At present, the average homicide clearance rate in the United States is approximately 65%, down roughly 15% from the mid-1970s. This research seeks to inform how police can best improve homicide clearance rates by identifying best practices in homicide investigations. To accomplish this goal, as part of a federally funded project, seven geographically representative law enforcement agencies were identified that had at least 24 homicides in 2011 and had a clearance rate of 80% or higher from which effective investigative practices could be gleaned. Qualitative findings indicate that a strong community policing presence, collaboration with external agencies, and an innovative culture facilitate high rates of homicide clearance. Implications for policy and future research are discussed.
AddingtonL. A. (2006). Using national incident-based reporting system murder data to evaluate clearance predictors: A research note. Homicide Studies, 10, 140-152.
2.
AlpertG. P.RojekJ.HansenA. (2009). Building bridges between police researchers and practitioners: Agents of change in a complex world (Final Report to the National Institute of Justice. Report Number 244245). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
3.
BlackD. J. (1976). The behavior of law. New York, NY: Academic Press.
4.
BrookmanF.InnesM. (2013). The problem of success: What is a “good” homicide investigation?Policing & Society, 23, 292-310.
CarterD. L.CarterJ. G. (2009a). The intelligence fusion process for state, local and tribal law enforcement. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 1323-1339.
7.
CarterD. L.CarterJ. G. (2009b). Intelligence-led policing: Conceptual considerations for public policy. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20, 310-325.
8.
CarterJ. G. (2015). Inter-organizational relationships and law enforcement information sharing post-September 11, 2001. Journal of Crime and Justice, 38, 522-542.
9.
CarterJ. G.PhillipsS. W.GayadeenS. M. (2014). Implementing intelligence-led policing: An application of loose-coupling theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 42, 433-442.
10.
ChermakS.CarterJ. G.CarterD. L.McGarrellE. F.DrewJ. (2013). Law enforcement’s information sharing infrastructure: A national assessment. Police Quarterly, 16, 211-244.
11.
CooperA.SmithE. L. (2011). Homicide trends in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics.
12.
GottfredsonM. R.HindelangM. J. (1979). A study of the behavior of law. American Sociological Review, 44, 3-18.
13.
GreeneJ. R. (2014). New directions in policing: Balancing prediction and meaning in police research. Justice Quarterly, 31, 193-228.
InnesM. (2002). The “process structures” of police homicide investigations. British Journal of Criminology, 42, 669-688.
16.
JarvisJ. P.RegoecziW. C. (2009). Homicides clearances: An analysis of arrest versus exceptional outcomes. Homicide Studies, 13, 174-188.
17.
KaneR. J. (2005). Compromised police legitimacy as a predictor of violence crime in structurally disadvantaged communities. Criminology, 43, 469-498.
18.
KeelT. G.JarvisJ. P.MuirheadY. E. (2009). An exploratory analysis of factors affecting homicide investigations: Examining the dynamics of murder clearance rates. Homicide Studies, 13, 50-68.
19.
KellingG.MooreM. (1988). The evolving strategy of policing (Perspectives on Policing). Washington, DC: Joint Publication of the National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice and the Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. Retrieved from https://ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/114213.pdf
20.
KenneyD. J.WhiteM. D.RuffingengoM. A. (2010). Expanding the role of patrol in criminal investigations: Houston’s investigative first responder project. Police Quarterly, 13, 136-160.
21.
KlingerD. A. (1997). Negotiating order in patrol work: An ecological theory of police response to deviance. Criminology, 35, 277-306.
22.
LitwinK. J. (2004). A multilevel multivariate analysis of factors affecting homicide clearances. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 41, 327-351.
23.
LitwinK. J.XuY. (2007). The dynamic nature of homicide clearances: A multilevel model comparison of three time Periods. Homicide Studies, 11, 94-114.
24.
LumC. (2009). Translating police research into practice (Ideas in American Policing, No. 11). Washington, DC: Police Foundation.
25.
LundmanR. J.MyersM. (2012). Explanations of homicide clearances: Do results vary dependent upon operationalization and initial (time 1) and updated (time 2) data?Homicide Studies, 16, 23-40.
26.
MarchéG. E. (1994). The production of homicide solutions: An empirical analysis. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 53, 385-401.
27.
PuckettJ. L.LundmanR. J. (2003). Factors affecting homicide clearances: Multivariate analysis of a more complete conceptual framework. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 40, 171-193.
28.
RachlinH. (1995). The making of a detective. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
29.
RegoecziW. C.JarvisJ. P. (2013). Beyond the social production of homicide rates: Extending social disorganization theory to explain homicide case outcomes. Justice Quarterly, 30, 983-1014.
30.
RegoecziW. C.KennedyL. W.SilvermanR. A. (2000). Uncleared homicides: A Canada/United States comparison. Homicide Studies, 4, 135-161.
31.
ReissA. J.Jr. (1971). The police and the public. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
32.
RiedelM. (2008). Homicide arrest clearances: A review of the literature. Sociology Compass, 2, 1145-1164.
33.
RiedelM.JarvisJ. (1999). The decline of arrest clearances for criminal homicide: Causes, correlates, and third parties. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 9, 279-306.
34.
RiedelM.RinehartT. A. (1996). Murder clearances and missing data. Journal of Crime & Justice, 19, 83-102.
35.
RobertsA. (2007). Predictors of homicide clearance by arrest: An event history analysis of NIBRS incidents. Homicide Studies, 11, 82-93.
36.
RobertsA.LyonsC. J. (2011). Hispanic victims and homicide clearance by arrest. Homicide Studies, 15, 48-73.
37.
RobinsonA.TilleyN. (2009). Factors influencing police performance in the investigation of volume crimes in England and Wales. Police Practice & Research, 10, 209-223.
38.
SkoganW. G.HartnettS. M.DuBoisJ.ComeyJ. T.KaiserM.LovigJ. H. (1999). On the beat: Police and community problem solving. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
39.
TaylorF. W. (1911). The principles of scientific management. New York, NY: Harper & Brothers.
40.
WarnerB. D. (2007). Directly intervene or call the authorities? A study of forms of neighborhood social control within a social disorganization framework. Criminology, 45, 99-130.
41.
WellfordC.CroninJ. (1999). An analysis of variables affecting the clearance of homicides: A multi-state study. Washington, DC: Justice Research and Statistics Association.
42.
WhiteM. D.FyfeJ. J.CampbellS. P.GoldkampJ. S. (2003). The police role in preventing homicide: Considering the impact of problem-oriented policing on the prevalence of murder. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 40, 194-225.
