Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This meta-analysis investigates linguistic cues to deception and whether these cues can be detected with computer programs. We integrated operational definitions for 79 cues from 44 studies where software had been used to identify linguistic deception cues. These cues were allocated to six research questions. As expected, the meta-analyses demonstrated that, relative to truth-tellers, liars experienced greater cognitive load, expressed more negative emotions, distanced themselves more from events, expressed fewer sensory–perceptual words, and referred less often to cognitive processes. However, liars were not more uncertain than truth-tellers. These effects were moderated by event type, involvement, emotional valence, intensity of interaction, motivation, and other moderators. Although the overall effect size was small, theory-driven predictions for certain cues received support. These findings not only further our knowledge about the usefulness of linguistic cues to detect deception with computers in applied settings but also elucidate the relationship between language and deception.

Keywords

detection of deception linguistic cues computer program meta-analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abe

(2009). The neurobiology of deception: Evidence from neuroimaging and loss-of-function studies. Current Opinion in Neurology, 22, 594-600. doi:10.1097/WCO.0b013e328332c3cf

Abe

(2011). How the brain shapes deception: An integrated review of the literature. Neuroscientist, 17, 560-574. doi:10.1177/1073858410393359

Abe

Suzuki

Mori

Itoh

Fujii

(2007). Deceiving others: Distinct neural responses of the prefrontal cortex and amygdala in simple fabrication and deception with social interactions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 287-295. doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.2.287

Adams

S. H.

(2002). Communication under stress: Indicators of veracity and deception in written narratives (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/

Adams

S. H.

Jarvis

J. P.

(2006). Indicators of veracity and deception: An analysis of written statements made to police. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 13, 1-21. doi:10.1558/ijsll.v13i1.2

*Ali

Levine

(2008). The language of truthful and deceptive denials and confessions. Communication Reports, 21, 82-91. doi:10.1080/08934210802381862

*Almela Sanchez-Lafuente

Valencia-Garcia

Cantos Gomez

(2012). Detectando la mentira en lenguaje escrito [Detecting deception in written language]. Procesamiento de Lenguaje Natural, 48, 65-72.

Ansarra

Colwell

Hiscock-Anisman

Hines

Fleck

Cole

Belarde

(2011). Augmenting ACID with affective details to assess credibility. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 3, 141-158.

APA Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards. (2008). Reporting standards for research in Psychology. Why do we need them? What might they be? American Psychologist, 63, 839-851. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.9.839

10.

Bachenko

Fitzpatrick

Schonwetter

(2008, August). Verification and implementation of language-based deception indicators in civil and criminal narratives. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (pp. 41-48). Manchester, UK: Coling 2008 Organizing Committee.

11.

Baddeley

(2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417-423. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2

12.

Baddeley

(2006) Working memory: An overview. In Pickering

(Ed.), Working memory and education (pp. 1-31). New York, NY: Academic Press.

13.

Bahrick

H. P.

(1996). The relation between reproductive and reconstructive processing of memory content. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 19, 191. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00042151

14.

Bahrick

H. P.

Hall

L. K.

Berger

S. A.

(1996). Accuracy and distortion in memory for high school grades. Psychological Science, 7, 265-271. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00372.x

15.

*Bedwell

J. S.

Gallagher

Whitten

S. N.

Fiore

S. M.

(2011). Linguistic correlates of self in deceptive oral autobiographical narratives. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 547-555. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2010.10.001

16.

Bender

H.-U.

(1987). Merkmalskombinationen in Aussagen [Criteria combinations in eyewitness statements]. Tübingen, Germany: J. C. B. Mohr.

17.

Benussi

(1914). Die Atmungssymptome der Lüge [Breathing symptoms of lying]. In Meumann

(Ed.), Sammlung von Abhandlungen zur Psychologischen Pädagogik (Vol. 3, pp. 513-542). Leipzig, Germany: Engelmann.

18.

Blandón-Gitlin

Fenn

Masip

Yoo

(2014). Cognitive-load approaches to detect deception: Searching for cognitive mechanisms. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 441-444. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.05.004

19.

Bond

C. F.

DePaulo

B. M.

(2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 214-234. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2

20.

*Bond

G. D.

Lee

A. Y.

(2005). Language of lies in prison: Linguistic classification of prisoners’ truthful and deceptive natural language. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 313-329. doi:10.1002/acp.1087

21.

Borenstein

(2009). Effect sizes for continuous data. In Cooper

Harris

L. V.

Valentine

J. C.

(Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (pp. 221-235). New York, NY: Russell Sage.

22.

Brown

J. D.

(2012). Understanding the better than average effect: Motives (still) matter. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 209-219. doi:10.1177/0146167211432763

23.

Brown

Kulik

(1977). Flashbulb memories. Cognition, 5, 73-99. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(77)90018-X

24.

Bruner

(1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.

25.

*Brunet

M. K.

(2009). Why bullying victims are not believed: Differentiating between children’s true and fabricated reports of stressful and non-stressful events (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/

26.

Brunet

M. K.

Evans

A. D.

Talwar

Bala

Lindsay

R. C.

Lee

(2013). How children report true and fabricated stressful and non-stressful events. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 20, 867-881. doi:10.1080/13218719.2012.750896

27.

Buller

D. B.

Burgoon

J. K.

(1996). Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory, 3, 203-242.

