This study examines the validity of a statistical offender profiling technique that predicts the multi-dimensional classification of homicide offenders. Analyzing 539 Japanese homicide cases, we constructed multivariate prediction models that infer classifications defined by three dichotomous variables (stranger offender, solo offender, money-oriented motive) on the basis of crime scene information. We evaluated the validity of the models with a 10-fold cross-validation procedure and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and found the models to have moderate accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] = .73 to .82). We discussed the results from the perspective of the offender’s rational choices in the crime scene and crime specialization.
AkersR. L. (1973). Deviant behavior: A social learning approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
2.
AlisonL. J.BennellC.MokrosA.OrmerodD. (2002). The personality paradox in offender profiling: A theoretical review of the processes involved in deriving background characteristics from crime scene actions. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 8, 115-135.
3.
AlisonL. J.GoodwillA.AlmondL.van den HeuvelC.WinterJ. (2010). Pragmatic solutions to offender profiling and behavioural investigative advice. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, 115-132.
4.
AlisonL. J.SnookB.SteinK. L. (2001). Unobtrusive measurement: Using police information for forensic research. Qualitative Research, 1, 241-254.
5.
AlisonL. J.WestA.GoodwillA. (2004). The academic and the practitioner: Pragmatists’ views of offender profiling. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 10, 71-101.
6.
BeauregardE.LeclercB.LussierP. (2012). Decision making in the crime commission process: Comparing rapists, child molesters, and victim-crossover sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 1275-1295.
7.
BeauregardE.ProulxJ.RossmoK.LeclercB.AllaireJ. F. (2007). Script analysis of the hunting process of serial sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1069-1084.
8.
CanterD. V. (1994). Criminal shadows. London, England: HarperCollins.
9.
CanterD. V. (2000). Offender profiling and criminal differentiation. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 5, 23-46.
10.
CanterD. V.FritzonK. (1998). Differentiating arsonists: A model of firesetting actions and characteristics. Journal of Criminal and Legal Psychology, 3, 73-96.
11.
CanterD. V.AlisonL. J. (2003). Converting evidence into data: The use of law enforcement archives as unobtrusive measurement. The Qualitative Report, 8, 151-176.
12.
CanterD. V.AlisonL. J.AlisonE.WentinkN. (2004). The organized/disorganized typology of serial murder: Myth or model?Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 10, 293-320.
13.
CanterD. V.WentinkN. (2004). An empirical test of Holmes and Holmes’s serial murder typology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 489-515.
14.
ClarkeR. V. (1997). Situational crime prevention: Successful case studies (2nd ed.). Guilderland, NY: Harrow and Heston.
15.
DaviesA.WittebroodK.JacksonJ. L. (1997). Predicting the criminal antecedents of a stranger rapist from his offence behaviour. Science & Justice, 37, 161-170.
16.
DoanB.SnookB. (2008). A failure to find empirical support for the homology assumption in criminal profiling. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 23, 61-70.
17.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2014). Crime in the United States, 2013. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
18.
FeshbachS. (1964). The function of aggression and the regulation of aggressive drive. Psychological Review, 71, 257-272.
19.
FirestoneP.BradfordJ. M.GreenbergD. M.LaroseM. R. (1998). Homicidal sex offenders: Psychological, phallometric, and diagnostic features. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 26, 537-552.
20.
FoxK. A.AllenT. (2014). Examining the instrumental-expressive continuum of homicides: Incorporating the effects of gender, victim-offender relationships, and weapon choice. Homicide Studies, 18, 298-317.
21.
FujitaG.WatanabeK.YokotaK.KuraishiH.SuzukiM.WachiT.OtsukaY. (2013). Multivariate models for behavioral offender profiling of Japanese homicide. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40, 214-230.
22.
GanpatS. M.LiemM.van der LeunJ.NieuwbeertaP. (2014). The influence of criminal history on the likelihood of committing lethal versus nonlethal violence. Homicide Studies, 18, 221-240.
23.
GoodwillA. M.AlisonL. J. (2007). When is profiling possible? Offense planning and aggression as moderators in predicting offender age from victim age in stranger rape. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 25, 823-840.
24.
GoodwillA. M.AlisonL. J.BeechA. R. (2009). What works in offender profiling? A comparison of typological, thematic, and multivariate models. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 27, 507-529.
25.
GoodwillA. M.AllenJ. C.KolarevicD. (2014). Improvement of thematic classification in offender profiling: Classifying Serbian homicides using multiple correspondence, cluster, and discriminant function analyses. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 11, 221-236.
26.
GoodwillA. M.StephensS.OzielS.SharmaS.AllenJ. C.BowesN.LehmannR. (2013). Advancement of criminal profiling methods in faceted multidimensional analysis. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 10, 71-95.
27.
GreenallP. V.RichardsonK. (2015). Adult male-on-female stranger sexual homicide: A descriptive (baseline) study from Great Britain. Homicide Studies, 19, 237-256.
HarrisG. T.RiceM. E.LalumièreM. (2001). Criminal violence: The roles of psychopathy, neurodevelopmental insults, and antisocial parenting. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 402-426.
30.
HickeyE. V. (2006). Serial murderers and their victims (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
31.
HolmesR. M.HolmesS. T. (1998). Serial murder (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
32.
