The current study contrasts and compares the role of socioeconomic factors that explain variations in the homicide rate for 165 countries in 2010. Regression analyses demonstrate that economic development (GNI), inequality (Gini), and poverty (excess infant mortality) are significant predictors of the homicide rate for all countries. However, subsample analyses shows that income inequality, not economic development or poverty, predicts homicide for countries with a medium level of human development. Also, the variations in homicide for developing countries are inadequately explained by our model. To conclude, an analysis of the countries that exhibited significant discrepancies between their predicted and observed homicide rate is discussed.
AlesinaA.DevleeschauwerA.EasterlyW.KurlatS.WacziargR. (2003). Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth, 8, 155-194.
2.
AltheimerI. (2008). Social support, ethnic heterogeneity, and homicide: A cross-national approach. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 103-114.
3.
AntonaccioO.TittleC. R. (2007). A cross-national test of Bonger’s theory of criminality and economic conditions. Criminology, 45, 925-958.
4.
ArcherD.GartnerR. (1984). Violence and crime in cross-national perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
5.
AvisonW. R.LoringP. L. (1986). Population diversity and cross-national homicide: The effects of inequality and heterogeneity. Criminology, 24, 733-750.
6.
BabonesS. J.Alvarez-RivadullaM. J. (2007). Standardized income inequality data for use in cross-national research. Sociological Inquiry, 77, 3-22.
7.
BennettR.LynchJ. (1990). Does a difference make a difference: Comparing cross-national crime indicators. Criminology, 28, 153-182.
8.
BjerregaardB.CochranJ. K. (2008). A cross-national test of institutional anomie theory: Do the strength of other social institutions mediate or moderate the effects of the economy on the rate of crime?Western Criminology Review, 9, 31-48.
9.
BourguignonF. (1998). Crime as a social cost of poverty and inequality: A review focusing on developing countries. Paris, France: Delta.
10.
BrillonY. (1985). Crime, justice and culture in Black Africa. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Centre International de Criminologie Comparée, Université de Montréal.
11.
ChamlinM. B.CochranJ. K. (2006). Economic inequality, legitimacy, and cross-national homicide rates. Homicide Studies, 10, 231-252.
12.
ColeJ. H.GramajoA. M. (2009). Homicide rates in a cross-section of countries: Evidence and interpretations. Population and Development Review, 35, 749-776.
13.
ConklinG. H.SimpsonM. E. (1985). A demographic approach to the cross-national study of homicide. Comparative Social Research, 8, 171-185.
14.
DalyM.WilsonM.VasdevS. (2001). Income inequality and homicide rates in Canada and the United States. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 43, 219-236.
15.
DeatonA. (2005). Measuring poverty in a growing world. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87, 1-19.
16.
DiamondJ. (1997). Guns, germs and steel: The fates of human societies. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
17.
DurkheimE. (1893). De la division du travail social. Paris: Les Presses Universitaires de France.
18.
EliasN. (1939). The civilizing process. New York, NY: Blackwell.
19.
FajnzylberP.LedermanD.LoayzaN. (2002). Inequality and violent crime. Journal of Law and Economics, 45, 1-40.
20.
FirebaughG. (1999). Empirics of world income inequality. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 1597-1630.
21.
FordeD.KennedyL.SilvermanR. (1991). Homicide in urban Canada: Testing the impact of economic inequality and social disorganization. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 16, 397-411.
22.
FrühlingH.TulchinJ. S.GoldingH. A. (2003). Crime and violence in Latin America: Citizen security, democracy, and the state. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
23.
Geneva Declaration. (2008). Global burden of armed violence. Geneva, Switzerland: GD Secretariat.
24.
GrovesW. B.McClearyR.NewmanG. R. (1985). Religion, modernization, and world crime. In TomassonR. F. (Ed.), Comparative social research (Vol. 8, pp. 59-80). London, UK: JAI Press.
25.
GurrT. R. (2000). Ethnic warfare [is] on the wane. Foreign Affairs, 79, 52-64.
26.
Human Development Report Office. (2011). Human development report 2011 (Human Development Report Office, United Nations Development Programme). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
27.
HeilandH. G.ShelleyL.KatoH. (1992). Civilization, modernization and the development of crime and control: Crime and control in comparative perspectives. New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter.
28.
HibouB. (2007). La force de l’obéissance. Paris, France: Éditions la Découverte.
29.
HowardG.NewmanG.PridemoreW. A. (2000). Theory, method and data in comparative criminology. In Criminal Justice 2000: Measurement and analysis of crime and justice (Vol. 4, pp. 139-211). Washington. DC: U.S. Department of Justice: National Institute of Justice.
30.
HsiehC.PughM. D. (1993). Poverty, income inequality, and violent crime: A meta-analysis of recent aggregate data studies. Criminal Justice Review, 18, 182-202.
31.
HugginsM. K. (1991). Vigilantism and the state in modern Latin America. New York, NY: Praeger.
32.
HuntingtonS. P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
33.
JacobsD.RichardsonA. M. (2008). Economic inequality and homicide in the developed nations from 1975 to 1995. Homicide Studies, 12, 28-45.
34.
KalyvasS. (2006). The logic of violence in civil war. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35.
KarstedtS.LafreeG. (2006). Democracy, crime, and justice. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
36.
KekikL. (2007). The Economist intelligence unit’s analysis of democracy. London, UK: The Economist.
37.
KooningsK.KruijtD. (1999). Societies of fear: The legacy of civil war, violence and terror in Latin America. New York, NY: Sed Books.
38.
KooningsK.KruijtD. (2004). Armed actor: Organized violence and state failure in Latin America. New York, NY: Zed Books.
39.
