This study contributes to the body of research examining why city-level violence rates peaked in 1993. Taking homicide data from that year, we introduce an indicator for active street gangs along with indicators derived from common structural explanations of homicide rates. We assess whether gang presence is empirically associated with homicide variation across 154 U.S. central cities. Consistent with conceptual claims, correlational evidence demonstrates that active gangs were a significant source of homicides across this sample of cities. As a secondary concern, we assess structural conditions that were likely to predict gang formation within cities during the crime peak.
AndersonE. (1990). Streetwise: Race, class and change in an urban community. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
2.
AndersonE. (1994, May). The code of the streets. Atlantic Monthly, 273(5), 80-94.
3.
AndersonE. (1999) Code of the street: decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York, W. W. Norton Company.
4.
BaileyW. C. (1984). Poverty, inequality, and city homicide rates: Some not so unexpected findings. Criminology, 22, 531-550.
5.
BarnettA.SchwartzE. (1989). Urban homicide: Still the same. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 5(1), 83-99.
6.
BarrowsJ.HuffC. R. (2009). Gangs and public policy: Constructing and deconstructing gang databases. Criminology & Public Policy, 8, 675-703.
7.
BattinS. R.HillK. G.AbbotR. D.CatalanoR. F.HawkinsD. J. (1998). The contribution of gang membership to delinquency: Beyond delinquent friends. Criminology, 36(1), 93-115.
8.
BeaulieuM.MessnerS. (2010). Assessing changes in the effect of divorce rates on homicide rates across large U.S. cities, 1960-2000: Revisiting the Chicago School. Homicide Studies, 14(1), 24-51.
9.
BernardT. J. (1990). Angry aggression among the truly disadvantaged. Criminology, 28(1), 73-96.
10.
BjerregardB. (2010). Gang membership and drug involvement: Untangling the complex relationship. Crime & Delinquency, 56(1), 3-34.
11.
BlauJ. R.BlauP. M. (1982). The cost of inequality: Metropolitan structure and violent crime. American Sociological Review, 47(1), 114-129.
12.
BlockC. R.AntigonC.AyadJ.PrzybylskiR. (1996). Street gangs and crime: Patterns and trends in Chicago. Chicago, IL: Criminal Justice Information Authority.
13.
BlumsteinA. (1995). Youth violence, guns, and the illicit-drug industry. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 88(1), 10-36.
14.
BlumsteinA.RosenfeldR. (1998). Explaining recent trends in U.S. homicide rates. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 88, 1175-1216.
15.
CantorD.LandK. C. (1985). Unemployment and crime rates in the Post-World War II United States: A theoretical and empirical analysis. American Sociological Review, 50, 317-332.
16.
CerdáM.MessnerS. F.TracyM.GladovD.GoldmannE.TardiffK.GaleaS. (2010). Gun-related homicide rates in New York City: Investigating the contribution of social changes on age-specific homicide rates during the 1990s. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 1107-1015.
17.
CookP. J.LaubJ. (1998). The Unprecedented Epidemic in Youth Violence. In TonryM.MooreM. H. (Eds.), Youth violence (pp.101-138). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
18.
CorkD. (1999). Examining space-time interaction in city-level homicide data: Crack markets and the diffusion of guns among youth. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 13, 379-406.
19.
CostanzaS. E.HelmsR.RatansiS.KilburnJ.HarmonJ. (2010). Boom to bust or bust to boom? Following the effects of weed and seed zoning in New Britain, Connecticut from 1995 to 2000. Police Quarterly, 13(1), 49-72.
20.
CoughlinB. C.VenkateshS. A. (2003). The urban street gang after 1970. Annual Review of Sociology, (29), 41-64.
21.
CurtisR. (1998). The improbable transformation of inner-city neighborhoods: Crime, violence, drugs, and youth in the 1990s. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88, 1233-1276.
22.
CurryG. D.SpergelI. A. (1992). Gang involvement and delinquency among Hispanic and African-American adolescent males. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 29, 273-291.
23.
CurryG. D.SpergelI. A. (1988). Gang homicide, delinquency, and community. Criminology, 26, 381-405.
24.