28.

Buller

D. B.

Burgoon

J. K.

Busling

Roiger

(1996). Testing interpersonal deception theory: The language of interpersonal deception. Communication Theory, 6, 268-289. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00129.x

29.

Bunn

G. C.

(2012). The truth machine: A social history of lie detection. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

30.

Burgoon

J. K.

Blair

J. P.

Qin

Nunamaker

J. F.

(2003). Detecting deception through linguistic analysis. In Chen

(Ed.), Lecture notes in computer sciences, Vol. 2665. Intelligence and security informatics (pp. 91-101). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/3-540-44853-5_7

31.

*Burgoon

J. K.

Qin

T. T.

(2006). The dynamic nature of deceptive verbal communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 25, 76-96. doi:10.1177/02619-27X05284482

32.

Chandramouli

Chen

Subbalakshmi

K. P.

(2011). Psycho-linguistic statistical deception detection from text content (Report No. WO/2011/085108). Retrieved from http://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/WO2011085108

33.

*Chen

(2010). Psycho-linguistic forensic analysis of internet text data (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Faculty of the Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ.

34.

Christ

S. E.

Van Essen

D. C.

Watson

J. M.

Brubaker

L. E.

McDermott

K. B.

(2009). The contributions of prefrontal cortex and executive control to deception: Evidence from activation likelihood estimate meta-analysis. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 1557-1566. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn189

35.

Churyk

N. T.

Lee

C.-C.

Clinton

(2008, October). Can we detect fraud earlier? A technique called content analysis raises the possibility. Strategic Finance. Available from www.thefreelibrary.com

36.

Cialdini

R. B.

Borden

R. J.

Thorne

Walker

M. R.

Freeman

Sloan

R. L.

(1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 366-375. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.34.3.366

37.

Cody

M. J.

Marston

P. J.

Foster

(1984). Deception: Paralinguistic and verbal leakage. In Bostrom

R. N.

(Ed.), Communication yearbook 8 (pp. 464-490). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.

38.

Cohen

(1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46. doi:10.1177/001316446002000104

39.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

40.

College Board. (1976-1977). Student descriptive questionnaire. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

41.

*Colwell

Hiscock

C. K.

Memon

(2002). Interviewing techniques and the assessment of statement credibility. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 287-300. doi:10.1002/acp.78

42.

Conway

M. A.

(1990). Autobiographical memory: An introduction. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

43.

Cooper

(Ed.). (2010). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.

44.

*Cooper

J. E.

(2008). Using natural language processing to identify the rhetoric of deception in business and competitive intelligence email communications (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3374690)

45.

Cunningham

(2002). GATE, a General Architecture for Text Engineering. Computers and the Humanities, 36, 223-254. doi:10.1023/A:1014348124664

46.

Daft

R. L.

Lengel

R. H.

(1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554-571. doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554

47.

Debey

Verschuere

Crombez

(2012). Lying and executive control: An experimental investigation using ego depletion and goal neglect. Acta Psychologica, 140, 133-141. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.03.004

48.

DePaulo

B. M.

(1992). Nonverbal behavior and self-presentation. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 203-243. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.203

49.

DePaulo

B. M.

Kirkendol

S. E.

(1989). The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception. In Yuille

J. C.

(Ed.), Credibility assessment (pp. 51-70). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. doi:10.1007/BF00987487

50.

DePaulo

B. M.

Lanier

Davis

(1983). Detecting the deceit of the motivated liar. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1096-1103. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.45.5.1096

51.

DePaulo

B. M.

Lindsay

J. J.

Malone

B. E.

Muhlenbruck

Charlton

Cooper

(2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74-118. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74

52.

DePaulo

B. M.

Morris

W. L.

(2004). Discerning lies from truths: Behavioural cues to deception and the indirect pathway of intuition. In Granhag

P. A.

Strömwall

L. A.

(Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts (pp. 15-40). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511490071

53.

*Derrick

Meservy

Burgoon

Nunamaker

(2012, January). An experimental agent for detecting deceit in chat-based communication. In Jensen

Meservy

Burgoon

Nunamaker

(Eds.), Proceedings of the Rapid Screening Technologies, Deception Detection and Credibility Assessment Symposium. Grand Wailea, Maui, HI. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2003.1173793

54.

Dilmon

(2009). Between thinking and speaking: Linguistic tools for detecting a fabrication. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1152-1170. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.032

55.

Dulaney

E. F.

(1982). Changes in language behavior as a function of veracity. Human Communication Research, 9, 75-82. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1982.tb00684.x

56.

Duran

N. D.

Crossley

S. A.

Hall

McCarthy

P. M.

McNamara

D. S.

(2009). Expanding a catalogue of deceptive linguistic features with NLP technologies. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Flairs Conference (pp. 243-248). Sanibel Island, FL: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.

57.

*Duran

N. D.

Hall

McCarthy

P. M.

McNamara

D. S.

(2010). The linguistic correlates of conversational deception: Comparing natural language processing technologies. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 439-462. doi:10.1017/S0142716410000068

58.

Dzindolet

M. T.

Pierce

L. G.

(2004). A computerized text analysis can detect deception. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th annual meeting (pp. 635-639). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. doi:10.1177/154193120404800377

59.

