Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The gay and trans panic defense is a long-standing legal strategy that “heterosexual” men have employed in criminal courtrooms to excuse or justify lethal violence against gay men or transgender women. While studies have investigated this defense for 35 years, research has yet to analyze a large sample of gay and trans panic defense court outcomes. This study addresses this gap by conducting a descriptive and bivariate analysis of 587 defendants who raised panic defenses in homicide cases within the United States from 1970 to 2023. Specifically, this work analyzed the gay and trans panic defense, as well as individual, situational, and legal variables, across four criminal court outcomes: dismissal of charges versus prosecution, plea bargain versus continue to trial, acquittal versus conviction, and leniency versus conviction on the original charge(s). Drawing on research on homicide case processing and focal concerns theory, this work explores whether court outcomes align with variables suggestive of defendant/victim culpability. This study found no statistical association between lenient court convictions and victim gender. However, bivariate analysis found that lenient convictions were associated with defendants who negotiated plea bargains, raised self-defense claims for trial, and utilized legal counsel who criminalized the victim’s sexual orientation or gender.

Keywords

gay panic trans panic LGBTQIA+ victims homicide court homophobia

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Bar Foundation. (2013, August 12–13). Resolution. Adopted by the House of Delegates. https://www.abajournal.com/files/gay_panic_resolution.pdf

American Civil Liberties Union. (2025, January 22). The ACLU is tracking 471 anti-LGBTQ bills in the U.S. https://www.aclu.org/legislative-attacks-on-lgbtq-rights-2024

Andresen

W. C.

(2022). Research note: Comparing the gay and trans panic defenses. Women & Criminal Justice, 32(1–2), 219–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2021.1965067

Andresen

W. C.

(2024). The gay and trans panic defense: Focusing on the homicides, not the court room strategy. Homicide Studies, 28(3), 270–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/10887679231217112

Baumer

E. P.

Messner

S. F.

Felson

R. B.

(2000). The role of victim characteristics in the disposition of murder cases. Justice Quarterly, 17(2), 281–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820000096331

Beauchamp

(2019). Going stealth: Transgender politics and US surveillance practices. Duke University Press.

Blakemore

(2022, June 24). How historians are documenting the lives of transgender people. National Geographic. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/article/how-historians-are-documenting-lives-of-transgender-people

Brightman

Lenning

Lurie

K. J.

DeJong

(2024). Anti-transgender ideology, laws, and homicide: An analysis of the trifecta of Violence. Homicide Studies, 28(3), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/10887679231201803

Center for Countering Digital Hate. (2022, August 10). Digital hate: Social media’s role in amplifying dangerous lies about LGBTQ+ people. https://hrc-prod-requests.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/CCDH-HRC-Digital-Hate-Report-2022-single-pages.pdf

10.

Chen

C. P. L.

(2000). Provocation’s privileged desire: The provocation doctrine, homosexual panic, and the non-violent unwanted sexual advance defense. Cornell Journal & Public Policy, 10(1), 195–235. https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cjlpp/vol10/iss1/8

11.

Comstock

G. D.

(1992). Dismantling the homosexual panic defense. Law & Sexuality: A Review of Lesbian and Gay Legal Issues, 2, 81–102. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lsex2÷=10&g_sent=1&casa_token=&collection=journals

12.

Conboy

L. R.

(2022). You need to calm down: Examining the origin and eliminating the future of the “gay panic” defense. Buffalo Law Review, 70(2), 955–983. https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/buffalolawreview/vol70/iss2/8

13.

Crenshaw

(1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039

14.

Dressler

(1995). When “Heterosexual” men kill “Homosexual” men: Reflections on provocation law, sexual advances, and the “Reasonable man” starndard. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 85(3), 726–763.

15.

Farrell

Givelber

(2010). Liberation reconsidered: understanding why judges and juries disagree about guilt. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 100(4), 1549–1586. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25766129

16.

Farrell

R. A.

Swigert

V. L.

(1986). Adjudication in homicide: An interpretive analysis of the effects of defendant and victim social characteristics. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 23(4), 349–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427886023004003

17.

Gambino

(2024). Poll shows U.S. public support for LGBTQ+ protections falling for first time since 2015. The Guardian. Retrieved January 22, 2025, from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/mar/11/us-public-support-lgbtq-protection-falls

18.

