Research on group influence has yielded a prototypical majority effect (PME): Majority views are endorsed faster and with greater confidence than minority views, with the difference increasing with majority size. The PME was attributed to conformity pressure enhancing confidence in consensual views and causing inhibition in venturing deviant opinions. Our results, however, indicate that PME for binary choices can arise from the process underlying confidence and latency independent of social influence. PME was demonstrated for tasks and conditions that are stripped of social relevance; it was observed in within-individual analyses in contrasting the individual’s more frequent and less frequent responses to the same item, and was found for the predictions of others’ responses. A self-consistency model, which assumes that choice and confidence are based on the sampling of representations from a commonly shared pool of representations, yielded a PME for confidence and latency. Behavioral implications of the results are discussed.
AlbaJ. W.MarmorsteinH. (1987). The effects of frequency knowledge on consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 14-25. doi:10.1086/209089
2.
AllenV. L.LevineJ. M. (1969). Consensus and conformity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 389-399. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(69)90032-8
3.
AlterA. L.OppenheimerD. M.EpleyN.EyreR. N. (2007). Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 569-576. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.569
4.
AschS. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure on the modification and distortion of judgments. In GuetzkowH. (Ed.), Groups, leadership, and men (pp. 177-190). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie.
5.
AschS. E. (1952). Social psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1155-31
6.
AschS. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193, 31-35.
7.
AschS. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70, 1-70. doi:10.1037/h0093718
8.
AschS. E. (1990). Comments on D.T. Campbell’s chapter. In RockI. (Ed.), The legacy of Solomon Asch: Essays in cognition and social psychology (pp. 53-55). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
AudleyR. J. (1960). A stochastic model for individual choice behavior. Psychological Review, 67, 1-15. doi:10.1037/h0046438
BaranskiJ. V.PetrusicW. M. (1998). Probing the locus of confidence judgments: Experiments on the time to determine confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 929-945. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.929
12.
BassiliJ. N. (1995). Response latency and the accessibility of voting intentions: What contributes to accessibility and how it affects vote choice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 686-695. doi:10.1177/0146167295217003
13.
BassiliJ. N. (1996a). The “how” and “why” of response latency measurement in survey research. In SchwarzN.SudmanS. (Eds.), Answering questions (pp. 319-346). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
14.
BassiliJ. N. (1996b). Meta-judgmental versus operative indexes of psychological attributes: The case of measures of attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 637-653. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.4.637
15.
BassiliJ. N. (2003). The minority slowness effect: Subtle inhibitions in the expression of views not shared by others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 261-276. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.261
16.
BassiliJ. N. (2008). Attitude strength. In CranoW. D.PrislinR. (Eds.), Attitudes and attitude change (pp. 237-260). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
17.
BlessH.MackieD. M.SchwarzN. (1992). Mood effects on attitude judgments: Independent effects of mood before and after message elaboration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 585-595.
18.
BovardE. W. (1951). Group structure and perception. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 398-405. doi:10.1037/h0058994
19.
BrewerW. F.SampaioC. (2006). Processes leading to confidence and accuracy in sentence recognition: A metamemory approach. Memory, 14, 540-552. doi:10.1080/09658210600590302
20.
BrewerW. F.SampaioC. (2012). The metamemory approach to confidence: A test using semantic memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 67, 59-77. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.04.002
21.
CialdiniR. B.GoldsteinN. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591-622. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
22.
ClarksonJ. J.TormalaZ. L.DeSensiV. L.WheelerS. C. (2009). Does attitude certainty beget self-certainty?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 436-439. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.10.004
23.
ClementR. W.KruegerJ. (2000). The primacy of self-referent information in perceptions of social consensus. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 279-299. doi:10.1348/014466600164471
24.
CochranW. G. (1954). The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics, 10, 101-129. doi:10.2307/3001666
25.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
CranoW. D.PrislinR. (2006). Attitudes and persuasion. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 345-374. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190034
27.
DenrellJ.Le MensG. (2007). Interdependent sampling and social influence. Psychological Review, 114, 398-422. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.398
28.
