Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This meta-analysis summarized findings from 65 studies using the hidden profile paradigm (101 independent effects, 3,189 groups). Results showed (a) groups mentioned two standard deviations more pieces of common information than unique information; (b) hidden profile groups were eight times less likely to find the solution than were groups having full information; (c) two measures of information pooling, including the percentage of unique information mentioned out of total available information (the information coverage measure) and the percentage of unique information out of total discussion (the discussion focus measure), were positively related to decision quality, but the effect of information coverage was stronger than that of discussion focus; and communication medium did not affect (d) unique information pooling or (e) group decision quality. Group size, total information load, the proportion of unique information, task demonstrability, and hidden profile strength were found to moderate these effects. Results are discussed in terms of how they offer conceptual advancement for future hidden profile research.

Keywords

hidden profile information sharing meta-analysis group decision making

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Borenstein

(2005). A short course in meta-analysis. Unpublished manuscript.

Borenstein

Hedges

Higgins

Rothstein

(2006). Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (Version 2.2.27) [Computer software]. Englewood, NJ: Biostat.

*Boster

Hale

Mongeau

P. A.

(1990, June). Social loafing and information sharing in group discussion. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Dublin, Ireland.

*Botero

Wittenbaum

(2002, November). Effects of leadership and task demonstrability on information repetition in decision-making groups. Paper presented at the 88th annual meeting of the National Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.

*Brodbeck

F. C.

Kerschreiter

Mojzisch

Frey

Schulz-Hardt

(2002). The dissemination of critical, unshared information in decision-making groups: The effects of pre-discussion dissent. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 35-56. doi:10.1002/ejsp.7410.1002/ejsp.74

Brodbeck

F. C.

Kerschreiter

Mojzisch

Schulz-Hardt

(2007). Group decision making under conditions of distributed knowledge: The information asymmetries model. Academy of Management Review, 32, 459-479.

Burnstein

Vinokur

(1977). Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 315-332. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(77)90002-610.1016/0022-1031(77)90002-6

*Campbell

Stasser

(2006). The influence of time and task demonstrability on decision-making in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Small Group Research, 37, 271-294. doi:10.1177/104649640628897610.1177/1046496406288976

*Christensen

Larson

J. R.

Abbott

Ardolino

Franz

Pfeiffer

(2000). Decision making of clinical teams: Communication patterns and diagnostic error. Medical Decision Making, 20, 45-50.

10.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavior sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

11.

Cooper

H. M.

Hedges

L. V.

(1994). The handbook of research synthesis. New York, NY: Russell Sage.

12.

*Cruz

M. G.

Boster

F. J.

Rodriguez

J. I.

(1997). The impact of group size and proportion of shared information on the exchange and integration of information in groups. Communication Research, 24, 291-313. doi:10.1177/00936509702400 300410.1177/00936509702400 3004

13.

*Cruz

M. G.

Henningsen

D. D.

Smith

B. A.

(1999). The impact of directive leadership on group information sampling, decisions, and perceptions of the leader. Communication Research, 26, 349-369. doi:10.1177/00936509902600300410.1177/009365099026003004

14.

Davis

(1973). Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. Psychological Review, 80, 97-125. doi:10.1037/h003395110.1037/h0033951

15.

*Dennis

A. R.

(1996a). Information exchange and use in group decision making: You can lead a group to information, but you can’t make it think. MIS Quarterly, 20, 433-457.

16.

*Dennis

A. R.

(1996b). Information exchange and use in small group decision making. Small Group Research, 27, 532-550. doi:10.1177/104649649627400310.1177/1046496496274003

17.

*Dennis

A. R.

Hilmer

K. M.

Taylor

N. J.

(1997). Information exchange and use in GSS and verbal group decision making: Effects of minority influence. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(3), 61-88.

18.

Deutsch

Gerard

H. B.

(1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636.

19.

*Devine

(1999). Effects of cognitive ability, task knowledge, information sharing, and conflict in group decision-making effectiveness. Small Group Research, 30, 608-634.

20.

*Dose

J. J.

(2003). Information exchange in personnel selection decisions. Applied Psychology, 52, 237-252. doi:10.1111/1464-0597.0013310.1111/1464-0597.00133

21.

*Faulmuller

Kerschreiter

Mojzisch

Schulz-Hardt

(2010). Beyond group-level explanations for the failure of groups to solve hidden profiles: The individual preference effect revisited. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 653-671. doi:10.1177/13684302103691410.1177/136843021036914

22.

Festinger

(1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.

23.

*Fraidin

S. N.

(2004). When is one head better than two? Interdependent information in group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 93, 102-113. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2003.12.00310.1016/j.obhdp.2003.12.003

24.