Garfinkel

(1949). Research note on inter- and intra-racial homicides. Social Forces, 27(4), 369–381. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2572490

19.

Goulette

(2021). Is chivalry dead?: An examination of charge reductions in one Ohio jurisdiction. Women & Criminal Justice, 31(2), 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2020.1753141

20.

Gruenewald

Klein

B. R.

Hayes

B. E.

Parkin

W. S.

June

. (2024). Examining disparities in case dispositions and sentencing outcomes for domestic violent extremists in the United States. Crime and Delinquency, 70(1), 126–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287221109769

21.

Harvard Law Review. (1989). Developments in the law: Sexual Orientation and the Law. Harvard Law Review, 102(7), 1508–1671. https://doi.org/10.2307/1341338

22.

Johnson

G. B.

(1941). The Negro and Crime. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 217(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271624121700112

23.

Keller

(2024, November 19). HRCF’s 2024 epidemic of violence report: Fatal violence against transgender and gender non-conforming people continues, with Black trans women comprising nearly half of the deaths. Human Rights Campaign. https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/hrcs-2024-epidemic-of-violence-report-fatal-violence-against-transgender-and-gender-non-conforming-people-continues-with-black-trans-women-comprising-nearly-half-of-the-deaths

24.

Kempf

E. J.

(1920). Psychopathology. C.V. Mosby.

25.

Kidd

J. D.

Witten

(2007). Transgender and transsexual identities: The Next Strange Fruit—hate crimes, violence and genocide against the Global trans-Communities. Journal of Hate Studies, 6(1), 31–63.

26.

Kohn

(2001). Greasing the wheel: How the Criminal Justice System hurts Gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered people and why hate crime laws won’t Save Them. New York University Review Law & Social Change, 27(2–3), 257–280.

27.

Kopacz

Juźwik-Kopacz

Bolechała

Strona

Konopka

(2023). Overkilling: A specific type of homicide - constructing the definition: Perpetrator, weapon and circumstances. Legal Medicine, 64(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2023.102273

28.

Kraus

S. W.

Ragatz

L. L.

(2011). Gender, jury instructions, and homophobia: What influence do these factors have on legal decision making in a homicide case where the defendant used the homosexual panic defense? Criminal Law Bulletin, 47, 237–256.

29.

Lantz

Faulkner

Mills

J. M.

(2024). A descriptive account of the nature and extent of transgender homicide in America, 2010 to 2021. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 39(1-2), 341–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605231197139

30.

Lantz

Mills

J. M.

Faulkner

Wenger

M. R.

(2025). Deadnamed and denied justice: The role of deadnaming and other factors in transgender homicide clearance. Homicide Studies, 29(3), 283–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/10887679241294085

31.

Lee

(2008). The gay panic defense. University of California, Davis Law Review, 42(2), 471–566. https://lawreview.law.ucdavis.edu/issues/42/2/articles/42-2_lee.pdf

32.

Lee

Kwan

P. K. Y.

(2014). The trans panic defense: Heteronormativity, and the murder of transgender women. Hastings Law Journal, 66, 77. https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2377&context=faculty_publications

33.

LGBTQ+ Bar. (2025). LGBTQ+ “Panic” Defense. Retrieved January 4, 2025, from https://lgbtqbar.org/programs/advocacy/gay-trans-panic-defense/

34.

Lartey

(2023, March 25). New FBI data shows more hate crimes. The Marshall Project. https://www.themarshallproject.org/2023/03/25/asian-hate-crime-fbi-black-lgbtq?gclid=Cj0KCQjwmN2iBhCrARIsAG_G2i7wQSAfFNwpTB_vUzLXplB4PDatyaru2_V4-NBKwqNNTZRrcJ14sXEaAoduEALw_wcB

35.

Martinez

(2025, February 4). Making sense of the Trump Administration’s anti-LGBTQ+ Executive Orders. GLAD Law. GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders. https://www.glad.org/making-sense-of-the-trump-administrations-anti-lgbtq-executive-orders/

36.

Michalski

N. D.

Bitter

A. N.

Nuñez

(2022). “Trans folks are in the crosshairs”: Jury decision-making and the trans panic defense. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(23–24), n22453–n22474.

37.

Michalski

N. D.

Nunez

(2022). When is “gay panic” accepted? Exploring juror characteristics and case type as predictors of a successful gay panic defense. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(1–2), 782–803.

38.

