The Role of Drug Markets and Gangs in Local Homicide Rates

Abstract

The presence of ongoing enterprises, sustained by a purpose and life beyond those of the current participants, distinguishes drug- and gang-related homicides. Without these enterprises that are sustained over time within distinctive spatial areas, violence would be reduced to individual acts precipitated by unique features of interactions between distinct individuals. Consistent with expectation, drug and gang homicides display substantial concentrations of violent incidents spatially and temporally within different neighborhoods in a city. The authors also find evidence for localized temporal dependencies in which a recent homicide alters the probability of another homicide in the same local area. Both drug and gang homicides display evidence of self-limiting suppression effects that inhibit extended periods of sustained high rates of these types of violence in the same area. Finally, there is evidence of cross-type diffusion from drug and gang homicides to subsequently higher rates of other gun homicides involving young offenders or victims.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Block, C. R. , & Block, R. (1994). Street gang crime in Chicago (Research in Brief). Washington, DC: Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.

Blumstein, A. (1995). Youth violence, guns, and the illicit-drug industry. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, 10-36.

Boyum, D. , & Kleiman, M.A.R. (1995). Alcohol and other drugs. In J. Q. Wilson & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Crime. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies Press.

Cohen, J. , & Tita, G. E. (1998). The drugs-gangs-guns nexus of homicide in Pittsburgh, 1987-95. Unpublished manuscript.

Cork, D. (1997). Crack markets and the diffusion of guns among youth. Unpublished manuscript.

Fagan, J. (1993). The political economy of drug dealing among urban gangs. In A. Lurigio & D. P. Rosenbaum (Eds.), Drug and community (pp. 19-54). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.

Fagan, J. , & Chin, K. (1989). Initiation into crack and cocaine: A tale of two epidemics. Contemporary Drug Problems, 16, 579-618.

Federal Bureau of Investigation . (1993). Age-specific arrest rates and race-specific arrest rates for selected offenses, 1965-1992. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

Goldstein, P. J. (1985). The drugs/violence nexus: A tripartite conceptual framework. Journal of Drug Issues, 15, 493-506.

10.

Grogger, J. , & Willis, M. (1998). The introduction of crack cocaine and the rise in urban crime rates (Working Paper 6353). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

11.

Hamid, A. (1992). The development cycle of a drug epidemic: The cocaine-smoking epidemic of 1981-1991. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 24, 337-348.

12.

Johnson, B. D. , Natarajan, M. , Dunlap, E. , & Elmoghazy, E. (1994). Crack abusers and non-crack abusers: Profiles of drug use, drug sales, and nondrug criminality. Journal of Drug Issues, 24, 117-141.

13.

Johnson, B. D. , Williams, T. , Dei, K. A. , & Sanabria, H. (1990). Drug abuse in the inner city: Impact on hard-drug users and the community. In M. Tonry & J. Q. Wilson (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review (pp. 9-67). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

14.

Klein, M. W. , Maxson, C. L. , & Cunningham, L. C. (1991). “Crack,” street gangs, and violence. Criminology, 29, 623-650.

15.

National Center for Health Statistics . (1997). National summary of injury mortality data. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control, Department of Health and Human Services.

16.

Prothrow-Stith, D. , & Weissman, M. (1991). Deadly consequences: How violence is destroying our teenage population and a plan to begin solving the problem. New York: Harper-Collins.

17.

Rosenfeld, R. (1998). Wolfgang's footprints: Guest editor's introduction. Homicide Studies, 2(3), 228-231.

18.

Wolfgang, M. E. (1958). Patterns in criminal homicide. New York: University of Pennsylvania Press.