This analysis examines the extent to which homicides initially reported as unknown offender in end-of-year reports, once cleared, are more likely to have been perpetrated by strangers than other cleared homicides. Using solved and unsolved homicides in Indianapolis (N = 829), we determined victim–offender relationships in homicides reported as unsolved in year-end reports, when solved, were not significantly different from homicides reported as having a suspect in year-end reports. Indianapolis homicides were classified disproportionately as acquaintances. Findings help negate the ongoing myth that unsolved homicides are disproportionately stranger homicides. Results suggest decreased homicide clearance rates are not due to increased stranger homicides.
AddingtonL. A. (2007). Hot vs. cold cases: Examining time-to-clearance for homicides using NIBRS data. Justice Research and Policy, 9(2), 87-112.
2.
AlderdenM. A.LaveryT. A. (2007). Predicting homicide clearances in Chicago: Investigating disparities in predictors across different types of homicide. Homicide Studies, 11(2), 115-132.
3.
AllisonP. (2001). Missing data. Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
4.
AltheideD. L.FritzN. J. (1987). The mass media and social construction of the missing children problem. The Sociological Quarterly, 28, 473-492.
5.
BestJ. (1987a). Calculating the numbers of children abducted by strangers: Dark figures and child victims. Paper presented at the Pacific Sociological Association Meeting, Seattle, WA.
6.
BestJ. (1987b). Dark figures and missing children: Defining stranger abduction. Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology Meeting, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
7.
BestJ. (1988). Missing children, misleading statistics. The Public Interest, 92, 84-92.
8.
DeckerS. H. (1993). Exploring victim offender relationships in homicide: The role of individual and event characteristics. Justice Quarterly, 10, 585-612.
FlewellingR. L.WilliamsK. R. (1999). Categorizing homicides: The use of disaggregated data in homicide research. In SmithM. D.ZahnM. A. (Eds.), Homicide: A sourcebook of social research (pp. 96-106). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
11.
GilbertJ. N. (1983). A study of the increased rate of unsolved criminal homicide in San Diego, California and its relationship to police investigative effectiveness. American Journal of Police, 2(2), 149-166.
12.
GruenwaldJ.PridemoreW. (2009). Stability and change in homicide victim, offender, and event characteristics in Chicago, 1900 and 2000. Homicide Studies, 13, 355-384.
13.
Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department. (2005-2012). IMPD YTD Homicide Incidents Report.
KigerK. (1990). The darker side of crime: The serial murder enigma. In EggerS. A. (Ed.), Serial murder: An elusive phenomenon (pp. 35-52). New York, NY: Praeger.
16.
LeeC. (2005). The value of life in death: Multiple regression and event history analyses of homicide clearance in Los Angeles County. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 527-534.
17.
Leinwand LegerD. (2011, November15). Misconceptions make sex abuse offenders difficult to detect. USA Today.
18.
LitwinK. J.XuY. (2007). The dynamic nature of homicide clearances: A multilevel comparison of three time periods. Homicide Studies, 11(2), 94-114.
19.
LundmanR. J.MyersM. (2012). Explanations of homicide clearances: Do results vary dependent upon operationalization and initial (time 1) and updates (time 2) data?Homicide Studies, 16(1), 23-40.
20.
MaxfieldM. (1989). Circumstances in supplementary homicide reports: Variety and validity. Criminology, 27, 671-695.
21.
MaxfieldM. G.BabbieE. R. (2011). Research methods for criminal justice and criminology (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
22.
MessnerS. F.DeaneG.BeaulieuM. (2002). A log-multiplicative association model for allocating homicides with unknown victim offender relationships. Criminology, 40, 457-479.
23.
OuseyG. C.LeeM. R. (2010). To know the unknown: The decline in homicide clearance rates, 1980-2000. Criminal Justice Review, 35(2), 141-158.
24.
PampelF. C.WilliamsK. R. (2000). Intimacy and homicide: Compensating for missing data in the SHR. Criminology, 38, 661-680.
25.
PeteeT. A.WeaverG. S.CorzineJ.Huff-CorzineL.WittekindJ. (Eds.). (2000). Victim offender relationships and the situational context of homicide. In The diversity of homicide: Proceedings of the 2000 Homicide Research Working Group (pp. 117-127). Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation.
26.
PizarroJ. M. (2008). Reassessing the situational covariates of homicides: Is there a need to disaggregate?Homicide Studies, 12, 323-349.
27.
PuckettJ. L.LundmanR. J. (2003). Factors affecting homicide clearances: Multivariate analysis of a more complete conceptual framework. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40(2), 171-193.
28.
QuinetK. (2012). Missing Persons. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, Problem-Oriented Guides for Police, Problem-Specific Guide Series.
29.
ReginiC. (1997). The cold case concept. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 66(8), 1-6.
30.
RegoecziW. C.MietheT. D. (2003). Taking on the unknown: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of unknown relationship homicides. Homicide Studies, 7, 211-234.
31.
RegoecziW. C.RiedelM. (2003). The application of missing data estimation models to the problem of unknown victim/offender relationships in homicide cases. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19(2), 155-183.
32.
RegoecziW. C.JarvisJ.RiedelM. (2008). Clearing murders: Is it about time?Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 45, 142-162.
33.
RegoecziW. C.KennedyL. W.SilvermanR. A. (2000). Uncleared homicides: A Canada/United States comparison. Homicide Studies, 4(2), 135-161.
34.
RiedelM. (1998). Counting stranger homicides: A case study of statistical prestidigitation. Homicide Studies, 2, 206-219.
35.
RiedelM. (2008). Homicide arrest clearances: A review of the literature. Sociology Compass, 2, 1145-1164.
36.
RiedelM.JarvisJ. (1998). The decline of arrest clearances for criminal homicide: Causes, correlates, and third parties. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 9, 279-305.
37.
RobertsA. (2007). Predictors of homicide clearance by arrest: An event history analysis of NIBRS incidents. Homicide Studies, 11(2), 82-93.
38.
SafarikM.JarvisJ.NussbaumK. (2000). Elderly serial sexual homicide: A limited empirical test of criminal investigative analysis. Homicide Studies, 4, 294-307.
39.
SafarikM.JarvisJ.NussbaumK. (2002). Sexual homicide of elderly females: Linking offender characteristics to crime scene and victim characteristics. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 500-525.
40.
SilvermanR. A.KennedyL. W. (1987). Relational distance and homicide: The role of the stranger. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 78, 272-308.
41.
SimonD. (2006). Homicide: A year on the killing streets. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
42.
SimpsonK. (2010, November28). Dispelled kidnap myths do little to allay parents’ fears. The Denver Post.
43.
TrusslerT. (2010). Explaining the changing nature of homicide clearance in Canada. International Criminal Justice Review, 20, 366-383.
44.
WadsworthT.RobertsJ. M. (2008). When missing data are not missing: A new approach to evaluating supplemental homicide report imputation strategies. Criminology, 46, 841-870.
45.
WalinskyA. (1995, July). The crisis of public order. The Atlantic.
46.
WellfordC.CroninJ. (1999). An analysis of variables affecting the clearance of homicides: A multistate study. Washington, DC: Justice Research and Statistics Association.
47.
WilliamsK. R.FlewellingR. L. (1987). Family, acquaintance, and stranger homicide: Alternative procedures for rate calculations. Criminology, 25, 543-560.
48.
WolfgangM. (1958). Patterns in criminal homicides. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