Mogul

J. L.

(2005). The dykier, the butcher, the better: The state’s use of homophobia and sexism to execute women in the United States. New York City Law Review, 8(2), 473–493. https://doi.org/10.31641/clr080221

39.

Mogul

J. L.

Ritchie

A. J.

Whitlock

(2011). Queer (in)justice : The criminalization of LGBT people in the United States. Beacon Press.

40.

Momen

R. E.

Dilks

L. M.

(2021). Examining case outcomes in U.S. transgender homicides: An exploratory investigation of the intersectionality of victim characteristics. Sociological Spectrum, 41(1), 53–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.2020.1850379

41.

Panter

Farrell

(2025). Overkill and antemortem facial injuries in U.S. transgender and gender non-conforming homicides (2013–2023). Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 22(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.70003

42.

Parkin

W. S.

Gruenewald

(2017). Open-source data and the study of homicide. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(18), 2693–2723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515596145

43.

Phillips

(2009). Legal disparities in the capital of capital punishment. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 99(3), 717–756.

44.

Phillips

Marceau

Kamin

King

(2024). Sacred victim: Fifty years of data on victim race and sex as predictors of execution. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 114(2), 67–112. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48785846

45.

Pizarro

J. M.

Zgoba

K. M.

Salerno

L. M.

Circo

(2020). The processing of homicides in the courts: An examination of multiple case outcomes. Race and Justice, 10(4), 400–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/2153368718759401

46.

Public Religion Research Institute. (2024). Views on LGBTQ Rights in All 50 States: Findings from PRRI’s 2023 American Values Atlas. prri.org. March 12. Retrieved April 16, 2024. https://www.prri.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/PRRI-Mar-2024-LGBTQ.pdf

47.

Ragatz

L. L.

Russell

(2010). Sex, sexual orientation, and sexism: What influence do these factors have on verdicts in a crime-of-passion case? Journal of Social Psychology, 150(4), 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540903366677

48.

Romain Dagenhardt

D. M.

Heideman

A. J.

Freiburger

T. L

. (2022). An examination of the direct and interactive effects of race/ethnicity and gender on charge reduction. Journal of Crime and Justice, 45(3), 324–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648x.2021.1936123

49.

Salerno

J. M.

Najdowski

C. J.

Bottoms

B. L.

Harrington

Kemner

Dave

(2015). Excusing murder? Conservative jurors’ acceptance of the gay-panic defense. Psychology Public Policy and Law, 21(1), 24–34. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3198822

50.

Shatz

S. F.

Shatz

N. R.

(2011). Chivalry is not dead: Murder, gender, and the death penalty. Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law & Justice, 27(1), 64–112. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1767508

51.

Steffensmeier

Ulmer

Kramer

(1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36(4), 763–798. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01265.x

52.

Stotzer

R. L.

(2008). Gender identity and hate crimes: Violence against transgender people in Los Angeles County. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 5(1), 43–52.

53.

Strader

J. K.

Selvin

Hay

(2015). Gay panic, gay victims, and the case for gay shield laws. Cardozo Law Review, 36, 1473–1531. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2602493

54.

Terrorism Research Center. (2020). Bias Homicide Database (BHDB) Manual and Codebook. University of Arkansas. https://terrorismresearch.uark.edu/research/bhdb/

55.

Tomei

Cramer

R. J.

Boccaccini

M. T.

Panza

N. R.

(2020). The gay panic defense: Legal defense strategy or reinforcement of homophobia in court? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(21–22), 4239–4261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517713713

56.

Vidmar

(2001). A historical and comparative perspective on the common law jury. World Jury Systems. Oxford University Press.

57.

Wall

B. W.

(2000). Criminal responsibility, diminished capacity, and the gay panic defense. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 28(4), 454–459.

58.

Wodda

Panfil

V. R.

(2015). Don’t talk to me about deception: The necessary erosion of the trans panic defense. Albany Law Review, 78, 927–972. https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/sociology_criminaljustice_fac_pubs/68

59.

Woods

J. B.

(2017). LGBT identity and crime. California Law Review, 105, 667–734. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2810854

60.

Woods

J. B.

(2020). Framing legislation banning the ‘gay and trans panic’ defenses. University of Richmond Law Review, 54, 833–876. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3734690

Panic in the Courtroom: Analyzing Court Outcomes in Gay and Trans Panic Homicides

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References