*Dzindolet

M. T.

Pierce

L. G.

(2005). Using a linguistic analysis tool to detect deception. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th annual meeting (pp. 563-567). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. doi:10.1177/154193120504900374

60.

Ekman

(1988). Lying and nonverbal behavior: Theoretical issues and new findings. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12, 163-176. doi:10.1007/BF00987486

61.

Ekman

(2001). Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.

62.

Elkins

A. L.

(2011). Vocalic markers of deception and cognitive dissonance for automated emotion detection systems (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona

63.

Elntib

Wagstaff

G. H.

Wheatcroft

J. M.

(2014). The role of account length in detecting deception in written and orally produces autobiographical accounts using reality monitoring. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/jip.1420

64.

Enos

(2009). Detecting deception in speech (Doctoral dissertation). Available from http://www.cs.columbia.edu/. (UMI No. 3348430)

65.

Enos

Shribergy

Graciarena

Hirschberg

Stolcke

(2007, August). Detecting deception using critical segments. Proceedings of Interspeech, Antwerpen, Belgium.

66.

*Evans

A. D.

Brunet

M. K.

Talwar

Bala

Lindsay

R. C. L.

Lee

(2012). The effects of repetition on children’s true and false reports. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 19, 517-529. doi:10.1080/13218719.2011.615808

67.

Fleiss

J. L.

(1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley.

68.

Fornaciari

Poesio

(2011, June). Lexical vs. surface features in deceptive language analysis. In Wyner

Branting

(Eds.), Proceedings of the ICAIL 2011 Workshop: Applying Human Language Technology to the Law (pp. 2-8). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh School of Law.

69.

Freud

(1905). Bruchstück einer Hysterieanalyse [Fragments of an analysis of a case of hysteria] (Collected papers). New York, NY: Basic Books. (Reprinted in 1959)

70.

Fuller

C. M.

(2008). High-stakes, real-world deception: An examination of the process of deception and deception detection using linguistic-based cues (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://dc.library.okstate.edu/cdm/

71.

*Fuller

C. M.

Biros

D. P.

Burgoon

J. K.

Adkins

Twitchell

D. P.

(2006). An analysis of text-based deception detection tools. In Proceedings of the 12th Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 3465-3472). Acapulco, Mexico: AIS Electronic Library.

72.

Fuller

C. M.

Biros

D. P.

(2008, January). Exploration of feature selection and advanced classification models for high-stakes deception detection. In Proceedings of the 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1-8). HI: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2008.158

73.

Fuller

C. M.

Biros

D. P.

(2011). An investigation of data and text mining methods for real world deception detection. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 8392-8398. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.01.032

74.

Fuller

C. M.

Biros

D. P.

Wilson

R. L.

(2009). Decision support for determining veracity via linguistic-based cues. Decision Support Systems, 46, 695-703. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2008.11.001

75.

Gamer

Bauermann

Stoeter

Vosse

(2008). Covariations among fMRI, skin conductance, and behavioral data during processing of concealed information. Human Brain Mapping, 28, 1287-1301. doi:10.1002/hbm.20343

76.

Global Deception Research Team. (2006). A world of lies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 60-74. doi:10.1080/14789940412331337353

77.

Gombos

V. A.

(2006). The cognition of deception: The role of executive processes in producing lies. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132, 197-214. doi:10.3200/MONO.132.3.197-214

78.

Graciarena

Shriberg

Stolcke

Enos

Hirschberg

Kajarekar

(2006, May). Combining prosodic, lexical and cepstral systems for deceptive speech detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (pp. 1033-1036). Toulouse, France: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. doi:10.1109/ICASSP.2006.1660200

79.

Graesser

A. C.

McNamara

D. S.

Louwerse

Cai

(2004). Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 193-202. doi:10.3758/BF03195564

80.

Granhag

P. A.

Strömwall

L. A.

Olsson

(2001, June). Fact or fiction? Adults’s ability to assess children’s veracity. Paper presented at the 11th European Conference on Psychology and Law, Lisbon, Portugal.

81.

Greenhouse

J. B.

Iyengar

(2009). Handling missing data. In Cooper

Hedges

L. V.

Valentine

J. C.

(Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (pp. 417-433). New York, NY: Russell Sage.

82.

Greenwald

A. G.

(1980). The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history. American Psychologist, 35, 603-618. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.35.7.603

83.

Grubin

Madsen

(2005). Lie detection and the polygraph: A historical review. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 16, 357-369.

84.

Gupta

(2007). Modelling deception detection in text (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from http://qspace.library.queensu.ca/handle/1974/922

85.

Hancock

J. T.

Curry

L. E.

Goorha

Woodworth

(2004, July). Lies in conversation: An examination of deception using automated linguistic analysis. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 534-540). Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. doi:10.1.1.87.9371

86.

Hancock

J. T.

Curry

L. E.

Goorha

Woodworth

(2005, January). Automated linguistic analysis of deceptive and truthful synchronous computer-mediated communication. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1-10). HI: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2005.111

87.

*Hancock

J. T.

Curry

L. E.

Goorha

Woodworth

(2008). On lying and being lied to: A linguistic analysis of deception in computer-mediated communication. Discourse Processes, 45, 1-23. doi:10.1080/01638530701739181

88.