*Franz

T. M.

Larson

J. R.

(2002). The impact of experts on information sharing during group discussion. Small Group Research, 33, 383-411. doi:10.1177/10464964020330040110.1177/104649640203300401

25.

*Gigone

Hastie

(1993). The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 959-974. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.95910.1037/0022-3514.65.5.959

26.

*Gigone

Hastie

(1997). The impact of information on small group choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 132-140. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.13210.1037/0022-3514.72.1.132

27.

*Graetz

K. A.

Boyle

E. S.

Kimble

C. E.

Thompson

Garloch

J. L.

(1998). Information sharing face-to-face, teleconferencing, and electronic chat groups. Small Group Research, 29, 714-743.

28.

*Greitemeyer

Schulz-Hardt

(2003). Preference-consistent evaluation of information in the hidden profile paradigm: Beyond group-level explanations for the dominance of shared information in group decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 322-339. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.32210.1037/0022-3514.84.2.322

29.

*Greitemeyer

Schulz-Hardt

Brodbeck

F. C.

Frey

(2006). Information sampling and group decision making: The effects of an advocacy decision procedure and task experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12, 31-42. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.12.1.3110.1037/1076-898X.12.1.31

30.

*Gruenfeld

D. H.

Mannix

E. A.

Williams

K. Y.

Neale

M. A.

(1996). Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 1-15.

31.

Hedges

L. V.

(1994). Fixed effects models. In Cooper

Hedges

L. V.

(Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 285-299). New York, NY: Russell Sage.

32.

Hedges

L. V.

Pigott

T. D.

(2004). The power of statistical tests for moderators in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 9, 426-445.

33.

*Henningsen

D. D.

Henningsen

M. L. M.

(2003). Examining social influence in information-sharing contexts. Small Group Research, 34, 391-412.

34.

*Henningsen

D. D.

Henningsen

M. L. M.

(2007). Do groups know what they don’t know? Dealing with missing information in decision-making groups. Communication Research, 34, 507-525. doi:10.1177/009365020730559410.1177/0093650207305594

35.

*Henningsen

D. D.

Henningsen

M. L. M.

Jakobsen

Borton

(2004). It’s good to be leader: The influence of randomly and systematically selected leaders on decision-making groups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 8, 62-76. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.8.1.6210.1037/1089-2699.8.1.62

36.

Hinsz

V. B.

Tindale

R. S.

Vollrath

D. A.

(1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 43-64. doi:10.1037/0033-2909 .121.1.4310.1037/0033-2909 .121.1.43

37.

*Hollingshead

A. B.

(1996a). Information suppression and status persistence in group decision making: The effects of communication media. Human Communication Research, 23, 193-219. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00392.x10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00392.x

38.

*Hollingshead

A. B.

(1996b). The rank-order effect in group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68, 181-193. doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.009810.1006/obhd.1996.0098

39.

Huang

Raman

K. S.

Wei

K. K.

(1993, December). A process study of effects of GSS and task type on informational and normative influence in small groups. Paper presented at the proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Information Systems, Orlando, FL.

40.

Kaplan

M. F.

Miller

C. E.

(1987). Group decision making and normative versus informational influence: Effects of type of issue and assigned decision rule. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 306-313. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.2.30610.1037/0022-3514.53.2.306

41.

*Kelly

J. R.

Karau

S. J.

(1999). Group decision making: The effects of initial preferences and time pressure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1342-1354. doi:10.1177/014616729925900210.1177/0146167299259002

42.

*Kerr

D. S.

Murthy

U. S.

(2009). The effectiveness of synchronous computer-mediated communication for solving hidden-profile problems: Further empirical evidence. Information & Management, 46, 83-89. doi:10.1016/j.im.2008.12.00210.1016/j.im.2008.12.002

43.

*Klein

Jacobs

Gemoets

Licata

Lambert

S. M.

(2003). Hidden profiles and the consensualization of social stereotypes: How information distribution affects stereotype content and sharedness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 755-777. doi:10.1002/ejsp.16810.1002/ejsp.168

44.

*Klocke

(2007). How to improve decision making in small groups: Effects of dissent and training interventions. Small Group Research, 38, 437-468. doi:10.1177/104649640730197410.1177/1046496407301974

45.

*Lagroue

H. J.

(2006). The effectiveness of virtual facilitation in supporting GDSS appropriation and structured group decision making (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations database.

46.

*Lam

S. S. K.

Schaubroeck

(2000). Improving group decisions by better pooling information: A comparative advantage of group decision support systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 565-573. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.51210.1037/0021-9010.85.4.512

47.

*Larson

J. R.

Christensen

Abbott

A. S.

Franz

T. M.

(1996). Diagnosing groups: Charting the flow of information in medical decision-making teams. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 315-330. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.31510.1037/0022-3514.71.2.315

48.

