This article extends the social identity model of deindividuation effects (SIDE) by considering the various ways in which relations of visibility to an audience can affect the public expression of identity-relevant norms (identity performance). It is suggested that social identity performance can fulfill two general functions: Affirming, conforming, or strengthening individual or group identities (the identity consolidation function) and persuading audiences into adopting specific behaviors (the mobilization function). The authors report evidence supporting these two functions of identity performance both in intragroup and intergroup contexts. They argue that through these functions, social identity performance plays a major role in the elaboration and coordination of social action. Finally, and building on this framework, the authors consider the ways through which social identity performance can be used in the very construction of social identity.
Anderson, B. R. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism (Rev. ed.). London: Verso.
2.
Angelou, M. (1978). And still I rise. London: Virago.
3.
Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2002). The impact of respect versus neglect of self-identities on identification and group loyalty. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 629-639.
4.
Barreto, M., Spears, R., Ellemers, N., & Shahinper, M. (2003). Who wants to know? The effect of audience on identity expression among minority group members. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 299-318.
5.
Baumeister, R. F. (1982). A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 3-26.
6.
Baumeister, R. F., & Jones, E. E. (1978). When self-presentation is constrained by the target’s knowledge: Consistency and compensation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 608-618.
7.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachment as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
8.
Baumeister, R. F., & Tice, D. M. (1984). Role of self-presentation and choice in cognitive dissonance under forced compliance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 5-13.
Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 1-62). New York: Academic Press.
11.
Besson, Y. (1990). Identités et conflits au Proche-Orient [Identities and conflict in the Middle East]. Paris: L’Harmattan.
12.
Billig, M. (1978). Fascists: A social psychological view of the National Front. London: Academic Press.
13.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
14.
Bourdieu, P. (1982). CE que parler veut dire: l’économie des échanges linguistiques [What saying means: The economy of linguistic exchange]. Paris: Fayard.
15.
Branscombe, N. R., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In N. Ellemers, R.Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity (pp. 35-58). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
16.
Breuilly, J. (1982). Nationalism and the state. Manchester, UK: Manchester University press.
17.
Cheek, J. M., & Hogan, R. (1983). Self-concepts, self-presentations, and moral judgments. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (pp. 249-273). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
Chen, S., Chen, K. Y., & Shaw, L. (2004). Self-verification motives at the collective level of self-definition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 77-94.
19.
Chryssochoou, X. (2003). Cultural diversity: Its social psychology. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
20.
Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Scribner.
21.
Cronin, P., & Reicher, S. (2006). A study of the factors that influence how senior officers police crowd events: On SIDE outside the laboratory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 175-196.
22.
Deaux, K., & Ethier, K. A. (1998). Negotiating social identity. In J. K. Swim & C. Stangor (Eds.), Prejudice: The target’s perspective (pp. 301-323). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
23.
Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369-389.
24.
Douglas, K. M., & McGarty, C. (2001). Identifiability and self-presentation: Computer-mediated communication and intergroup communication. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 399-416.
25.
Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (2005). Explaining enduring empowerment: A comparative study of collective action and psychological outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 35-58.
26.
Drury, J., & Reicher, S. D. (1999). The intergroup dynamics of collective empowerment: Substantiating the social identity model of crowd behavior. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 2, 381-402.
27.
Drury, J., & Reicher, S. D. (2000). Collective action and psychological change: The emergence of new identities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 579-604.
28.
Ellemers, N. (1993). The influence of socio-structural variables on identity management strategies. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (pp. 27-58). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
29.
Ellemers, N., Doosje, B., & Spears, R. (2004). Sources of respect: From the effects of being liked by ingroups and outgroups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 155-172.
30.
Ellemers, N., & Van Rijswijk, W. (1997). Identity needs versus social opportunities: The use of group-level and individual-level identity management strategies. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 52-65.
31.
Ellison, R. (2001). Invisible man. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin
32.
Emler, N., & Reicher, S. D. (1995). The social psychology of adolescent delinquency. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
33.
Fantasia, R. (1988). Cultures of solidarity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
34.
Fantasia, R., & Stepan-Norris, J. (2004). The labor movement in motion. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 555-575). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
35.
Fazio, R. H., Effrein, E. A., & Falender, V. J. (1981). Self-perceptions following social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 232-242.
36.
Fiske, S. T., Xu, J., & Cuddy, A. C. (1999). (Dis)respecting versus (dis)liking: Status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 473-489.
