Although research has established economic disadvantage as one of the strongest, most robust predictors of urban violence, the conditions under which this relation holds need further elaboration. This study examines the disadvantage–violence link across age-specific transitional periods from adolescence to adulthood and provides theoretical arguments for why the strength of this relation should decline with age. Using 90 of the largest cities in the United States, the present study analyzes the impact of economic disadvantage and other urban conditions (residential instability, family disruption, and population heterogeneity) on age-specific homicide counts from 1984 to 2006. The analytical strategy incorporates temporal trends by using negative binomial fixed-effects regression models. The results reveal a consistent decline from adolescence to adulthood in the strength of the estimated effects of economic disadvantage, residential instability, and family disruption on homicide trends. The findings are discussed in terms of the implications for future research and public policy.
AgnewR.BrezinaT.WrightJ. P.CullenF. (2002). Strain, personality traits, and delinquency: Extending general strain theory. Criminology, 40, 43-71.
2.
AllisonP. D. (1994). Using panel data to estimate the effects of events. Sociological Methods & Research, 23, 174-199.
3.
AllisonP. D. (1999). Multiple regression: A primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
4.
AllisonP. D. (2005). Fixed effects regression methods for longitudinal data using SAS. Cary, NC: The SAS Institute.
5.
AlwinD.ConverseP.MartinS. (1985). Living arrangements and social integration. Journal of Marriage and Family, 47, 319-344.
6.
AshfordJ. B.LeCroyC. W. (2010). Human behavior in the social environment: A multidimensional perspective. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage.
7.
BaumerE. P. (2008). An empirical assessment of the contemporary crime trends puzzle: A modest step towards a more comprehesive research agenda. In RosenfeldR.GoldbergerA. (Eds.), Understanding crime trends (pp. 127-176). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
8.
BaumerE.RosenfeldR.WolffK. T. (2012). Are the criminogenic consequences of economic downturns conditional? In RosenfeldR.EdbergM. (Eds.), Economics and youth violence (pp. 53-84). New York: New York University Press.
9.
BlonigenD.CarlssonM.KicksB.KruegerR.IaconoW. (2008). Stability and change in personality traits from late adolescence to early adulthood. Journal of Personality, 76, 229-266.
10.
BoggessL. N.HippJ. H. (2010). Violent crime, residential instability and mobility: Does the relationship differ in minority neighborhoods?Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26, 351-370.
11.
BonnieR. J.JohnsonR. L.ChemersB.SchuckJ. (Eds.). (2012). Reforming juvenile justice: A developmental approach. Committee on Assessing Juvenile Justice Reform, Committee on Law and Justice, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
12.
ChiltonR.ChamblissW. (2015). Urban homicide in the United States, 1980-2010: The importance of disaggregated trends. Homicide Studies, 19(3), 257-272.
13.
CookP.LaubJ. (1998). The unprecedented epidemic in youth violence. In TonryM. (Ed.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (pp. 26-64). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14.
DunnO. J. (1961). Multiple comparisons among means. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 56, 52-64.
15.
EriksonE. H. (1963). Childhood and society. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
16.
FaganJ.WilkinsonD. (1998). Social contexts and functions of adolescent violence. In ElliotD.HamburgB.WilliamsK. (Eds.), Violence in American schools: A new perspective (pp. 55-93). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17.
FieldA. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London, England: Sage.
18.
FoxJ. A. (2004). Missing data problems in the SHR: Imputing offender and relationship characteristics. Homicide Studies, 8, 214-254.
19.
FoxJ. A.SwattM. (2009). Multiple imputation of the Supplementary Homicide Reports, 1976-2005. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25, 51-77.
20.
FriedsonM.SharkeyP. (2015). Violence and neighborhood disadvantage after the crime decline. ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 660, 341-358.
21.
FukudaK. (2010). Interpolation and forecasting of population census data. Journal of Population Research, 27, 1-13.
22.
GottfredsonM. R. (2006). The empirical status of control theory in criminology. In CullenF. T.WrightJ. P.BlevinsK. (Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory (pp. 77-100). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
23.
GrantD. S.MartinezR.Jr. (1997). Crime and the restructuring of the U.S. economy: A reconsideration of the class linkages. Social Forces, 75, 769-798.
24.
GuerraN.BradshawC. (2008). Linking prevention of problem behaviors and positive youth development: Core competencies for positive youth development. In GuerraN.BradshawC. (Eds.), Core competencies to prevent problem behaviors and promote positive youth development: New directions in child and adolescent development (pp. 1-18). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
25.
