Homicides Related to Intimate Partner Violence in Massachusetts

Abstract

Multiple data sources were used to construct a database of intimate partner violence-related homicide cases from 1991 through 1995 in Massachusetts using an expanded case definition that includes others killed in the context of intimate partner disputes. Results show that nearly one in four victims who died in intimate partner-related incidents were victims other than the intimate partner. In a comparison of the FBI's Supplementary Homicide Report (SHR) with the study database, the SHR identified only 71.1% of the partner victims and could at best identify only 26.7% of the victims other than partners. Intimate homicides involving multiple victims were underreported in the SHR. Cases involving ex-boyfriend perpetrators were reported as partner homicides less often in the SHR than other intimate relationships. Rates calculated using a methodology designed to compensate for nonreporting and missing data in the SHR overestimated partner homicide rates. Issues of generalizability of these findings are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Biderman, A. D. , & Lynch, J. P. (1991). Understanding crime incidence statistics: Why the UCR diverges from the NCS. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Block, C. R. , & Christakos, A. (1995). Intimate partner homicide in Chicago over 29 years. Crime & Delinquency, 41, 496-526.

Brewer, V. (1993). Issues in the use of Supplemental Homicide Reports. In C. R. Block & R. L. Block (Eds.), Questions and answers in lethal and non-lethal violence: Proceedings of the second annual workshop of the Homicide Research Working Group (pp. 87-88). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

Bureau of Justice Statistics . (1994). Violence between intimates (NCJ-149259). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.

Cantor, D. , & Cohen, L. E. (1980). Comparing measures of homicide trends: Methodological and substantive differences in the Vital Statistics and Uniform Crime Report time series (1933-1975). Social Science Research, 9, 121-145.

Crawford, M. , & Gartner, R. (1992). Woman killing: Intimate femicide in Ontario, 1974-1990. Toronto, Canada: Women We Honour Action Committee.

Crawford, M. , Gartner, R. , & Dawson, M. (1997). Intimate femicide in Ontario, 1991-1994. Toronto, Canada: Women We Honour Action Committee.

Dawson, J. M. , & Langan, P. A. (1994). Murder in Families (NCJ-143498). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

Durfee, M., J. , Gellert, G. A. , & Tilton-Durfee, D. (1992). Origins and clinical relevance of child death review teams. Journal of the American Medical Association, 267, 3172-3175.

10.

Keppel, R. D. , & Weis, J. G. (1992). Improving the investigation of murder: An analysis of the effect of time and distance relationships in murder investigations (NCJ-138620). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

11.

Loftin, C. , Kindley, K. , Norris, S. , & Wiersema, B. (1987). An attribute approach to relationships between offenders and victims in homicide. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 78, 259-271.

12.

MacKenzie, D. L. , & Baunach, P. J. (1990). The challenge of measuring crime. In D. L. MacKenzie , P. J. Baunach , & R. R. Roberg (Eds.), Measuring crime: Large-scale, long-range efforts (pp. 175-205). Albany: State University of New York Press.

13.

Maxfield, M. G. (1989). Circumstances in supplementary homicide reports: Variety and validity. Criminology, 27, 671-695.

14.

Rand, M. R. (1993). The study of homicide caseflow: Creating a comprehensive homicide dataset. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics.

15.

Riedel, M. (1990). Nationwide homicide data sets: An evaluation of the Uniform Crime Reports and the National Center for Health Statistics Data. In D. L. MacKenzie , P. J. Baunach , & R. R. Roberg (Eds.), Measuring crime: Large-scale, long-range efforts (pp. 175-205). Albany: State University of New York Press.

16.

Rokaw, W. , Mercy, J. , & Smith, J. (1990). Comparing death certificate data with FBI crime reporting statistics on U.S. homicides. Public Health Reports, 102, 447-455.

17.

Saltzman, L. E. , Mercy, J. E. , O'Carroll, P. W. , Rosenberg, M. L. , & Rhodes, P. H. (1992). Weapon involvement and injury outcomes in family and intimate assaults. Journal of the American Medical Association, 267, 3043-3047.

18.

Tennenbaum, A. H. (1993). The Supplemental Homicide Report (SHR): A neglected but valuable source for homicide research. In C. R. Block & R. L. Block (Eds.), Questions and answers in lethal and non-lethal violence: Proceedings of the second annual workshop of the Homicide Research Working Group (pp. 77-86). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

19.

Williams, K. R. , & Flewelling, R. L. (1987). Family, acquaintance, and stranger homicide: Alternative procedures for rate calculations. Criminology, 25, 543-560.

20.

Wilson, M. , & Daly, M. (1993). Spousal homicide risk and estrangement. Violence and Victims, 8, 3-16.

21.

Wilson, M. , Daly, M. , & Daniele, A. (1995). Familicide: The killing of spouse and children. Aggressive Behavior, 21, 275-291.