Hancock

J. T.

Woodworth

(2013). An “eye” for an “I”: The challenges and opportunities for spotting credibility in a digital world. In Cooper

B. S.

Griesel

Ternes

(Eds.), Applied issues in investigative interviewing, eyewitness memory, and credibility assessment (pp. 325-340). New York, NY: Springer.

89.

Hancock

J. T.

Woodworth

Goorha

(2010). See no evil: The effect of communication medium and motivation on deception detection. Group Decision and Negotiation, 19, 327-336. doi:10.1007/s10726-009-9169-7

90.

Hartwig

Granhag

P. A.

Strömwall

L. A.

(2007). Guilty and innocent suspects’ strategies during police interrogations. Psychology, Crime & Law, 13, 213-227. doi:10.1080/10683160600750264

91.

Hedges

L. V.

(1981). Distribution theory for Glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6, 107-128. doi:10.3102/10769986006002107

92.

Hedges

L. V.

(1982). Estimation of effect size from series of independent experiments. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 490-499. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.92.2.490

93.

Hedges

L. V.

Olkin

(1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York, NY: Academic Press.

94.

Higgins

J. P. T.

Thompson

S. G.

(2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 1539-1558. doi:10.1002/sim.1186

95.

Hines

Colwell

Hiscock-Anisman

Garrett

Ansarra

Montalvo

(2010). Impression management strategies of deceivers and honest reporters in an investigative interview. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 2, 73-90.

96.

Hirschberg

Beus

Brenier

J. M.

Enos

Friedman

Gilman

. . . Stolcke

(2005, September). Distinguishing deceptive from non-deceptive speech. In Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, Interspeech (pp. 1833-1836). Lisboa, Portugal. doi:10.1.1.59.8634

97.

Horowitz

M. W.

Newman

J. B.

(1964). Spoken and written expression: An experimental analysis. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 640-647. doi:10.1037/h0048589

98.

*Humpherys

S. L.

Moffitt

K. C.

Burns

M. B.

Burgoon

J. K.

Felix

W. F.

(2011). Identification of fraudulent financial statements using linguistic credibility analysis. Decision Support Systems, 50, 585-594. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2010.08.009

99.

*Jensen

M. L.

Bessarabova

Adame

Burgoon

Slowik

S. M.

(2011). Deceptive language by innocent and guilty criminal suspects: The influence of dominance, question, and guilt on interview responses. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 30, 357-375. doi:10.1177/0261927X11416201

100.

Jensen

M. L.

Burgoon

J. K.

Nunamaker

J. F.

(2010). Judging the credibility of information gathered from face-to-face interactions. Journal of Data and Information Quality, 2, Article 3. doi:10.1145/1805286.1805289

101.

Jensen

M. L.

Lowry

P. B.

Burgoon

J. K.

Nunamaker

J. F.

(2010). Technology dominance in complex decision making: The case of aided credibility assessment. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27, 175-201. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222270108

102.

Jensen

M. L.

Lowry

P. B.

Jenkins

J. L.

(2011). Effects of automated and participative decision support in computer-aided credibility assessment. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28, 201-233. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222280107

103.

Jensen

M. L.

Meservy

T. O.

Burgoon

J. K.

Nunamaker

J. F.

(2010). Automatic, multimodal evaluation of human interaction. Group Decision and Negotiation, 19, 367-389. doi:10.1007/s10726-009-9171-0

104.

Johnson

M. K.

Bush

J. C.

Mitchell

K. J.

(1998). Interpersonal reality monitoring: Judging the sources of other people’s memories. Social Cognition, 16, 199-224. doi:10.1521/soco.1998.16.2.199

105.

Johnson

M. K.

Hashtroudi

Lindsay

D. S.

(1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.114.1.3

106.

Johnson

M. K.

Raye

C. L.

(1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67-85. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.88.1.67

107.

Johnson

M. K.

Suengas

A. G.

(1989). Reality monitoring judgments of other people’s memories. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27, 107-110.

108.

Johnson

Barnhardt

Xhu

(2004). The contribution of executive processes to deceptive responding. Neuropsychologia, 42, 878-901. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.12.005

109.

Keila

P. S.

Skillicorn

D. B.

(2005). Detecting unusual and deceptive communication in email (ISSN-0836-0227-.2005-498) (External Tech. Rep.). School of Computing, Queen’s University. Available from http://research.cs.queensu.ca/

110.

Kellogg

R. T.

(2007). Are written and spoken recall of text equivalent? The American Journal of Psychology, 120, 415-428. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20445412

111.

Knapp

M. L.

Hart

R. P.

Dennis

H. S.

(1974). An exploration of deception as a communication construct. Communication Research, 1, 15-29. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1974.tb00250.x

112.

*Koyanagi

Blandón-Gitlin

(2011, March). Analysis of children’s deception with the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count approach. Poster session presented at the 4th International Congress on Psychology and Law/2011 annual meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society, Miami, FL.

113.

*Krackow

(2010). Narratives distinguish experienced from imagined childhood events. The American Journal of Psychology, 123, 71-80. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/amerjpsyc.123.1.0071

114.

Kuiken

(1981). Nonimmediate language style and inconsistency between private and expressed evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 183-196. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(81)90013-5

115.

Lane

J. D.

Wegner

D. M.

(1995). The cognitive consequences of secrecy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 237-253. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.2.237

116.