GuerraN.WilliamsK. R. (2006). Ethnicity, youth violence, and the ecology of development. In GuerraN. G.SmithE. P. (Eds.), Preventing youth violence in a multicultural society (pp. 17-45). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
26.
GuerraN.WilliamsonA.Lucas-MolinaB. (2012). Normal development: Infancy, childhood, and adolescence. In ReyJ. M. (Ed.), IACAPAP e-textbook of child and adolescent mental health (pp. 1-39). Geneva, Switzerland: International Association for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Allied Professions.
27.
HausmanJ.HallB.GrilichesZ. (1984). Economic models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica, 52, 909-938.
28.
HibeJ. (2011). Negative binomial regression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29.
HirschiT. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
30.
KovandzicT.VieratisL.YeisleyM. (1998). The structural covariates of urban homicide: Reassessing the impact of income inequality and poverty in the post-Reagan era. Criminology, 36, 569-600.
31.
LaFreeG.BaumerE. P.O’BrienR. (2010). Still separate and unequal? A city-level analysis of the black-white gap in homicide arrests since 1960. American Sociological Review, 75(1), 75-100.
32.
LandK. C.McCallP. L.CohenL. (1990). Structural covariates of homicide rates: Are there any invariances across time and social space?American Journal of Sociology, 95, 922-963.
33.
LevinsonD. J. (1986). A conception of adult development. American Psychologist, 41(1), 3-13.
34.
LiemM.ReichelmannA. (2014). Patterns of multiple family homicide. Homicide Studies, 18, 3-6.
35.
LowenkampC.CullenF. T.PrattT. (2003). Replicating Sampson and Groves’s test of social disorganization theory: Revisiting a criminological classic. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40, 351-373.
36.
LynchJ.PridemoreW. A. (2011). Crime in international perspective. In WilsonJ. Q.PetersiliaJ. (Eds.), Crime and Public Policy (pp. 5-52). San Francisco, CA: Institute for Contemporary Studies.
37.
MacDonaldJ.GoverA. (2005). Concentrated disadvantage and youth-on-youth homicide: Assessing the structural covariates over time. Homicide Studies, 9, 30-54.
38.
MartinezR.Jr.RosenfeldR.MaresD. (2008). Social disorganization, drug market activity, and neighborhood violent crime. Urban Affairs Review, 43, 846-874.
39.
MartinezR.Jr.StowellJ.LeeM. (2010). Immigration and crime in an era of transformation: A longitudinal analysis of homicides in San Diego neighborhoods, 1980-2000. Criminology, 48, 797-829.
40.
McCallP. L.LandK. C.DollarC. B.ParkerK. F. (2013). The age structure-crime rate relationship: Solving a long-standing puzzle. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 29, 167-190.
41.
McCallP. L.LandK. C.ParkerK. F. (2010). What do we know about the structural covariates of homicide rates? A return to a classic twenty years later. Homicide Studies, 14, 219-243.
42.
McCallP. L.LandK. C.ParkerK. F. (2011). Heterogeneity in the rise and decline of city-level homicide rates, 1976-2005: A latent trajectory analysis. Social Science Research, 40, 363-378.
43.
McCallP. L.ParkerK. F.MacDonaldJ. (2008). The dynamic relationship between homicide rates and social, economic, and political factors from 1970 to 2000. Social Science Research, 37, 721-735.
44.
McDowellD.LoftinC. (2009). Do US city crime rates follow a national trend? The influence of nationwide conditions on local crime patterns. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25, 307-324.
45.
MessnerS. F.RaffalovichL. E.McMillanR. (2001). Economic deprivation and changes in homicide arrest rates for white and black youth, 1967–1998: A national level time-series analysis. Criminology, 16, 21-44.
46.
Minnesota Population Center. (2011). National Historical Geographic Information System: Version 2.0. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
47.
MoffittT. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 614-701.
48.
OsgoodW. (2000). Poisson based regression analysis of aggregate crime rates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16, 21-43.
49.
OuseyG.AugustineM. C. (2001). Young guns: Examining alternative explanations of juvenile firearm homicide rates. Criminology, 39, 933-968.
50.
OuseyG.KubrinC. (2009). Exploring the connection between immigration and violent crime rates in U.S. cities, 1980-2000. Social Problems, 56, 447-473.
51.
OuseyG.LeeM. (2002). Examining the conditional nature of the illicit drug market-homicide relationship: A partial test of the theory of contingent causation. Criminology, 40, 73-102.
52.
ParkerK. (2004). Industrial shift, polarized labor markets and urban violence: Modeling the dynamics between the economic transformation and disaggregated homicide. Criminology, 42, 619-646.
53.
