Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-5
Testing the Systemic Model of Social Disorganization Theory in South Korean Neighborhoods: A Latent Class Growth Analysis Approach to Specifying Pathways to Homicide
This study examines the relationship between structural characteristics and homicide trajectories in South Korean neighborhoods utilizing the systemic model of social disorganization theory as an analytical lens. Group-based trajectory modeling of Korean homicide data across 229 municipal-level sub-national regions between 2008 and 2013 yielded three groups: high-decrease, moderate, and low-stable. The odds of belonging to the high and moderate groups compared to the low-stable group were significantly increased for communities with a higher-level divorce rate and residential instability rate. Social control was significant in the high-decrease group compared to the low-stable group, but had no mediating effect on this relationship.
AgnewR. (1985). A revised strain theory of delinquency. Social Forces, 64(1), 151–167.
2.
AltheimerI. (2008). Social support, ethnic heterogeneity, and homicide: A cross-national approach. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36(2), 103–114.
3.
AndresenM. A. (2012). International immigration, internal migration, and homicide in Canadian provinces. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57(5), 632–657.
4.
BarcellosC.FeitosaP.DamacenaG. N.AndreazziM. A. (2010). Highways and outposts: Economic development and health threats in the central Brazilian Amazon region. International Journal of Health Geographics, 9, 30–40.
5.
BaumerE. P.VélezM. B.RosenfeldR. (2018). Bringing crime trends back into criminology: An assessment of the literature and a blueprint for future inquiry. Annual Review of Criminology, 1, 39–61.
6.
BrownB. (2016a). Fear of crime in South Korea. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 5(4), 116–131.
7.
BrownJ. (2016b). Social support and crime: A state-level analysis of social support policies. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 43(2), 135–156.
8.
BucheliJ. R.FontenlaM.WaddellB. J. (2019). Return migration and violence. World Development, 116, 113–124.
9.
BursikR. J.GrasmickH. G. (1993). Neighbourhoods and crime. Lexington.
10.
BursikR. J.GrasmickH. G. (1996). Neighbourhood-based networks and the control of crime and delinquency. In BarlowH. (Ed.) Crime and public policy (pp. 107−130). Westview Press.
11.
ChamlinM. B.CochranJ. K. (1997). Social altruism and crime. Criminology, 35, 203–228.
12.
ChamlinM. B.CochranJ. K.LowenkampC. T. (2002). A longitudinal analysis of the welfare–homicide relationship: Testing two (nonreductionist) macro-level theories. Homicide Studies, 6(1), 39–60.
13.
ChawlaS. (2010a). Homicide statistics. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.
14.
ChawlaS. (2010b). Statistics on crime, sexual violence. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.
15.
ChawlaS. (2010c). World drug report 2010. United Nations.
16.
CheongJ.KangW. (2013). Causal relationship between structural characteristics of metropolitan neighborhoods and homicide. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 13(3), 152–161.
17.
CheongJ. S.KwakD. H. (2008). A study on the effects of community conditions on crime rates: Longitudinal analyses using the growth curve model. Criminological Review, 19(3), 251–290.
18.
CheongJ. S.ParkH. H (2010). A study on the effects of structural covariates on homicide: Nationwide analysis using negative binomial regression model. Korean Criminological Review, 21(1), 91–119.
19.
ChonD. S. (2010). Medical resources and national homicide rates: A cross-national assessment. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 34(1), 97–118.
20.
ClearT. R.RoseD. R.WaringE.ScullyK. (2003). Coercive mobility and crime: A preliminary examination of concentrated incarceration and social disorganization. Justice Quarterly, 20(1), 33–64.
21.
ColvinM.CullenF. T.Vander VenT. (2002). Coercion, social support, and crime: An emerging theoretical consensus. Criminology, 40(1), 19–42.
22.
ConklinG.SimpsonM. (1985). Demographic approach to the cross-national study of homicide. Comparative Social Research, 8, 171–185.
23.
CullenF. T. (1994). Social support as an organizing concept for criminology: Presidential address to the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences. Justice Quarterly, 11(4), 527–559.
24.
DoernerW. G. (1988). The impact of medical resources on criminal induced lethality: A further examination. Criminology, 26(1), 171–180.
25.
FaganJ.DaviesG. (2004). The natural history of neighborhood violence. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 20(2), 127–147.
26.
FarrellG.TilleyN.TseloniA. (2014). Why the crime drop?Crime and Justice, 43(1), 421–490.
27.
FarrellG.TseloniA.MailleyJ.TilleyN. (2011). The crime drop and the security hypothesis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48(2), 147–175.