DeckerS. H. (1996). Collective and normative features of gang violence. Justice Quarterly, 13, 242-264.
25.
DeckerS. H.Van WinkleB. (1994). Life in the gang: Family, friends, and violenceCambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
26.
DeschenesE. P.EsbensenF. (1999). Violence and gangs: Gender differences in perceptions and behavior. Journal of Qualitative Criminology, 15(1), 63-96.
27.
DownsA. (1973). Opening up the suburbs: An urban strategy for America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
28.
EsbensenF. A.HuisingaD. (1996). Gangs, drugs, and delinquency in a survey of urban youth. Criminology, 31, 565-589.
29.
EsbensenF. A.PetersonD.TaylorT. J.FrengA. (2010). Youth violence: Sex and race differences in offending, victimization, and gang membership. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
30.
EsbensenF.WinfreeT. L.Jr.HeN.TaylorT. J. (2001). Youth gangs and definitional issues: When is a gang a gang, and why does it matter?Crime & Delinquency, 47(1), 105-130.
31.
FaganJ.WexlerS. (1987). Family origins of violent delinquentsCriminology, 25, 643-669.
32.
FelsonM. (1994). Crime and everyday life: Insight and implications for society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
33.
GilfoyleT. J. (2004). Street-rats and gutter-snipes: Child pickpockets and street culture in New York City, 1850-1900. Journal of Social History, 37, 853-862
34.
GottfredsonM. R.HirshiT. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
35.
HaganJ. (1994). Crime and disrepute. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
36.
HagedornJ.M. (1988). People and folks: Gangs, crime, and the underclass in a rustbelt city. Chicago, IL: Lakeview Press.
37.
HagedornJ. M. (1998). Gang violence in the postindustrial era. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, (24), 365-419.
38.
HagedornJ.RauchB. (2007). Housing, gangs, and homicide: What we can learn from Chicago. Urban Affairs Review, 42, 435-456.
39.
HirschiT. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
40.
HowellJ. C. (1999). Youth gang homicides: A literature review. Crime & Delinquency, 45, 208-241.
41.
JacobsD.RichardsonM. (2008). Economic inequality and homicide from 1975 to 1995: A cross national fixed-effects test. Homicide Studies, 12(1), 28-45.
42.
JacksonP. (1991). Crime, youth gangs, and urban transition: the social dislocations of postindustrial economic development. Justice Quarterly, 8(3), 379-397.
43.
JohnsonB. D.WilliamsT.DeiK. A.SanabriaH. (1990). Drug abuse in the inner city: Impact on hard-drug users and the community. Crime & Justice: An Annual Review (Drugs and Crime), (13), 9-67.
44.
JohnsonB. D.NatarajanM.DunlapE.ElmoghazyE. (1994). Crack abusers and noncrack abusers: Profiles of drug use, drug sales and nondrug criminality. Journal of Drug Issues, 24(1), 117-141.
45.
KapuscinskiC. A.BraithwaiteJ.ChapmanB. (1998). Unemployment and crime: Toward resolving the paradox. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14, 215-243.
46.
KleinM. W. (1995). The American street gang: Its nature, prevalence, and control. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
47.
KleinM. W.MaxsonC. L.CunninghamL. C. (1991).Crack, street gangs and violence. Criminology, 29, 623-650.
48.
KovandzicT.VieraitisL. M.YeisleyM. R. (1998). The structural covariates of urban homicide: Reassessing the impact of income inequality and poverty in the Post-Reagan Era. Criminology, 36, 569-599.
49.
KraskaP. (2001). Militarization and Policing-Its Relevance to 21st Century Police. Policing, 1(4): 501-513.
50.
KyriacouD. N.HutsonH. R.AnglinD.Peek-AsaC.KrausJ. F. (1999). The relationship between socioeconomic factors and gang violence in the city of los angeles. Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection & Critical Care, 46, 334-339.
51.
LandK. C.McCallP. L.CohenL. E. (1990). Structural covariates of homicide rates: Are there any invariances across time and social space?American Journal of Sociology, 95, 922-963.
52.
LaneR. (2001). Murder in America: A historian’s perspective. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, (25), 191-224.
