising is predictive of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with severe sepsis or acute pancreatitis. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:819-825.
69.
MaizelJAirapetianNLorneETribouilloyCMassyZSlamaM. Diagnosis of central hypovolemia by using passive leg raising. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33:1133-1138.
70.
TeboulJLMonnetX. Prediction of volume responsiveness in critically ill patients with spontaneous breathing activity. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2008;14:334-339.
71.
MarikPE. Techniques for assessment of intravascular volume in critically ill patients. J Intensive Care Med. 2009;24:329-337.
72.
MarikPECavallazziRVasuTHiraniA. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:2642-2647.
73.
BiaisMVidilLSarrabayPCottenceauVRevelPSztarkF. Changes in stroke volume induced by passive leg raising in spontaneously breathing patients: comparison between echocardiography and Vigileo/FloTrac device. Crit Care. 2009;13:R195.
74.
LamiaBOchagaviaAMonnetXChemlaDRichardCTeboulJL. Echocardiographic prediction of volume responsiveness in critically ill patients with spontaneously breathing activity. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33:1125-1132.
75.
MitchellCRahkoPSBlauwetLA, et al.Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transthoracic echocardiographic examination in adults: recommendations from the american society of echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019;32(1):1-64. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2018.06.004.
76.
QuinonesMAOttoCMStoddardMWaggonerAZoghbiWADoppler Quantification Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. Recommendations for quantification of doppler echocardiography: a report from the doppler quantification task force of the nomenclature and standards committee of the American society of echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002;15(2):167-184. doi:10.1067/mje.2002.120202.
77.
HuntsmanLLStewartDKBarnesSRFranklinSBColocousisJSHesselEA. Noninvasive Doppler determination of cardiac output in man: clinical validation. Circulation. 1983;67(3):593-602. doi:10.1161/01.cir.67.3.593.
78.
FerradaPMurthiSAnandRJBochicchioGVScaleaT. Transthoracic focused rapid echocardiographic examination: real-time evaluation of fluid status in critically ill trauma patients. J Trauma. 2011;70(1):56-62. discussion 62-4. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e318207e6ee.
79.
KimuraBJYogoNO’ConnellCWPhanJNShowalterBKWolfsonT. Cardiopulmonary limited ultrasound examination for ‘‘quick-look’’ bedside application. Am J Cardiol. 2011;108(4):586-590. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.03.091.
80.
AtkinsonPRTMcAuleyDJKendallRJ, et al.Abdominal and cardiac evaluation with sonography in shock (ACES): an approach by emergency physicians for the use of ultrasound in patients with undifferentiated hypotension. Emerg Med J. 2009;26(2):87-91. doi:10.1136/emj.2007.056242.
81.
RoseJSBairAEMandaviaDKinserDJ. The UHP ultrasound protocol: a novel ultrasound approach to the empiric evaluation of the undifferentiated hypotensive patient. Am J Emerg Med. 2001;19(4):299-302. doi:10.1053/ajem.2001.24481.
82.
PereraPMMailhotTRileyDMandaviaD. The RUSHexam 2012: rapid ultrasound in shock in the evaluation of the critically ill patient. Ultrasound Clin. 2012;7:255-278.
83.
NagreAS. Focus-assessed transthoracic echocardiography: Implications in perioperative and intensive care. Ann Card Anaesth. 2019;22(3):302-308. doi:10.4103/aca.ACA_88_18.
84.
PaceJArntfieldR. Focused assessment with sonography in trauma: a review of concepts and considerations for anesthesiology. Can J Anaesth. 2018;65(4):360-370. doi:10.1007/s12630-017-1030-x.
85.
GunstMSperryJGhaemmaghamiVO’KeeffeTFrieseRFrankelH. Bedside echocardiographic assessment for trauma/critical care: the BEAT exam. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207(3):e1-e3. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.05.02.
86.
HernandezCShulerKHannanHSonyikaCLikourezosAMarshallJ. C.A.U.S.E.: cardiac arrest ultra-sound exam--a better approach to managing patients in primary non-arrhythmogenic cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2008; 76(2):198-206. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2007.06.033.
87.
StaudtGESheltonK. Development of a rescue echocardiography protocol for noncardiac surgery patients. Anesth Analg. 2019;129(2):37-40.
88.
Anesthesia Quality Institute. AQI QCDR Measure Specifications” Updated. Schaumburg, IL: Anesthesia Quality Institute. 2016.
89.
RamsinghDSRinehartJKainZ, et al.Impact assessment of perioperative point-of-care ultrasound training on anesthesiology residents. Anesthesiology. 2015;123(3):670-682. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000000776.
90.
PernatAWeilMHSunSTangW. Stroke volumes and end-tidal carbon dioxide generated by precordial compression during ventricular fibrillation. Crit Care Med. 2003;31(6):1819-1823. doi:10.1097/01.CCM.0000069538.12447.82.