37.
Fitzpatrick, S. (2005). Tear off the masks! Identity and imposture in twentieth-century Russia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38.
Gandy, O. H., Jr. (1993). The panoptic sort: A political economy of personal information. Oxford, UK: Westview.
39.
Gergen, K. J. (1965). Interaction goals and personalistic feedback as factors affecting the presentation of self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 413-424.
40.
Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (1985). Compensatory self-inflation: A response to the threat to self-regard of public failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 273-280.
41.
Haslam, S. A. (2001). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. London: Sage.
42.
Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. D. (in press). Social identity and the dynamics of organizational life: Insights from the BBC Prison Study. In C. Bartel, S. Blader, & A. Wrzesniewski (Eds.), Identity and the modern organization. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43.
Hobsbawm, E. (1983). Mass-producing traditions: Europe, 1870-1914. In E. Hobsbawm & T. Ranger (Eds.), The invention of tradition (pp. 263-308). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Hobsbawm, E. (1990). Nations and nationalism since 1780: Programme, myth, reality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45.
Hobsbawm, E., & Ranger, T. (1983). The invention of tradition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46.
Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2000). Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 143-156.
47.
Hornsey, M. J., & Imani, A. (2004). Criticism from in-group and from out-groups: An identity perspective on the intergroup sensitivity effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 365-383.
48.
Hornsey, M. J., & Jetten, J. (2003). Not being what you claim to be: Impostors as sources of group threat. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 639-657.
49.
Hornsey, M. J., Oppes, T., & Svensson, A. (2002). “It’s OK if we say it, but you can’t”: Responses to intergroup and intragroup criticism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 293-307.
50.
Jetten, J., Branscombe, N. R., & Spears, R. (2002). On being peripheral: Effects of identity insecurity on personal and collective self-esteem. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 105-123.
51.
Jetten, J., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & McKimmie, B. M. (2003). Predicting the path of peripherals: The interaction of identification and future possibilities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 130-140.
52.
Jones, E. E., & Pittman, T. S. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 1, pp. 231-262). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
53.
Jones, E. E., Rhodewalt, F., Berglas, S., & Skelton, J. A. (1981). Effects of strategic self-presentation on subsequent self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 407-421.
54.
Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 163-204.
55.
Klein, O. (2004). L’expression des stéréotypes et des représentations groupales: cognition, stratégie, politique [The expression of stereotypes: Cognition, strategy, politics]. In J.-L. Beauvois, R.-V. Joule, & J.-M. Monteil (Eds.), Perspectives Cognitives et Conduites Sociales (Vol. IX, pp. 131-159). Rennes, France: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
56.
Klein, O., & Azzi, A. E. (2001). The strategic confirmation of meta-stereotypes: How group members attempt to tailor an out-group’s representation of themselves. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 279-293.
57.
Klein, O., Azzi, A. E., Brito, R., & Berckmans, S. (2000). Nationalism and the strategic expression of identity. In T. Postmes, R. Spears, M. Lea, & S. Reicher (Eds.), SIDE issues centre stage: Recent developments in studies of de-individuation in groups (pp. 131-141). Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.
58.
Klein, O., & Licata, L. (2003). When group representations serve social change: The speeches of Patrice Lumumba during the Congolese decolonization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 571-593.
59.
Klein, O., Licata, L., Azzi, A. E., & Durala, I. (2003). “How European am I?” Prejudice expression and the presentation of social identity. Self and Identity, 2, 251-264.
60.
Klein, O., Livingston, R. W., & Snyder, M. (2005). Etre ou ne pas etre politiquement correct? la relation entre prejuge et expression d’impressions stereotypees en fonction du self-monitoring [To be or not to be politically correct? The relation between prejudice and expression of stereotypical impressions as a function of self-monitoring]. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 67/68, 55-64.
61.
Klein, O., & Snyder, M. (2003). Stereotypes and behavioral confirmation: From interpersonal to intergroup perspectives. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 153-234). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
62.
Klein, O., Snyder, M., & Livingston, R. W. (2004). Prejudice on the stage: Self-monitoring and the public expression of group attitudes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 299-314.
63.
Leach, C. W., Snider, S., & Iyer, A. (2002). “Poisoning the consciences of the fortunate”: The experience of relative advantage and support for social equality. In I. Walker & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration (pp. 136-163). New York: Cambridge University.
