Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2020-8
Introducing the Sociopolitical Motive × Intergroup Threat Model to Understand How Monoracial Perceivers’ Sociopolitical Motives Influence Their Categorization of Multiracial People
Researchers have used social dominance, system justification, authoritarianism, and social identity theories to understand how monoracial perceivers’ sociopolitical motives influence their categorization of multiracial people. The result has been a growing understanding of how particular sociopolitical motives and contexts affect categorization, without a unifying perspective to integrate these insights. We review evidence supporting each theory’s predictions concerning how monoracial perceivers categorize multiracial people who combine their ingroup with an outgroup, with attention to the moderating role of perceiver group status. We find most studies cannot arbitrate between theories of categorization and reveal additional gaps in the literature. To advance this research area, we introduce the sociopolitical motive × intergroup threat model of racial categorization that (a) clarifies which sociopolitical motives interact with which intergroup threats to predict categorization and (b) highlights the role of perceiver group status. Furthermore, we consider how our model can help understand phenomena beyond multiracial categorization.
AlabreseE.BeckerS. O.FetzerT.NovyD. (2019). Who voted for Brexit? Individual and regional data combined. European Journal of Political Economy, 56, 132–150.
2.
AltemeyerB. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality.” In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47–92). Academic Press.
3.
BlumerH. (1958). Race prejudice as a sense of group position. The Pacific Sociological Review, 1(1), 3–7.
4.
BonikowskiB. (2017). Ethno-nationalist populism and the mobilization of collective resentment. The British Journal of Sociology, 68, S181–S213.
5.
BrewerM. B. (2007). The importance of being we: Human nature and intergroup relations. American Psychologist, 62(8), 728–738.
6.
CarusoE. M.MeadN. L.BalcetisE. (2009). Political partisanship influences perception of biracial candidates’ skin tone. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106(48), 20168–20173.
7.
CastanoE.YzerbytV.BourguignonD.SeronE. (2002). Who may enter? The impact of in-group identification on in-group/out-group categorization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(3), 315–322.
8.
ChenJ. M. (2019). An integrative review of impression formation processes for multiracial individuals. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13(1), Article e12430.
9.
ChenJ. M.de Paula CoutoM. C. P.SaccoA. M.DunhamY. (2018). To be or not to be (black or multiracial or white): Cultural variation in racial boundaries. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(7), 763–772.
10.
ChenJ. M.HamiltonD. L. (2012). Natural ambiguities: Racial categorization of multiracial individuals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 152–164.
11.
ChenJ. M.KteilyN.HoA. K. (2019). Whose side are you on? Asian Americans’ mistrust of Asian-White biracials predicts more exclusion from the ingroup. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45, 827–841.
12.
ChenJ. M.MoonsW. G.GaitherS. E.HamiltonD. L.ShermanJ. W. (2014). Motivation to control prejudice predicts categorization of multiracials. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(5), 590–603.
13.
ChenJ. M.PaukerK.GaitherS. E.HamiltonD. L.ShermanJ. W. (2018). Black + White = Not White: A minority bias in categorizations of Black-White multiracials. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 43–54.
14.
ChenJ. M.RatliffK. A. (2015). Implicit attitude generalization from Black to Black–White biracial group members. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(5), 544–550.
15.
ChengH. L.McDermottR. C.WongY. J.LaS. (2016). Drive for muscularity in Asian American men: Sociocultural and racial/ethnic factors as correlates. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 17, 215–227.
16.
CooleyE.Brown-IannuzziJ. L.BrownC. S.PolikoffJ. (2018). Black groups accentuate hypodescent by activating threats to the racial hierarchy. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(4), 411–418.
17.
CraigM. A.RichesonJ. A. (2016). Stigma-based solidarity: Understanding the psychological foundations of conflict and coalition among members of different stigmatized groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(1), 21–27.
18.
DavisF. J. (1991). Who is Black? One nation’s definition. Pennsylvania State University Press.
19.
DevineP. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 5–18.
20.
DevosT.BanajiM. R. (2005). American = White?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 447–466.
21.
DuckittJ. (1989). Authoritarianism and group identification: A new view of an old construct. Political Psychology, 10(1), 63–84.
22.
DuckittJ.SibleyC. G. (2016). Personality, ideological attitudes, and group identity as predictors of political behavior in majority and minority ethnic groups. Political Psychology, 37(1), 109–124.
23.
DuckittJ.WagnerC.du PlessisI.BirumI. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 75–93.
24.
DunhamY. (2011). An angry = outgroup effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(3), 668–671.
25.