DeutschM.GerardH. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636. doi:10.1037/h0046408
29.
DhamiM. K.HertwigR.HoffrageU. (2004). The role of representative design in an ecological approach to cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 959-988. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.6.959
DunningD. (2012). Confidence considered: Assessing the quality of decisions and performance. In BriñolP.DeMarreeK. G. (Eds.), Social metacognition (pp. 63-80). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
32.
ErbH. P.BohnerG. (2001). Mere consensus effects in minority and majority influence. In De DreuC. K. W.De VriesN. K. (Eds.), Group consensus and minority influence: Implications for innovation (pp. 40-59). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
33.
FazioR. H. (1979). Motives for social comparison: The construction-validation distinction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1683-1698. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1683
34.
FazioR. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In PettyR. E.KrosnickJ. A. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 247-282). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
FestingerL. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140. doi:10.1177/001872675400700202
36.
FiedlerK.JuslinP. (2006). Information sampling and adaptive cognition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
GigerenzerG.MurrayD. J. (1987). Cognition as intuitive statistics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40.
GillM. J.SwannW. B.Jr.SilveraD. H. (1998). On the genesis of confidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1101-1114. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1101
41.
GlynnC. J.HayesA. F.ShanahanJ. (1997). Perceived support for one’s opinions and willingness to speak out a meta-analysis of survey studies on the “spiral of silence.”Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 452-463. doi:10.1086/297808
42.
HardinC. D.HigginsE. T. (1996). Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective. In HigginsE. T.SorrentinoR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: The interpersonal context (Vol. 3, pp. 28-84). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
43.
HedgesL. V.VeveaJ. L. (1998). Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3, 486-504. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.486
44.
HertwigR. (2012). Tapping into the wisdom of the crowd—With confidence. Science, 336, 303-304. doi:10.1126/science.1221403
45.
HerzogS. M.HertwigR. (2009). The wisdom of many in one mind: Improving individual judgments with dialectical bootstrapping. Psychological Science, 20, 231-237. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02271.x
46.
HerzogS. M.HertwigR. (2013). The ecological validity of fluency. In UnkelbachC.GreifenederR. (Eds.), The experience of thinking: How the fluency of mental processes influences cognition and behavior (pp. 190-219). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
47.
HerzogS. M.HertwigR. (2014). Harnessing the wisdom of the inner crowd. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 504-506. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.06.009
48.
HochS. J. (1987). Perceived consensus and predictive accuracy: The pros and cons of projection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 221-234. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(89)90036-X
49.
HoggM. A. (2006). Social identity theory. Contemporary Social Psychological Theories, 13, 111-1369.
50.
HollandR. W.VerplankenB.van KnippenbergA. (2003). From repetition to conviction: Attitude accessibility as a determinant of attitude certainty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 594-601. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00038-6
51.
HourihanK. L.BenjaminA. S. (2010). Smaller is better (when sampling from the crowd within): Low memory span individuals benefit more from multiple opportunities for estimation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1068-1074. doi:10.1037/a0019694
52.
HugeM. E.GlynnC. J. (2013). Hesitation blues: Does minority opinion status lead to delayed responses?Communication Research, 40, 287-307. doi:10.1177/0093650211435505
53.
JohnsonD. M. (1940). Confidence and the expression of opinion. Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 213-220. doi:10.1080/00224545.1940.9713815
54.
KelleyC. M.LindsayD. S. (1993). Remembering mistaken for knowing: Ease of retrieval as a basis for confidence in answers to general knowledge questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 1-24. doi:10.1006/jmla.1993.1001
55.
KleitmanS.StankovL. (2001). Ecological and person-oriented aspects of metacognitive processes in test-taking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 321-341. doi:10.1002/acp.705
56.
KoriatA. (1976). Another look at the relationship between phonetic symbolism and the feeling of knowing. Memory & Cognition, 4, 244-248. doi:10.3758/BF03213170
57.
KoriatA. (1993). How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 100, 609-639. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.100.4.609
58.