FelsonM. (1986). Linking criminal choices, routine activities, informal control, and criminal outcomes. In CornishD. B.ClarkeR. V. (Eds.), The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending (pp. 119–128). Springer-Verlag.
30.
FreudenbergW. R. (1986). The density of acquaintanceship: An overlooked variable in community research. American Journal of Sociology, 92(1), 27–63.
31.
GastilR. D. (1971). Homicide and a regional culture of violence. American Sociological Review, 36, 412–427.
32.
GoudriaanH.WittebroodK.NieuwbeertaP. (2006). Neighbourhood characteristics and reporting crime: Effects of social cohesion, confidence in police effectiveness and socio-economic disadvantage. The British Journal of Criminology, 46(4), 719–742.
33.
GriffithsE.ChavezJ. M. (2004). Communities, street guns and homicide trajectories in Chicago, 1980–1995: Merging methods for examining homicide trends across space and time. Criminology, 42(4), 941–978.
34.
HansmannH. B.QuigleyJ. M. (1982). Population heterogeneity and the sociogenesis of homicide. Social Forces, 61(1), 206−224.
35.
HippJ. R. (2007). Block, tract, and levels of aggregation: Neighborhood structure and crime and disorder as a case in point. American Sociological Review, 72(5), 659–680.
36.
HongY. O.KimB.SohnJ. S. (2019). Patterns and trends on homicide in Korea: Focusing on family homicide. Korean Institute of Criminology Report, pp. 1–543.
37.
HwangJ. T. (2010). What are the real trends of murder rates in Korea?Korean Criminology, 4(1), 31–56.
38.
JooH. J. (2003). Crime and crime control. In ShinD. C.RutkowskiC.P.ParkC. M. (Eds.), The quality of life in Korea (pp. 239–263). Springer.
39.
KasardaJ. D.JanowitzM. (1974). Community attachment in mass society. American Sociological Review, 39, 328–339.
40.
KickE.LaFreeG. (1985). Development and the social context of murder and theft. Comparative Social Research, 8, 37–58.
41.
KimS.-H.KimJ.-H.HwangH.-Y. (2011). Analysis of resident consciousness regarding the effectiveness of the wall removal project for prevention of crime. Journal of the Urban Design Institute of Korea, 12(1), 5–20.
42.
KimS. W.PridemoreW. A. (2005). Social support and homicide in transitional Russia. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(6), 561–572.
KornhauserR. (1978). Social sources of delinquency. University of Chicago Press.
49.
KrohnM. (1978). A Durkheimian analysis of international crime rates. Social Forces, 57(2), 654–670.
50.
KubrinC.HertingJ. (2003). Neighborhood correlates of homicide trends: An analysis using growth-curve modeling. The Sociological Quarterly, 44(3), 329–350.
51.
KubrinC. E.WeitzerR. (2003). Retaliatory homicide: Concentrated disadvantage and neighborhood culture. Social Problems, 50(2), 157–180.
52.
LeeD. S.LeeK. H. (2009). A study on the relationship between crime rates and characteristics of urban areas: Focusing on demographic and socio-economic factors. National Association of Korean Local Government, 26(5), 189–206.
53.
LeeM. R. (2001). Population growth, economic inequality, and homicide. Deviant Behavior, 22(6), 491–516.
54.
LinN. (1986). Conceptualizing social support. In LinN.DeanA.EdselW. (Eds.), Social support, life events, and depression (pp. 17–30). Academic Press.
55.
LochnerL. (2004). Education, work, and crime: A human capital approach. International Economic Review, 45(3), 811–843.
56.
MakariosM. D.SamsT. L. (2013). Social support and crime. In CullenF. T.WilcoxP. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminological theory (pp. 160–185). Oxford University Press.
57.
MaumeM. O.LeeM. R. (2003). Social institutions and violence: A sub-national test of institutional anomie theory. Criminology, 41(4), 1137–1172.
58.
MertonR. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. Simon and Schuster.
59.
MessnerS. (1980). Income inequality and murder rates: Some cross-national findings. Comparative Social Research, 3, 185–198.
60.
MessnerS. (1989). Economic discrimination and social homicide rates: Further evidence of the cost of inequality. American Sociological Review, 54(4), 597–611.
61.
MessnerS. F.RosenfeldR. (1997). Political restraint of the market and levels of criminal homicide: A cross-national application of institutional-anomie theory. Social Forces, 75(4), 1393–1416.
62.
MessnerS. F.TardiffK. (1986). Economic inequality and levels of homicide: An analysis of urban neighborhoods. Criminology, 24(2): 297–317.
63.
MuthénB.MuthénL. K. (2000). Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: Growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 24(6), 882–891.
64.
MuthenL. K.MuthenB. O. (2015). Mplus version 7.4 software [Internet]. Los Angeles: statmodel.com
65.
