We present a neural network implementation of central components of the iterative reprocessing (IR) model. The IR model argues that the evaluation of social stimuli (attitudes, stereotypes) is the result of the IR of stimuli in a hierarchy of neural systems: The evaluation of social stimuli develops and changes over processing. The network has a multilevel, bidirectional feedback evaluation system that integrates initial perceptual processing and later developing semantic processing. The network processes stimuli (e.g., an individual’s appearance) over repeated iterations, with increasingly higher levels of semantic processing over time. As a result, the network’s evaluations of stimuli evolve. We discuss the implications of the network for a number of different issues involved in attitudes and social evaluation. The success of the network supports the IR model framework and provides new insights into attitude theory.
AmodioD. M.BartholowB. D.ItoT. A. (2014). Tracking the dynamics of the social brain: ERP approaches for social cognitive and affective neuroscience. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9, 385-393.
3.
BardenJ.MadduxW. W.PettyR. E.BrewerM. B. (2004). Contextual moderation of racial bias: The impact of social roles on controlled and automatically activated attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 5-22.
4.
BassiliJ. N.BrownR. D. (2005). Implicit and explicit attitudes: Research, challenges, and theory. In AlbarracínD.JohnsonB. T.ZannaM. P. (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 543-574). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
BlairI. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 242-260.
6.
BrewerM. B.FeinsteinA. S. (1999). Dual processes in the cognitive representation of persons and social categories. In ChaikenS.TropeY. (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 254-288).New York, NY: Guilford Press.
7.
CacioppoJ. T.BerntsonG. G. (1994). Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 401-423.
8.
CacioppoJ. T.GardnerW. L.BerntsonG. G. (1997). Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 3-25.
9.
ConreyF. R.SmithE. R. (2007). Attitude representation: Attitudes as patterns in a distributed, connectionist representational system. Social Cognition, 25, 718-735.
10.
CorrellJ.WittenbrinkB.ParkB.JuddC. M.GoyleA. (2011). Dangerous enough: Moderating racial bias with contextual threat cues. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 184-189.
11.
CunninghamW. A.Van BavelJ. J.ArbuckleN. L.PackerD. J.WaggonerA. S. (2012). Rapid social perception is flexible: Approach and avoidance motivational states shape P100 responses to other-race faces. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 1-7.
12.
CunninghamW. A.ZelazoP. (2007). Attitudes and evaluations: A social cognitive neuroscience perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 97-104.
13.
CunninghamW. A.ZelazoP.PackerD. J.Van BavelJ. J. (2007). The iterative reprocessing model: A multilevel framework for attitudes and evaluation. Social Cognition, 25, 736-760.
14.
De HouwerJ.Teige-MocigembaS.SpruytA.MoorsA. (2009). Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 347-368.
15.
EvansJ. T. (2003). In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 454-459.
16.
EvansJ. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255-278.
17.
FazioR. H. (1995). Attitudes as object–evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In PettyR. E.KrosnickJ. A. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 247-282). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
FazioR. H. (2007). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations of varying strength. Social Cognition, 25, 603-637.
19.
FiskeS. T.LinM.NeubergS. L. (1999). The continuum model. In ChaikenS.TropeY. (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 231-254).New York, NY: Guilford Press.
20.
FreemanJ. B.AmbadyN. (2010). MouseTracker: Software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse-tracking method. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 226-241.
21.
FreemanJ. B.AmbadyN. (2011). A dynamic interactive theory of person construal. Psychological Review, 118, 247-281.
22.
FreemanJ. B.DaleR.FarmerT. A. (2011). Hand in motion reveals mind in motion. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, Article 59.
23.
GawronskiB.BodenhausenG. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692-731.
24.
GawronskiB.CreightonL. A. (2013). Dual-process theories. In CarlstonD. E. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of social cognition (pp. 282-312). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
25.
GawronskiB.SritharanR. (2010). Formation, change, and contextualization of mental associations: Determinants and principles of variations in implicit measures. In GawronskiB.PayneB. K. (Eds.), The handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. 216-240). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
26.