KoriatA. (2008a). Subjective confidence in one’s answers: The consensuality principle. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 945-959. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.945
59.
KoriatA. (2008b). When confidence in a choice is independent of which choice is made. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 997-1001. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.5.997
60.
KoriatA. (2011). Subjective confidence in perceptual judgments: A test of the self-consistency model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 117-139. doi:10.1037/a0022171
61.
KoriatA. (2012a). The self-consistency model of subjective confidence. Psychological Review, 119, 80-113. doi:10.1037/a0025648
62.
KoriatA. (2012b). When are two heads better than one and why?Science, 336, 360-362. doi:10.1126/science.1216549
63.
KoriatA. (2013). Confidence in personal preferences. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 247-259. doi:10.1002/bdm.1758
64.
KoriatA. (2015). Can people discriminate between deceptive and non-deceptive items? Manuscript in preparation.
65.
KoriatA.AdivS. (2011). The construction of attitudinal judgments: Evidence from attitude certainty and response latency. Social Cognition, 29, 577-611. doi:10.1521/soco.2011.29.5.577
66.
KoriatA.AdivS. (2012). Confidence in one’s social beliefs: Implications for belief justification. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 1599-1616. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2012.08.008
67.
KoriatA.AdivS. (2014). Confidence in the predictions of others’ beliefs and attitudes. Manuscript in preparation.
68.
KoriatA.GoldsmithM. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103, 490-517. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.103.3.490
69.
KoriatA.Ma’ayanH.NussinsonR. (2006). The intricate relationships between monitoring and control in metacognition: Lessons for the cause-and-effect relation between subjective experience and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 36-69. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.36
70.
KoriatA.SorkaH. (2015). The construction of categorization judgments: Using subjective confidence and response latency to test a distributed model. Cognition, 134, 21-38. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.09.009
71.
KrosnickJ. A.BoningerD. S.ChuangY. C.BerentM. K.CarnotC. G. (1993). Attitude strength: One construct or many related constructs?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1132-1151. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.6.1132
72.
KruegerJ. (1998). On the perception of social consensus. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 164-240.
73.
KruegerJ. I. (2007). From social projection to social behaviour. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 1-35. doi:10.1080/10463280701284645
74.
KruegerJ. I.AcevedoM.RobbinsJ. M. (2005). Self as sample. In FiedlerK.JuslinP. (Eds.), Information sampling and adaptive cognition (pp. 353-377). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
75.
KruglanskiA.MackieD. (1990). Majority and minority influence: A judgmental process analysis. In StroebeW.HewstoneM. (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 229-261). London, England: Wiley.
76.
LevineJ. M.PrislinR. (2013). Majority and minority influence. In LevineJ. M. (Ed.), Group processes (pp. 135-163). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
77.
LichtensteinS.SlovicP. (Eds.). (2006). The construction of preference. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
78.
LuusC. A. E.WellsG. L. (1994). The malleability of eyewitness confidence: Co-witness and perseverance effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 714-723. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.5.714
79.
MarksG.MillerN. (1987). Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: An empirical and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 72-90. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.102.1.72
80.
McKenzieC. R. M. (2005). Judgment and decision making. In LambertsK.GoldstoneR. L. (Eds.), Handbook of cognition (pp. 321-338). London, England: SAGE.
81.
Noelle-NeumannE. (1974). The spiral of silence—A theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24, 43-51. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.x
82.
Noelle-NeumannE. (1993). The spiral of silence. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
83.
OriveR. (1988a). Group consensus, action immediacy, and opinion confidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 573-577. doi:10.1177/0146167288143016
84.
OriveR. (1988b). Social projection and social comparison of opinions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 953-964. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.953
85.
PetersonC. R.BeachL. R. (1967). Man as an intuitive statistician. Psychological Bulletin, 68, 29-46. doi:10.1037/h0024722
86.
PetrocelliJ. V.TormalaZ. L.RuckerD. D. (2007). Unpacking attitude certainty: Attitude clarity and attitude correctness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 30-41. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.30
87.