KrahnH.HartnagelT. F.GartrellJ. W. (1986). Income inequality and homicide rates: Cross-national data and criminological theories. Criminology, 24, 269-295.
40.
LaFreeG.TseloniA. (2006). Democracy and crime: A multilevel analysis of homicide trends in forty-four countries, 1950-2000. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 605, 25-49.
41.
LeblancS. (2004). Constant battles: Why we fight. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Griffin.
42.
LeeM. (2000). Community cohesion and violent predatory victimization: A theoretical extension and cross-national test of opportunity theory. Social Forces, 79, 683-706.
43.
LeeM. R.BankstonW. B. (1999). Political structure, economic inequality, and homicide: A cross-national analysis. Deviant Behavior, 20, 27-55.
44.
LinM. (2007). Does democracy increase crime? The evidence from international data. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35, 467-483.
45.
LondonoJ. L.GuerreroR. (1999). Violencia en América Latina epidemiología y costos [Violence in Latin America epidemiology and costs] (Report R-375). Washington, DC: Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo.
46.
LosM. (2003). Post-communist fear of crime and the commercialization of security. Theoretical criminology, 6, 165-188.
47.
MauroP. (1998). Corruption: Causes, consequences, and agenda for future research. Finance and Development, 35, 11-14.
48.
MessnerS. F. (1989). Economic discrimination and societal homicide rates: Further evidence on the cost of inequality. American Sociological Review, 54, 597-611.
49.
MessnerS. F.RosenfeldR. (1997). Political restraint of the market and levels of criminal homicide: A cross-national application of institutional anomie theory. Social Forces, 75, 1393-1416.
50.
MessnerS. F.RaffalovichL. E.ShrockP. (2002). Reassessing the cross-national relationship between income inequality and homicide rates: Implications of data quality control in the measurement of income distribution. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 377-395.
51.
MichnikA. (1998). Letters from freedom: Post–Cold War realities and perspectives. San Francisco: University of California press.
52.
NeapolitanJ. L. (1994). Cross-national variation in homicides: The case of Latin America. International Criminal Justice Review, 4, 4-22.
53.
NeapolitanJ. L. (1997). Cross-national crime: A research review and sourcebook. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
54.
NeapolitanJ. L. (1998). Cross-national variation in homicides: Is race a factor?Criminology, 36, 139-156.
55.
NeumayerE. (2003). Good policy can lower violent crime: Evidence from a cross-national panel of homicide rates, 1980-1997. Journal of Peace Research, 40, 619-640.
56.
NivetteA. E. (2011). Cross-national predictors of homicide: A meta-analysis. Homicide Studies, 15, 103-131.
57.
OuimetM.ÉtienneB. (2002). L’impact de la démographie sur les tendances de la criminalité au Québec de 1962 à 1999 [The impact of demographics on crime trends in Quebec from 1962 to 1999]. Criminologie, 35, 5-24.
58.
OuimetM. (2011). Un monde d’homicides [A world of homicide]. Champ pénal: Nouvelle revue internationale de criminologie, 8, 1-30.
59.
ParéP. P. (2006). Income inequality and crime across nations reexamined (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
60.
PrattT. C.GodseyT. W. (2003). Social support, inequality, and homicide: A cross-national test of an integrated theoretical model. Criminology, 41, 611-643.
61.
PridemoreW. A. (2000). Social structure and homicide in Post-Soviet Russia (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). SUNY Albany, NY.
62.
PridemoreW. A. (2008). A methodological addition to the cross-national empirical literature on social structure and homicide: A first test of the poverty-homicide thesis. Criminology, 46, 133-154.
63.
PridemoreW. A.KimS.-W. (2006). Democratization and political change as threats to collective sentiments: Testing Durkheim in Russia. Annals of the Academy of Political and Social Science, 605, 82-103.
64.
PridemoreW. A.TrentC. L. S. (2010). Do the invariant findings of Land, McCall, and Cohen generalize to cross-national studies of social structure and homicide?Homicide Studies, 14, 296-335.
65.
RajaratnamJ. K.MarcusJ. R.FlaxmanA. D.WangH.Levin-RectorA.DwyerL.. . . MurrayC. J. L. (2010). Neonatal, postneonatal, childhood, and under-5 mortality for 187 countries, 1970-2010: A systematic analysis of progress towards Millennium Development Goal 4. Lancet, 375, 1988-2008.
66.
RosenbergT. (1991). Children of Cain: Violence and the violent in Latin America. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
67.
SherryV. N. (1993). Security forces practices in Egypt. Criminal Justice Ethics, 12, 41-52.
68.
SnyderJ. (2000). From voting to violence: Democratization and nationalist conflict. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
69.
SoaresR. (2002). Development, crime and punishment: Accounting for the international differences in crime rates. Journal of Development Economics, 73, 155-184.
70.
SouthS.MessnerS. (2000). Crime and demography: Multiple linkages, reciprocal relations. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 83-106.
71.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2011). Global study on homicide. Statistics and survey section, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Vienna.
72.
Van DijkJ. (2008). The world of crime: Breaking the silence on problems of crime, justice and development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
73.
Van EveraS. (1994). Hypotheses on nationalism and war. International Security, 18, 5-39.
74.
Van ReevenP. (2004). Policing extensions in Latin America. In KooningsD. K.KruijtD. (Eds.), Armed actors: Organized violence and state failure in Latin America. London, UK: Zed Books.
75.
VoldG. (1958). Theoretical criminology. Newark, NJ: University of Delaware Press.
76.
WilkinsonR.PickettK. (2009). The spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. London, UK: Penguin.
77.
World Bank. (2007). Crime, violence, and development: Trends, costs, and policy options in the Caribbean (A joint report by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime and the Latin America and the Caribbean Region of the World Bank). Washington, DC: Author.
