Is Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Cost-Saving?

Abstract

One of the challenges in comparing the cost of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery to conventional coronary artery bypass graft surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass is that most data are from observational studies, not randomized controlled trials. Thus, cost differences observed between groups may not be attributable to the difference in surgical technique, but to the underlying patient characteristics that ultimately led the patient to be selected to receive one procedure or another. The purpose of this study was to control for patient selection effects in observational data and estimate reductions in costs and length of stay attributable to the off-pump coronary artery bypass procedure. We studied 1172 patients (245 off-pump coronary artery bypass and 927 coronary artery bypass graft) undergoing coronary bypass graft surgery via a median sternotomy at the Lehigh Valley Hospital between January 1, 1999 and June 30, 2000. Propensity scores were used to match patients who received off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery to similar coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients. Logistic regression was used to estimate propensity scores and select 181 patients from the coronary artery bypass graft group for comparison to patients in the off-pump coronary artery bypass group. Statistical comparisons of continuous outcomes were made using the Student t test after a transformation to natural log scale to correct skewness. Patients in the off-pump group tended to be treated by surgeons with more experience with off-pump surgery (p=0.0001), relatively older (p-0.001), had fewer diseased vessels (p=0.0001), did not have previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery (p=0.01), and had elective (p=0.0002) or urgent (p=0.002) surgery rather than emergent or salvage surgery. Propensity score matched coronary artery bypass graft patients had significantly longer total LOS (p=0.02), postoperative length of stay (p=0.03), and total costs (p=0.016) than patients who underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. After correcting for selection effects, off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery was associated with 12% lower total costs, 14% fewer total and postoperative hospital days. This suggests that coronary artery bypass surgery without cardiopulmonary bypass is cost-saving at a large academic community medical center. Future research should consider whether off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery is also cost-effective.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Diegeler A , Hirsch R , Schneider F , et al: Neuromonitoring and neurocognitive outcome in off-pump versus conventional coronary bypass operation. Ann Thorac Surg 69(4): 1162-1166, 2000.

2. Bhasker Rao B , Van Himbergen D , Edmonds HL Jr , et al: Evidence for improved cerebral function after minimally invasive bypass surgery. J Card Surg 13(1):27-31, 1998.

3. Newman MF , Kirchner JL , Phillips-Bute B , et al: Longitudinal assessment of neurocognitive function after coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 344(6):395-402, 2001.

4. Cleveland JC Jr , Shroyer AL , Chen AY , Peterson E , Grover FL : Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting decreases risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity. Ann Thorac Surg 72(4):1282-1288, 2001.

5. Boyd WD , Desai ND , Del Rizzo DF , Novick RJ , McKenzie FN , Menkis AH : Off-pump surgery decreases postoperative complications and resource utilization in the elderly. Ann Thorac Surg 68(4):1490-1493, 1999.

6. Sinclair MC , Wilsker GA , Morris DL , Mohan R , Hollenbeak CS : Coronary artery bypass: The increasing role of offpump surgery in a large community hospital. Heart Surg Forum 5(Supp 1):SI30-S144, 2002.

7. Arom KV , Flavin TF , Emery RW , Kshettry VF , Janey PA , Petersen RJ : Safety and efficacy of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 69(3):704-710, 2000.

8. van Dijk D , Nierich AP , Jansen EW , et al: Early outcome after off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery: Results from a randomized study. Circulation 104(15): 1761-1766, 2001.

9. Puskas JD , Thourani VH , Marshall JJ , et al: Clinical outcomes, angiographic patency, and resource utilization in 200 consecutive off-pump coronary bypass patients. Ann Thorac Surg 71(5):1477-1483, 2001.

10.

10. Ascione R , Caputo M , Calori G , Lloyd CT , Underwood MJ , Angelini GD : Predictors of atrial fibrillation after conventional and beating heart coronary surgery: A prospective, randomized study. Circulation 102(13):1530-1535, 2000.

11.

11. Arom KV , Emery RW , Flavin TF , Petersen RJ : Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 68(4):1562-1566, 1999.

12.

12. Ascione R , Lloyd CT , Underwood MJ , Lotto AA , Pitsis AA , Angelim GD : Economic outcome of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: A prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg 68(6):2237-2242, 1999.

13.

13. Bull DA , Neumayer LA , Stringham JC , Meldrum P , Affleck DG , Karwande SV : Coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass versus off-pump cardiopulmonary bypass grafting: Does eliminating the pump reduce morbidity and cost? Ann Thorac Surg 71(1):170-173, 2001.

14.

14. Lee JH , Abdelhady K , Capdeville M : Clinical outcomes and resource usage in 100 consecutive patients after off-pump coronary bypass procedures. Surgery 128(4):548-555, 2000.

15.

15. Calafiore AM , Di Giammarco G , Teodori G , et al: Midterm results after minimally invasive coronary surgery (LAST operation). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 115(4):763-771, 1998.

16.

16. Rosenbaum PR , Rubin D : The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1):41-55, 1983.

17.

17. Rosenbaum PR , Rubin D : Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. JASA 79(387):516-524, 1985.

18.

18. Sinclair MC , Wilsker GA , Morris DL , Mohan R , Hollenbeak CS : Is off-pump bypass better? Adverse effects of on-pump conversion. Ann Thorac Surg 73(6):2036-2037, 2002.