64.
Leary, M. R., & Kowalsky, R. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 34-47.
65.
Levine, M., Prosser, A., Evans, D., & Reicher, S. (2005). Identity and emergency intervention: How social group membership and inclusiveness of group boundaries shape helping behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 443-453.
66.
Lyon, D. (1994). The electronic eye: The rise of surveillance society. London: Polity.
67.
Marr, D. (1992). The battle for Scotland. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
68.
Mead, G. H. (1967). Mind, self, and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist (Vol. 1). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
69.
Morris, A., & Staggenborg, S. (2004). Leadership in social movements. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 171-196). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
70.
Mummendey, A., & Schreiber, H. J. (1983). Better or just different? Positive social identity by discrimination against or differentiation from outgroups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 389-397.
71.
Mummendey, A., & Wenzel, M. (1999). Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 158-174.
72.
Noel, J. G., Wann, D. L., & Branscombe, N. R. (1995). Peripheral ingroup membership status and public negativity toward out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 127-137.
73.
Oakes, P. J. (1987). The salience of social categories. In J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, & M. S. Wetherell (Eds.), Re-discovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 117-141). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
74.
Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & Turner, J. C. (1994). Stereotyping and social reality. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
75.
Ozouf, M. (1988). Festivals and the French Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
76.
Patrick, J. (1973). A Glasgow gang observed. London: Eyre Methuen.
77.
Postmes, T., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Young, H. (1999). Comparative processes in personal and group judgments: Resolving the discrepancy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 320-338.
78.
Postmes, T., & Jetten, J. (Eds.). (2006). Individuality and the group: Advances in social identity. London: Sage.
79.
Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (1998). Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 238-259.
80.
Reicher, S. D. (1982). The determination of collective action. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 41-84). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
81.
Reicher, S. D. (1984). Social influence in the crowd: Attitudinal & behavioural effects of de-individuation in conditions of high & low group salience. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 341-350.
82.
Reicher, S. D. (1987). Crowd behavior as social action. In J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, & M. S. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 171-202). New York: Blackwell.
83.
Reicher, S. D. (1996a). “The Battle of Westminster”: Developing the social identity model of crowd behavior in order to explain the initiation and development of collective conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 115-134.
84.
Reicher, S. D. (1996b). Social identity and social change: Rethinking the context of social psychology. In W. P. Robinson (Ed.), Social groups and identities: Developing the legacy of Henri Tajfel (pp. 317-336). Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
85.
Reicher, S. D., Cassidy, C., Wolpert, I., Hopkins, N., & Levine, M. (2006). Saving Bulgaria’s Jews: An analysis of social identity and the mobilisation of social solidarity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 49-72.
86.
Reicher, S. D., & Haslam, S. A. (2006). Rethinking the psychology of tyranny: The BBC Prison Study. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 1-40.
87.
Reicher, S. D., Haslam, S. A., & Hopkins, N. (2005). Social identity and the dynamics of leadership: Leaders and followers as collaborative agents in the transformation of social reality. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 547-568.
88.
Reicher, S. D., & Hopkins, N. (1996). Self-category constructions in political rhetoric: An analysis of Thatcher’s and Kinnock’s speeches during the British miner’s strike (1984-1985). European Journal of Personality, 26, 353-371.
89.
Reicher, S. D., & Hopkins, N. (2001a). Psychology and the end of history: A critique and a proposal for the psychology of social categorization. Political Psychology, 22, 383-407.
90.
Reicher, S. D., & Hopkins, N. (2001b). Self and nation. London: Sage.
91.
Reicher, S. D., Hopkins, N., & Condor, S. (1997). Stereotype construction as a strategy of influence. In R. Spears & P. J. Oakes (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 94-118). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
92.
Reicher, S. D., & Levine, M. (1994a). On the consequences of deindividuation manipulations for the strategic communication of self: Identifiability and the presentation of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 511-524.
93.
Reicher, S. D., & Levine, M. (1994b). Deindividuation, power relations between groups and the expression of social identity: The effects of visibility to the out-group. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 145-163.
94.
Reicher, S. D., Levine, R. M., & Gordijn, E. (1998). More on deindividuation, power relations between groups and the expression of social identity: Three studies on the effects of visibility to the in-group. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 15-40.
95.
Reicher, S. D., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 161-198.
96.