Leal

Vrij

Warmelink

Vernham

Fisher

R. P.

(2013). You cannot hide your telephone lies: Providing a model statement as an aid to detect deception in insurance telephone calls. Legal and Criminological Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/lcrp.12017

117.

*Lee

C.-C.

Welker

R. B.

Odom

M. B.

(2009). Features of computer-mediated, text-based messages that support automatable, linguistics-based indicators for deception detection. Journal of Information Systems, 23, 5-24. doi:10.2308/jis.2009.23.1.24

118.

Lench

H. C.

Flores

S. A.

Bench

S. W.

(2011). Discrete emotions predict changes in cognition, judgment, experience, behavior, and physiology: A meta-analysis of experimental emotion elicitations. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 834-855. doi:10.1037/a0024244

119.

Levine

T. R.

Asada

K. J.

Carpenter

(2009). Sample sizes and effect sizes are negatively correlated in meta-analyses: Evidence and implications of a publication bias against nonsignificant findings. Communication Monographs, 76, 286-302. doi:10.1080/03637750903074685

120.

Levine

T. R.

McCornack

S. A.

(2001). Behavioral adaptation, confidence, and heuristic-based explanations of the probing effect. Human Communication Research, 27, 471-502. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00790.x

121.

Levine

T. R.

Park

H. S.

McCornack

S. A.

(1999). Accuracy in detecting truths and lies: Documenting the “veracity effect.” Communication Monographs, 66, 125-144. doi:10.1080/03637759909376468

122.

Lipsey

M. W.

Wilson

D. B.

(2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

123.

*Liu

Hancock

Zhang

Markowitz

Bazarova

(2012, January). Exploring linguistic features for deception detection in unstructured text. In Jensen

Meservy

Burgoon

Nunamaker

(Eds.), Proceedings of the Rapid Screening Technologies, Deception Detection and Credibility Assessment Symposium. Grand Wilea, HI.

124.

*Masip

Bethencourt

Lucas

Sánchez-San Segundo

Herrero

(2012). Deception detection from written accounts. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 53, 103-111. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2011.00931.x

125.

Masip

Garrido

Herrero

(2003). Facial appearance and judgments of credibility: The effects of facial babyishness and age on statement credibility. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 129, 269-311.

126.

Masip

Herrero

(2013). “What would you say if you were guilty?” Suspects’ strategies during a hypothetical behavior analysis interview concerning a serious crime. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 60-70. doi:10.1002/acp.2872

127.

Masip

Sporer

S. L.

Garrido

Herrero

(2005). The detection of deception with the reality monitoring approach: A review of the empirical evidence. Psychology, Crime & Law, 11, 99-122. doi:10.1080/10683160410001726356

128.

McNamara

D. S.

Graesser

A. C.

(2012). Coh-Metrix: An automated tool for theoretical and applied natural language processing. In McCarthy

P. M.

Boonthum-Denecke

(Eds.), Applied natural language processing: Identification, investigation, and resolution (pp. 188-205). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. doi:10.4018/978-1-60960-741-8

129.

Mehrabian

(1972). Nonverbal communication. Chicago, IL: Aldine.

130.

Mehrabian

Wiener

(1966). Non-immediacy between communicator and object of communication in a verbal message: Application to inference of attitudes. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 30, 420-425. doi:10.1037/h0023813

131.

Meissner

C. A.

Kassin

S. M.

(2002). “He’s guilty!”: Investigator bias in judgments of truth and deception. Law and Human Behavior, 5, 469-480. doi:10.1023/A:1020278620751

132.

Mihalcea

Strappavara

(2009, August). The lie detector: Explorations in the automatic recognition of deceptive language. In Su

K.-Y.

Wiebe

(Eds.), Proceedings of the 47th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing Conference Short Papers (pp. 309-312). Suntec, Singapore: ACL.

133.

*Morgan

C. A.

Colwell

Hazlett

G. A.

(2011). Efficacy of forensic statement analysis in distinguishing truthful from deceptive eyewitness accounts of highly stressful events. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 56, 1227-1234. doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01896.x

134.

*Morgan

C. A.

Mishara

Christian

Hazlett

G. A.

(2008, August). Detecting deception through automated analysis of translated speech: Credibility assessment of Arabic-speaking interviewees. Journal of Intelligence Community Research and Development, 1-22.

135.

Morgan

C. A.

Rabinowitz

Christian

Hazlett

G. A.

(2009, January). Detecting deception in Vietnamese: Efficacy of forensic statement analysis when interviewing via an interpreter. Journal of Intelligence Community Research and Development, 1-16.

136.

Morgan

C. A.

Steffian

Clark

Coric

Hazlett

G. A.

(2008). Efficacy of verbal and global judgment cues in the detection of deception in persons interviewed via an interpreter. Unpublished manuscript.

137.

Neisser

(1982). Memory observed: Remembering in natural contexts. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

138.

*Newman

M. L.

Pennebaker

J. W.

Berry

D. S.

Richards

J. M.

(2003). Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistic style. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 665-675. doi:10.1177/0146167203029005010

139.

Nunamaker

J. F.

Burgoon

J. K.

Twyman

N. W.

Proudfoot

J. G.

Schuetzler

Giboney

J. S.

(2012, January). Establishing a foundation for automated human credibility screening. In IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics. Retrieved from http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/bitstream/10150/222874/1/azu_etd_12045_sip1_m.pdf

140.