MuthénB.SheddenK. (1999). Finite mixture modeling with mixture outcomes using the EM algorithm. Biometrics, 55(2), 463–469.
66.
NaginD. S. (1999). Analyzing developmental trajectories: A semiparametric, group-based approach. Psychological Methods, 4(2), 139–157.
ParkS. J.KangS. Y. (2019). Connection between homicide and death related crimes based on the International Standard Classification of Crimes. Korean Police Studies, 18(1), 125–150.
69.
PetersonR. D.KrivoL. J.HarrisM. A. (2000). Disadvantage and neighborhood violent crime: Do local institutions matter?Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 37(1), 31–63.
70.
PrattT. C.GodseyT. W. (2002). Social support and homicide: A cross-national test of an emerging criminological theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30(6), 589–601.
71.
PrattT. C.GodseyT. W. (2003). Social support, inequality, and homicide: A cross-national test of an integrated theoretical model. Criminology, 41(3), 611–644.
72.
PridemoreW. A. (2002) Vodka and violence: Alcohol consumption and homicide rates in Russia. American Journal of Public Health, 92(12), 1921–1930.
73.
PridemoreW. A.TrentC. L. S. (2010). Do the invariant findings of Land, McCall, and Cohen generalize to cross-national studies of social structure and homicide?Homicide Studies, 14(3), 296–335.
74.
RosenfeldR.MessnerS. F. (2009). The crime drop in comparative perspective: The impact of the economy and imprisonment on American and European burglary rates. The British Journal of Sociology, 60(3), 445–471.
75.
RosenfeldR.MessnerS. F.BaumerE. (2001). Social capital and homicide. Social Forces, 80(1), 283–309.
76.
SampsonR. J. (1986). Crime in cities: The effects of formal and informal social control. Crime and justice, 8, 271–311.
77.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W.EarlsF. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918–924.
78.
SampsonR. J.WilsonW. J. (1995). Toward a theory of race, crime, and urban inequality. In HaganJ.PetersonR. D. (Eds.), Crime and inequality (pp. 37–56). Stanford University Press.
79.
SharkeyP.SampsonR. J. (2010). Destination effects: Residential mobility and trajectories of adolescent violence in a stratified metropolis. Criminology, 48(3), 639–681.
80.
ShawC.McKayH. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. University of Chicago Press.
81.
ShihadehE. S.BarrancoR. E. (2013). Homicide and the new Latino migration. The Sociological Quarterly, 54(1), 81–104.
82.
ShinJ.-H.KimS.-W. (2012). The effect of natural surveillance of detached house on the fear of crime. Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 12(6), 230–237.
83.
StreteskyP. B.SchuckA. M.HoganM. J. (2004). Space matters: An analysis of poverty, poverty clustering, and violent crime. Justice Quarterly, 21(4), 817–841.
84.
StuckyT. D.PaytonS. B.OttensmanJ. R. (2016). Intra- and inter-neighborhood income inequality and crime. Journal of Crime and Justice, 39(3), 345–362.
85.
StultsB. J. (2010). Determinants of Chicago neighborhood homicide trajectories: 1965–1995. Homicide Studies, 14(3), 244–267.
86.
SunI. Y.ChuD. C.SungH. (2011). A Cross-national analysis of the mediating effect of economic deprivation on crime. Asian Criminology, 6(1), 15–32.
87.
TarkJ. Y. (2007). How to improve Korean crime statistics: Focusing on crime information. Modern Society and Public Administration, 17(3), 169–194.
88.
TcherniM. (2011). Structural determinants of homicide: The big three. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 27(4), 475–496.
89.
ThamesK. M.McCallP. L. (2014). A longitudinal examination of the effects of social support on homicide across European regions. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 8(2), 244–261.
90.
TseloniA.MailleyJ.FarrellG.TilleyN. (2010). Exploring the international decline in crime rates. European Journal of Criminology, 7(5), 375–394.
91.
VeselakK. (2015). The relationship between educational attainment and the type of crime committed by incarcerated offenders. Journal of Correctional Education, 66(2), 30–56.
92.
WillsT. A.MarianiJ.FilerM. (1996). The role of the family and peer relationships in adolescent substance use. In PierceG. R.SarasonB. R.SarasonI. G. (Eds.), Handbook of social support and the family (pp. 521–549). Plenum.
93.
YoonO. K. (2018). An exploratory study on the relationship between welfare spending and crime. Korean Journal of Correctional Discourse, 12(1), 1–27.
94.
YunW. S. (2012). Testing the Relationship between Community’s Informal Social Control and Victimization: Focusing on Daegu Metropolitan City Area. Korean Criminological Review, 88, 319–354.
