To explore whether homicide of intimate partners is distinct from homicide of nonintimates, we compared sociodemographic, legal, family, clinical, and situational characteristics of men who murdered an intimate partner (n = 71) to those of men who murdered a nonintimate (n = 363). Bivariate findings suggest that intimate murder offenders are more socially bonded and conforming regarding employment and relationship patterns and use fatal violence to meet emotional rather than instrumental needs compared to nonintimate offenders. Multivariate findings indicate marital status, history of severe mental illness, and motive are important factors that differentiate men who murder intimates from those who murder nonintimates. Homicide prevention efforts must be tailored to account for factors that differentiate these two offender types.
AdamsD. (2009). Predisposing childhood factors for men who kill their intimate partners. Victims & Offenders, 4, 215-229.
2.
AvakameE. F. (1998). How different is violence in the home? An examination of some correlates of stranger and intimate homicide. Criminology, 36, 601-632.
3.
BenjaminiY.HochbergY. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 57, 289-300.
4.
BenjaminiY.HochbergY. (2000). On the adaptive control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing with independent statistics. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 60-83.
5.
BlockC. R.ChristakosA. (1995). Intimate partner homicide in Chicago over 29 years. Crime & Delinquency, 41, 496-526.
6.
BlockC. R.DevittC. O.FugateM.MartinC.PasoldT.NaureckasS.. . . WalkerG. R. (2000). The Chicago women’s health risk study: Risk of serious injury or death in intimate violence a collaborative research project. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice
7.
BoyleD. J.O’LearyD.RosenbaumA.Hassett-WalkerC. (2008). Differentiating between generally and partner-only violent subgroups: Lifetime antisocial behavior, family of orgin violence, and impulsivity. Journal of Family Violence, 23, 74-55.
8.
CampbellJ. C.GlassN.SharpsP. W.LaughtonK.BloomT. (2007). Intimate partner homicide: Review and implications of research and policy. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 8, 246-269.
9.
CatalanoS.SmithE.SnyderH.RandM. (2009). Female victims of violence(No. NCJ 228356). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
10.
CavanaughM. M.GellesR. J. (2005). The utility of male domestic violence offender typologies: New directions for research, policy and practice. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 155-166.
11.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS.AikenL. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
CookP. J.MolliconiS.ColeT. B. (1995). Regulating gun markets. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, 59-92.
13.
DobashR. E.DobashR. P. (2011). What were they thinking? Men who murder an intimate partner. Violence Against Women, 17, 111-134.
14.
DobashR. E.DobashR. P.CavanaughK.LewisR. (2004). Not an ordinary killer—Just an ordinary guy: When men murder an intimate woman partner. Violence Against Women, 10, 577-605.
15.
DobashR. E.DobashR. P.CavanaughK.Medina-ArizaJ. (2007). Lethal and nonlethal violence against an intimate female partner: Comparing male murderers to nonlethal abusers. Violence Against Women, 13, 329-353.
16.
DuttonM. A.GoodmanL. A. (2005). Coercion in intimate partner violence: Towards a new conceptualization. Sex Roles, 52, 743-756.
17.
EvansC.MalesuR. R. (2001). Homicide in Barbados: An 18-year review. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 12, 182-193.
18.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2009). Crime in the United States, 2008. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
19.
FelsonR. B.LaneK. J. (2010). Does violence involving women and intimate partners have a special etiology?Criminology, 48, 321-338.
20.
FleuryR. E.SullivanC. M.BybeeD. I. (2000). When ending the relationship does not end the violence: Women’s experiences of violence by former partners. Violence Against Women, 6, 1363-1383.
21.
FowlerK. A.WestenD. (2011). Subtyping male perpetrators of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 607-639.
22.
FoxJ. A.ZawitzM. W. (2007). Homicide trends in the United States. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
23.
GondolfE. (2007). Supplemental mental health treatment for batterer intervention participants. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
24.
GottfredsonM. R.HirschiT. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25.
