This article explores the homicidal behavior of women against intimate partners, using a modification of Black's self-help perspective. Simpson has called for theoretical perspectives that speak to the interplay of race, gender, and social class. My interpretation of self-help theory incorporates these factors as predictors of low social status. Low social status leads to decreased access to formal social control, which in turn leads some women to resort to lethal violence as a form of criminal conflict resolution in the perceived absence of available legal remedies. Conversely, low social status serves to inhibit homicidal behavior in most women, through greater fear of retribution and involvement in fewer conflicts related to honor. This may account for the wide disparity in the amount of lethal violence committed by men and women.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bernard, T. J.
(1990). Angry aggression among the truly disadvantaged. Criminology, 28, 73-95.
2.
Birch, H.
(Ed.). (1994). Moving targets: Women, murder and representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3.
Black, D.
(1976). The behavior of law. San Diego: Academic Press.
4.
Black, D.
(1983). Crime as social control. American Sociological Review, 48, 34-45.
5.
Black, D.
(1993). The social structure of right and wrong. San Diego: Academic Press.
6.
Browne, A.
(1987). When battered women kill. New York: Free Press.
7.
Browne, A.
(1995). Fear and the perception of alternatives: Asking “why women don't leave” is the wrong question. In B. R. Price & M. Sokoloff (Eds.), The criminal justice system and women (2nd ed., pp. 228-245). New York: McGraw-Hill.
8.
Browne, A.
, & Williams, K. R. (1993). Gender, intimacy, and lethal violence: Trends from 1976 through 1987. Gender and Society, 7, 78-98.
9.
Brownmiller, S.
(1975). Against our will: Men, women, and rape. New York: Ballantine.
10.
Chesney-Lind, M.
(1993). Girls, gangs and violence: Anatomy of a backlash. Humanity & Society, 17, 321-344.
11.
Chesney-Lind, M.
(1997). The female offender: Girls, women, and crime. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Cooney, M.
(1997). The decline of elite homicide. Criminology, 35, 381-407.
13.
Daly, K.
(1989). Neither conflict nor labeling nor paternalism will suffice: Intersections of race, ethnicity, gender, and family in criminal court decisions. Crime & Delinquency, 35, 136-168.
14.
Davis-Adeshoté, J.
(1995). Black survival in White America: From past history to the next century. Orange, NJ: Bryant & Dillon.
15.
Decker, S. H.
(1993). Exploring the victim-offender relationships in homicide: The role of individual and event characteristics. Justice Quarterly, 10, 585-612.
16.
Decker, S. H.
(1996). Deviant homicide: A new look at the role of motives in victim-offender relationships. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 33, 427-449.
17.
Dugan, L.
, Nagin, D., & Rosenfeld, R. (1997). Explaining the decline in intimate partner homicide: The effects of changing domesticity, women's status, and domestic violence resources (Working paper No. 2). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, National Consortium on Violence Research.
18.
Edwards, S.
(1984). Women on trial. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
19.
Erikson, K. T.
(1966). Wayward puritans: A study in the sociology of deviance. New York: John Wiley.
20.
Faludi, S.
(1991). Backlash: The undeclared war against American women. New York: Crown.
21.
Flowers, R. B.
(1987). Women and criminality: The woman as victim, offender, and practitioner. New York: Greenwood.
22.
Friedan, B.
(1983). The feminine mystique. New York: Norton.
23.
Friedman, L. N.
, & Shulman, M. (1990). Domestic violence: The criminal justice response. In A. J. Lurigio, W. G. Skogan, & R. C. Davis (Eds.), Victims of crime: Problems, policies, and programs (pp. 87-103). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24.
Gauthier, D. K.
, & Bankston, W. B. (1997). Gender equality and the sex ratio of intimate killing. Criminology, 35, 577-600.
25.
Gibbs, J. T.
(Ed.). (1988). Young, Black, and male in America: An endangered species. Westport, CT: Auburn House.
26.
Gillespie, C. K.
(1989). Justifiable homicide: Battered women, self-defense, and the law. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
27.
Goetting, A.
(1987). Homicidal wives: A profile. Journal of Family Issues, 8, 332-341.
28.
Goetting, A.
(1988). Patterns of homicide among women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 3, 3-20.
29.
Goetting, A.
(1995). Homicide in families and other special populations. New York: Springer.
30.
Gordon, D. M.
(1976). Class and the economics of crime. In W. J. Chambliss & M. Mankoff (Eds.), Whose law? What order? A conflict approach to criminology (pp. 193-214). New York: John Wiley.
31.
Grant, B.
, & Curry, G. D. (1993). Women murderers and victims of abuse in a southern state. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 17, 73-83.
32.
Green, E.
, & Wakefield, R. P. (1979). Patterns of middle and upper class homicide. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 70, 172-181.
33.
Heidensohn, F. M.
(with Silvestri, F.). (1995). Women and crime (2nd ed.). New York: New York University Press.
34.
Herzog, E.
(1966). Is there a culture of poverty? In H. H. Meissner (Ed.), Poverty in the affluent society (pp. 92-102). New York: Harper & Row.
35.
Jones, A.
(1996). Women who kill. Boston: Beacon.
36.
Katz, J.
(1988). Seductions of crime: Moral and sensual attractions in doing evil. New York: Basic Books.
37.
Klein, D.
(1973). The etiology of female crime: A review of the literature. Issues in Criminology, 8, 3-30.
38.
Lerner, H. G.
(1980). Internal prohibitions against female anger. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 40, 137-147.
39.
Maguire, K.
, & Pastore, A. L. (Eds.). (1997). Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics-1996. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
40.
Mann, C. R.
(1990). Black female homicides in the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5, 176-201.
41.
Mann, C. R.
(1996). When women kill. Albany: State University of New York Press.
42.
Markowitz, F. E.
, & Felson, R. E. (1998). Social-demographic differences in attitudes and violence. Criminology, 36, 117-138.
43.
Maxfield, M. G.
(1989). Circumstances in Supplemental Homicide Reports: Variety and validity. Criminology, 27, 671-695.
44.
Miller, J.
(1998). Up it up: Gender and the accomplishment of street robbery. Criminology, 36, 37-66.
45.
National Center for Children in Poverty
. (1987). Household statistics on families and poverty rate. New York: Columbia University Press.
46.
Ogle, R. S.
, Maier-Katkin, D., & Bernard, T. J. (1995). A theory of homicidal behavior among women. Criminology, 33, 173-193.
47.
Polk, K.
(1999). Males and honor contest violence. Homicide Studies, 3, 6-29.
48.
Rasche, C.
(1989). Early models for contemporary thought on domestic violence and women who kill their mates: A review of the literature from 1895-1970. Women and Criminal Justice, 1, 31-53.
49.
Rosenfeld, R.
(1986). Urban crime rates: Effects of inequality, welfare dependency, region, and race. In J. M. Byrne & R. J. Sampson (Eds.), The social ecology of crime (pp. 116-130). New York/Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
50.
Rosenfeld, R.
(1997). Changing relationships between men and women: A note on the decline of intimate partner homicide. Homicide Studies, 1, 72-83.
51.
Schafran, L. H.
(1990). Overwhelming evidence of gender bias in the courts. In B. F. Price & N. J. Sokoloff (Eds.), The criminal justice system and women (pp. 333-342). New York: McGraw-Hill.
52.
Simpson, S. S.
(1991). Caste, class, and violent crime: Explaining differences in female offending. Criminology, 29, 115-135.
53.
Wolfgang, M. E.
(1958). Patterns in criminal homicide. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