*Ott

Choi

Cardie

Hancock

J. T.

(2011, June). Finding deceptive opinion spam by any stretch of the imagination. In Proceedings of the 49th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 309-319). Portland, Oregon: Omnipress Incompany.

141.

O’Sullivan

(2003). The fundamental attribution error in detecting deception: The boy-who-cried-wolf effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1316-1327. doi:10.1177/0146167203254610

142.

Pennebaker

J. W.

Chew

C. H.

(1985). Behavioral inhibition and electrodermal activity during deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1427-1433. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.5.1427

143.

Pennebaker

J. W.

Francis

M. E.

Booth

R. J.

(2001). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC): LIWC 2001. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

144.

Pigott

T. D.

(2012). Advances in meta-analysis. New York, NY: Springer.

145.

Pillemer

D. B.

Desrochers

A. B.

Ebanks

C. M.

(1998). Remembering the past in the present: Verb tense shifts in autobiographical memory narratives. In Thompson

C. P.

Herrmann

D. J.

Bruce

Read

J. D.

Payne

D. G.

Toglia

M. P.

(Eds.), Autobiographical memory: Theoretical and applied perspectives (pp. 145-162). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

146.

Qin

Burgoon

(2007, May). An investigation of heuristics of human judgments in detecting deception and potential implications in countering social engineering. In Muresan

Altiok

Melamed

Zeng

(Eds.), Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligence and Security Informatics (pp. 152-159). New Brunswick, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. doi:10.1109/ISI.2007.379548

147.

*Qin

Burgoon

Blair

J. P.

Nunamaker

J. F.

(2005, January). Modality effects in deception detection and applications in automatic deception detection. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1-10). HI: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2005.436

148.

Qin

Burgoon

Nunamaker

J. F.

(2004, January). An exploratory study on promising cues in deception detection and application of decision tree. In Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 23-32). HI: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2004.1265083

149.

Reinhard

M.-A.

Sporer

S. L.

Scharmach

Marksteiner

(2011). Listening, not watching: Situational familiarity and the ability to detect deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 467-484. doi:10.1037/a0023726

150.

Richard

F. D.

Bond

C. F.

Stokes-Zoota

J. J.

(2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7, 331-363. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331

151.

Rogers

T. B.

Kuiper

N. A.

Kirker

W. S.

(1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 677-688. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.35.9.677

152.

Rothstein

H. R.

Sutton

A. J.

Borenstein

(Eds.). (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. Chichester, UK: John Wiley. doi:10.1002/0470870168.ch1

153.

*Rowe

Blandón-Gitlin

(2008, March). Discriminating true, suggested, and fabricated statements with the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count approach. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society, Jacksonville, FL.

154.

Rubin

V. L.

Conroy

(2012, March). Discerning truth from deception: Human judgments of automation efforts. First Monday, 17(3). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3933/3170

155.

Sauerland

Sporer

S. L.

(2011). Written vs. spoken eyewitness accounts: Does modality of testing matter? Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 29, 846-857. doi:10.1002/bsl.1013

156.

*Schafer

J. R.

(2007). Grammatical differences between truthful and deceptive narratives (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Fielding Graduate University, Santa Barbara, CA.

157.

Schank

Abelson

(1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structure. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

158.

*Schelleman-Offermans

Merckelbach

(2010). Fantasy proneness as a confounder of verbal lie detection tools. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 7, 247-260. doi:10.1002/jip.121

159.

Shadish

W. R.

Haddock

C. K.

(2009). Combining estimates of effect size. In Cooper

Harris

L. V.

Valentine

J. C.

(Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (pp. 257-277). New York, NY: Russell Sage.

160.

Skillicorn

D. B.

Leuprecht

(2011). Deception in speeches of candidates for public office. Retrieved from https://hal.inria.fr/file/index/docid/1024985/filename/2014paper_ready_to_go.pdf

161.

Slamecka

N. J.

Graf

(1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592-604. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.4.6.592

162.

Sporer

S. L.

(1997). The less travelled road to truth: Verbal cues in deception in accounts of fabricated and self-experienced events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 373-397. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199710)11:5<373::AID-ACP461>3.0.CO;2-0

163.

Sporer

S. L.

(1998, March). Detecting deception with the Aberdeen Report Judgment Scales (ARJS): Theoretical development, reliability and validity. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society in Redondo Beach, CA.

164.

Sporer

S. L.

(2004). Reality monitoring and the detection of deception. In Granhag

P.-A.

Stromwall

(Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts (pp. 64-102). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511490071

165.

Sporer

S. L.

(2008). Lessons from the origins of eyewitness testimony research in Europe. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 737-757. doi:10.1002/acp.1479

166.

Sporer

S. L.

(2012). Making the subjective objective? Computer-assisted quantification of qualitative content cues to deception. In European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Ed.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Approaches to Deception Detection (pp. 78-85). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.

167.

Sporer

S. L.

(2013, March). Content-criteria to detect deception: Methodological pitfalls and solutions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society, Portland, OR.

168.

Sporer

S. L.

Cohn

L. D.

(2011). Meta-analysis. In Rosenfeld

B. D.

Penrod

S. D.

(Eds.), Research methods in forensic psychology (pp. 43-62). New York, NY: Wiley.