KaplanD. E.DubroA. (2012). Yakuza: Japan’s criminal underworld. Berkeley: University of California Press.
33.
KeppelR. D. (2000). Signature murders: A report of the 1984 Cranbrook, British Columbia cases. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 45, 500-503.
34.
KeppelR. D.WalterR. (1999). Profiling killers: A revised classification model for understanding sexual murder. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 43, 417-437.
35.
KocsisR. N.CookseyR. W.IrwinH. J. (2002). Psychological profiling of sexual murders: An empirical model. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46, 532-553.
36.
LastS. K.FritzonK. (2005). Investigating the nature of expressiveness in stranger, acquaintance and intrafamilial homicides. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 2, 179-193.
37.
LundriganS.CanterD. (2001). A multivariate analysis of serial murderers’ disposal site location choice. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 423-432.
38.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
39.
MeloyJ. R. (2000). The nature and dynamics of sexual homicide: An integrative review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5, 1-22.
40.
MokrosA.AlisonL. J. (2002). Is offender profiling possible? Testing the predicted homology of crime scene actions and background characteristics in a sample of rapists. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 7, 25-43.
41.
MorisueO. (2000). Analysis of conflicts among Japanese gangs. Journal of Police Science, 53(6), 141-163.
OsukaK. (2003). Aichi Pref. Police measures against delinquent groups such as motorcycle gangs. Journal of Police Science, 56(12), 91-112.
44.
QuinetK.NunnS. (2014). Establishing the victim–offender relationship of initially unsolved homicides: Partner, family, acquaintance, or stranger?Homicide Studies, 18, 271-297.
45.
ResslerR. K.BurgessA. W.DouglasJ. E.HartmanC. R.D’AgostinoR. B. (1986). Sexual killers and their victims: Identifying patterns through crime scene analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1, 288-308.
46.
RobertsJ. V.GrossmanM. G. (1993). Sexual homicide in Canada: A descriptive analysis. Annals of Sex Research, 6, 5-25.
47.
RoscoeA.RahmanM. S.MehtaH.WhileD.ApplebyL.ShawJ. (2012). Comparison of a national sample of homicides committed by lone and multiple perpetrators. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 23, 510-521.
48.
SalfatiC. G. (2000). The nature of expressiveness and instrumentality in homicide: Implications for offender profiling. Homicide Studies, 4, 265-293.
49.
SalfatiC. G.BatemanA. L. (2005). Serial homicide: An investigation of behavioral consistency. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 2, 124-144.
50.
SalfatiC. G.CanterD. V. (1999). Differentiating stranger murders: Profiling offender characteristics from behavioral styles. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 17, 391-406.
51.
SalfatiC. G.ParkJ. (2007). An analysis of Korean homicide crime-scene actions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 1448-1470.
52.
SanttilaP.HäkkänenH.CanterD.ElfgrenT. (2003). Classifying homicide offenders and predicting their characteristics from crime scene behavior. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 44, 107-118.
53.
SatsumiY.IkegamiS. (1997). Satsuzin sousa honbu ziken ni okeru kagaisya-higaisya kan no menshiki kankei [Offender-victim relationship in murder cases solved by specific investigative headquarters]. Reports of the National Research Institute of Police Science, 38, 115-123.
54.
SewallL. A.KruppD. B.LalumièreM. (2013). A test of two typologies of sexual homicide. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 25, 82-100.
55.
SnookB.EastwoodJ.GendreauP.GogginC.CullenR. M. (2007). Taking stock of criminal profiling: A narrative review and meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 437-453.
56.
SuzukiM.WatanabeK.TamuraM. (1999). Kyouaku hanzai deitabeisu wo mochiita kinnen no satsuzinziken ni kansuru kenkyu: Chiriteki zyouhou ni kansuru bunseki [A study of modern homicide using felonious offenses database: An analysis of geographic information]. Japanese Journal of Criminal Psychology, 37(Suppl.), 10-11.
57.
SwetsJ. A. (1988). Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science, 240, 1285-1293.
58.
TrojanC.KrullA. C. (2012). Variations in wounding by relationship intimacy in homicide cases. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 2869-2888.
59.
TrojanC.SalfatiC. G. (2011). Linking criminal history to crime scene behavior in single-victim and serial homicide: Implications for offender profiling research. Homicide Studies, 15, 3-31.
60.
WatanabeK.SuzukiM.TamuraM. (1999). Kyouaku hanzai deitabeisu wo mochiita kinnen no satsuzinziken ni kansuru kenkyu: Hankou genba no zyouhou ni kansuru bunseki [A study of modern homicide using felonious offenses database: An analysis of crime scene information]. Japanese Journal of Criminal Psychology, 37(Suppl.), 8-9.
61.
WatanabeK.TamuraM. (1998). Analysis on the characteristics of mutilation-murder cases in the last 50 years. Reports of the National Research Institute of Police Science, 39, 52-65.
62.
YokotaK.FujitaG.WatanabeK.YoshimotoK.WachiT. (2007). Application of the behavioral investigative support system for profiling perpetrators of serial sexual assaults. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 25, 841-856.
63.
ZweigM. H.CampbellG. (1993). Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: A fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clinical Chemistry, 39, 561-577.