*Larson

J. R.

Christensen

Franz

T. M.

Abbott

A. S.

(1998). Diagnosing groups: The pooling, management, and impact of shared and unshared case information in team-based medical decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 93-108. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.9310.1037/0022-3514.75.1.93

49.

*Larson

J. R.

Foster-Fishman

P. G.

Keys

C. B.

(1994). Discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 446-461. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.44610.1037/0022-3514.67.3.446

50.

Laughlin

P. R.

(1980). Social combination processes of cooperative problem-solving groups on verbal intellective tasks. In Fishbein

(Ed.), Progress in social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 125-155). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

51.

Laughlin

P. R.

Ellis

A. L.

(1986). Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 177-189. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(86)90022-310.1016/0022-1031(86)90022-3

52.

*Lavery

T. A.

Franz

T. M.

Winquist

J. R.

Larson

J. R.

(1999). The role of information exchange in predicting group accuracy on a multiple judgment task. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 281-289. doi:10.1207/S15324834BASP2104_210.1207/S15324834BASP2104_2

53.

Lipsey

M. W.

Wilson

D. B.

(2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

54.

*Marin

(1993). Effects of communication support technology on the distribution of unshared information and the discovery of hidden profiles in group decision making (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations database. (AAT 9403551)

55.

*McLeod

P. L.

(2004). [Information sharing and decision-making in asynchronous computer-mediated communication]. Unpublished raw data.

56.

*McLeod

P. L.

Baron

R. S.

Marti

M. W.

Yoon

(1997). The eyes have it: Minority influence in face-to-face and computer-mediated group discussion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 706-718. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.70610.1037/0021-9010.82.5.706

57.

Mennecke

B. E.

(1997). Using group support systems to discover hidden profiles: An examination of the influence of group size and meeting structures on information sharing and decision quality. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 47, 387-405. doi:10.1006/ijhc.1997.013610.1006/ijhc.1997.0136

58.

*Mennecke

B. E.

Valacich

J. S.

(1998). Information is what you make of it: The influence of group history and computer support on information sharing, decision quality, and member perceptions. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(2), 173-197.

59.

Mesmer-Magnus

J. R.

DeChurch

L. A.

(2009). Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 535-546. doi:10.1037/a001377310.1037/a0013773

60.

*Mojzisch

Grouneva

Schulz-Hardt

(2010). Evaluation of information during discussion: Disentangling the effects of preference consistency, social validation, and ownership of information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 946-956. doi:10.1002/ejsp.66010.1002/ejsp.660

61.

*Murthy

U. S.

Kerr

D. S.

(2004). Comparing audit team effectiveness via alternative modes of computer-mediated communication. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 23, 141-152.

62.

Phillips

K. W.

Loyd

D. L.

(2006). When surface and deep-level diversity collide: The effects on dissenting group members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, 143-160. doi:doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.12.001doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.12.001

63.

*Phillips

K. W.

Mannix

E. A.

Neale

M. A.

Gruenfeld

D. H.

(2004). Diverse groups and information sharing: The effects of congruent ties. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 497-510.

64.

Pierce

C. A.

(2008). Software review: Borenstein, M., Hedges, LV, Higgins, JPT, & Rothstein, HR (2006). Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (Version 2.2.027) [Computer software]. Englewood, NJ: Biostat. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 188-191.

65.

Postmes

Spears

Cihangir

(2001). Quality of decision making and group norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 918-930. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.91810.1037/0022-3514.80.6.918

66.

*Reimer

Kuendig

Hoffrage

Park

Hinsz

(2007). Effects of the information environment on group discussions and decisions in the hidden-profile paradigm. Communication Monographs, 74, 1-28. doi:10.1080/0363775070120994710.1080/03637750701209947

67.

Reimer

Czienskowski

(2010). Decision-making groups attenuate the discussion bias in favor of shared information: A meta-analysis. Communication Monographs, 77, 122-143. doi:10.1080/0363775090351431810.1080/03637750903514318

68.

*Reimer

Reimer

Hinsz

(2010). Naive groups can solve the hidden-profile problem. Human Communication Research, 36, 443-467. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01383.x10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01383.x

69.

Rosenthal

(1995). Writing meta-analytic reviews. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 183-192. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.118 .2.18310.1037/0033-2909.118 .2.183

70.

Rosenthal

DiMatteo

M. R.

(2001). Meta-analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual Reviews in Psychology, 52, 59-82.

71.

*Savadori

van Swol

L. M.

Sniezek

J. A.

(2001). Information sampling and confidence within groups and judge advisor systems. Communication Research, 28, 737-771. doi:10.1177/00936500102800600210.1177/009365001028006002

72.