PrislinR.BrewerM.WilsonD. J. (2002). Changing majority and minority positions within a group versus an aggregate. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 640-647. doi:10.1177/0146167202288008
88.
PrislinR.WoodW. (2005). Social influence in attitudes and attitude change. In AlbarracínD.JohnsonB. T.ZannaM. P. (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 671-706). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
89.
RadenD. (1985). Strength-related attitude dimensions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 312-330.
90.
RiosK. (2012). Minority opinions: Antecedents and benefits of expression. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 392-401. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00431.x
91.
RobinsonM. D.JohnsonJ. T.HerndonF. (1997). Reaction time and assessments of cognitive effort as predictors of eyewitness memory accuracy and confidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 416-425. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.3.416
92.
RoedigerH. L.DeSotoK. A. (2014). Confidence and memory: Assessing positive and negative correlations. Memory, 22, 76-91. doi:10.1080/09658211.2013.795974
93.
RossL.GreeneD.HouseP. (1977). The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13, 279-301. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(77)90049-X
94.
RossM.BuehlerR.KarrJ. W. (1998). Assessing the accuracy of conflicting autobiographical memories. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1233-1244. doi:10.3758/BF03201197
95.
SchwarzN. (2007). Attitude construction: Evaluation in context. Social Cognition, 25, 638-656. doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.638
96.
SchwarzN.StrackF. (1991). Context effects in attitude surveys: Applying cognitive theory to social research. European Review of Social Psychology, 2, 31-50. doi:10.1080/14792779143000015
97.
SlovicP. (1995). The construction of preference. American Psychologist, 50, 364-371. doi:10.1002/bdm.575
98.
SniezekJ. A. (1992). Groups under uncertainty: An examination of confidence in group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 124-155. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(92)90048-C
99.
SniezekJ. A.HenryR. A. (1989). Accuracy and confidence in group judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 1-28. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(89)90055-1
100.
StasserG.DavisJ. H. (1981). Group decision making and social influence: A social interaction sequence model. Psychological Review, 88, 523-551. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.88.6.523
101.
StewartN. (2009). Decision by sampling: The role of the decision environment in risky choice. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1041-1062. doi:10.1080/17470210902747112
102.
SurowieckiJ. (2005). The wisdom of crowds. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
103.
TormalaZ. L.RuckerD. D. (2007). Attitude certainty: A review of past findings and emerging perspectives. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 469-492. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00025.x
104.
TourangeauR. (1992). Attitudes as memory structures: Belief sampling and context effects. In SchwarzN.SudmanS. (Eds.), Context effects in social and psychological research (pp. 35-47). New York, NY: Springer Verlag.
105.
TulvingE.PearlstoneZ. (1966). Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 5, 381-391. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(66)80048-8
106.
VickersD. (2001). Where does the balance of evidence lie with respect to confidence? In SommerfeldE.KompassR.LachmannT. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics (pp. 148-153). Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Science.
107.
VisserP. S.HolbrookA. (2012). Metacognitive determinants of attitude strength. In BriñolP.DeMarreeK. G. (Eds.), Social metacognition (pp. 21-42). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
108.
VisserP. S.MirabileR. R. (2004). Attitudes in the social context: The impact of social network composition on individual-level attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 779-795. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.779
109.
VulE.PashlerH. (2008). Measuring the crowd within: Probabilistic representations within individuals. Psychological Science, 19, 645-647. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02136.x
110.
WilliamsE. F.DunningD.KrugerJ. (2013). The hobgoblin of consistency: Algorithmic judgment strategies underlie inflated self-assessments of performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 976-994. doi:10.1037/a0032416
111.
WoodW. (2000). Attitude change: Persuasion and social influence. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 539-570. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.539
112.
YanivI.Choshen-HillelS.MilyavskyM. (2009). Spurious consensus and opinion revision: Why might people be more confident in their less accurate judgments?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 558-563. doi:10.1037/a0014589
113.
ZarnothP.SniezekJ. A. (1997). The social influence of confidence in group decision making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 345-366. doi:10.1006/jesp.1997.1326
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