EberhardtJ. L.DaviesP. G.Purdie-VaughnsV. J.JohnsonS. L. (2006). Looking deathworthy: Perceived stereotypicality of Black defendants predicts capital-sentencing outcomes. Psychological Science, 17(5), 383–386.
26.
EllemersN.HaslamS. A. (2012). Social identity theory. In van LangeP.KruglanskiA.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories in social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 379–398). SAGE.
27.
FiskeS. T. (2010). Interpersonal stratification: Status, power, and subordination. In FiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 5th ed., pp. 941–982). John Wiley & Sons.
28.
FreemanJ. B.PennerA. M.SapersteinA.ScheutzM.AmbadyN. (2011). Looking the part: Social status cues shape race perception. PLOS ONE, 6(9), Article e25107.
29.
GaitherS. E.ChenJ. M.PaukerK.SommersS. R. (2019). At face value: Psychological outcomes differ for real vs. computer-generated multiracial faces. The Journal of Social Psychology, 159, 592–610.
30.
GaitherS. E.PaukerK.SlepianM. L.SommersS. R. (2016). Social belonging motivates categorization of racially ambiguous faces. Social Cognition, 34(2), 97–118.
31.
GaitherS. E.ToosiN. R.BabbittL. G.SommersS. R. (2019). Exposure to biracial faces reduces colorblindness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(1), 54–66.
32.
HalberstadtJ.ShermanS. J.ShermanJ. W. (2011). Why Barack Obama is Black: A cognitive account of hypodescent. Psychological Science, 22(1), 29–33.
33.
HennesE. P.NamH. H.SternC.JostJ. T. (2012). Not all ideologies are created equal: Epistemic, existential, and relational needs predict system-justifying attitudes. Social Cognition, 30(6), 669–688.
34.
HickmanC. B. (1997). The devil and the one drop rule: Racial categories, African Americans, and the U.S. census. Michigan Law Review, 95(5), 1161–1265.
35.
HoA. K.KteilyN.ChenJ. M. (2017). “You’re one of us”: Black Americans’ use of hypodescent and its association with egalitarianism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 753–768.
36.
HoA. K.RobertsS. O.GelmanS. A. (2015). Essentialism and racial bias jointly contribute to the categorization of multiracial individuals. Psychological Science, 26(10), 1639–1645.
37.
HoA. K.SidaniusJ.CuddyA. J.BanajiM. R. (2013). Status boundary enforcement and the categorization of Black–White biracials. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(5), 940–943.
38.
HoA. K.SidaniusJ.KteilyN.Sheehy-SkeffingtonJ.PrattoF.HenkelK. E.FoelsR.StewartA. L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO7 scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6), 1003–1028.
39.
HoA. K.SidaniusJ.LevinD. T.BanajiM. R. (2011). Evidence for hypodescent and racial hierarchy in the categorization and perception of biracial individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 492–506.
40.
HoA. K.SidaniusJ.PrattoF.LevinS.ThomsenL.KteilyN.Sheehy-SkeffingtonJ. (2012). Social dominance orientation: Revisiting the structure and function of a variable predicting social and political attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(5), 583–606.
41.
HugenbergK.BodenhausenG. V. (2004). Ambiguity in social categorization: The role of prejudice and facial affect in race categorization. Psychological Science, 15(5), 342–345.
42.
HutchingsP. B.HaddockG. (2008). Look Black in anger: The role of implicit prejudice in the categorization and perceived emotional intensity of racially ambiguous faces. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1418–1420.
43.
JardinaA. (2019). White identity politics. Cambridge University Press.
JostJ. T. (2019). A quarter century of system justification theory: Questions, answers, criticisms, and societal applications. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(2), 263–314.
46.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1–27.
47.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6), 881–919.
48.
JostJ. T.BeckerJ.OsborneD.BadaanV. (2017). Missing in (collective) action: Ideology, system justification, and the motivational antecedents of two types of protest behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(2), 99–108.
49.
JostJ. T.BurgessD. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low-status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 293–305.
50.
JostJ. T.FedericoC. M.NapierJ. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337.
51.
JostJ. T.ThompsonE. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(3), 209–232.
52.
JostJ. T.van der ToornJ. (2012). System justification theory. In van LangeP. A. M.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 313–343). SAGE.
53.
KahnK.HoA. K.SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (2009). The space between us and them: Perceptions of status differences. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12(5), 591–604.
54.
KaufmannE. (2019). Can narratives of white identity reduce opposition to immigration and support for hard Brexit? A survey experiment. Political Studies, 67, 31–46.