*Schittekatte

van Hiel

(1996). Effects of partially shared information and awareness of unshared information on information sampling. Small Group Research, 27, 431-449. doi:10.1177/104649649627300610.1177/1046496496273006

73.

*Scholten

van Knippenberg

Nijstad

B. A.

De Dreu

C. K. W.

(2007). Motivated information processing and group decision-making: Effects of process accountability on information processing and decision quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 539-552. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.010.10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.010.

74.

*Schulz-Hardt

Brodbeck

F. C.

Mojzisch

Kerschreiter

Frey

(2006). Group decision making in hidden profile situations: Dissent as a facilitator for decision quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1080-1093. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.108010.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1080

75.

*Shirani

A. I.

(2006). Sampling and pooling of decision-relevant information: Comparing the efficiency of face-to-face and GSS supported groups. Information & Management, 43, 521-529. doi:10.1016/j.im.2006.01.00110.1016/j.im.2006.01.001

76.

Stasser

(1992). Pooling of unshared information during group discussion. In Worchel

Wood

Simpson

(Eds.), Group process and productivity (pp. 48-57). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

77.

Stasser

Birchmeier

(2003). Group creativity and collective choice. In Paulus

P. B.

Nijstad

B. A.

(Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 85-109). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

78.

*Stasser

Stewart

(1992). Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 426-434. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.42610.1037/0022-3514.63.3.426

79.

*Stasser

Stewart

Wittenbaum

G. M.

(1995). Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 244-265. doi:10.1006/jesp.1995.101210.1006/jesp.1995.1012

80.

Stasser

Taylor

L. A.

Hanna

(1989). Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three- and six-person groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 67-78. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.1.6710.1037/0022-3514.57.1.67

81.

*Stasser

Titus

(1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467-1478. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.146710.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467

82.

Stasser

Titus

(1987). Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 81-93. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.8110.1037/0022-3514.53.1.81

83.

Stasser

Titus

(2003). Hidden profiles: A brief history. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 304-313. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1403&4_2110.1207/S15327965PLI1403&4_21

84.

Stasser

Vaughan

S. I.

Stewart

D. D.

(2000). Pooling unshared information: The benefits of knowing how access to information is distributed among group members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 102-116. doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.289010.1006/obhd.2000.2890

85.

*Stewart

D. D.

Billings

R. S.

Stasser

(1998). Accountability and the discussion of unshared, critical information in decision-making groups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2, 18-23. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.2.1.1810.1037/1089-2699.2.1.18

86.

Stewart

D. D

Stasser

. (1995). Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 619-628. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.61910.1037/0022-3514.69.4.619

87.

*Stewart

D. D.

Stasser

(1998). The sampling of critical, unshared information in decision-making groups: The role of an informed minority. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 95-113. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199801/02)28:1<95::AID-EJSP847>3.0.CO;2->010.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199801/02)28:1<95::AID-EJSP847>3.0.CO;2-0

88.

*Straus

S. G.

(1996). Getting a clue: The effects of communication media and information distribution on participation and performance in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Small Group Research, 27, 115-142. doi:10.1177/10464964962 7100610.1177/10464964962 71006

89.

*Toma

Butera

(2009). Hidden profiles and concealed information: Strategic information sharing and use in group decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 793-806.

90.

*Trindel

(2007). Cognitive independence and cohesion in decision-making groups (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations database.

91.

*van Swol

L. M.

(2009). Discussion and perception of information in groups and judge-advisor systems. Communication Monographs, 76, 99-120. doi:10.1080/0363775080237878110.1080/03637750802378781

92.

van Swol

L. M.

Seinfeld

(2006). Differences between minority, majority, and unanimous group members in the communication of information. Human Communication Research, 32, 178-197. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00008.x10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00008.x

93.

*Vathanophas

Liang

S. Y.

(2007). Enhancing information sharing in group support systems (GSS). Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1675-1691.

94.

*Winquist

J. R.

Larson

J. R.

(1998). Information pooling: When it impacts group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 371-377. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.37110.1037/0022-3514.74.2.371

95.

Wittenbaum

G. M.

Hollingshead

A. B.

Botero

I. C.

(2004). From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: Moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm. Communication Monographs, 71, 286-310. doi:10.1080/036345204200029989410.1080/0363452042000299894

96.

Wood

Lundgren

Ouellette

J. A.

Busceme

Blackstone

(1994). Minority influence: A meta-analytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 323-345. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.3.32310.1037/0033-2909.115.3.323

97.

Yuan

Y. C.

McLeod

(2009, August). Revisiting the role of transactive memory in the hidden profile paradigm: From one to multiple expertise domains. Paper presented at the Academy of Management annual conference, Chicago, IL.

Twenty-Five Years of Hidden Profiles in Group Decision Making

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References