The relationship between a victim and an offender is critical to understanding the context and dynamics of homicide. It is recognized that the causes and correlates of homicides within intimate relationships differ from the causes and correlates of homicides by strangers. Systematic research has seldom examined, however, differences in the nature of intimate violence, particularly lethal violence, among intimate relationships that vary in the degree of intimacy and level of commitment. Such an examination is important, not only for understanding the phenomenon of intimate femicide, but also for explaining variations in the reactions to such acts. Using relationship state and relationship status to differentiate among various degrees of intimacy and commitment, we show that the characteristics of the people involved in intimate femicides as well as the circumstances surrounding the killing do differ by relationship type.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barr, L.
(1993). Basic facts on families in Canada: Past and present. Ottawa, Canada: Statistics Canada.
2.
Black, D.
(1976). The behavior of law. New York: Academic Press.
3.
Blau, P. M.
(1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley.
4.
Block, C. R.
(1986). Homicide in Chicago. Chicago: Loyola University of Chicago Press.
5.
Campbell, J. C.
(1992). “If I can't have you, no one can”: Power and control in homicide of female partners. In J. Radford & D.E.H. Russell (Eds.), Femicide: The politics of woman killing (pp. 99-113). New York: Twayne.
6.
Cardarelli, A. P.
(1997). Violence between intimate partners: Patterns, causes, and effects. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
7.
Crawford, M.
, & Gartner, R. (1992). Woman killing: Intimate femicide in Ontario, 1974-1990. Toronto, Canada: Women We Honour Action Committee.
8.
Crawford, M.
, Gartner, R., & Dawson, M. (1997). Intimate femicide in Ontario, 1991-1994. Toronto, Canada: Women We Honour Action Committee.
9.
Daly, M.
, & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. New York: Aldine.
10.
Daly, M.
, Wiseman, K. A., & Wilson, M. I. (1997). Women with children sired by previous partners incur excess risk of uxoricide. Homicide Studies, 1, 61-71.
11.
Gillis, A. R.
(1986). Domesticity, divorce and deadly quarrels: An exploratory study of integration-regulation and homicide. In T. Hartnagel & R. Silverman (Eds.), Critique and explanation: Essays in honor of Gwynne Nettler (pp. 133-147). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
12.
Glick, P. C.
, & Spanier, G. B. (1980). Married and unmarried cohabitation in the United States. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 19-30.
13.
Gottfredson, M. R.
, & Gottfredson, D. M. (1988). Decision-making in criminal justice: Towards a rational exercise of discretion (2nd ed.). New York: Plenum.
14.
Horwitz, A.
(1990). The logic of social control. New York: Plenum.
15.
Johnson, H.
(1996). Dangerous domains: Violence against women in Canada. Scarborough, Canada: Nelson.
16.
Makepeace, J.
(1997). Courtship violence as process: A developmental theory. In A. P. Cardarelli (Ed.), Violence between intimate partners: Patterns, causes, and effects (pp. 29-47). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
17.
Parker, R. N.
& Smith, M. D. (1979). Deterrence, poverty, and type of homicide. American Journal of Sociology, 85, 614-624.
18.
Rapaport, E.
(1994). The death penalty and the domestic discount. In M. A. Fineman & R. Mykitiuk (Eds.), The public nature of private violence (pp. 224-251). New York: Routledge.
19.
Rodgers, K.
(1994). Wife assault: The findings of a national survey. Juristat Service Bulletin, 14(9), 1-21.
20.
Rodriguez, S. F.
, & Henderson, V. A. (1993). Intimate homicide: Victim-offender relationship in female-perpetrated homicide. Deviant Behavior, 16, 45-57.
21.
Rosenfeld, R.
(1997). Changing relationships between men and women: A note on the decline in intimate partner homicide. Homicide Studies, 1, 72-83.
22.
Silverman, R.
& Kennedy, L. (1993). Deadly deeds: Murder in Canada. Scarborough, Ontario, Canada: Nelson.
23.
Silverman, R.
, & Mukherjee, S. K. (1987). Intimate homicide: An analysis of violent social relationships. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 5, 37-47.
24.
Spanier, G. B.
(1985). Cohabitation in the 1980s: Recent changes in the United States. In K. David & A. Grossbard-Shechtman (Eds.), Contemporary marriage: Comparative perspectives on a changing institution (pp. 91-111). New York: Russell Sage.
25.
Stets, J. E.
(1991). Cohabiting and marital aggression: The role of social isolation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 669-680.
26.
Stets, J. E.
, & Straus, M. A. (1989). The marriage license as a hitting license: A comparison of assaults in dating, cohabiting, and married couples. In M. A. Pirog-Good & J. E. Stets (Eds.), Violence in dating relationships: Emerging social issues (pp. 33-52). New York: Praeger.
27.
Wallace, A.
(1986). Homicide: The social reality. Sydney, Australia: New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.
28.
Williams, K. R.
, & Flewelling, R. L. (1988). The social production of criminal homicide. American Sociological Review, 53, 421-431.
29.
Wilson, M.
, Johnson, H., & Daly, M. (1995). Lethal and non-lethal violence against wives. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 37, 331-361.
30.
Wolfgang, M. E.
(1958). Patterns in criminal homicide. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