ParkerK.McCallP. L. (1999). Structural conditions and racial homicide patterns: A look at the multiple disadvantages in urban areas. Criminology, 37, 447-473.
54.
PaternosterR.BrameR.MazerolleP.PiqueroA. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36, 859-866.
55.
PetersonR.KrivoL. (2005). Macrostructural analyses of race, ethnicity, and violent crime: Recent lessons and new directions for research. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 331-356.
56.
PetersonR.KrivoL. (2010). Divergent social worlds: Neighborhood crime and the racial-spatial divide. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
57.
PhillipsJ. (1997). Variation in African-American homicide rates: An assessment of potential explanations. Criminology, 35, 527-559.
58.
PhillipsJ. (2002). White, black and Latino homicide rates: Why the difference?Social Problems, 49, 349-374.
PrattT.CullenF. (2005). Assessing macro-level predictors and theories of crime: A meta-analysis. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 32, 373-450.
61.
PridemoreW. (2002). What we know about social structure and homicide: A review of the theoretical and empirical literature. Violence and Victims, 7, 127-156.
62.
PuzzancheraC. (2009). Juvenile arrests, 2007: Juvenile justice bulletin. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
63.
Rabe-HeskethS.SkrondalA. (2008). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
64.
SampsonR. J. (1987). Urban black violence: The effect of male joblessness and family disruption. American Journal of Sociology, 93, 348-383.
65.
SampsonR. J. (2008). Rethinking crime and immigration. Contexts, 7, 28-33.
66.
SampsonR. J. (2013). The place of context: A theory and strategy for criminology’s hard problems. Criminology, 51, 1-31.
67.
SampsonR. J.GrovesB. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 774-802.
68.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
69.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. (2005). A life course view of the development of crime. ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 602, 12-45.
70.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W.EarlsF. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918-924.
71.
ScanlonE.DevineK. (2001). Residential mobility and youth well-being: Research, policy, and practice issues. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 28, 119-138.
72.
SeeL. A. (2007). Human behavior in the social environment from an African American perspective. New York, NY: The Haworth Press.
73.
SharkeyP.FaberJ. (2014). Where, when, why and for whom do residential contexts matter? Moving away from the dichotomous understanding of neighborhood effects. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 559-579.
74.
ShawC.McKayH. (1969). Juvenile delinquency and urban crime (Rev. ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
75.
ShihadehE. S.OuseyG. C. (1998). Industrial restructuring and violence: The link between entry-level jobs, economic deprivation, and black and white homicide. Social Forces, 77, 185-206.
76.
SnyderH.SickmundM. (2006). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2006 National Report. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
77.
StansfieldR.ParkerK. (2013). Teasing out the effects of macro-conditions on race-specific male homicide rates: Do distinct predictors vary by racial group and over time?Social Science Research, 42, 633-649.
78.
SteffensmeierD.UlmerJ.FeldmeyerB.HarrisC. (2010). Testing the race-crime invariance thesis: Black, white, and Hispanic comparisons. Criminology, 48, 1133-1169.
79.
SteinbergL. (2009). Adolescent development and juvenile justice. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 459-485.
80.
SteinbergL.AlbertD.CauffmanE.BanichM.GrahamS.WoolardJ. (2008). Age differences in sensation seeking and impulsivity as indexed by behavior and self-report: Evidence for a dual systems model. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1764-1778.
81.
SteinbergL.GrahamS.O’BrienL.WoolardJ.CauffmanE. (2009). Age differences in future orientation and delay discounting. Child Development, 80, 28-44.
82.
StromK.MacDonaldJ. (2007). The influence of social and economic disadvantage on racial patterns in youth homicide over time. Homicide Studies, 11, 50-69.
83.
TellesE. E.OrtizV. (2008). Generations of exclusion: Mexican Americans, assimilation, and race. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
84.
TobyJ. (1957). Social disorganization and stake in conformity: Complementary factors in the predatory behavior of hoodlums. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 48, 12-17.
85.
UrdangE. (2002). Human behavior in the social environment. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
86.
WadsworthT.RobertsJ. (2008). When missing data are not missing: A new approach to evaluating Supplemental Homicide Report imputation strategies. Criminology, 46, 841-870.
87.
WarnerB.RountreeP. (1997). Local social ties in a community and crime model: Questioning the systemic nature of informal social control. Social Problems, 44, 520-536.
88.
WilsonW. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
89.
WilsonW. J. (1996). When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. New York, NY: Knopf.
90.
XieM.HeimerK.LauritsenJ. (2012). Violence against women in U.S. metropolitan areas: Changes in women’s status and risk, 1980-2004. Criminology, 50, 105-143.
