AllenD. (2016). Education and equality. The University of Chicago Press.
2.
AllenM. S.IliescuD. (2021). Impact factor wars: Episode VI—Return of the meaningless metric. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 37(5), 341–343.
3.
AthertonO. E.ChungJ. M.HarrisK.RohrerJ. M.CondonD. M.CheungF.CorkerK. S. (2021). Why has personality psychology played an outsized role in the credibility revolution?Personality Science, 2, 1–21.
4.
BarabinoG. A.YamamotoK. R.DeSantisM.FiskeS.GilbertJ.MonteauD.PettigrewR. I.ThomasK. M.SchererL.MarkovichB. (2021). Addressing diversity, equity, inclusion, and anti-racism in 21st century STEMM organizations. The National Academies Press.
5.
BaumanH. D. L.MurrayJ. J. (Eds.). (2014). Deaf gain: Raising the stakes for human diversity. University of Minnesota Press.
6.
BuchananN. T.PerezM.PrinsteinM.ThurstonI. (in press). Upending racism in psychological science: Strategies to change how our science is conducted, reported, reviewed and disseminated. American Psychologist.
7.
CheekN. N. (2017). Scholarly merit in a global context: The nation gap in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1133–1137.
8.
CrenshawK. (1990). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.
9.
CrossW. E.Jr.ParhamT. A.HelmsJ. E. (1991). The stages of Black identity development: Nigrescence models. In JonesR. L. (Ed.), Black psychology (pp. 319–338). Cobb & Henry Publishers.
10.
FunderD. C.LevineJ. M.MackieD. M.MorfC. C.SansoneC.VazireS.WestS. G. (2014). Improving the dependability of research in personality and social psychology: Recommendations for research and educational practice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(1), 3–12.
11.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.NosekB. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046.
HendrenS. (2020). What can a body do: How we meet the built world. Penguin Random House.
14.
LedgerwoodA.HudsonS. T. J.LewisN. A.Jr.MaddoxK. B.PickettC. L.RemediosJ. D.CheryanS.DiekmanA. B.DutraN. B.GohJ. X.GoodwinS. A.MunakataY.NavarroD. J.OnyeadorI. N.SrivastavaS.WilkinsC. L. (in press). The pandemic as a portal: Reimagining psychological science as truly open and inclusive. Perspectives on Psychological Science.
15.
MurphyM. C.MejiaA. F.MejiaJ.YanX.CheryanS.DasguptaN.. . . PestilliF. (2020). Open science, communal culture, and women’s participation in the movement to improve science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(39), 24154–24164.
16.
PlautV. C. (2010). Diversity science: Why and how difference makes a difference. Psychological Inquiry, 21(2), 77–99.
17.
RobertsB. W. (2019). Be interesting, my friends, but be robust [Conference session]. Presidential address at the Biennial Conference of the Association for Research in Personality, Grand Rapids, MI, United States.
18.
RobertsS. O.Bareket-ShavitC.DollinsF. A.GoldieP. D.MortensonE. (2020). Racial inequality in psychological research: Trends of the past and recommendations for the future. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(6), 1295–1309.
19.
SpellmanB. A. (2015). A short (personal) future history of revolution 2.0. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(6), 886–899.
20.
SyedM. (2021). It’s 2 × 2 designs all the way down: Social psychology’s over-reliance on experiments needlessly restricts diversity in the field. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u89e2
21.
SyedM.McLeanK. C. (in press). Disentangling paradigm and method can help bring qualitative research to post-positivist psychology and address the generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
22.
ThalmayerA. G.ToscanelliC.ArnettJ. J. (2021). The neglected 95% revisited: Is American psychology becoming less American?American Psychologist, 76(1), 116–129.
23.
WinstonA. S. (2020). Why mainstream research will not end scientific racism in psychology. Theory & Psychology, 30(3), 425–430.