APA Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards. (2008). Reporting standards for research in psychology: Why do we need them? What might they be?American Psychologist, 63, 839-851.
2.
BastianB.JettenJ.HornseyM. J.LeknesS. (2014). The positive consequences of pain: A biopsychosocial approach. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 256-279.
CushmanF. (2013). Action, outcome, and value: A dual-system framework for morality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 273-292.
5.
FunderD. C.LevineJ. M.MackieD. M.MorfC. C.SansoneC.VazireS.WestS. G. (2014). Improving the dependability of research in personality and social psychology: Recommendations for research and educational practice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 3-12.
6.
GawronskiB.CesarioJ. (2013). Of mice and men: What animal research can tell us about context effects on automatic responses in humans. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 187-215.
7.
MacKinnonD. P.PirlottA. G. (2015). Statistical approaches for enhancing causal interpretation of the M to Y relation in mediation analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 30-43.
8.
MurayamaK.PekrunR.FiedlerK. (2014). Research practices that can prevent an inflation of false-positive rates. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 107-118.
StrackF.DeutschR. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220-247.
11.
Van LangeP. A. (2013). What we should expect from theories in social psychology: Truth, abstraction, progress, and applicability as standards (TAPAS). Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 40-55.
12.
YangY. J.ChiuC. Y. (2009). Mapping the structure and dynamics of psychological knowledge: Forty years of APA journal citations (1970–2009). Review of General Psychology, 13, 349-356.