55.
KayA. C.FriesenJ. (2011). On social stability and social change: Understanding when system justification does and does not occur. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(6), 360–364.
56.
KayA. C.JostJ. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 823–837.
57.
KemmelmeierM.ChavezH. L. (2014). Biases in the perception of Barack Obama’s skin tone. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 14(1), 137–161.
58.
KihlstromJ. F. (2013). The person-situation interaction. In CarlstonD. E. (Ed.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of social cognition (pp. 786–805). Oxford University Press.
59.
KnowlesE. D.LoweryB. S.HoganC. M.ChowR. M. (2009). On the malleability of ideology: Motivated construals of color blindness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 857–869.
60.
KnowlesE. D.PengK. (2005). White selves: Conceptualizing and measuring a dominant-group identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(2), 223–241.
61.
KrausM. W.PiffP. K.KeltnerD. (2011). Social class as culture: The convergence of resources and rank in the social realm. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(4), 246–250.
62.
KroschA. R.AmodioD. M. (2014). Economic scarcity alters the perception of race. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 111(25), 9079–9084.
63.
KroschA. R.BerntsenL.AmodioD. M.JostJ. T.Van BavelJ. J. (2013). On the ideology of hypodescent: Political conservatism predicts categorization of racially ambiguous faces as Black. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(6), 1196–1203.
64.
KteilyN. S.CotterillS.SidaniusJ.Sheehy-SkeffingtonJ.BerghR. (2014). “Not one of us” Predictors and consequences of denying ingroup characteristics to ambiguous targets. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(10), 1231–1247.
65.
KteilyN. S.HoA. K.SidaniusJ. (2012). Hierarchy in the mind: The predictive power of social dominance orientation across social contexts and domains. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(2), 543–549.
66.
KteilyN. S.HodsonG.DhontK.HoA. K. (2019). Predisposed to prejudice but responsive to intergroup contact? Testing the unique benefits of intergroup contact across different types of individual differences. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22(1), 3–25.
67.
KteilyN. S.Sheehy-SkeffingtonJ.HoA. K. (2017). Hierarchy in the eye of the beholder: Social dominance orientation shapes the perception of inequality between groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(1), 136–159.
68.
KurdiB.SeitchikA. E.AxtJ. R.CarrollT. J.KarapetyanA.KaushikN.BanajiM. R. (2019). Relationship between the Implicit Association Test and intergroup behavior: A meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 74, 569–586.
69.
LeeI.PrattoF.JohnsonB. T. (2011). Intergroup consensus/disagreement in support of group-based hierarchy: An examination of socio-structural and psycho-cultural factors. Psychological Bulletin, 137(6), 1029–1064.
70.
LeonardelliG. J.PickettC. L.BrewerM. B. (2010). Optimal distinctiveness theory: A framework for social identity, social cognition and intergroup relations. In ZannaM. P.OlsonJ. M. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 43, pp. 65–115). Elsevier.
71.
LevinS.SidaniusJ.RabinowitzJ. L.FedericoC. (1998). Ethnic identity, legitimizing ideologies, and social status: A matter of ideological asymmetry. Political Psychology, 19, 373–404.
72.
LinM. H.KwanV. S.CheungA.FiskeS. T. (2005). Stereotype content model explains prejudice for an envied outgroup: Scale of anti-Asian American stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 34–47.
73.
MarxA. W. (1997). Making race and nation: A comparison of South Africa, the United States, and Brazil. Cambridge University Press.
74.
McClanahanK.HoA. K.KteilyN. (2019). Which group to credit (and blame)? Whites make attributions about White-Minority Biracials’ successes and failures based on their own (anti-)egalitarianism and ethnic identification. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 22 (5), 631–654.
75.
McGuireW. J.McGuireC. V.ChildP.FujiokaT. (1978). Salience of ethnicity in the spontaneous self-concept as a function of one’s ethnic distinctiveness in the social environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(5), 511–520.
76.
MillerS. L.ManerJ. K.BeckerD. V. (2010). Self-protective biases in group categorization: Threat cues shape the psychological boundary between “us” and “them.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 62–77.
77.
NicolasG.SkinnerA. L.DickterC. L. (2019). Other than the sum: Hispanic and Middle Eastern categorizations of black-white mixed-race faces. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(4), 532–541.
78.
PaukerK.CarpinellaC.MeyersC.YoungD. M.SanchezD. T. (2018). The role of diversity exposure in Whites’ reduction in race essentialism over time. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(8), 944–952.
79.