LieberM. J.MackK. Y.FeatherstoneR. A. (2009). Family structure, family processes, economic factors, and delinquency similarities and differences by race and ethnicity. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 7(2), 79-99.
55.
LibermanA. (2010). The long view of crime: A synthesis of longitudinal research. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
56.
LiskaA. E.LoganJ. R.BellairP. E. (1998). Race and violent crime in the suburbs. American Sociological Review, 63(1) 27-38.
57.
LoftinC.McDowallD.XieM. (2008). Likely errors when linking supplementary homicide report records for large U.S. cities. Homicide Studies, 12, 234-248.
58.
MaresD. (2010). Social Disorganization and gang homicides in Chicago A neighborhood level comparison of disaggregated homicides. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 8(1), 38-57.
59.
MarkowitzF. E. (2003). Socioeconomic disadvantage in violence: recent research on culture and neighborhood control as explanatory mechanisms. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 145-154.
60.
MaxsonC.L. (1992). “Impact of gang migration: Effective responses by law enforcement agencies in the United States” U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics (technical report)
61.
MaxsonC.CurryG. D.HowellJ. (2002). Youth Gang Homicides in the United States in the 1990s. In DeckerS. H. (Ed.) Responding to gangs: Evaluation and research (pp. 107-137). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
62.
MaxsonC.KleinM. (1996). Defining gang homicide: An updated look at member and motive approaches. In Ronald HuffC. (Ed.), Gangs in America (2nd ed., pp. 107-137). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
63.
MaxsonC. L. (1999). Impact of gang migration: Effective responses by law enforcement agencies in the United States, 1992. [Computer file]. ICPSR version. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California [producer], 1995. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortuim for Political and Social Research [distributor]
64.
McCallP. L.LandK. C.ParkerK. F. (2010). An empirical assessment of what we know about structural covariates of homicide rates: a return to a classic 20 years later. Homicide Studies, 14, 219-243.
65.
MacDonaldJ. M.GoverA. R. (2005). Concentrated disadvantage and youth-on-youth homicide: Assessing the structural covariates over time. Homicide Studies, 9(1), 30-54.
66.
MietheR. C.McCorkleT. D. (1998). The political and organizational response to gangs: An examination of a moral panic in Nevada. Justice Quarterly, 15(1), 41-64.
67.
MessnerS. F. (1982). Poverty, inequality and the urban homicide rate: Some unexpected findings. Criminology, 20(2), 103-114.
68.
MessnerS. F. (1983). Regional and racial effects on the urban homicide rate: The subculture of violence revisited. American Journal of Sociology, 88, 997-1007.
69.
MessnerS. F. (1989). Economic discrimination and societal homicide rates: Further evidence on the cost of inequality. American Sociological Review, 54, 597-611.
70.
MessnerS. F.RosenfeldR. (2001). Crime and the American dream (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
71.
MessnerS. F.RaffalovichSuttonG. (2010). Poverty, infant mortality, and homicide rates in cross-national perspective: assessments of criterion and construct validity”. Criminology, (48), 509-537.
72.
MessnerS. F.TardiffK. (1985). The social ecology of urban homicide: an application of the routine activities approach. Criminology, 23, 241-267.
73.
MooreJ. W. (1991). Going down to the barrio: Homeboys and homegirls in change. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University.
74.
NofzigerS. (2010). A gendered perspective on the relationship between self-control and deviance. Feminist Criminology, 5(1), 29-50.
75.
OsgoodD. W.ChambersJ. M. (2000). Social disorganization outside the metropolis: An analysis of rural youth violence. Criminology, 38(1), 81-115.
76.
OuseyG. C.LeeM. R. (2002). Examining the conditional nature of the illicit drug market homicide relationship: a partial test of the theory of contingent causation. Criminology, 40(1), 73-102.
77.
PadillaF. (1992). The gang as an American enterprise. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
78.
PapachristosA. V.KirkD. S. (2006). Neighborhood effects on street gang behavior. In ShortJ. F.HughesL. A. (Eds.), Studying youth gangs (pp. 63-84). Lanham, MD: Alta Mira Press.
79.
ParkerK. F.McCallP. L. (1999). Structural conditions and racial homicide patterns: A look at the multiple disadvantages in urban areas. Criminology, 37, 447-478.
