Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The 1985 release of hospital report cards by the Health Care Financing Administration awakened the public's awareness of variations in outcomes following patient treatment. In 1972, the Department of Veterans Affairs initiated an oversight process for all VA-based cardiac surgery programs. In response to Public Law 99-166, the Continuous Improvement in Cardiac Surgery Program (CICSP) national database was developed in 1987. This CICSP effort reported variations in outcomes across VA cardiac programs. In 1997, the CICSP expanded (CICSP-X) to identify the interrelationships of risk factors with processes and structures of care, as well as clinical outcomes. Based on VA findings to date, these quality improvement endeavors appear to have positively affected short-term and longer-term cardiac surgical outcomes. To advance a new patient-focused paradigm for continuous improvement in cardiac surgical care quality for all US citizens, an integrated data-driven reporting approach with broad-based participation should be implemented to optimally improve patient care.

Keywords

risk factor coronary artery bypass process assessment quality assurance quality indicators outcome assessment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Spiegelhalter DJ Surgical audit: statistical lessons from Nightingale and Codman. J R Stat Soc Ser A (Stat Soc). 1999;162:45-58.

Donabedian A. , Wheeler JRC , Wyszewianski L. Quality, cost, and health: an integrative model. Med Care. 1982;20:975-992.

McDonald GO Annual Patient Care Services Summary: VA Cardiac Surgery, 2002 .

Takaro T. , Ankeney JL , Laning RC , Peduzzi PN Quality control for cardiac surgery in the Veterans Administration . Ann Thorac Surg. 1986;42:37-44.

Grover FL Future Healthcare. http://www.futurehealthcareus.com/?mc=quality-improvement&page=fs-viewresearch . Accessed February 8, 2008.

PL 99-166. 38 USC Chapter 73 Veterans Health Administration-Organization and Functions, Subchapter II-General Authority and Administration, Section 7311.

Grover FL , Hammermeister KE , Burchfiel C. Initial report of the Veterans Administration Preoperative Risk Assessment Study for Cardiac Surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990;50:12-26.

VA Circular 10-87-21, March 27, 1987.

Tu JV , Austin PC Cardiac report cards: How can they be made better? Circulation . 2007;116:2897-2899.

10.

Shroyer AL Proposal to Expand Data Collection and Reports to Evaluate VA Cardiac Surgery Performance. VA Health Services Research and Development Grant IHY 99214-1, funded 1999-2000.

11.

Shroyer AL , Grover FL Enhanced Wait Time Data Collection and Reporting for Surgery. VA Central Office, Office of Patient Care Services, funded 2007-2008.

12.

Mainz J. Defining and classifying clinical indicators for quality improvement . Int J Qual Health Care. 2003;15:523-530.

13.

Steyerberg EW , Harrell FE Jr , Borsboom GJ , Eijkemans MJ , Vergouwe Y. , Habbema JD Internal validation of predictive models: efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54: 774-781.

14.

Krumholz HM , Brindis RG , Brush JE , et al. Standards and statistical models used for public reporting of health outcomes: an American Heart Association Scientific Statement from the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Writing Group: cosponsored by the Council on Epidemiology and Prevention and the Stroke Council. Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation . Circulation. 2006;113:456-462.

15.

Malenka DJ , O'Connor GT The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group: a regional collaborative effort for continuous improvement in cardiovascular disease . Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1998;24:594-600.

16.

Ferguson TB , Hammill BG , Peterson ED , DeLong ER , Grover FL A decade of change: risk profiles and outcomes for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting procedure 1990-1999: A report from the STS National Database Committee and Duke Clinical Research Institute . Ann Thorac Surg. 2002 ;73:480-490.

17.

Hannan EL , Siu AL , Kumar D. , Kilburn H. , Chassin MR The decline in coronary artery bypass graft surgery mortality in New York State: the role of surgeon volume. JAMA. 1995 ;273:209-213.

18.

Hannan EL , Sarrazin MS , Doran DR , Rosenthal GE Provider profiling and quality improvement efforts in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: the effect on short-term mortality among Medicare beneficiaries . Med Care. 2003;41:1164-1172.

19.

Grover FL , Shroyer AL , Hammermeister KE , et al. A decade's experience with quality improvement in cardiac surgery using the Veterans Affairs and Society of Thoracic Surgeons national databases . Ann Surg. 2001;234:464-472.

20.

Pl 109-432. 42 USC 1305 Title 1-Medicare Improved Quality and Provider Payments, Section 1001-Physician Payment and Quality Improvement. Medicare Improvements and Extension Act of 2006.

21.

National Quality Forum. National Voluntary Consensus Standards for Cardiac Surgery: A Consensus Report. 2004 .

22.

Shroyer AL , London MJ , VillaNueva CB , et al. The processes, structures, and outcomes of care in cardiac surgery study protocol. Med Care. 1995;33:OS17-OS25.

23.

VHA Handbook 1102.3. Criteria and Standards for Cardiac Surgery Programs. February 5, 2008.

24.

Adams K , Corrigan JM , eds. Committee on Identifying Priority Areas for Quality Improvement. Priority Areas for National Action: Transforming Health Care Quality. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003.

25.

Donabedian, A. Criteria and standards for quality assessment and monitoring. Qual Rev Bull. 1986;12:99-108.

Improving Quality of Care in Cardiac Surgery: Evaluating Risk Factors,Processes of Care,Structures of Care,and Outcomes

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References