PaukerK.CarpinellaC. M.LickD. J.SanchezD. T.JohnsonK. L. (2018). Malleability in biracial categorizations: The impact of geographic context and targets’ racial heritage. Social Cognition, 36(5), 461–480.
80.
PaukerK.MeyersC.SanchezD. T.GaitherS. E.YoungD. M. (2018). A review of multiracial malleability: Identity, categorization, and shifting racial attitudes. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 12(6), Article e12392.
81.
PeeryD.BodenhausenG. V. (2008). Black + White = Black: Hypodescent in reflexive categorization of racially ambiguous faces. Psychological Science, 19(10), 973–977.
PickettC. L.SilverM. D.BrewerM. B. (2002). The impact of assimilation and differentiation needs on perceived group importance and judgments of ingroup size. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(4), 546–558.
84.
PlantE. A.DevineP. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 811–832.
85.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–763.
86.
PrewittK. (2013). What is your race? The census and our flawed efforts to classify Americans. Princeton University Press.
87.
RobertsS. O.GelmanS. A. (2015). Do children see in Black and White? Children’s and adults’ categorizations of multiracial individuals. Child Development, 86(6), 1830–1847.
88.
RobertsS. O.HoA. K.GulgozS.LeekaJ.GelmanS. A. (in press). The role of group status and group membership in the practice of hypodescent. Child Development.
89.
RodehefferC. D.HillS. E.LordC. G. (2012). Does this recession make me look black? The effect of resource scarcity on the categorization of biracial faces. Psychological Science, 23(12), 1476–1478.
90.
RozinP.RoyzmanE. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4), 296–320.
91.
SanchezD. T.YoungD. M.PaukerK. (2015). Exposure to racial ambiguity influences lay theories of race. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(4), 382–390.
92.
SearsD. O.HenryP. J. (2003). The origins of symbolic racism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 259–275.
93.
SidaniusJ.FeshbachS.LevinS.PrattoF. (1997). The interface between ethnic and national attachment: Ethnic pluralism or ethnic dominance?The Public Opinion Quarterly, 61(1), 102–133.
94.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
95.
SkowronskiJ. J.CarlstonD. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), 131–142.
96.
SmedleyA.SmedleyB. D. (2005). Race as biology is fiction, racism as a social problem is real: Anthropological and historical perspectives on the social construction of race. American Psychologist, 60(1), 16–26.
97.
StepanovaE. V.StrubeM. J. (2012). The role of skin color and facial physiognomy in racial categorization: Moderation by implicit racial attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 867–878.
98.
StephanW. G.YbarraO.BachmanG. (1999). Prejudice toward immigrants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(11), 2221–2237.
99.
StephanW. G.YbarraO.RiosK. (2016). Intergroup threat theory. In NelsonT. D. (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 255–278). Psychology Press.
100.
SternC.BalcetisE.ColeS.WestT. V.CarusoE. M. (2016). Government instability shifts skin tone representations of and intentions to vote for political candidates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(1), 76–95.
101.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). An integrative theory of intergroup relation. In WorchelS.AustinW. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall.
102.
TaylorS. E. (1991). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 110(1), 67–85.
103.
TellesE. E. (2004). Race in another America: The significance of skin color in Brazil. Princeton University Press.
104.
ThomsenL.GreenE. G.HoA. K.LevinS.Van LaarC.SinclairS.SidaniusJ. (2010). Wolves in sheep’s clothing: SDO asymmetrically predicts perceived ethnic victimization among white and Latino students across three years. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 225–238.
105.
ThomsenL.GreenE. G.SidaniusJ. (2008). We will hunt them down: How social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism fuel ethnic persecution of immigrants in fundamentally different ways. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(6), 1465–1464.
106.
Van AsscheJ.DhontK.PettigrewT. F. (2019). The social-psychological bases of far-right support in Europe and the United States. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 29, 385–401.
107.
van ZomerenM.PostmesT.SpearsR. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504–535.
108.
WiltonL. S.RattanA.SanchezD. T. (2018). White’s perceptions of biracial individuals’ race shift when biracials speak out against bias. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(8), 953–961.
109.
YzerbytV.CastanoE.LeyensJ.PaladinoM. (2000). The primacy of the ingroup: The interplay of entitativity and identification. European Review of Social Psychology, 11(1), 257–295.
110.
ZmigrodL.RentfrowP. J.RobbinsT. W. (2018). Cognitive underpinnings of nationalistic ideology in the context of Brexit. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 115, E4532–E4540.
111.
ZouL. X.CheryanS. (2017). Two axes of subordination: A new model of racial position. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(5), 696–717.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