80.
ParkerK. F.McCallP. LLandK. C. (1999). Determining social-structural predictors of homicide: Units of analysis and related methodological concerns. In Dwayne SmithM.ZahnMargaret A. (Eds.), Homicide: A sourcebook of social research (pp. 107-124). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
81.
ParkerK. F.PruittM. V. (2000). Poverty, poverty concentration, and homicide. Social Science Quarterly, 81, 555-570.
82.
ParrentiC. (2008). Lockdown America: Police and prisons in the age of crisis. New York, NY: Verso
83.
PridemoreW. A.TrentC. L. S. (2010). Do the invariant findings of Land, McCall, and Cohen generalize beyond the United States? A review of the cross-national literature on the structural covariates of homicide. Homicide Studies, 14, 296-335.
84.
RobinsonP. W.BoscardinJ.GeorgeS. M.SenaitT.HeslinK. C.BluthenthalR. N. (2009). The effect of urban street gang densities on small area homicide incidence in a large metropolitan county, 1994-2002. Journal of Urban Health, 86, 511-523.
85.
RosenfeldR.BrayT. M.EgleyA. (1999). Facilitating violence: A comparison of gang-motivated, gang-affiliated, and non-gang youth homicides. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15, 495-516.
86.
RossB. H.LevineM. A. (2000). Urban politics: Power in metropolitan America (6th ed.). Itasca, IL: Peacock.
87.
ShihadehE. S.OuseyG. C. (1998). Industrial restructuring and violence: The link between entry-level jobs, economic deprivation, and black and white homicide. Social Forces, 77, 185-206.
88.
ShortJ. F. (1997). Poverty, ethnicity, and violent crime. Boulder, CO: Westview.
SpergelI. A. (1990). Youth gangs: Continuity and change. In TonryM.MorrisN. (Eds.), Crime and justice: A review of research, (Vol. 12, pp. 171-275).
91.
StataCorp. (2009). Stata Statistical Software: Release 10.0. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.
92.
StromK. J.MacDonaldJ. M. (2007). The influence of social and economic disadvantage on racial patterns in youth homicide over time. Homicide Studies, 11(1), 50-69.
93.
StrosniderK. (2002). Anti-gang ordinances after City of Chicago v. Morales: The intersection of race, vagueness, doctrine, and equal protection under the criminal law. American Criminal Law Review, 39(1), 101-146.
94.
SykesG. (1997) 8-Ball Chicks: A Year in the Violent World of Girl Gangsters. New York, N.Y., Anchor Books.
95.
ThornberryT. P.KrohnM. D. (2003). Taking stock of delinquency: An overview of findings from contemporary longitudinal studies. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
96.
ThrasherF. M. (1927). The gang: A study of 1,313 gangs in Chicago. Chicago, IL: New Chicago School Press.
97.
U.S. Census of Population and Housing, (1990): Summary Tape File 3 on CD-ROM [Machine- Readable Data Files]/ prepared by the Bureau of the Census.–Washington: The Bureau, 1992.
98.
U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Uniform Crime Reports: County Level Detailed Arrest and Offense Data, 1990; 1993. Washington, DC: Author.
99.
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (1990-1992). Unemployment in States and Local Areas. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC: Author, 1989.
100.
U.S. Internal Revenue Service. (1994). Statistics of income bulletin. Washington, DC: Author.
101.
VenkateshS. A. (1997). The social organization of street gang activity in an urban ghetto. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 82-111.
102.
WelchM.PriceE.YankeyN. (2004). Youth violence and race in the media: the emergence of wilding as an invention of the press. Youth & Society, 34(1), 3-30.
103.
WhyteW. F. (1943). Street corner society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
104.
WilliamsK. R. (1984). Economic sources of homicide: Re-estimating the effects of poverty and inequality. American Sociological Review, 49, 283-289.
105.
WilsonW. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
106.
WoodJ.AlleyneE. (2010). Street gang theory and research: Where are we now and where do we go from here?Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(2), 113-121.
107.
ZatzM. S.PortillosE. L. (2000). Voices from the barrio: Chicano/a gangs, families, and communities. Criminology, 38, 369-401.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