GudjonssonG. H.PeturssonH. (1982). Some criminological and psychiatric aspects of homicide in Iceland. Medicine Science and the Law, 22, 91-98.
26.
JacobsJ. B.PotterK. A. (1995). Keeping guns out of the “wrong” hands: The Brady Law and the limits of regulation. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, 93-120.
27.
JohnsonM. P. (2008). A typology of domestic violence: Intimate terrorism, violent resistance and situational couple violence. Lebanon, NH: Northeastern University Press.
28.
JurikN. C.WinnR. (1990). Gender and homicide: A comparison of men and women who kill. Violence and Victims, 5, 227-242.
29.
MacdonaldH. M. (1961). The murderer and his victim. Springfield, IL: CC Thomas.
30.
MarvellT. B.MoodyC. E. (1999). Female and male homicide victimization rates: Comparing trends and regressors. Criminology, 37, 879-902.
31.
MatejkowskiJ. C.CullenS. W.SolomonP. L. (2008). Characteristics of persons with severe mental illness who have been incarcerated for murder. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 36, 74-86.
32.
MoffittT. E.KruegerR. F.CaspiA.FaganJ. (2000). Partner abuse and general crime: How are they the same? How are they different?Criminology, 38, 199-232.
33.
P.L. 148, et seq., Indiana Code 35-42-1-1 (1976).
34.
ParkerR. N.TothA. M. (1990). Family, intimacy, and homicide: A macro-social approach. Violence & Victims, 5, 195-210.
35.
PollackK. M.AustinW.GrissoJ. A. (2010). Employee assistance programs: A workplace resource to address intimate partner violence. Journal of Women’s Health, 19, 729-733.
36.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (1990). Crime and deviance over the life course: The salience of adult social bonds. American Sociological Review, 55, 609-627.
37.
ShermanL. W.SmithD. A. (1992). Crime, punishment, and stake in conformity: Legal and informal control of domestic violence. American Sociological Review, 57, 680-690.
38.
StackS. (1997). Homicide followed by suicide: An analysis of Chicago data. Criminology, 35, 435-453.
39.
StarkE. (2007). Coercive control: Entrapment of women in personal life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
40.
SteffensmeierD.AllanE. A.HarerM.StreifelC. (1989). Age and the distribution of crime. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 803-831.
41.
StrackG. B.McClaneG. E.HawleyD. (2001). A review of 300 attempted strangulation cases: Criminal legal issues. Journal of Emergency Medicine, 21, 303-309.
42.
TremblayR. E.CraigW. M. (1995). Developmental crime prevention. In TonryM.FarringtonD. P. (Eds.), Building a safer society: Strategic approaches to crime prevention (Vol. 19, pp. 151-236). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
43.
VerhoevenK. J. F.SimonsenK. L.McIntyreL. M. (2005). Implementing false discovery rate control: Increasing your power. Oikos, 108, 643-647.
44.
VigdorE. R.MercyJ. A. (2006). Do laws restricting access to firearms by domestic violence offenders prevent intimate partner homicide?Evaluation Review, 30, 313-346.
45.
WestH. C.SabolW. J.CooperM. (2009). Prisoners in 2008 (No. NCJ 228417). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
46.
WilburL.HighleyM.HatfieldJ.SurprenantZ.TaliaferroE.SmithD. J.PaoloA. (2001). Survey results of women who have been strangled while in an abusive relationship. Journal of Emergency Medicine, 21, 297-302.
47.
WilliamsK. R.FlewellingR. L. (1988). The social production of criminal homicide: A comparative study of disaggregated rates in American cities. American Sociological Review, 53, 421-431.
48.
WongM.SingerK. (1973). Abnormal homicide in Hong Kong. British Journal of Psychiatry, 123, 295-298.
49.
Ziemba-DavisM.MyersB. L.GarciaC. A. (2004). The social ecology of murder in Indiana. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana Criminal Justice Institute.