GreenwaldA. G.BanajiM. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4-27.
27.
GreenwaldA. G.McGheeD. E.SchwartzJ. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
28.
HusterR. J.DebenerS.EicheleT.HerrmannC. S. (2012). Methods for simultaneous EEF-fMRI: An introductory review. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 6053-6060.
29.
ItoT. A.UrlandG. R. (2003). Race and gender on the brain: Electrocortical measures of attention to race and gender of multiply categorizable individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 616-626.
30.
KerenG.SchulY. (2009). Two is not always better than one: A critical evaluation of two-system theories. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 533-550.
31.
KnutsonK. M.MahL.ManlyC. F.GrafmanJ. (2007). Neural correlates of automatic beliefs about gender and race. Human Brain Mapping, 28, 915-930.
32.
KruglanskiA. W.DechesneM. (2006). Are associative and propositional processes qualitatively distinct? Comment on Gawronski and Bodenhausen (2006). Psychological Bulletin, 132, 736-739.
33.
KruglanskiA. W.GigerenzerG. (2011). Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles. Psychological Review, 118, 97-109.
34.
KruglanskiA. W.OrehekE. (2007). Partitioning the domain of social inference: Dual mode and systems models and their alternatives. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 291-316.
35.
KundaZ.ThagardP. (1996). Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: A parallel-constraint-satisfaction theory. Psychological Review, 103, 284-308.
36.
MajaniE.ErlarsonR.Abu-MostafaY. (1989). The induction of multiscale temporal structure. In TouretzkyD. S. (Ed.), Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 634-642). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
37.
MonroeB. M.ReadS. J. (2008). A general connectionist model of attitude structure and change: The ACS (Attitudes as Constraint Satisfaction) model. Psychological Review, 115, 733-759.
38.
O’ReillyR. C.MunakataY. (2000). Computational explorations in cognitive neuroscience: Understanding the mind by simulating the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39.
PhelpsE. A.O’ConnorK. J.CunninghamW. A.FunayamaE. S.GatenbyJ. C.GoreJ. C.BanajiM. R. (2000). Performance on indirect measures of race evaluation predicts amygdala activation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 729-738.
40.
ReadS. J.MonroeB. M. (2009). Using connectionist networks to understand neurobiological processes in social and personality psychology. In Harmon-JonesE.BeerJ. S. (Eds.), Methods in social neuroscience (pp. 259-294). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
41.
SekaquaptewaD.VargasP.von HippelW. (2010). A practical guide to paper-and-pencil implicit measures of attitude. In GawronskiB.PayneB. K. (Eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition (pp. 140-151). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
42.
SinclairL.KundaZ. (1999). Reactions to a Black professional: Motivated inhibition and activation of conflicting stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 885-904.
43.
SmithE. R.ConreyF. R. (2007). Agent-based modeling: A new approach for theory building in social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 1-18.
44.
StrackF.DeutschR. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220-247.
45.
Van BavelJ. J.XiaoY. J.CunninghamW. A. (2012). Evaluation is a dynamic process: Moving beyond dual system models. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 438-454.
46.
Van BavelJ. J.XiaoY. J.HackelL. M. (2013). Social identity shapes social perception and evaluation: Using neuroimaging to look inside the social brain. In DerksB.ScheepersD.EllemersN. (Eds.), The neuroscience of prejudice and in intergroup relations (pp. 110-129). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
47.
WegenerD. T.PettyR. E. (1997). The flexible correction model: The role of naïve theories of bias in bias correction. In SannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 141-208). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
48.
WilsonT. D.SamuelL.SchoolerT. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107, 101-126.
49.
WittenbrinkB.JuddC. M.ParkB. (2001). Spontaneous prejudice in context: Variability in automatically activated attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 815-827.
50.
WojnowiczM. T.FergusonM. J.DaleR.SpiveyM. J. (2009). The self-organization of explicit attitudes. Psychological Science, 20, 1428-1435.
51.
WoodrowB.HoffM. (1960). Adaptive switching circuits. Western Electronic Show and Convention, 4, 96-104.