169.

Sporer

S. L.

Küpper

(1995). Realitaetsueberwachung und die Beurteilung des Wahrheitsgehaltes von Erzaehlungen: Eine experimentelle Studie [Reality monitoring and the judgment of credibility of stories: An experimental investigation]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 26, 173-193.

170.

Sporer

S. L.

Schwandt

(2006). Paraverbal correlates of deception: A meta-analysis. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 421-446. doi:10.1002/acp.1190

171.

Sporer

S. L.

Schwandt

(2007). Moderators of nonverbal indicators of deception: A meta-analytic synthesis. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 13, 1-34. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.13.1.1

172.

Sporer

S. L.

Sharman

S. J.

(2006). Should I believe this? Reality monitoring of accounts of self-experienced and invented recent and distant autobiographical events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 985-1001. doi:10.1002/acp1234

173.

Sporer

S. L.

Walther

(2006, March). Truth detection by content cues: General vs. specific questions. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society in Petersburg, FL.

174.

Steller

Köhnken

(1989). Criteria-based statement analysis. In Raskin

D. C.

(Ed.), Psychological methods for investigation and evidence (pp. 217-245). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

175.

Strömwall

L. A.

Hartwig

Granhag

P. A.

(2006). To act truthfully: Nonverbal behavior and strategies during a police interrogation. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12, 207-219. doi:10.1080/10683160512331331328

176.

*Suckle-Nelson

J. A.

Colwell

Hiscock-Anisman

Florence

Youschak

K. E.

Duarte

(2010). Assessment Criteria Indicative of Deception (ACID): Replication and gender differences. The Open Criminology Journal, 3, 23-30.

177.

Sutton

A. J.

(2009). Publication bias. In Cooper

Harris

L. V.

Valentine

J. C.

(Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (pp. 435-452). New York, NY: Russell Sage.

178.

Tausczik

Pennebaker

J. W.

(2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 24-54. doi:10.1177/0261927X09351676

179.

Taylor

P. J.

Tomblin

Conchie

S. M.

Menacere

(2011, March). Verbal indicators of deception in some cultures are indicators of truth in others. Paper presented at the 4th International Congress on Psychology and Law and the annual meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society, Miami, FL.

180.

*ten Brinke

Porter

(2012). Cry me a river: Identifying the behavioural consequences of extremely high-stakes interpersonal deception. Law and Human Behavior, 36, 469-477. doi:10.1037/h0093929

181.

Toma

C. L.

Hancock

J. T.

(2010, February). Reading between the lines: Linguistic cues to deception in online dating profiles. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 5-8). Savannah, GA. doi:10.1145/17-18918.1718921

182.

Toma

C. L.

Hancock

J. T.

(2012). What lies beneath: The linguistic traces of deception in online dating profiles. Journal of Communication, 62, 78-97. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01619.x

183.

Twitchell

D. P.

(2005). Automated analysis techniques for online conversations with application in deception detection (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/194997

184.

Twitchell

D. P.

Biros

D. P.

Adkins

Forsgren

Burgoon

J. K.

Nunamaker

J. F.

(2006, January). Automated determination of the veracity of interview statements from people of interest to an operational security force. In Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1-6). HI: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2006.70

185.

Twitchell

D. P.

Nunamaker

J. F.

Burgoon

J. K.

(2004). Using speech act profiling for deception detection. In Chen

(Ed.), Lecture notes in computer sciences, Vol. 3073. Intelligence and security informatics (pp. 403-410). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.

186.

*Van Swol

L. M.

Braun

M. T.

Malhotra

(2012). Evidence for the Pinocchio effect: Linguistic differences between lies, deception by omissions, and truths. Discourse Processes, 49, 79-106. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2011.633331

187.

Vrij

(2005). Criteria-based content analysis: A qualitative review of the first 37 studies. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 3-41. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.11.1.3

188.

Vrij

(2008a). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

189.

Vrij

(2008b). Nonverbal dominance versus verbal accuracy in lie detection: A plea to change police practice. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 1323-1336. doi:10.1177/009-3854808321530

190.

Vrij

Akehurst

Soukara

Bull

(2004). Detecting deceit via analyses of verbal and nonverbal behavior in adults and children. Human Communication Research, 30, 8-41. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00723.x

191.

Vrij

Edward

Roberts

K. P.

Bull

(2000). Detecting deceit via analysis of verbal and nonverbal behavior. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 24, 239-263. doi:10.1023/A:1006610329284

192.

Vrij

Granhag

P. A.

(2012). Eliciting cues to deception and truth: What matters are the questions asked. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1, 110-117. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.02.004

193.

Vrij

Mann

Kristen

Fisher

R. P.

(2007). Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 499-518. doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9066-4

194.

Vrij

Mann

Leal

Granhag

P. A.

(2010). Getting into the minds of pairs of liars and truth-tellers: An examination of their strategies. The Open Criminology Journal, 3, 17-22. doi:10.2174/1874917801003010017

195.

Wagner

Pease

(1976). The verbal communication of inconsistency between attitudes held and attitudes expressed. Journal of Personality, 44, 1-15. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1976.tb00580.x

196.

Walczyk

J. J.

Harris

L. L.

Duck

T. K.

Mulay

(2014). A social-cognitive framework for understanding serious lies: Activation-decision-construction-action theory. New Ideas in Psychology, 34, 22-36. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2014.03.001

197.