Ringmar, E. (1996). Identity, interest and action: A cultural explanation of Sweden’s intervention in the Thirty Years War. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
97.
Scheepers, D., Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2002). Integrating identity and instrumental approaches to intergroup differentiation: Different contexts, different motives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1455-1467.
98.
Scheepers, D., Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2003). Two functions of verbal intergroup discrimination: Identity and instrumental motives as a result of group identification and threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 568-577.
99.
Scheepers, D., Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2006). Diversity in in-group bias: Structural factors, situational features, and social functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
100.
Schlenker, B. R. (1986). Threats to identity: Self-identification and social stress. In C. R. Snyder & C. E. Ford (Eds.), Coping with negative life events: Clinical and social psychological perspectives (pp. 273-321). New York: Plenum.
101.
Schlenker, B. R., & Weigold, M. F. (1992). Interpersonal processes involving impression regulation and management. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 133-168.
102.
Simon, B., & Stürmer, S. (2003). Respect for group members: Intragroup determinants of collective identification and group-serving behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 183-193.
103.
Smith, E. R., Murphy, J., & Coats, S. (1999). Attachment to groups: Theory and management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 94-110.
104.
Smith, H. J., & Tyler, T. R. (1997). Choosing the right pond: The impact of group membership on self-esteem and group-oriented behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 146-170.
105.
Smith, M. B., Bruner, J. S., & White, R. W. (1956). Opinions and personality. New York: John Wiley.
106.
Snyder, M. (1987). Public appearances, private realities: The psychology of self-monitoring. New York: Freeman.
107.
Snyder, M., & Swann, W. B. (1978). Behavioral confirmation in social interaction: From social perception to social reality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 148-162.
108.
Spears, R. (2001). The interaction between the individual and the collective self: Self-categorization in context. In C. Sedikides & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Individual self, relational self, and collective self: Partners, opponents or strangers? (pp. 171-198). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
109.
Spears, R., Gordijn, E., Dijksterhuis, A., & Stapel, D. A. (2004). Reaction in action: Intergroup contrast in automatic behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 605-616.
110.
Spears, R., & Haslam, S. A. (1997). Stereotyping and the burden of cognitive load. In R. Spears & P. J. Oakes (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 171-207). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
111.
Spears, R., Jetten, J., & Doosje, B. (2001). The (il)legitimacy of ingroup bias: From social reality to social resistance. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 332-362). New York: Cambridge University Press.
112.
Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1992). Social influence and the influence of the “social” in computer-mediated communication. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 30-65). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
113.
Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1994). Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 21, 427-459.
114.
Spears, R., Lea, M., Corneliussen, R. A., Postmes, T., & Ter Haar, W. (2002). Computer-mediated communication as a channel for social resistance: The strategic side of SIDE. Small Group Research, 33, 555-574.
115.
Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. (1989). The social context of stereotyping and differentiation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 101-121.
116.
Spears, R., Postmes, T., Lea, M., & Wolbert, A. (2002). The power of influence and the influence of power in virtual groups: A SIDE look at CMC and the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 91-108.
117.
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African-Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797-811.
118.
Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 379-440). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
119.
Stott, C., & Reicher, S. (1998). Crowd action as intergroup process: Introducing the police perspective. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 509-529.
120.
Swann, W. B. (1983). Self-verification: Bringing social reality into harmony with the self. In J. Suls & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 2, pp. 33-66). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
121.
Swann, W. B. (1987). Identity negotiation: Where two roads meet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1038-1051.
122.
Swann, W. B. (2005). The self and identity negotiation. Interaction Studies, 6, 69-83.
123.
Tajfel, H. (1975). The exit of social mobility and the voice of social change. Social Science Information, 14, 101-118.
124.
Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups. London: Academic Press.
125.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
126.
Tice, D. M. (1992). Self-concept change and self-presentation: The looking glass self is also a magnifying glass. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 435-451.
127.
Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15-40). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
128.
Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
129.
Turner, J. C. (2005). Explaining the nature of power: A three-process theory. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 1-22.
130.
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Re-discovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
131.
van Knippenberg, A. (1984). Intergroup differences in group perceptions. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The social dimension: European studies in social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 560-578). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
132.
van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., Fischer, A., & Leach, C. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 649-664.
133.
Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994-1003.
134.
Yzerbyt, V., Rocher, S., & Schadron. (1997). Stereotypes as explanations: A subjective essentialistic view of group perception. In R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 20-50). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