Walczyk

J. J.

Igou

F. P.

Dixon

A. P.

Tcholakian

(2013). Advancing lie detection by inducing cognitive load on liars: A review of relevant theories and techniques guided by lessons from polygraph-based approaches. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 14, 1-13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00014

198.

Walczyk

J. J.

Mahoney

K. T.

Doverspike

Griffith-Ross

D. A.

(2009). Cognitive lie detection: Response time and consistency of answers as cues to deception. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24, 33-49. doi:10.1007/s10869-009-9090-8

199.

Walczyk

J. J.

Schwartz

J. P.

Clifton

Adams

Wei

Zha

(2005). Lying person to person about life events: A cognitive framework for lie detection. Personnel Psychology, 58, 141-170. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00484.x

200.

Walker

W. R.

Skowronski

J. J.

(2009). The fading affect bias: But what the hell is it for? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 1122-1136. doi:10.1002/acp.1614

201.

Walker

W. R.

Skowronski

J. J.

Thompson

C. P.

(2003). Life is pleasant and memory helps to keep it that way. Review of General Psychology, 7, 203-210. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.7.2.203

202.

Walker

W. R.

Vogl

R. J.

Thompson

C. P.

(1997). Autobiographical memory: Unpleasantness fades faster than pleasantness over time. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 399-413. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199710)11:5<399::AID-ACP-462>3.0.CO;2-E

203.

Watson

K. W.

(1981). Oral and written linguistic indices of deception during employment interviews (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.

204.

Wertheimer

Klein

(1904). Psychologische Tatbestandsdiagnostik [Psychological assessment of facts about an event]. Archiv für Kriminologie, Anthropologie und Kriminalistik, 15, 72-113.

205.

Wiener

Mehrabian

(1968). Language within language: Immediacy, a channel in verbal communication. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

206.

*Williams

S. M.

Talwar

Lindsay

R. C.

Bala

N. C.

Lee

(2012). Is the truth in your words? Distinguishing children’s deceptive and truthful statements. Journal of Criminology, 2014, Article 547519. doi:10.1155/2014/547519

207.

Wilson

D. B.

(2002). Meta-analysis macros for SAS, SPSS, and Stata. Retrieved from http://mason.gmu.edu/~dwilsonb/ma.html

208.

*Zhou

(2005). An empirical investigation of deception behavior in instant messaging. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48, 147-160. doi:10.1109/TPC.2005.849652

209.

Zhou

Booker

Q. E.

Zhang

(2002). ROD: Towards rapid ontology development for underdeveloped domains. In Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 957-965). HI: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2002.994046

210.

*Zhou

Burgoon

J. K.

Nunamaker

J. F.

Twitchell

(2004). Automating linguistics-based cues for detecting deception in text-based asynchronous computer-mediated communication. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13, 81-106. doi:10.1023/B:GRUP.0000011944.62889.6f

211.

Zhou

Burgoon

J. K.

Twitchell

D. P.

Qin

T. T.

Nunamaker

J. F.

(2004). A comparison of classification methods for predicting deception in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20, 139-165.

212.

Zhou

Burgoon

J. K.

Zhang

D. S.

Nunamaker

J. F.

(2004). Language dominance in interpersonal deception in computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 381-402. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(03)00051-7

213.

Zhou

Shi

Y. M.

Zhang

D. S.

(2008). A statistical language modeling approach to online deception detection. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 20, 1077-1081. doi:10.1109/TKDE.2007.190624

214.

Zhou

Sung

Y.-W.

(2008). Cues to deception in online Chinese groups. In Proceedings of the 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1-8). HI: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2008.109

215.

Zhou

Twitchell

D. P.

Qin

Burgoon

J. K.

Nunamaker

J. F.

(2003). An exploratory study into deception detection in text-based computer-mediated communication. In Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1-10). HI: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2003.1173793

216.

Zhou

Zenebe

(2005). Modeling and handling uncertainty in deception detection. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1-9). HI: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2005.438

217.

Zhou

Zenebe

(2008, April). Representation and reasoning under uncertainty in deception detection: A neuro-fuzzy approach. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 16, 442-454. doi:10.1109/TFUZZ.2006.889914

218.

*Zhou

Zhang

(2004). Can online behavior unveil deceivers? An exploratory investigation of deception in instant messaging. In Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1-9). HI: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2004.1265079

219.

Zhou

Zhang

D. S.

(2006). A comparison of deception behavior in dyad and triadic group decision making in synchronous computer-mediated communication. Small Group Research, 37, 140-164. doi:10.1177/1046496405285125

220.

Zuckerman

DePaulo

B. M.

Rosenthal

(1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In Berkowitz

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 1-60). New York, NY: Academic Press.

221.

Zuckerman

Driver

R. E.

(1985). Telling lies: Verbal and nonverbal correlates of deception. In Siegman

A. W.

Feldstein

(Eds.), Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior (pp. 129-147). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

222.

Zuckerman

Koestner

R. E.

Colella

M. J.

Alton

A. O.

(1984). Anchoring in the detection of deception and leakage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 301-311. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.47.2.301

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.19 MB

0.00 MB

Are Computers Effective Lie Detectors? A Meta-Analysis of Linguistic Cues to Deception

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material